Dispatch No. 166 19 October 2017 In Mali, citizens access to justice compromised by perceived bias, corruption, complexity Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 166 Pauline M. Wambua and Carolyn Logan Summary Access to justice for ordinary citizens is a key component of the rule of law and democracy. Mali was once considered a democratic frontrunner on the continent, but political instability and insecurity in recent years have revealed democracy s foothold as tenuous. The state s weakness has raised concerns about the quality and extent of democratic practices and institutions, including the extent to which rule of law and access to justice have taken root in the country. Political unrest erupted in early 2012 when Tuaregs in the North launched a rebellion, the government lost control over parts of the country, and anti-government protests broke out in Bamako. A disgruntled military staged a coup d état just a month before the planned 2012 general election. Under immense international pressure, elected government was restored in mid-2013. Since then, the government has gradually regained control of the North. But even under a peace accord signed in mid-2015, occasional militant attacks have continued, and many observers remain concerned that the country could again unravel. Like the country as a whole, the Malian justice system has faced deep threats and disruptions, especially in the North, where its reach was limited during the insurgency. According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), Mali s justice system suffered from inadequate personnel and budgetary capacity even before the 2012 conflict (Human Rights Watch, 2015), and these problems continue despite the government s success in re-establishing courts and deploying legal and police officials in the northern regions of Timbuktu and Gao. HRW reports that one consequence of the conflict is a large backlog of cases against individuals suspected of insurgent activities (Human Rights Watch, 2016). Reflecting the legal system s challenges and the need to establish the rule of law, the government requested help from the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate crimes associated with the rebellion in northern Mali. In the face of these challenges, do ordinary Malians have access to justice? Core elements that define citizens access to justice include: 1) a supportive legal framework, 2) citizen awareness of their legal rights and responsibilities, 3) availability of legal advice and representation, 4) availability of affordable and accessible justice institutions, 5) the practice of fair procedures in those institutions, and 6) enforceability of decisions (American Bar Association, 2012). Afrobarometer Round 6 surveys included a special module that explored individuals perceptions of the legal system, their access to it, and their experiences when engaging with it. (For findings across all surveyed countries, please see Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 39 at www.afrobarometer.org.) Survey responses in Mali suggest that access to justice remains severely compromised. Public trust in the judiciary is low, and perceptions of corruption are high. Malians have some of the lowest contact rates with the judicial system among the 36 African countries surveyed in 2014/2015. Delays, the system s complexities, and perceptions of bias lead many Malians to Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 1
rely on traditional and local authorities to dispense justice, rather than engaging with the courts. As the country regains its footing and rebuilds democratic political institutions, it is clear that making the justice system more trustworthy, comprehensible, and fair to ordinary Malians must be a key priority. Afrobarometer survey Afrobarometer is a pan-african, non-partisan research network that conducts public attitude surveys on democracy, governance, economic conditions, and related issues across Africa. After five rounds of surveys between 1999 and 2013, findings from Round 6 surveys (2014/2015) are currently being disseminated. Afrobarometer conducts face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent s choice with nationally representative samples. Round 6 interviews with nearly 54,000 respondents in 36 countries represent the views of more than three-fourths of the continent s population. The Afrobarometer team in Mali, led by Groupe de Recherche en Economie Appliquée et Théorique (GREAT), interviewed 1,200 adult Malians in December 2014. A sample of this size yields country-level results with a margin of sampling error of +/-3% at a 95% confidence level. Previous surveys have been conducted in Mali in 2001, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2012, and 2013. Key findings Only a minority (45%) of Malians say they trust the courts somewhat or a lot (Figure 1). This proportion is slightly lower than the West Africa average 1 of 48% and considerably worse than the 36-country average of 53%. Both the courts and the police (52%) are less trusted than most other public institutions in Mali, where religious leaders (86%) and traditional leaders (85%) enjoy the greatest public trust (Figure 2). A majority (56%) of Malians say that most or all judges and magistrates are corrupt the worst rating among all 36 surveyed countries and well above the West Africa average (40%) (Figure 3). Malians rate of contact with the justice system is very low: Just 7% of citizens say they had dealings with the court system in the five years preceding the survey (2009-2014), the fourth-lowest rate among 36 surveyed countries (Figure 4). Men are twice as likely () to have contact with courts as women (4%). Young citizens (18-25 years old), rural residents, and those without formal education have lower levels of contact than older Malians, urbanites, and those with at least a primary education (Figure 5). When asked why people might not take cases to court, Malians say they often prefer to take disputes to traditional leaders or local authorities (32%) (Figure 6). Citizens also indicate that they do not expect fair treatment from the courts (20%), that they believe the courts will favour the rich and powerful (18%), and that they think judges or other court officials will demand money (16%). Respondents who had interacted with the courts during the previous five years were asked which problems they encountered. Contact rates in Mali were too low to report the country-specific responses, 2 but they generally follow the same patterns 1 In addition to Mali, Afrobarometer s West Africa grouping includes Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte d'ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Togo. 2 In general, Afrobarometer does not report numeric results for samples of fewer than 100, because margins of uncertainty surrounding such results are too large. Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 2
Figures observed in West Africa and across all 36 countries: Long delays are the most commonly cited problem, and the complexity of the legal system, lack of legal counsel, inattentive judges, and high costs are all common experiences as well (Figure 7). The proportion of Malians who report experiencing each of these problems is somewhat lower than the regional and continental averages, but this may reflect the small sample size with a high margin of error. Figure 1: Trust in the courts 36 countries 2014/2015 Niger Namibia Mauritius Burundi Malawi Tanzania Botswana Lesotho Egypt Senegal Swaziland Zimbabwe Cape Verde Tunisia Kenya Zambia South Africa Uganda Burkina Faso Sudan Benin Mozambique Mali Guinea Cameroon Ghana Morocco Gabon Nigeria Côte d'ivoire Togo Algeria São Tomé and Príncipe Sierra Leone Liberia Madagascar 82% 73% 72% 71% 71% 6 6 66% 65% 65% 63% 63% 61% 60% 58% 57% 56% 56% 55% 52% 4 46% 45% 43% 42% 42% 40% 40% 38% 37% 37% 36% 33% 32% 32% 2 West Africa average 36-country average 48% 53% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: How much do you trust each of the following, or haven t you heard enough about them to say: Courts of law? (% who say somewhat or a lot ) Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 3
Figure 2: Trust in institutions Mali 2014 Religious leaders 86% Traditional leaders 85% Army 82% President 70% Electoral commission 68% Parliament 62% Ruling party 5 Local government councillors 57% Tax department 56% Police 52% Courts 45% Opposition parties 43% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: How much do you trust each of the following, or haven t you heard enough about them to say? (% who say somewhat or a lot ) Do your own analysis of Afrobarometer data on any question, for any country and survey round. It s easy and free at www.afrobarometer.org/online-data-analysis. Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 4
Figure 3: Perception of corruption among judges and magistrates 36 countries 2014/2015 Mali Liberia Cameroon Gabon Ghana Madagascar Togo Benin Sierra Leone Nigeria Uganda Burundi Guinea Tanzania Côte d'ivoire Burkina Faso Morocco Kenya Zambia Zimbabwe Algeria Namibia Swaziland Mozambique São Tomé and Príncipe Sudan Senegal South Africa Niger Malawi Egypt Tunisia Lesotho Botswana Cape Verde Mauritius 56% 56% 51% 50% 4 4 48% 48% 47% 45% 45% 40% 38% 36% 35% 34% 34% 33% 30% 2 28% 28% 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 23% 23% 22% 20% 17% 16% 14% West Africa average 36-country average Respondents were asked: How many of the following people do you think are involved in corruption, or haven t you heard enough about them to say: Judges and magistrates? (% who say most of them or all of them ) Note: In Egypt, the question asked about corruption among court officials. 33% 40% 0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 5
Figure 4: Contact with courts in past five years 36 countries 2014/2015 Egypt Morocco Liberia Algeria Sudan Cameroon Cape Verde Burundi Mozambique Tunisia Swaziland Gabon Tanzania Average Uganda Lesotho Zambia South Africa Mauritius Namibia São Tomé and Príncipe Botswana Malawi Togo Zimbabwe Kenya Nigeria Niger Benin Ghana Guinea Sierra Leone Madagascar Mali Senegal Côte d'ivoire Burkina Faso 28% 28% 27% 24% 21% 21% 18% 17% 16% 14% 14% 14% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 8% 8% 7% 7% 6% 6% 4% 0% 20% 30% 40% 50% Respondents were asked: In the last five years, how often, if ever, have you or anyone in your family been directly involved in an administrative, civil, or criminal case that has come before a government court or tribunal as a claimant, as a respondent or defendant, or as a witness? (% who say once, twice, or three or more times ) Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 6
Figure 5: Contact with courts in past five years by demographic group Mali 2014 30% 20% 6% 4% 7% 8% 6% 5% 4% 6% 8% 7% 5% 7% 0% Respondents were asked: In the last five years, how often, if ever, have you or anyone in your family been directly involved in an administrative, civil, or criminal case that has come before a government court or tribunal as a claimant, as a respondent or defendant, or as a witness? (% who say once, twice, or three or more times ) Figure 6: Why citizens avoid courts Mali 2014 Prefer to go to traditional/local leaders Don't expect fair treatment Courts favour the rich/powerful Judges/court officials will demand money Don't trust the courts Court costs are too high Don't know their legal rights and remedies Expect case to take too long Lawyers are too expensive Distance to courts is too great Think the processes are too complex Don't know how to take a case to court Most people do take cases to court 20% 18% 16% 7% 5% 4% 4% 4% 32% 0% 20% 30% 40% Respondents were asked: Sometimes people do not take a case to the government courts, even if they think they have a legitimate complaint and deserve justice. In your opinion, what would be the most important reason that people like yourself would not take a case to court? (Note: Respondents could give up to two responses. Percentages shown are proportion of respondents citing each reason as one of their two responses. Percentages can therefore total more than 100%.) Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 7
West Africa 36 countries West Africa 36 countries West Africa 36 countries West Africa 36 countries West Africa 36 countries Figure 7: Problems encountered in court interactions West Africa and Africa (36 countries) 2014/2015 80% 60% 40% 62% 60% 51% 47% 46% 43% 44% 38% 41% 38% 20% 0% Long delays Too complex No advice Judge did not listen Too expensive Respondents who had contact with the courts during the previous five years were asked: Have you encountered any of these problems in your experience with government courts in the past five years? a. You were unable to pay necessary costs and fees. b. You could not understand the legal processes and procedures. c. You could not obtain legal counsel or advice. d. The judge or magistrate did not listen to your side of the story. e. There were long delays in handling or resolving the case. (Note: Numbers represent those who say once or twice, a few times, or often, as a percentage of respondents who say they had contact with the courts during the previous five years. Those with no contact are excluded.) Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 8
References American Bar Association. (2012). Access to justice assessment for Mali. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaea452.pdf. Human Rights Watch. (2015). Mali: Lawlessness, abuses imperil population. https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/04/14/mali-lawlessness-abuses-imperil-population. Human Rights Watch. (2016). World report Mali 2016. https://www.hrw.org/worldreport/2016/country-chapters/mali. Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 9
Acknowledgements Afrobarometer would like to acknowledge the special support provided by the World Bank through its Nordic Trust Fund for the inclusion of the Round 6 access-to-justice module, and the advisory and technical assistance of Waleed Malik and Roberto Panzardi, senior public sector specialists, for the innovative idea and in making this support possible. Pauline M. Wambua is a research assistant for Afrobarometer and a PhD student in educational policy at Michigan State University. Email: wambuapa@msu.edu. Carolyn Logan is deputy director of Afrobarometer and associate professor in the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University. Email: clogan@msu.edu. Afrobarometer is produced collaboratively by social scientists from more than 30 African countries. Coordination is provided by the Center for Democratic Development (CDD) in Ghana, the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) in South Africa, the Institute for Development Studies (IDS) at the University of Nairobi in Kenya, and the Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) in Benin. Michigan State University (MSU) and the University of Cape Town (UCT) provide technical support to the network. Core support for Afrobarometer Rounds 5 and 6 has been provided by the UK s Department for International Development (DFID), the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the World Bank. Donations help the Afrobarometer Project give voice to African citizens. Please consider making a contribution (at www.afrobarometer.org) or contact Aba Kittoe (akittoe@afrobarometer.org) to discuss institutional funding. For more information, please visit www.afrobarometer.org. Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 166 19 October 2017 Copyright Afrobarometer 2017 10