Official Statistics on Refusals to Entry for Foreign Citizens at the Georgian Border

Similar documents
The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 429 persons in January 2018, and 137 of these were convicted offenders.

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

LANGUAGE LEARNING MEASURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR MIGRANTS: LATVIA

Baghdad Hostage Working Group

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

Latvijas Republikas VALSTS ROBEŽSARDZE. State Border Guard REPUBLIC OF LATVIA

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.

Translation from Norwegian

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

GEORGIAN NATIONAL TOURISM ADMINISTRATION

Report. Iran's Foreign Policy Following the Nuclear Argreement and the Advent of Trump: Priorities and Future Directions.

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

Return of convicted offenders

Introduction. International Traveler Trips. Significance of International Travel. Figure 1: International Traveler Trips by years

Future Developments of Cooperation on Security Issues, Including Non-proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Illegal Arms Export

ASYLUM STATISTICS MONTHLY REPORT

World Refugee Survey, 2001

Infrastructure Connectivity from Transit Country Perspective. Noshrevan Lomtatidze. ტრანსპორტის Ministry of Foreign პოლიტიკის Affairs დეპარტამენტი

International migration and development in the LLDCs: An overview

EASO EU+ asylum trends 2018 overview

Comparison of the Roles of Neighboring Countries in the Foreign Trade of the USA, Germany and Turkey

Tusheti National Park

Refugee and Asylum-Seekers Update

TISAX Activation List

ARABPLAST 2019 FACT SHEET

REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE OF ARMENIA: PERSPECTIVES AND POTENTIALS

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 1997

Ministry of Culture of the Republic of China (Taiwan) The Lazurite Initiative

CHAPTER I: SIZE AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION

India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka: Korea (for vaccine product only):

Notes to Editors. Detailed Findings

I. LEVELS AND TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL MIGRANT STOCK

PRICING BEHAVIOUR OF KAZAKH, RUSSIAN AND UKRAINIAN EXPORTERS IN THE INTERNATIONAL WHEAT MARKET

Trends in international higher education

ISC Learning Contract Academic Standards Talk Introduction to Academic Personal Tutor Book Police Registration. Fire Safety Talk Lunch

Official development assistance of the Czech Republic (mil. USD) (according to the OECD DAC Statistical Reporting )

CAUCASUS 2008 International Conference Yerevan, Armenia. The U.S. and the Caucasus in 2008

Embassies and Travel Documents Overview

International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

The Three Elephants in the Room: Coal, Oil and Gas in the Primary Energy Consumption (PEC) and their CO2 Emissions up to 2013 Bernard CHABOT

ENC Academic Council, Partnerships and Organizational Guidelines

Higher education global trends and Emerging opportunities to 2020

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

MIGRATION IN TURKEY CONFERENCE Transformation of Opportunity and Risks in the Country from Emigrant to Immigrant

Summary of the Results

ANNUAL REPORT ON STATISTICS ON MIGRATION, ASYLUM AND RETURN IN GREECE (Reference Year 2004)

Two Global Leaders with Very Different Global Perceptions

TURKISH CONTRACTING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET

REPORT. Of the State Migration Service of the RA Ministry of Territorial Administration and Emergency Situations

Concept note. The workshop will take place at United Nations Conference Centre in Bangkok, Thailand, from 31 January to 3 February 2017.

Welcome Week Timetable

Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. First Quarter, 2005

MIGRATION IN SPAIN. "Facebook or face to face? A multicultural exploration of the positive and negative impacts of

The Legal Framework for Circular Migration in Belarus

Asia Pacific (19) EMEA (89) Americas (31) Nov

COUNTRY FACTSHEET: LATVIA 2014

Asylum Seekers in Europe May 2018

ECRE COUNTRY REPORT 2002: NORWAY

Annual Report on Asylum and Migration for FINLAND 2004

ANNEX 12 of the Practical Handbook = ANNEX 7 (7A, 7B and 7C) of the Visa Code Handbook ANNEX 12A

International Student Exchange Among Muslim Nations; Soft Power and Voting Alliances at the United Nations

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy of the Russian Federation

APA Standing Committee Meeting on Economic and Sustainable Development, June 2018 Pissouri Bay (Limassol) - Cyprus

Generational Change in the World Environment Dr. Jack M. Wilson Distinguished Professor of Higher Education, Emerging Technologies, and Innovation

The Conference Board Total Economy Database Summary Tables November 2016

Good Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-

Session 2: The importance of institutions and standards for soft connectivity

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

Analyzing the Location of the Romanian Foreign Ministry in the Social Network of Foreign Ministries

Women s Role in Developing Economies: Case of Georgia

Proforma Cost for national UN Volunteers for UN Partner Agencies

ASYLUM LEVELS AND TRENDS IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES, 2005

HAPPINESS, HOPE, ECONOMIC OPTIMISM

Changing Attitudes towards Gender Equality: Update from the World Values Survey

1. Cross-Border Transactions of Individuals in Cross-border transactions (US$, billion) 1.1. Money Transfers from Russia

World Schools Debating Championships 2015 Singapore, 27 July 6 August

Asylum Levels and Trends: Europe and non-european Industrialized Countries, 2003

As payments abroad grew faster, the deficit of cross-border transactions increased by 55% in 2008.

C OVER STORY OVERPOPULATION: MYTHS AND REALITY. Text: Olga Irisova

Associated Document for the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data, Version 3.0 April 14, 2003

On June 2015, the council prolonged the duration of the sanction measures by six months until Jan. 31, 2016.

24. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICS IRAN STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 1394

ONE BELT ONE ROAD INITIATIVE: PERKS AND CHALLENGES FOR TURKEY

SLOW PACE OF RESETTLEMENT LEAVES WORLD S REFUGEES WITHOUT ANSWERS

TURKISH CONTRACTING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET

Maritime Transport. Intergovernmental Bilateral Agreements. Date of Signature. N Country Agreement (Title)

ESTONIAN PUBLIC SERVICE ACADEMY EUROPEAN MIGRATION NETWORK 2008 MIGRATION AND ASYLUM STATISTICS REPORT OF ESTONIA

World Public Says Iraq War has Increased Global Terrorist Threat

Turkey. Development Indicators. aged years, (per 1 000) Per capita GDP, 2010 (at current prices in US Dollars)

What is Peace? What is peace? An agreement? The absence of violence? Co-existence? Security? Justice? Prosperity? Right relationships?

Contributions to UNHCR For Budget Year 2014 As at 31 December 2014

Asylum decisions in the EU EU Member States granted protection to more than asylum seekers in 2014 Syrians remain the main beneficiaries

chapter 3 donors: who gives assistance?

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

ASYLUM STATISTICS JANUARY Date of publication: 10 February 2014 Contact: Tine Van Valckenborgh

L 292/12 Official Journal of the European Union

Current international regulations regarding the validity and transferability of Taiwan s international driver s permit and/or

Report Launch December 9, 2011 ODI, London

Transcription:

Official Statistics on Refusals to Entry for Foreign Citizens at the Georgian Border The analysis was prepared in frames of the project "Empower Society for Strengthening Good Governance", financially supported by International Visegrad Fund and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The responsibility of the content of the article lies with the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI). It does not necessarily reflect the opinions of International Visegrad Fund and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Contact: A. Griboedovi Str. #3, 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: + 995 32 292 15 14 E-mail: info@idfi.ge Website: www.idfi.ge 2018

KEY FINDINGS: - The number of refusals to let foreign citizens enter the country has been declining over the past 4 years. - In the last four years, most refusals of entry were given to the citizens of Turkey, Azerbaijan, Russia, Iran and India. The citizens of these countries made up 58% of all those who were refused entry into the country. - In the last two years, citizens of India were refused entry most often. - In 2015, the largest share of refusals of entry fell on Turkish (33%) and Azerbaijani (13%) citizens. - The Ministry of Internal Affairs does not keep a record of the bases for refusal of entry into Georgia to foreign citizens. STATISTICS OF REFUSAL TO ENTER BY YEAR Between 2014 and September 30 of 2017, foreign citizens were refused entry at the Georgian state border a total of 27,400 times (see Figure #1).1 The 2014-2016 data makes it clear that the incidence of such refusals was decreasing annually. Specifically, in 2014 a total of 8,819 instances of refusals to enter were recorded, in 2015 the number decreased to 8,405, while in 2016 saw a decline by 32% compared to the previous year and went down to 5,711 cases. In the first nine months of 2017, foreigners were refused entry into the country only 4,465 times. According to the Georgian legislation, a person can be refused entry to Georgia on the following bases: - The person is banned from entering the country; - The person did not pay the prescribed fine for being on the territory of Georgia unlawfully; - The person does not possess health and accident insurance; - The person does not possess the financial means to live in Georgia and subsequently return to the country of origin; - The person does not provide or provides false information regarding self and the reasons for travelling to Georgia; - The presence of the person in Georgia constitutes a threat to national security and/or public order, etc. 1 Data presented in this article was provided to IDFI by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia 2

Figure #1 - Statistics of Refusal to Enter Georgia to Foreign Citizens at the Georgian Border by Year 8819 8405 5711 4465 2014 2015 2016 2016 (9 months) STATISTICS OF REFUSALS BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN According to the data from the previous four years, citizens from the following list of countries were refused entry to Georgia most often; Turkey, Azerbaijan, Russia, Iran, India, Iraq, Syria, Uzbekistan, Armenia and Turkmenistan. Citizens of these countries account for the majority of the cases of refusal to enter Georgia (80%), while the share from the first five countries from the list is 58% (see Figure #2). Among the total number of refusals to enter (27,400), citizens of Turkey were met with refusal 4,565 times (17%), Azerbaijan 3,299 (12%), Russia 2,774 (10%), Iran 2,665 (10%), India 2,482 (9%), Iraq 1,895 (7%), Syria 1,540 (6%), Uzbekistan 1,290 (5%), Armenia 979 (3%) and Turkmenistan 536 (2%). 3

Figure #2-2014-2017 Statistics of Refusal to Enter Georgia to Foreign Citizens at the Georgian Border by Country of Origin Other, 5375, 19% Turkey, 4565, 17% Turkmenistan, 536, 2% Armenia, 979, 3% Uzbekistan, 1290, 5% Azerbaijan, 3299, 12% Syria, 1540, 6% Russia, 2774, 10% Iraq, 1895, 7% India, 2482, 9% Iran, 2665, 10% In the first 9 months of 2017, citizens of India were refused entry most often (914 34% of the total amount). Following citizens of India, the following countries were represented: Turkey (573 13%), Azerbaijan (507 11%), Russia (349 8%), Syria (332 7%), Uzbekistan (273 6%), Turkmenistan (172 4%), Pakistan (146 3%), Armenia (120 3%) and Iran (108 2%). These countries represent 78% share of the total number of cases of refusal to enter Georgia. Meanwhile, the remaining 929 cases (21% of the total) were distributed among citizens of 78 different countries (as well, 42 cases dealt with persons with no citizenship). 4

Figure #3-2017 Data by Citizenship Status Other, 971, 22% India, 914, 21% Iran, 108, 2% Armenia, 120, 3% Turkey, 573, 13% Pakistan, 146, 3% Turkmenistan, 172, 4% Uzbekistan, 273, 6% Syria, 332, 7% Russia, 349, 8% Azerbaijan, 507, 11% In 2016, citizens of India represented the largest share of cases of refusal (1,109 19.4% of the total amount). Following citizens of India, the following countries were represented in declining order: Azerbaijan (1,086 19%), Turkey (564 10%), Syria (452 8%), Russia (409 7%), Uzbekistan (265 5%), Armenia (203 4%), Iran (162 3%), Turkmenistan (126 2%) and Iraq (109 2%). These countries represent 79% of the cases of refusal to enter. The remaining number of 1,196 (21%) cases was distributed among citizens of 90 different countries (with additional 30 cases of persons lacking citizenship status). 5

Figure #4-2016 Data by Citizenship Status Other, 1226, 21% India, 1109, 19% Iraq, 109, 2% Turkmenistan, 126, 2% Iran, 162, 3% Armenia, 203, 4% Azerbaijan, 1086, 19% Uzbekistan, 265, 5% Russia, 409, 7% Syria, 452, 8% Turkey, 564, 10% The following tendencies were observed in 2015: Turkey - 2,764 cases (33% of the total), Azerbaijan - 1,063 (13%), Russia - 776 (9%), Armenia 521 (6%), Iran - 509 (6%), Syria 402 (5%), India 306 (4%), Nigeria - 243 (3%) and Uzbekistan 233 (3%). Citizens of the abovementioned countries represented 81% of the total statistics. The remaining cases from this year (1,331 16%) were distributed among citizens of 91 different countries (with additional 40 cases of persons with no citizenship status). 6

Figure #5-2015 Data by Citizenship Status Uzbekistan, 233, 3% Other, 1371, 17% Nigeria, 243, 3% India, 306, 4% Turkey, 2764, 34% Syria, 402, 5% Iran, 509, 6% Armenia, 521, 6% Russia, 776, 9% Azerbaijan, 1063, 13% In 2014, citizens of Iran and Iraq were often refused entry at the border, representing a share of 21% (1,886) and 18% (1,569), respectively. They were followed by citizens of Russia (1,240-14%), Turkey (664-8%), Azerbaijan (643-7%), Uzbekistan (519 6%), Syria (354 4%), Turkmenistan (166 2%), Kirgizstan (162 2%), and Saudi Arabia 157 2%). In total, these ten countries account for 83% of the total number of cases of refusal to enter Georgia in 2014. Meanwhile, the remaining 1,398 cases were distributed among citizens of 105 different countries (with additional 61 cases of persons lacking a citizenship status). 7

Figure #6-2014 Data by Citizenship Status Saudi Arabia, 157, 2% Kyrgyzstan, 162, 2% Turkmenistan, 166, 2% Other, 1459, 17% Iran, 1886, 21% Syria, 354, 4% Uzbekistan, 519, 6% Iraq, 1569, 18% Azerbaijan, 643, 7% Turkey, 664, 7% Russia, 1240, 14% Interesting trends can be pointed out in the data of the refusal to enter Georgia to citizens of those countries that fell in the top five in terms of numbers in any of the last four years. Among these seven countries, only three showed declining tendencies in the number of refusals to enter Georgia at the border: Iran, Iraq and Russia. The statistics of Iran and Iraq are especially noteworthy, as compared to 2014, the number of refusals declined 12 times and 14 times, respectively. 8

3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Figure #7 - Trends of Refusals to Enter Georgia at the Border by Citizenship Status 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 (9 months) Iran 1886 509 162 108 Iraq 1569 304 109 99 Russia 1240 776 409 349 Turkey 664 2764 564 573 Azerbaijan 643 1063 1086 507 Syria 354 402 452 332 India 153 306 1109 914 Armenia 135 521 203 120 Citizens of Azerbaijan and especially Turkey were refused entry at the Georgian border the most in 2015. For the citizens of Azerbaijan, the number increased slightly in 2016, while the number of refusals to Turkish citizens saw a sharp decline (5 times). The statistics of refusal to enter Georgia to citizens of India, in contrast, was increasing annually: in 2014 the number of such cases was only 153, which doubled next year and by 2016 exceeded the indicators of all other countries. The number of refusals to enter Georgia to Armenian citizens increased especially in 2015 (almost 4 times compared to the previous year), up to 521 cases. The following year, however, this number decreased to 203. Among these seven countries, the indicators for Syria were relatively stable and the number of cases of refusal of entry into Georgia increased only modestly. The Georgian border was crossed most often by the citizens of the following six countries: Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, Russia, Iran and Ukraine. Among the eight countries mentioned above, whose citizens are often refused entry at the border, more than a million persons crossed the Georgian border in the 9

cases of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Russia. With the exceptions of Turkey and Iraq, the number of persons coming into Georgia was increasing in all cases. Figure #8 - Statistics of International Entry to Georgia by Citizenship Status (Thousands of Persons) 2,000.0 1,800.0 1,600.0 1,400.0 1,200.0 1,000.0 800.0 600.0 400.0 200.0 0.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 Armenia 1,326.0 1,469.0 1,496.0 1,718.0 Azerbaijan 1,283.0 1,393.0 1,524.0 1,695.0 Russia 812.0 926.0 1,039.0 1,393.0 Turkey 1,443.0 1,392.0 1,257.0 1,247.0 Iran 48.0 25.0 148.0 323.0 India 5.0 12.0 36.0 60.0 Iraq 22.0 10.0 4.0 5.0 Syria 1.7 2.0 5.9 10.7 IDFI also attempted to analyze the reasons for the refusal to enter Georgia. However, unfortunately, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia does not record the mentioned data in terms of bases for refusal. Keeping a record of this information would promote the transparency of state policies in this regard and improve the effective planning of the informational campaign about Georgia. There would also be fewer reasons to raise questions about unjustified treatment and decisions made at the border regarding citizens of specific countries. 10