CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO

Similar documents
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO

Lake Forest Park City Council. Agenda Cover Sheet. Ordinance 1175/Extending the Conservation Cluster Housing Moratorium

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

Ordinance No. 544 Public Hearing to Renew the Moratorium on Single Family Residential Subdivisions That Do Not Meet Minimum Lot Sizes

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

Req. # SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF OCEAN SHORES ORDINANCE NO. 972

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Keywords: Sewer Connection Fee Ordinance Amendment October Meeting Date: PREPARED BY:

I. CALL TO ORDER & FLAG SALUTE at 7:00 p.m. IV. PUBLIC COMMENT - Please keep to 3 minutes

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 1943

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the CSA is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any conflicting State enactments; and

WHEREAS, Part 10, Chapter 2, Section requires that a Special Use Permit be obtained to operate a school, private or special; and

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 03C-10

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

WOODINVILLE CITY COUNCIL

Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter 1.01 CODE ADOPTION

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY OF WOODLAND, WASHINGTON

TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO P&Z

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA, CHAPTER 11, BUSINESS LICENSING AND

Updated: 7/16/2015 9:32 AM Page 1

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS:

RE: ORDINANCE NO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT CPT TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Growth Management Act, RCW A et seq., for the City of Des. the greatest extent practicable, and ORDINANCE NO. 1476

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions.

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Section 9.9 of the Charter of the City of North Lauderdale requires the

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

BOROUGH OF ELMER, COUNTY OF SALEM, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

AUG 0 3 2m NORTH KITSAP FIRE & RESCUE AUDITOR/EL KITSAP COUN'Ty''

ORDINANCE NO

Ordinance NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA:

ORDINANCE NO

VILLAGE OF NORTH RIVERSIDE ORDINANCE NO. 17-O-09

ORDINANCE provides for the general powers and duties of the City Council and states as follows:

RESOLUTION NO SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFETIVE DATE. Referendum ( the " Petition") labeled Exhibit. on August 24, 2017 ; and

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

ORDINANCE NO Town of Rising Sun. Cecil County, Maryland

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2216

ORDINANCE NO THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

Recommendation to Adopt Proposed Ordinance Relating to Pain Management Clinics

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

Ii pjf.ij1li! GRANTP[U[ ] Lm#nrn.a Or d. I *:i &vi 3iiIii[ i u i an i TO: COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON: SNOHOMISHICOUNTY COUNCI P

To: Honorable City Council Date: 03/20/12 From: Richard A. Leahy, City Manager By: Thomas E. Hansen, RE., Public Works Director

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF NORTH LAUDERDALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Tammy Reed-Holguin, Community Development Director

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, homelessness continues to be a local, regional and national challenge due to many social and economic faclors; and

CITY OF PARKLAND FLORIDA

Concurrency Management City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa supports the full participation of all residents in electing Members of the City Council; and

ORDINANCE NO. O

TOWNSHIP CLERK'S OFFICE ORDINANCE COVER PAGE

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Commission discussed a proposal to eliminate odd year elections; and

CITY OF YPSILANTI NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 1281

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

WHEREAS, the City of Bellflower supports the full participation of all residents in electing Members of the City Council; and

DRAFT CITY OF SAMMAMISH WASHINGTON

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, there exists the potential for misappropriation and diversion of medical marijuana to non-medical uses; and

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

ORDINANCE NO R

TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK COUNTY OF HUDSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE #35/17

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, such modification is in the interest of public safety;

WHEREAS, for a variety of social, economic and personal reasons, many people dwell in their vehicles on City public streets;

ORDINANCE NO (b) Authority of Permitting Officer. The permitting officer is hereby authorized to accept or deny applications.

ORDINANCE 21, 2014 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINWOOD, AS FOLLOWS:

SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HILLSBORO, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE , BOARDS, COMMISSIONERS, AND

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON,

AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE THE TERM AND DUTIES THEREOF,AND PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENTS THERETO AND COMPENSATION THEREFORE

ORDINANCE NO. 11-O-03AA

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, Resolution called for studies on how to reduce Seattleites use of hard-torecycle


Article 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

ORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is

SUMTER COUNTY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO RECORDS MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

City of Palm Coast, Florida Agenda Item

ORDINANCE NO

Oregon Theodore R, Kulongoski, Governor

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: February 7, 2017 Item Number: D 8 To:

29 ordinances that require a criminal history records check and a 3 to 5-day waiting period in

John Harpootlian Thursday, June 09, :38 AM Deborah Padovan Fw: Joint Los Altos/Los Altos Hills Senior Commission

(Published in the Tulsa World,

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, in all other respects Chapter 125 entitled Mercantile Licenses shall remain in full force and effect.

Transcription:

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT, ADOPTING AN IMMEDIATE, EMERGENCY, SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY NECESSITATING IMMEDIATE ADOPTION OF A MORATORIUM AND EST ABLISIDNG AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW ("GMA"), the City of Mercer Island adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 1994 and has amended the plan on several occasions since that time, including the most recent amendment in 2016;and WHEREAS, the Transportation Element of Mercer Island's Comprehensive Plan includes numerous Transportation goals and policies to guide transportation decisions for Mercer Island; and WHEREAS, as required by the GMA, Mercer Island's Comprehensive Plan includes a transportation element that specifies level of service ("LOS") standards for locally-owned intersections within the City; and WHEREAS, under the GMA, specifically RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b), the City is required to adopt and enforce a transportation concurrency ordinance regulating development that causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has not adopted a transportation concurrency ordinance consistent with the GMA; and WHEREAS, as required by the GMA, the City's Comprehensive Plan also includes a process for identifying and siting essential public facilities; and WHEREAS, the proposed East Link light rail project is considered an essential public facility under the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the regulatory provisions enacted pursuant to the GMA provide that a local jurisdiction may impose reasonable permitting requirements and require mitigation of the essential public facility's adverse effects; and WHEREAS, the City has not adopted development regulations that implement the comprehensive plan's provisions as to identifying, siting, and regulating essential public facilities; and Page I

WHEREAS, as required by the GMA, the City must adopt a transportation concurrency ordinance and is considering adopting development regulations to address the siting and development of essential public facilities, including mitigation measures as appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City Council may adopt an immediate moratorium for a period of up to six months on development as long as the City Council holds a public hearing on the proposed moratorium within sixty days after adoption, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390; and WHEREAS, consistent with the provisions of RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, it is appropriate for the City Council to hold a public hearing and/or other means to gather information and adopt findings of fact supporting and justifying the moratorium, and to implement a work plan for review of the issues relating to the adoption of a transportation concurrency ordinance and an essential public facilities ordinance; and WHEREAS, allowing development to continue before the City Council can adopt new regulations relating to the GMA's concurrency requirements and essential public facilities will result in projects being approved that could cause irreversible damage to the character of the City, violate the City's Comprehensive Plan, and potentially result in the City violating the GMA; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2. Moratorium Established. The Mercer Island City Council hereby imposes an immediate, six-month moratorium on the acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for building permits, short subdivisions and subdivisions, development agreements, and other permits of any type associated with development, with the exception of design review, that: ( 1) as determined either by the Code Official or the developer, will cause any locally-owned intersection to decline below the LOS standards adopted by the City in the transportation element of its comprehensive plan; or (2) relate to the siting or development of any essential public facility. To the extent any such applications are received by the City, they shall be returned to the applicant. Term of Moratorium. This is an emergency ordinance. The moratorium imposed by this ordinance shall become effective immediately, on the date hereof, and shall continue in effect for an initial period of six months, unless repealed, extended, or modified by the City Council after subsequent public hearing(s) and entry of appropriate findings of fact pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, provided that the moratorium shall automatically expire upon the effective date of land use regulations adopted by the City Council to address both transportation concurrency, as required under RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b), and the siting or development of any essential public facilities, including mitigation measures as appropriate. Page 2

Section 3. Preliminary Findings. The following preliminary findings of fact are hereby adopted: A. That the City of Mercer Island desires to maintain and enhance the character of the City. B. That the City has not enacted into law a transportation concurrency ordinance that complies with RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) or development regulations that account for or otherwise provide for the development of essential public facilities. C. If a development is not subject to a transportation concurrency ordinance the development may be contrary to the best interests of the residents of Mercer Island. Similarly, if the development of an essential public facility is not subject to an ordinance imposing reasonable permitting and mitigation of the essential public facility's adverse effects, the development may be contrary to the best interests of the residents of Mercer Island. D. If a moratorium on development as provided herein is not imposed, the development would likely impact effective long range planning and result in the status quo not being preserved during consideration of necessary regulations. E. It is in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Mercer Island to suspend temporarily the acceptance of permit applications for development that would cause a decline of the LOS of a locally-owned intersection below the established standard in the City's comprehensive plan, as well as the acceptance of permit applications relating to the siting and development of any essential public facility. F. Allowing development to continue before the City Council can fully adopt new or revise existing regulations for such matters, including a transportation concurrency ordinance and an essential public facilities ordinance, could result in irreversible damage to the City and would be contrary to the GMA and state law. G. Special care and attention needs to be employed in evaluating, considering, and developing appropriate legisla~ion that satisfactorily addresses the concerns of the City while also- conforming to legal requirements. Collecting and compiling information, public testimony, and statements of concerned citizens of the City and of other persons interested in or familiar with the issues of development in the City is appropriate. Section 4. Conclusion. Based on the above Findings of Fact, the City Council concludes that the City has the authority to establish a moratorium, and that it is necessary to establish a moratorium in order stop the acceptance, processing, and approval of Pagc3

development applications and/or other development as further identified in this moratorium in order 1) to provide the City with an opportunity to more fully engage the citizens; and 2) to allow the City Manager, the Development Services Group staff, and outside consultants, as needed, to produce revised or new development regulations for City Council consideration as soon as possible. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on March 6, 2017, at Mercer Island City Hall, 9611 SE 36 1 h St., during the City Council's regular meeting, or as soon thereafter as the business of the City Council shall permit, in order to hear and consider the comments and testimony of those wishing to speak at such public hearing regarding the moratorium created by this Ordinance and to consider adopting further findings of fact. Declaration of Emergency. The City Council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this Ordinance take effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the Council, and that the same is not subject to a referendum (RCW 35A. l 2. l 30). Without an immediate moratorium on the City's acceptance, processing, and approval of development applications as provided in this Ordinance, the City will continue to be noncompliant with existing State law. Therefore, the moratorium established by this Ordinance must be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary consisting of the title. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, or its application held inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any other person, property, or circumstance. Effective Date. This Ordinance, as a public emergency ordinance necessary for the protection of the public health, public safety, public property, or public peace, shall take effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the City Council as required by RCW 35A.12.130. Pursuant to Matson v. Clark County Board of Commissioners, 19 Wn. App. 641, 904 P.2d 317 ( 1995), non-exhaustive underlying facts necessary to support this emergency declaration are included in the "WHEREAS" clauses, above, all of which are adopted by reference as findings of fact as if fully set forth herein. Pagc4

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Mercer Island, Washington at its regular meeting on the 13th day of February, 2017, and signed in authentication of its passage. Bruce Bassett, Mayor AITEST: ~ Approved as to Form: ~ Kari Sand, City Attorney Date of Publication: Page 5