brl Doc 4681 Filed 02/17/12 Entered 02/17/12 16:12:51 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Similar documents
smb Doc Filed 07/19/17 Entered 07/19/17 15:42:49 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

smb Doc Filed 11/23/15 Entered 11/23/15 18:21:10 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

smb Doc Filed 03/29/19 Entered 03/29/19 11:06:14 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No (BRL) SIPA Liquidation

smb Doc 92-1 Filed 10/23/15 Entered 10/23/15 10:00:20 Notice of Motion Pg 1 of 3

Case 1:18-cv PAE Document 20-1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 13

smb Doc Filed 09/19/18 Entered 09/19/18 20:14:12 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 16 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 2

TRUSTEE S OBJECTION TO MOTION TO STAY APPEAL OF ORDER DENYING REMOVAL OF TRUSTEE

Case , Document 34-1, 03/18/2016, , Page1 of 1

Irving H. Picard, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the court-appointed trustee ( SIPA Trustee ) for the liquidation of Bernard

brl Doc 111 Filed 08/26/13 Entered 08/26/13 14:16:36 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

smb Doc Filed 05/19/17 Entered 05/19/17 16:34:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

smb Doc Filed 05/19/17 Entered 05/19/17 16:38:12 Main Document Pg 1 of 4

smb Doc 234 Filed 04/06/16 Entered 04/06/16 12:55:19 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

smb Doc 117 Filed 09/28/17 Entered 09/28/17 17:00:54 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

David J. Sheehan Marc. E. Hirschfield Karin S. Jenson

brl Doc 111 Filed 12/17/13 Entered 12/17/13 15:22:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

alg Doc 17 Filed 03/06/13 Entered 03/06/13 10:17:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 1:11-mc RPP Document 18 Filed 12/06/11 Page 1 of 17

brl Doc 76 Filed 03/28/12 Entered 03/28/12 10:50:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No.

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 13 Filed 09/19/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 22 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 15

Case , Document 48-1, 07/16/2015, , Page1 of 1

Case , Document 912, 03/29/2018, , Page1 of 6

smb Doc Filed 11/15/17 Entered 11/15/17 16:16:45 Main Document Pg 1 of 101. v. (Substantively Consolidated)

smb Doc 373 Filed 05/10/17 Entered 05/10/17 20:38:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 11

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

smb Doc 115 Filed 08/29/17 Entered 08/29/17 15:12:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 13

smb Doc 135 Filed 10/06/17 Entered 10/06/17 16:36:33 Main Document Pg 1 of 13

TRUSTEE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY ROBERT BLECKER

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 86 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1928

Pg 1 of 25 STIPULATIONS REGARDING DESIGNATED DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND ADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case Doc 141 Filed 09/03/13 Entered 09/03/13 11:25:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

smb Doc Filed 03/26/18 Entered 03/26/18 12:57:00 Main Document Pg 1 of 3. Adv. Pro. No (SMB)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case EPK Doc 1019 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 16

alg Doc 51 Filed 04/09/13 Entered 04/09/13 11:39:08 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

The Avoidance Procedures

Case 1:17-cv GBD Document 14 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 23

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : Chapter 7

smb Doc 235 Filed 04/18/16 Entered 04/18/16 18:00:18 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

smb Doc Filed 10/28/16 Entered 10/28/16 16:40:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 20

smb Doc Filed 12/09/16 Entered 12/09/16 13:53:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 14

shl Doc 275 Filed 07/12/18 Entered 07/12/18 19:05:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

Case CSS Doc 457 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

management procedures set forth in the Final Order Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 105(a) and Fed. R.

smb Doc 223 Filed 01/08/19 Entered 01/08/19 15:28:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

TRUSTEE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case pwb Doc 1093 Filed 11/20/14 Entered 11/20/14 11:00:52 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8

MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING OMNIBUS MOTIONS TO DISMISS

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

rbk Doc#20 Filed 08/18/17 Entered 08/18/17 11:12:19 Main Document Pg 1 of 13

Case KJC Doc 1364 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P. ("B&H" or "Applicant"), files its First and Final Application

mg Doc 597 Filed 05/11/16 Entered 05/11/16 15:27:15 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

brl Doc 259 Filed 01/26/12 Entered 01/26/12 14:33:49 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

smb Doc 272 Filed 08/10/15 Entered 08/10/15 10:53:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 19

Case KJC Doc 500 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

Case 1:12-mc JSR Document 155 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:12-cv VM Document 30 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 12 LJSDC NY: Plaintiff, Defendant. Debtor. VICTOR MARRERO, united States District Judge.

Upon consideration of (i) the applications 1 seeking allowance of interim

Case CSS Doc 512 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case LSS Doc 700 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

smb Doc Filed 10/28/16 Entered 10/28/16 16:34:34 Main Document Pg 1 of 19

Case LSS Doc 445 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-bk Doc 129 Filed 02/14/14 Entered 02/14/14 15:44:27 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

Case LSS Doc 322 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case KG Doc 553 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CURRENT APPLICATION: Fees Requested: $ (September 1, 2002-December 18, 2002) Expenses Requested: $

Case KJC Doc 108 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Case LSS Doc 579 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

ORDER APPROVING AND IMPLEMENTING FEE COMMITTEE AND FEE PROCEDURES PROTOCOL

rdd Doc 1550 Filed 12/20/18 Entered 12/20/18 14:32:48 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Case Doc 45 Filed 04/19/17 Entered 04/19/17 11:03:02 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

brl Doc 5244 Filed 02/28/13 Entered 02/28/13 11:12:50 Main Document Pg 1 of 17

hcm Doc#150 Filed 07/10/15 Entered 07/10/15 19:14:59 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Case MFW Doc 378 Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

shl Doc 27 Filed 03/26/12 Entered 03/26/12 12:14:21 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case KG Doc 537 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) )

smb Doc 415 Filed 09/15/17 Entered 09/15/17 18:51:08 Main Document Pg 1 of 22

Case JMC-7A Doc 13 Filed 09/20/16 EOD 09/20/16 20:01:06 Pg 1 of 7

smb Doc 21 Filed 01/12/15 Entered 01/12/15 18:27:33 Main Document Pg 1 of 22

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case: HJB Doc #: 3397 Filed: 04/11/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE : :

JOINT ADMINISTRATION REQUESTED

) Chapter 11 In re ) ) Case No (AJG) XO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) ) Debtor. ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

mew Doc 3804 Filed 08/30/18 Entered 08/30/18 15:11:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 2

mew Doc 2153 Filed 01/16/18 Entered 01/16/18 21:09:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 20

Case AJC Doc 303 Filed 03/19/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Case Doc 162 Filed 02/03/18 Entered 02/03/18 22:15:55 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv GBD Document 12 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 28

Case pwb Doc 1097 Filed 11/26/14 Entered 11/26/14 10:26:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

smb Doc 308 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 17:49:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

scc Doc 26 Filed 02/03/17 Entered 02/03/17 17:11:35 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

Transcription:

Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (BRL) SIPA Liquidation (Substantively Consolidated) Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. APPLICATION OF GRAF & PITKOWITZ RECHTSÄNWALTE GMBH AS SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE TRUSTEE FOR ALLOWANCE OF INTERIM COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ACTUAL AND NECESSARY EXPENSES INCURRED FROM JUNE 1, 2011 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 Ferdinand Graf, together with other members and associates at the law firm of Graf & Pitkowitz Rechtsanwälte GmbH ( Graf & Pitkowitz ), special counsel for Irving H. Picard (the Trustee ), Trustee for the liquidation of the business of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ( BLMIS or Debtor ) under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq. ( SIPA ), and Bernard L. Madoff, submits this Application for Interim Allowance of Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses (the Application ) for compensation of legal fees in the amount of $600,076.69 (of which 20% is to be deferred through the conclusion of the liquidation period) and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $44,587.04 for the period from June 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011 (the Compensation Period ). In support of the Application, Graf & Pitkowitz respectfully submits as follows:

Pg 2 of 8 I. BACKGROUND 1. On December 15, 2008, Judge Stanton of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, upon application filed on the same date by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ( SIPC ), entered an order (the Decree Order ) calling for the liquidation of the business of the Debtor in accordance with SIPA and by Paragraph II of the Decree Order, the Trustee was appointed as the trustee for the liquidation of the Debtor s business. 2. The Debtor s liquidation proceeding was removed to this Court pursuant to SIPA 78eee(b)(4), and, to the extent consistent with the provisions of SIPA, is being conducted as though it were a case under chapters 1, 3, and 5 and subchapters I and II of chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code ) pursuant to SIPA 78fff(b). 3. Beginning on February 1, 2011, UGGC has served as special counsel for the Trustee. 4. On March 14, 2011, this Court entered an order approving the Trustee s motion for authority to retain Graf & Pitkowitz nunc pro tunc as of February 1, 2011 as special counsel to the Trustee with regard to matters pertaining to Austria. 5. The Trustee s motion to retain Graf & Pitkowitz established a fee arrangement pursuant to which Graf & Pitkowitz agreed to a fee reduction in the amount of 10% as well as an additional holdback of fees in the amount of 20%. II. SERVICES RENDERED BY GRAF & PITKOWITZ 6. The legal services performed on behalf of the Trustee during the time period covered by this Application are as follows: 2

Pg 3 of 8 7. During the Compensation Period, Graf & Pitkowitz reviewed and analyzed a substantial number of documents relating to U.S., U.K., and other proceedings against Sonja Kohn and other defendants. 8. Graf & Pitkowitz also provided written legal advice in connection with various issues of Austrian law. 9. Graf & Pitkowitz coordinated and prepared for the taking of interviews of certain witnesses in several Austrian courts pursuant to letters rogatory requests. 10. Graf & Pitkowitz also prepared detailed written information on pending Austrian proceedings and attended numerous hearings in the District Court concerning witness testimony. 11. Graf & Pitkowitz also conducted legal research and provided practical assistance in the preparation of documents to be served on Austrian defendants. 12. Graf & Pitkowitz communicated with Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Grant Thornton, Taylor Wessing and certain other of the Trustee foreign counsel and assisted with regard to Austrian law enforcement issues concerning the MSIL court proceedings. III. COMPENSATION REQUESTED 13. The Application demonstrates how Graf & Pitkowitz has both added value to the Debtor s estate and has advanced the Debtor s SIPC liquidation proceeding. 14. Graf & Pitkowitz has been mindful of the need to avoid undue legal fees in this case and has taken all reasonable steps to provide cost-effective representation while rendering services with the highest degree of skill and professionalism. To that end, Graf & Pitkowitz has endeavored to eliminate duplication of effort by giving responsibility for the day-to-day conduct of the case to Ferdinand Graf, involving others only when necessary. 15. From June 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011, Graf & Pitkowitz provided a total of 1,231.1 hours of legal services to the Trustee in this case. Prior to the 10% discount, the 3

Pg 4 of 8 total amount of fees incurred in this time period was $666,751.88 and the total blended rate for professional services was $541.59/hour. After the 10% discount, the total amount of fees incurred is $600,076.69 and the total blended rate is $487.43/hour. Graf & Pitkowitz has agreed to a further holdback of 20% of its fees in the amount of $120,015.34 resulting in the present request for compensation in the amount of $480,061.35. 16. A breakdown of the total number of hours performed by each Graf & Pitkowitz timekeeper is provided on Exhibit A annexed hereto. 17. Graf & Pitkowitz seeks reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its representation of the Trustee during the Compensation Period in the amount of $44,587.04. An itemized list of these expenses is detailed on Exhibit B attached hereto. IV. GENERAL MATTERS 18. All of the professional services for which compensation is requested herein were performed by Graf & Pitkowitz for and on behalf of the Trustee and not on behalf of any other person or entity. 19. No agreement or understanding exists between Graf & Pitkowitz and any other person for sharing compensation received in connection with this case nor has any other person or entity agreed to provide Graf & Pitkowitz with compensation for the legal services described herein. 20. Section 78eee(b)(5)(A) of SIPA provides in pertinent part that, upon appropriate application and after a hearing, [t]he court shall grant reasonable compensation for services rendered and reimbursement for proper costs and expenses incurred... by a trustee, and by the attorney for such a trustee. Section 78eee(b)(5)(C) of SIPA specifically establishes SIPC s role in connection with applications for compensation and the consideration the Court should give to SIPC s recommendation concerning fees. That section provides as follows: 4

Pg 5 of 8 In any case in which such allowances are to be paid by SIPC without reasonable expectation of recoupment thereof as provided in this chapter and there is no difference between the amounts requested and the amounts recommended by SIPC, the court shall award the amounts recommended by SIPC. In determining the amount of allowances in all other cases, the court shall give due consideration to the nature, extent, and value of the services rendered, and shall place considerable reliance on the recommendation of SIPC. SIPA 78eee(b)(5)(C). 21. To the extent the general estate is insufficient to pay such allowances as an expense of administration, SIPA 78eee(b)(5)(E) requires SIPC to advance the funds necessary to pay the compensation of Graf & Pitkowitz (see SIPA 78fff-3(b)(2)). 22. The Trustee has determined, at this time, that he has no reasonable expectation that the general estate will be sufficient to make a distribution to general creditors or pay administrative expenses. The Trustee has been advised by SIPC that it concurs in this belief of the Trustee. Accordingly, any fees and expenses allowed by this Court will be paid from advances by SIPC without any reasonable expectation by SIPC of recoupment thereof. 23. Therefore, with respect to this Application, Graf & Pitkowitz requests that consistent with section 78eee(b)(5)(C) of SIPA, the Court shall award the amounts recommended by SIPC. See In re Bell & Beckwith, 112 B.R. 876 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990). Graf & Pitkowitz expects that SIPC s recommendation shall be filed with this Court separately. WHEREFORE, Graf & Pitkowitz respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order: a. Granting this Application; and b. Allowing payment to Graf & Pitkowitz for interim compensation for services rendered to the Trustee in the amount of (a) $600,076.69, that reflects a reduction of 10% equal to $66,675.19; and (b) $480,061.35, that reflects a 20% holdback equal to $120,015.34, pending final approval of Graf & Pitkowitz s fees in this 5

Pg 6 of 8 case for professional services rendered to the Trustee from June 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011; and c. Allowing payment to Graf & Pitkowitz in the amount of $44,587.04 for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Graf & Pitkowitz from June 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011; and d. Granting Graf & Pitkowitz such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 17, 2012 GRAF & PITKOWITZ RECHTSÄNWALTE GMBH By: s/ Ferdinand Graf Ferdinand Graf Stadiongasse 2 Vienna, Austria A-1010 Telephone : +43(1)401170 Fax : +43(1)4011740 6

Pg 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF GRAF & PITKOWITZ FOR SERVICES RENDERED FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2011 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 NAME YEAR ADMITTED HOURLY RATE TOTAL HOURS BILLED TOTAL COMPENSATION Otto Wachter $682.36 32.3 $22,040.25 Ferdinand Graf 1994 $681.39 88.9 $60,575.19 Alexander Isola $681.30 14.4 $9,810.75 Nikolaus 1990 $677.48 88.4 $59,889.02 Pitkowitz Wolfgang $632.73 53.9 $34,104.06 Jelinek Stephan $618.16 52.3 $32,329.69 Schmalzl Marcus Schmitt 2006 $613.60 199.6 $122,474.08 Georg Graf $605.88 2.5 $1,514.70 Stefan Weileder $573.73 5.8 $3,327.62 Tanja Melber $546.76 89.3 $48,825.60 Natascha $482.01 13 $6,266.15 Scherzer Juliusz Czajka $478.54 238.2 $113,987.70 Alexander $477.82 261.5 $124,948.77 Teutsch Sabrina Herndl $300.58 58.7 $17,643.98 Christiane $287.77 25.8 $7,424.41 Schonen Barbara Kähler $244.60 6.5 $1,589.92 Total $541.59 1,231.1 $666,751.88 Total minus 10 $487.43 $600,076.69 % Discount Total Net of 20% Holdback $480,061.35

Pg 8 of 8 EXHIBIT B EXPENSE SUMMARY OF GRAF & PITKOWITZ FOR THE INTERIM PERIOD OF JUNE 1, 2011 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 EXPENSES AMOUNTS Copies $23,133.07 Legal Database Searches $2,731.14 Travel $1,483.94 Communication $278.62 Literature $75.48 Postage $3.88 Court Expenses $12,949.56 Miscellaneous $1,934.35 Translations $1,997.00 Total Expenses Requested: $44,587.04