Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 12 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Similar documents
Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 24 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 9

I. ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant IMPULSE MEDIA GROUP, INC. in the above-captioned

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 111 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:16-cv JCC Document 9 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

Case 2:16-cv MAT Document 10 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Plaintiff.

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv SS Document 10 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 5 The Honorable Mary Alice Theiler

Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc. Doc. 769

Case 3:15-cv RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 3 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 7

STATE OF WASHINGTON THURSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Case 1:08-cv RPM Document 12 Filed 01/16/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 8:13-cv JSM-AEP Document 17 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv JJB-SCR Document 27 09/20/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. No SEA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 4:15-cv DPM Document 25 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 1:10-CV ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv B Document 1 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

DSV Air & Sea GmbH et al v. Bragg Investment Company Inc. et al View Document View Docket

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

Case 2:18-cv HCM-RJK Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 1

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CASE # ADVERSARY # 7001(2)

SECOND AMENDED COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. 3:18-CV FDW-DSC

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 38 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case 2:13-cv MJP Document 19 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 1:16-cv LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/22/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION. Defendant Jeff Carter, by and through his counsel Law Offices of Walter M. Luers, by

Case 3:15-cv FAB-MEL Document 29 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv PBS Document 24 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv CMR Document 6 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO.: 1:15-CV LCB-LPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 2:07-cv RCJ-GWF Document 1 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

Case 1:09-cv TWT Document 3 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 28 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID 437 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

Court of Common Pleas

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2018

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Adams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 16 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 2

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JAMES R. HAUSMAN and CAROL D. HAUSMAN, a husband and wife; and M.H., a minor child, by her guardian ad litem, CAROL D. HAUSMAN, v. Plaintiffs, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE - U.S.A., a Washington corporation; HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., a Washington corporation; HOLLAND AMERICA LINE N.V., a Curacao corporation; and HAL ANTILLEN N.V., a Curacao corporation, Defendants. No. -00 COME NOW Defendants Holland America Line U.S.A., Holland America Line, Inc., Holland America Line N.V., and HAL Antillen N.V., by and through their attorneys, and respond to Plaintiff s Complaint as follows: No. -00 Page..00

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of. Admit.. Admit.. Deny.. Admit.. Admit.. Admit. I. PARTIES II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. The allegations contained in paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of the Court. To the extent an answer is deemed necessary from answering Defendants, admit.. Deny; loss of consortium damages are not available.. The allegations contained in paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of the Court. To the extent an answer is deemed necessary from answering Defendants, admit.. Admit.. Admit.. Admit. III. FACTS OF THE OCCURRENCE. Admit the MS AMSTERDAM is a 0-foot luxury cruise ship owned and operated by one of the defendants; deny all remaining allegations.. Admit.. Admit. No. -00 Page..00

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of. Admit that Plaintiffs approached a doorway that led to the pool; deny all remaining allegations for lack of information.. Admit the first sentence of paragraph and that one of the doors struck Mr. Hausman on the right side of his body and possibly head; deny all remaining allegations.. Deny.. Deny.. Deny.. Deny.. Deny.. Admit.. Admit.. Admit. IV. LIABILITY (TORTIOUS CONDUCT AND INACTION). Defendants re-allege its responses above as if fully set forth herein.. The allegations contained in paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of the Court. To the extent an answer is deemed necessary from answering Defendants, admit.. Deny. Plaintiff approached the door from a very severe angle and the sensors did not detect him.. Deny. No. -00 Page..00

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Admit that Defendants were aware of other instances in which passengers have been hit by automatic doors on ships in its fleet, deny all remaining allegations. No other passengers were hit by automatic doors during plaintiff s cruise.. Deny.. The allegations of this paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of. The allegations of this paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of. The allegations of this paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of. The allegations of this paragraph contain questions of law for the attention of V. DAMAGES. Defendants re-allege their responses above as if fully set forth herein.. Defendants are without sufficient information to confirm or deny the allegations of this paragraph and therefore, deny.. Deny.. Deny. 0. Deny.. Deny.. Deny as loss of consortium damages are not available in this action.. Deny. No. -00 Page..00

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of VI. PUNITIVE DAMAGES. Defendants re-allege its responses to above as if fully set forth herein.. Defendants admit that they have automatic doors on its ship, but deny all remaining allegations.. Deny. VII. JURY DEMAND. This allegation does not require a response from answering defendants. VIII. RELIEF REQUESTED Defendants deny Plaintiff s prayer for relief in its entirety. FURTHER AND ADDITIONAL DEFENSES, INCLUDING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES By way of further answer, including affirmative defenses, Defendants allege as follows:. Plaintiffs Complaint fails, in whole or in part, to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.. Plaintiffs claims are barred and/or limited by contract.. Plaintiffs damages, if any, were proximately caused, in whole or in part, by plaintiffs negligence.. Plaintiffs assumed the risk.. Plaintiffs damages, if any, were proximately caused, in whole or in part, by the negligence of third party(ies) not named in this lawsuit.. Plaintiffs damages, if any, were proximately caused, in whole or in part, by a superseding cause(s). No. -00 Page..00

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of. Plaintiffs have failed to mitigate their damages.. To the extent Defendants have made any payments to or on behalf of Plaintiffs, Defendants are entitled to a set-off.. Defendants reserve the right to add additional affirmative defenses as discovery develops. WHEREFORE, Defendants pray that Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed with prejudice at their own cost and expense, and for all other general and equitable relief to which Defendants may be entitled. DATED this st day of June,. s/louis Shields LOUIS A., WSBA # 0 Nielsen Shields, PLLC Telephone: --00 Facsimile: --0 Email: las@nielsenshields.com Attorneys for Defendants No. -00 Page..00

Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June,, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following: Herbert Farber, Esq. The Farber Law Group PO Box Bellevue, WA 00-00 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed at Seattle, Washington. Sheila Baskins Legal Assistant Telephone: --00 Facsimile: --0 smb@nielsenshields.com 0 pe0 No. -00 Page..00