July 16, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. RE: Montana State Senators Jackson and Keenan Response in P-5-098, Kerr Dam

Similar documents
PPL Montana, LLC ) Project No. P NorthWestern Corporation)

Montana Land and Water Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1061 Polson, Montana

The Motion asks the Court to do something in a case that already exists.

Mont. Power Co., 32 FERC 61,070 (1985) ( Licensing Order ).

Case 1:15-cv RCL Document 2 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Filing a Civil Complaint

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. PPL Montana, LLC ) Project No NorthWestern Corporation )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Vineyard Wind LLC ) Docket No. ER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) Docket No. ER

Re: Errata Filing for Joint Submittal of Motion for Leave to Respond and Response to Indicated LSEs Comments, Docket No. ER09-40S-000.

NorthWestern Energy requests an effective date of March 12, 2016, for the proposed revisions.

136 FERC 61,005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING TARIFF REVISIONS. (Issued July 1, 2011)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Re: Clearwater Creek Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No

130 FERC 61,051 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER APPROVING RELIABILITY STANDARD. (Issued January 21, 2010)

CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS. of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Of the Flathead Reservation, as amended

133 FERC 61,214 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. North American Electric Reliability Corporation

June 2, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

April 16, Docket No. ER

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Safety, Health and Environment Committee Terms of Reference

December 13, 2004 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE S MOTION TO INTERVENE

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. United Water Conservation District Project No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Oct.12, Mr. Steve Kallin, Refuge Manager. National Bison Range Complex. 132 Bison Range Road. Moiese, MT Dear Mr.

Governors of the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming, Docket No.

February 12, Notice of Certificate of Concurrence Regarding Agua Caliente Solar LGIA

Clean Water Act Section 401: Background and Issues

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES OF THE FLATHEAD RESERYATION, PABLO, MONTANA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Resource Agency Procedures for Conditions and Prescriptions in Hydropower

153 FERC 61,356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING SERVICE AGREEMENT. (Issued December 29, 2015)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Berry Petroleum Company ) Docket No. ER _

September 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC

Arizona Public Service Company, Docket No. ER , Agency Agreement

TRIBAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES OF THE FLATHEAD INDIAN NATION, MONTANA

main. July 6, 2017

160 FERC 61,058 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

April 26, Honorable Paul D. Ryan Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, DC Dear Mr. Speaker:

June 9, Tariff Amendment to Modify Definition of Pre-RA Import Commitment

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

October 10, FERC Electric Tariff No. 7, Transmission Control Agreement

HUMAN RESOURCES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE MANDATE

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 94 FERC 61,141 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ENROLLED JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 3, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SIXTIETH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WYOMING 2010 BUDGET SESSION

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN HYDROELECTRIC REGULATION. David R. Poe and Seth T. Lucia

Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians, 466 U.S. 765 (1984)

March 25, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Pacific Gas and Electric Company ) Docket No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

CUSHMAN PROJECT FERC Project No Settlement Agreement for the Cushman Project

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

November 12, 2004 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

March 22, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

Case 1:08-cv EJL Document 12 Filed 04/06/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO

ROBBINS,RUSSELL,ENGLERT,ORSECK,UNTEREINER &SAUBER LLP

October 1, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Docket No. ER Default Allocation Assessment Clarifying Revisions

N.J.A.C. 6A: 30 - EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS

131 FERC 61,039 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

N.J.A.C. 6A:30, EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 28, Via Electronic Filing

MINUTES Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Commission Meeting FWP Headquarters - Helena, MT January 10, 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. DA

New England Participating Transmission Owner (PTO) Procedure for Disclosure of Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII)

Case 1:15-cv NBF Document 16 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Energy Policy Act of 2005

(617) ext. 8 (tel) INSTANT MOTION TO REOPEN (617) (fax)

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ) hereby submits the

GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. CHARTER (as of February 9, 2016)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) )

A. Zonal Agreements and Termination of the GFA

BALANCING AUTHORITY OPERATIONS COORDINATION AGREEMENT. between. Wisconsin Electric Power Company. and. PJM Interconnection, LLC

BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION. Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee Mandate

Columbia River Treaty Review

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SERVICEMASTER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.

California lndependent System Operator Corporation Docket No. ER Compliance Filing

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

July 25, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER

February 12, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER15- Submission of Interconnection Agreement

AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration (Western), DOE. SUMMARY: This action is to extend the existing Falcon and Amistad Projects Firm Power

New Jersey State Board of Accountancy Laws

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF

CRS Issue Brief for Congress

Report released in June 2015

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

This is NOT AN ORDER, it is an invitation for a competitive sealed proposal.

March 27, Tariff Amendment to Modify Administrative Oversight of the Department of Market Monitoring

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1877-UM 1882, UM 1884-UM 1886, UM 1888-UM 1890

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ANSWER OF THE INDEPENDENT MARKET MONITOR FOR PJM

ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. Corporate Governance Guidelines

WESTJET AIRLINES LTD. ("WestJet" or the "Corporation") AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Section GT&C, Awarding of Available and Planned Pipeline Capacity, Bid Procedures ( Section ). 2

December 18, Filing of PSP Agreement with Placer County Water Agency

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AGREEMENT

April 20, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

Transcription:

July 16, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. RE: Montana State Senators Jackson and Keenan Response in P-5-098, Kerr Dam Dear Secretary Bose: Attached please find our response to the Answer of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) and Energy Keepers Inc. (CSKT/EKI Answer) to our Motion to Intervene in the partial license transfer proceedings for the Kerr Facility. The CSKT/EKI Answer urged that the Commission dismiss our motion to intervene filed in this matter on spurious and inaccurate grounds which we have responded to in the attached reply. We urge the Commission to grant our motion for intervention in these extremely important proceedings involving a publically-funded dam that serves primarily public purposes. Sincerely, /s/ Verdell Jackson /s/ Bob Keenan Senator Verdell Jackson Senator Bob Keenan Attachment 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes ) Project No. 5-098 Energy Keepers, Inc. ) RESPONSE OF SENATORS JACKSON AND KEENAN TO THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES AND ENERGY KEEPERS INC. ANSWER TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENE AND COMMENT On behalf of the thousands of constituents who are impacted by the operations of Kerr Dam, Senators Jackson and Keenan respectfully submit our response to the answer of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) and Energy Keepers, Inc. (EKI) urging the Commission to dismiss our Motion to Intervene in the partial license transfer proceedings involving the Kerr Project. 1 For the reasons described below, we urge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to accept our Motion to Intervene. I. Background On April 15, 2015, the CSKT, subsidiary Energy Keepers, Inc. (EKI), and NorthWestern Energy applied for a partial transfer of the license and co-licensee status for the Kerr Project, P-5-098. The Application proposes to partially transfer the license to and add EKI as a co-licensee to the Kerr Project as of the effective date of conveyance of Kerr Dam from NorthWestern to the CSKT, scheduled for September 5, 2015. On April 28, 2015, the Commission noticed the opportunity for intervention, protest, and comment on the Kerr Project partial license transfer proceeding. Senators Jackson and Keenan moved to intervene and protest the partial license transfer pending further public and Commission examination. The submission by Senators Jackson and Keenan (Jackson/Keenan motion) was one of four that were timely submitted to the Commission. On June 9, 2015, the CSKT/EKI submitted an Answer to the Motions to Intervene including the Jackson/Keenan motion. The CSKT/EKI incorrectly alleges that all of the motions are the same in that they all seek to challenge the conveyance of Kerr Dam to the CSKT. Based on that 1 Answer of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and Energy Keepers Inc. to Motions to Intervene and Comment, June 15, 2015, herein CSKT/EKI Answer 2

erroneous viewpoint, and in the form of a motion instead of an answer, 2 the CSKT/EKI dismiss all the concerns raised by interveners, including the Jackson/Keenan motion, and request that the Commission deny the motions to intervene. For the reasons stated herein, Senators Jackson and Keenan respectfully request that the Commission instead grant our Motion to Intervene. II. Jackson/Keenan Response to CSKT/EKI Allegations The CSKT/EKI Answer makes several allegations regarding the Jackson/Keenan Motion to Intervene, each of which dismiss the legitimate public concerns and issues represented by the Senators which have not been addressed by the CSKT and EKI, a new company with no track record. Each of these allegations is disputed below. a. The Jackson/Keenan Motion is the same as all the other Motions to Intervene. The Senators respectfully disagree with the CSKT/EKI assertion that all the Motions to intervene are the same. On the contrary, the Motions submitted by the Flathead Joint Board of Control, the Montana Public Service Commission, and the Montana Land and Water Alliance all have distinct purposes and represent different constituencies. Combined, they actually represent only a fraction of the many who are interested in the outcome of this specific proceeding. b. The Jackson/Keenan Motion is Intended to Derail the Conveyance of Kerr Dam to the CSKT. The CSKT/EKI allegation that the Jackson/Keenan Motion is designed to stop the conveyance of the Kerr Project to the CSKT is nonsense and designed to distract from the true purpose of the motion. Statements throughout the Jackson/Keenan Motion demonstrate the complete lack of merit in this CSKT/EKI argument. Simply stated, the Senators don t care who owns the facility but it must be operated as the public has grown to expect it to be and that ability has not been satisfactorily demonstrated by the EKI. c. The Jackson/Keenan Motion is based on evaluating the status of the EKI as fit for the license because of its status as a federally-recognized Tribe. To assume that the Senators Motion is based on matters of race rather than the professional operation of the largest hydropower facility in Montana does a disservice to this proceeding and is unacceptable. If the CSKT through the EKI as federal entities- - want the benefits and profits of owning Kerr Dam a public facility serving public needs then EKI can also accept the awesome responsibility of being 2 Footnote 1 of the Flathead Joint Board of Control (FJBC) Answer to the CSKT/EKI June 24 Answer highlights the reason why the CSKT/EKI Answer to the Jackson/Keenan Motion could also be viewed as a motion to dismiss, rather than answer. 3

responsive and accountable to the public, not just its own shareholder. They can also submit themselves to thorough public and Commission evaluation as every other potential licensee does. The determination of fitness to be a licensee in 1985 is insufficient and unrelated to ensuring that EKI, a brand new entity supposedly separate from the CSKT, has or will meet the conditions of all previous licensees. d. Senator Jackson s earlier Kerr Dam/FERC activities were ruled by FERC to be untimely, meritless, and designed to stop the conveyance of Kerr Dam to the CSKT. The CSKT/EKI response to the Jackson/Keenan Motion erroneously claims that Senator Jackson s intervention will be just a repeat of an earlier intervention granted to Senator Jackson by the Commission. In that action, Senator Jackson s comments and actions were timely filed and the Commission simply denied Senator Jackson s motions based on the 1985 license with no determination or comment. To Senator Jackson s disappointment, the Commission did not address the issues raised nor provide a reason why they didn t. While the Tribes take a considerable amount of time to ridicule Senator Jackson, they avoided any responses to the questions Senator Jackson identified. 3 The Tribes reaction in that proceeding just confirms that the Senator had timely raised critical issues that required the CSKT to produce a lengthy, but ultimately irrelevant document to the Commission s decision on Senator Jackson s pleadings. e. Jackson/Keenan Motion is beyond the scope of the proceeding, reflects a complete lack of understanding of federal, state, and tribal laws and regulations. Based on their erroneous view of the Jackson/Keenan motion that it is challenging the conveyance of Kerr Dam, the CSKT/EKI incorrectly state that the Senators motion is outside the scope of the instant proceeding. On the contrary, the Senators motion is both timely and relevant to partial license transfer proceeding because it focuses on the operational, managerial, disclosure, and financial conditions of the previous license and EKI s ability to meet those requirements. As to the familiarity with federal, state, and Tribal laws the Senators whose service in the state legislature spans more than 30 years collectively-- reject this CSKT/EKI assertion unequivocally. They represent more than 20,000 citizens who will be directly affected by Kerr Dam operations. When the interaction between federal, state, and Tribal law causes problems or shortfalls for state citizens, these Senators are going to likely have to craft legislation to address the deleterious effects of the CSKT/EKI licensed operation of Kerr Dam. It is only proper that the citizens of Montana understand these effects and can prepare for them. The only way to identify the concerns so they 3 CSKT documents from summer 2014 4

can be addressed is if the EKI/CSKT submits themselves to the same review as every other licensee in the United States. The form of the CSKT/EKI answer to the Jackson/Keenan Motion is not helpful to the Commission s resolution of issues presented in our Motion as well as others submitted for this proceeding. The CSKT/EKI provide no new information that would allow anyone, let alone sitting and former state Senators, to trust the Tribes word that nothing will change with the addition of EKI to the Kerr Project license, especially when their own application indicates an inability to meet previous license conditions, and that they may not honor other commitments, including water deliveries, power allocations, flood control, and lake level management. 4 III. Summary Senators Jackson and Keenan respectfully request the Commission to grant our Motion to Intervene. Our motion is based simply on 16 U.S.C. 801: any successor or assign of the rights of such licensee shall be subject to all the conditions of the license under which such rights are held by such licensee and also subject to all the provisions and conditions of this chapter to the same extent as though such successor or assign were the original licensee Our Motion is also triggered by the stated objectives of the CSKT/EKI Application to enable EKI to begin entering into power purchase agreements, generation interconnection agreements, and coordination agreements necessary to generate and sell electricity from the Kerr Project.... 5 The EKI wants to move forward before completing the first basic requirements. Our advice is to comply with the license conditions or condition the license to meet the conditions required of every other hydroelectric facility in the Nation, and commit to maintaining all previous agreements of previous licensees. If the CSKT/EKI is going to operate the dam the same as in the past, there is no reason not to put our assurances in the terms and conditions of the CSKT/EKI license. Because of the complexities and interaction of federal, state, and tribal laws and regulations regarding the operation and management of the Kerr Project, and the fact that the Kerr Project 4 The EKI mission statement and organizational documents, attached to the CSKT/EKI Application discern the other purposes of operating Kerr Dam that extend beyond and may conflict with the previous license conditions. Both the CSKT and EKI reject major components of state law which will place it in a position of operating the largest hydropower facility in Montana that serves primarily public interests without state or public oversight as would be required of any other federal, state, or private entity, agency, or corporation. 5 CSKT/EKI Application at page 1 5

serves primarily public interests, we believe that state legislation may be required to address known shortfalls to the public demonstrated in the CSKT/EKI Application. Thus our participation in this proceeding will be helpful to the Commission in resolving the issues presented in this proceeding. We believe the federal government has a duty to ensure that the public is not financially harmed by the operation of Kerr Dam. 6 We also believe that the proceedings would benefit from additional agency involvement and Congressional review. Respectfully submitted /s/ Verdell Jackson Verdell Jackson, Flathead Conservation District Supervisor /s/ Bob Keenan Senator Bob Keenan 6 For example, western Montana is extremely dependent on tourism which relies on lake level management. 6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document and attachment upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding. Dated at Kalispell Montana, this 16th day of July, 2015. /s/ Verdell Jackson Senator Verdell Jackson 555 Wagner Ln Kalispell, MT 59901-8079 (406) 756-8344 /s/ Bob Keenan Senator Bob Keenan 7