Case 3:12-cr L Document 54 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID 208

Similar documents
Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 3:12-cr L Document 122 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID 922

Case 3:12-cr L Document 42 Filed 04/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 148

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 3:12-cv L Document 201 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 4769

THE GOVERNMENT S MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO THE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION PROCEDURES ACT

Case 5:18-cv DAE Document 9 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 7

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.

NO. 89-CR-0000 STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT VS. ) 187TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JOE SMITH ) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:12-cr L Document 82-1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID 323

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 280 Filed: 03/13/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:5020

Case 1:04-cv GTE-DRH Document 50 Filed 05/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case Document 431 Filed in TXSB on 10/06/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 648 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Case hdh Doc 97 Filed 01/09/18 Entered 01/09/18 21:23:39 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 53 Filed: 09/14/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 1082 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

moves this Court for an order for the Disclosure of the Grand Jury Transcripts. This

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 51 Filed: 05/25/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:235

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. V. No. 3:15-cv-818-D-BN

John H. Tatlock. The Harris Law Firm, P.C.

REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT. 16 AMERICA UNITES FOR KIDS, et al., CASE NO. 2:15-cv PA-AJW

Civil Procedure II. Final Examination. Winter Essay Answer Outline

Case bjh Doc 69 Filed 04/29/16 Entered 04/29/16 19:18:10 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 322 Filed 10/07/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2438 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT, WEST JORDAN DEPARTMENT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SALT LAKE, STATE OF UTAH

Pennsylvania Code Rules Rule and

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 189 Filed: 11/09/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:2937

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 211 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE.

DECISION AND ORDER. This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard J. Arcara,

Case 2:12-cv JFB-ETB Document 26 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 158 CV (JFB)(ETB)

Illinois and Federal Civil and Criminal Procedure Local Practice Overview. Illinois State Bar Association Basic Skills Course

Case 1:08-cr EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:13-cv RC-ALM Document 13 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 106

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 2422 Filed: 04/01/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:64352

Case 3:15-cr AJB Document 11 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 4

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Case 8:12-cv JDW-EAJ Document 112 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2875 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 182 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1647 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 4:16-cv K Document 73 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 2299

Case bjh11 Doc 338 Filed 01/11/19 Entered 01/11/19 16:18:50 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. No. 13-CR Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mona K.

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

February 6, United States Attorneys Office 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas Re: United States v. XXXXX, No. YYYY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case 1:13-cv GBL-TCB Document 33 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 2015

Case 6:14-cv PGB-KRS Document 229 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID 8774

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORDER OF CIVIL CONTEMPT AND COERCIVE INCARCERATION

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

CONSENT MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING. Plaintiffs respectfully request that a status hearing be set in the abovecaptioned

Case hdh Doc 82 Filed 12/22/17 Entered 12/22/17 15:13:35 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

Case: 1:12-cr Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 122 Filed: 10/24/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:590

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Excerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS

Case 6:18-cr RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 3:12-cr-00413-L Document 54 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID 208 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No: 3:12-CR-317-L v. No: 3:12-CR-413-L No: 3:13-CR-030-L BARRETT LANCASTER BROWN RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT S MOTION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY AND NOTICE UNDER FED. R. CRIM. P. 12.2 BARRETT LANCASTER BROWN, through his counsel, respectfully submits his response to the government s Motions for Reciprocal Discovery (Dkt. 46) and Notice Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.2 (Dkt. 47). 1 I. RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY The government requests an Order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A-B) and 26.2. Specifically, the government asks for an Order that the defense produce (a) [a]ny documents which the defendant intends to use in his case in chief, (b) [a]ny digital evidence which the defendant intends to use in his case in chief, and (c) [a]ny results or reports of physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests or experiments made in connection with the case. The government also requests that discovery be provided not later than thirty days prior to the trial setting and requests an Order barring the introduction and use at trial of any evidence not produced by the defendant in response to this motion for reciprocal discovery. 1 Mr. Brown notes that identical motions were submit by the government in 12-CR-317 (Dkt. 37, 38), and not ruled on by the Court. Mr. Brown respectfully requests that the Court accept foregoing in response to those motions. 1

Case 3:12-cr-00413-L Document 54 Filed 08/22/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID 209 Rule 16(b) requires a defendant to disclose reciprocal discovery if the item is within the defendants' possession, custody, or control and the defendant intends to use the item in the defendant's case-in-chief at trial. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b). Therefore, Mr. Brown s obligations do not extend to documents in the government's possession that he intends to use in his case-in-chief at trial, except, as he is required to disclose trial exhibits. Moreover, Mr. Brown s obligations under Rule 16(b) do not extend to examinations, scientific tests or experiments unless the defendant intends to use the item in the defendant's case in chief or intends to call the witness who prepared the report, and the report relates to the witness' testimony. Id. Mr. Brown acknowledges his obligations regarding reciprocal discovery, and will comply with the dictates of Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A B) and 26.2. Currently every document Mr. Brown intends to use in his case in chief is in the control and possession of the government. Should an item that is not in the custody and control of the government come into Mr. Brown s possession, it will be provided to the government in accordance with his obligations under Rule 16(b), as identified above. The government also requests reciprocal discovery to be provided not later than thirty days prior to the trial setting, or risk preclusion by the Court. Local Rule 16.1 states that exhibits, exhibit lists and witness lists must be exchanged between opposing parties at least fourteen days prior to trial. See L.Cr.R. 16.1. Thus, the government s request effectively compels Mr. Brown to provide his case-in-chief to the government before viewing the government s case-in-chief, or risk evidentiary preclusion. Mr. Brown cannot possibly anticipate every aspect of his case-in-chief prior to the government putting on it s case-in-chief. Nor should Mr. Brown s disclosure obligations under Rule 16(b) preclude him from later designating and using any evidence identified during preparation for trial, or after hearing evidence and 2

Case 3:12-cr-00413-L Document 54 Filed 08/22/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID 210 testimony presented in the government's case-in-chief. As such, Mr. Brown respectfully proposes an Order requiring (1) the government to provide its exhibits, exhibit lists and witnesses thirty five days prior to trial; and (2) the defense to provide (i) documents pursuant to 16(b) and 26.2; and (ii) exhibits, exhibit lists and witnesses, thirty days prior to trial. It would also be appropriate, and in the interests of justice, for the Court to allow timely supplemental disclosure when additional documents are identified, and as government s case-in-chief is viewed by the defense in trial. Mr. Brown s proposal satisfies the government s request that the discovery be provided not later than thirty days prior to the trial setting. It will enable the defense to provide a more fulsome set of documents that reflect Mr. Browns case-in-chief because they will be responsive to the witnesses and exhibits the government expects to present in it s case-in-chief. Consequently, both the government and the defense will receive a complete, truthful disclosure of the critical facts, sufficiently prior to trial to allow both parties to be adequately prepared. Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, 412 (1988). Mr. Brown s proposal is in the interests of justice and judicial efficiency. It satisfies the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Local Rules, and the Scheduling Order entered by the Court in this case. As such, it should be adopted by the Court. II. RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR 12.2 NOTICE The government requests that Mr. Brown provide written notice pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12.2(b), and disclosure of reports pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.2(c) at least thirty days prior to the trial date. Mr. Brown has no objection, and will comply. 3

Case 3:12-cr-00413-L Document 54 Filed 08/22/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID 212 MARLO P. CADEDDU Attorneys for Barrett Lancaster Brown 5