REDACTED. 01/30/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 9

Similar documents
REBEKKA HIGGS, KATHERINE SPENGLER, AND KRISTEN NELSON. THE PEOPLE ARE

REDACTED. 02/26/2015 Minute Order (No Print) Event ID: E-Filed: N COURTROOM 202 MONITOR THIS MORNING WAS XXX AND THIS AFTERNOON WAS XXX /CMR

REDACTED. 4/03/2015 Filing Other Event ID: E-Filed: N DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-7 SEALED ENVELOPE #197 /LKO

REDACTED. 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE.

REDACTED. 10/04/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION REGARDING ORDERS TO PRODUCE RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-3, PSDT-4 AND

REDACTED. 5/07/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL DAY 63 MAY 7, 2015

6/24/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 91 JUNE 24, 2015

09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /30/2013 /REB

08/16/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY --

09/06/2013 Letter Event ID: LETTER RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL C THEIS. 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN

08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN ATTACHEMENTS - STD /JR. 08/30/2013 Motion Event ID:

REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL [D-267] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

Judge s Introductory Remarks. Center. My name is Carlos Samour, and I am the judge assigned to this division.

REDA TE MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF AN OUT OF STATE WITNESS FROM CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.

Superior Court of California County of Orange

I, as well as all evidence and testimony of Dr. Reid's opinions and. Division: 202 ^COURT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

Los Angeles Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction Department 77

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C17 LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE GLENDA SANDERS

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

Protocol for Judge Leo Bowman

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

COMMON PLEAS COURT OF DARKE COUNTY, OHIO PROBATE DIVISION LOCAL RULES 1. RULE 53 (A) HOURS OF THE COURT

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIALS)

Superior Court of California County of Orange County

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned

JURY MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE EATON MUNICIPAL COURT. Adopted January 13 th, 2011 by JUDGE PAUL D. HENRY CLERK, BERTHA D. KALIL

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT FIVE JUDGE COLLEEN K. STERNE. Departmental Requirements and Procedures

LOCAL RULES OF THE RIPLEY CIRCUIT & SUPERIOR COURTS INDEX

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

DEPARTMENT C26 GUIDELINES HONORABLE GREGORY H. LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas (Jonesboro) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:06-cv JLH

PRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL

RULES CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

Superior Court of California County of Orange

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUITS DIVISION 12 JURY TRIAL GUIDELINES AND DIVISION RULES

City and County of Denver CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE PROCEDURAL GUIDE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv RWT

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

WILLOUGHBY MUNICIPAL COURT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO JURY USE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON CIVIL PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON. (Revised February 8, 2018)

PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Longaphy, 2017 NSPC 67. v. Christopher Longaphy. Section 11(B) Charter - Decision - Unreasonable Delay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

Criminal Law Table of Contents

PRACTICE PREFERENCES JUDGE GREGORY G. GROGER

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S (Supersedes Administrative Order S )

LOCAL RULES FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT AND THE COUNTY COURT-AT-LAW RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

RULES OF FULTON COUNTY COURT EASTERN AND WESTERN DISTRICT

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEPARTMENT C9 PROCEDURES

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc

MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DIVISION 5 JURY TRIAL GUIDELINES PRETRIAL MOTIONS COURTROOM RULES AND DECORUM

CRIMINAL, TRAFFIC, CIVIL AND SMALL CLAIM RULES

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse

DOMESTIC RELATION CASES ARE GOVERNED BY SUGGESTED GUIDELINES AND PRACTICES IN DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

THE COUNTY COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY AREA ONE AND AREA TWO

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

The Mechanics of Impaneling a Jury OBJECTIVES. About Impaneling a Jury? Texas Municipal Courts Education Center. Fall 2009

Sangamon County Circuit Clerk s Office. Small Claims Court Manual

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULE

PART IV Pretrial, Trial, and Posttrial

CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. No. 13-CR Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mona K.

Ho norable Victoria A. Valentine

Jury Selection. JURY SELECTION Bench Book Checklist 7 2 HOW DO WE GET THEM IN THE COURTROOM??????? NOW THAT THE JURORS ARE IN THE COURTROOM

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Domestic Relations Division Calendar #62 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 3010 Chicago, Illinois 60602

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA. CC v. CC CC JSJ RUDOLPH LEMETRICK AGNEW, AMENDED MOTION FOR RECUSAL

Lakewood Municipal Court Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Local Rules of Court Revised January 1, 2015

Clark County Circuit Court Rules (Sixth Judicial District) version

Transcription:

REDACTED 01/30/2015 Notice Filed Event ID: 000608 E-Filed: N DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN DEFENSE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 16(III)(B) (D-278) SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #179 STD 201 1 30 15 /LKO 01/30/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000610 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 9 JUDGE: SAMOUR REPORTER: J. MARTIN THE DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEY S DAN KING, KRISTEN NELSON, KATHERINE SPENGLER, REBEKKA HIGGS, AND TAMARA BRADY. THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY GEORGE BRAUCHLER, JACOB EDSON, KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, AND LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE. MORNING SESSION: REGARDING SEVERAL PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE REPORTED THIS MORNING. THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTIVE JURORS ARE EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 3987, 3895, 3785, 3830, AND 3757. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 3979, 3776, AND 3921 WILL BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER INTRODUCTION SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3385, WHO REPORTED YESTERDAY MORNING, RECEIVED TWO SUMMONSES FOR THIS CASE, INCLUDING AS PROSPECTIVE JUROR 7798. THE PARTIES STIPULATE THAT THIS JUROR CAN BE RELEASED FROM THE 7798 SUMMONS. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3134 HAS RETURNED TO COMPLETE HIS QUESTIONNAIRE. THE COURT WILL INCLUDE PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3134'S QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE JUMP DRIVE WITH THE QUESTIONNAIRES FROM THIS MORNINGS SESSION. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING YESTERDAY AFTERNOON'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE MORNING GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. AFTER THE PROSPECTIVE JURORS HAVE EXITED THE COURTROOM, THE FOLLOWING 91 PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ARE DISMISSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 1762, 1775, 1784, 1795, 1801, 1828, 1830, 1851, 1868, 1874, 1933, 1985, 2060, 2071, 2076, 2104, 2124, 2131, 2136, 2203, 2222, 2286, 2351, 2391, 2462, 2471, 2751, 2756, 2759, 2764, 2765, 2767, 2768, 2775, 2781, 2787, 2795, 2798, 2799, 2800, 2829, 2831, 2838, 2839, 2843, 2844, 2845, 2853, 2854, 2855, 2863, 2866, 2868, 2881, 2882, 2889, 2896, 2901, 2902, 2904, 2912, 2920, 2922, 2928, 2935, 2936, 2938, 2940, 2943, 2945, 2947, 2958, 2959, 2963, 2964, 2965, 2970, 2972, 2976, 2978, 2979, 2981, 2985, 2987, 2989, 2990, 2991, 2993, 2995, 2997, 3212. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING THE INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 9 AND THE SCHEDULING OF INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE SESSIONS. THE COURT ASKS THE PARTIES TO CONSIDER ITS PROPOSAL AND BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THEM LATER THIS AFTERNOON. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING A YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORM SUBMITTED BY PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3859 IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE COURT FINISHED ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3859 IS EXCUSED WITHOUT OBJECTION. AFTERNOON SESSION: THE DEFENDANT AND THE SAME ATTORNEYS ARE PRESENT. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING SEVERAL PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE REPORTED THIS AFTERNOON. THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTIVE JURORS ARE EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 4030, 4121, AND 4003. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3696 WROTE THE WRONG JUROR NUMBER ON HER QUESTIONNAIRE. WITH THE COURT S PERMISSION, A STAFF MEMBER CORRECTED THE NUMBER ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE AND INITIALED IT. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3979 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 2/6/15 PM.

PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3776 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 2/6/15 AM. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3921 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 2/5/15 AM. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3810, WHO IS SCHEDULED FOR THIS AFTERNOON, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 2/6/15 AM AND THE COURT MAKES AN ADDITIONAL RECORD REGARDING THIS JUROR. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE AFTERNOON GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. THE COURT BRINGS PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4196 INTO THE COURTROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONING. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4196 WILL BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER INTRODUCTORY SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4015 SUBMITTED A QUESTION DURING THE COURT'S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS INDICATING THAT THE SHE HAS A JOB INTERVIEW SCHEDULED THIS AFTERNOON. THE COURT WILL HAVE ITS STAFF SEE IF THIS PROSPECTIVE JUROR WOULD LIKE TO RETURN AT A LATER DATE TO COMPLETE A QUESTIONNAIRE. THE COURT TAKES A BRIEF RECESS. THE COURT RECONVENES IN DIVISION 204 OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4196 WILL COME BACK ON 2/2/15 AT 1:00 P.M. TO COMPLETE A QUESTIONNAIRE. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4015 WILL COME BACK ON 2/6/15 AT 7:40 A.M. TO COMPLETE A QUESTIONNAIRE. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING THE MORNING INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE FOLLOWING 47 PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ARE DISMISSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 2530, 2623, 2632, 2644, 2651, 3006, 3007, 3011, 3016, 3022, 3037, 3052, 3060, 3061, 3069, 3070, 3072, 3075, 3076, 3078, 3080, 3083, 3085, 3089, 3091, 3093, 3101, 3102, 3108, 3121, 3132, 3135, 3136, 3137, 3140, 3142, 3146, 3148, 3150, 3151, 3153, 3157, 3159, 3167, 3170, 3195, 3196. THE PARTIES DISCUSS THE COURT S EARLIER COMMENTS REGARDING THE INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 9. THE DEFENSE, WITHOUT WAIVING ANY OF THE OBJECTIONS MADE IN MOTION D-206, AGREES TO CANCELLING THE INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS SCHEDULED ON FEBRUARY 10, 11, 12, AND 13 AND COMMENCING INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE ON FEBRUARY 11. THE DEFENSE WOULD AGREE TO SCHEDULING 12 PEOPLE PER DAY FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE. THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THE COURT SHOULD HOLD THE INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ON FEBRUARY 10, 11, 12, AND 13. THE PEOPLE ALSO EXPRESS CONCERNS ABOUT ONLY SCHEDULING 12 PEOPLE PER DAY FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE. THE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO STICK TO THE MOST RECENT PLAN OF HAVING 18 INDIVIDUALS PER DAY FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE. THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE 12 PEOPLE PER DAY FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE FOR THE FIRST TWO WEEKS. HOWEVER, IF THE PARTIES ARE NOT ABLE TO QUALIFY A MINIMUM OF 9 PEOPLE DURING THAT TIME, THE COURT WILL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE SCHEDULE. THE COURT WILL TAKE THE ISSUE OF WHEN TO END INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS UNDER ADVISEMENT. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4134, WHO REPORTED THIS AFTERNOON, WAS UNABLE TO COMPLETE HIS QUESTIONNAIRE. THIS PROSPECTIVE JUROR WILL RETURN FOR A LATER SESSION NEXT WEEK TO COMPLETE HIS QUESTIONNAIRE. 02/02/2015 Motion Event ID: 000609 E-Filed: N DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF XXX AN OUT OF STATE WITNESS FROM XXX (D-279) FILED BY THE DEFENSE - STD 201 2 2 15 /LKO 02/02/2015 Reply Event ID: 000611 E-Filed: N DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPRESS/EXCLUDE SPECIFIC EXCHANGES BETWEEN DR. REID AND MR. HOLMES DURING SECOND SANITY EXAMINATION AND TO REDACT THEM FROM ANY VIDEO RECORDING OF THE SECOND SANITY EXMINATION INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE (D-264A) FILED BY DEFENSE SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #180 STD 201 2 2 15

02/02/2015 Certificate Filed Event ID: 000612 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS CERTIFICATE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO (D-279). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, AND CHRISTINA TAYLOR. 02/02/2015 Order Event ID: 000613 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER SUPPRESSING DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS/EXCLUDE SPECIFIC EXCHANGES BETWEEN DR. REID AND MR. HOLMES DURING SECOND SANITY EXAMINATION AND TO REDACT THEM FROM ANY VIDEO RECORDING OF THE SECOND SANITY EXAMINATION INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE (D- 264A-2). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, AND CHRISTINA TAYLOR. 02/02/2015 Order Event ID: 000614 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER SUPPRESSING DEFENSE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 16 (III)(B) (D-278). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, AND CHRISTINA TAYLOR. 02/02/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000615 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 10 JUDGE: SAMOUR REPORTER: C. TROYANEK THE DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEY S DAN KING, KRISTEN NELSON, KATHERINE SPENGLER, REBEKKA HIGGS, AND TAMARA BRADY. THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY GEORGE BRAUCHLER, JACOB EDSON, KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, AND LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE. MORNING SESSION: REGARDING PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE REPORTED THIS MORNING. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4365 IS EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4414 IS BROUGHT INTO THE COURTROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE REGARDING A MEDICAL NOTE SHE PROVIDED TO THE COURT AND WILL PARTICIPATE IN THE MORNING SESSION. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING AN EMAIL FROM PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4238. WITHOUT OBJECTION, THE COURT WILL INSTRUCT THE JURY COMMISSIONER TO ADVISE THE JUROR THAT HE MAY COMMUNICATE WITH THE MEDIA, BUT NOT ABOUT THIS CASE. THE COURT WILL MARK PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4238 S EMAIL PROSPECTIVE JUROR EMAIL NO. 1 AND THE COMMISSIONER S EMAIL RESPONSE TO PROSPECTIVE JUROR EMAIL NO. 1. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE MORNING GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. THE COURT RECONVENES IN COURTROOM 204 OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. DEFENSE WITNESSES FROM THE ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE, DEPUTY ROBISON AND DEPUTY DESHAW, APPEAR AND THEIR SUBPOENAS ARE CONTINUED TO JULY 15, 2015 AT 8:30 AM IN DIVISION 201. ONE LAY PERSON, MR. GIOVANNI PADILLA, AND TWO OFFICERS FROM THE DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAJAN FORD AND PAUL CAPALUGO, HAVE FAILED TO APPEAR THIS MORNING. THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY S BELIEVE THIS COULD BE THE RESULT OF A MISUNDERSTANDING AND THEY WILL CONTACT THESE WITNESSES AND WILL REQUEST FURTHER RELIEF AT A LATER TIME IF NEEDED. FURTHER, 20 OFFICERS FROM THE AURORA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND 25 OFFICERS FROM THE ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE HAVE NEITHER RETURNED WAIVERS OF SERVICE NOR CONTACTED THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY S.

THE DEFENSE WILL WORK WITH THE LIAISONS AND WILL REQUEST FURTHER RELIEF AT A LATER TIME IF NEEDED. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING FRIDAY AFTERNOONS INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE COURT INDICATES THAT ON FEBRUARY 9 IT WILL HOLD A HEARING ON MOTION D-275A IN THE MORNING AND WILL HAVE THE FINAL INTRODUCTORY SESSION IN THE AFTERNOON. THERE WILL BE NOTHING SCHEDULED IN THE CASE ON FEBRUARY 10. INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE WILL BEGIN ON FEBRUARY 11. THE PARTIES INDICATE THAT THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH THE QUESTIONNAIRES FROM THE EARLY SESSIONS MULTIPLE TIMES AND DO NOT ANTICIPATE ANY MORE STIPULATED EXCUSALS. THE COURT WILL PROVIDE THE ATTORNEY S A LIST OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS SCHEDULED FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE IN ADVANCE OF EACH SESSION. THE DEFENSE ASKS FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR AN OUT-OF-STATE SUBPOENA. THE REQUEST IS GRANTED. THE FOLLOWING 53 PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ARE DISMISSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 2832, 2837, 2842, 2867, 2998, 2323, 3252, 3257, 3259, 3261, 3271, 3272, 3273, 3278, 3279, 3282, 3289, 3292, 3294, 3305, 3308, 3316, 3321, 3344, 3350, 3360, 3363, 3371, 3373, 3375, 3376, 3385, 3386, 3389, 3394, 3404, 3405, 3427, 3428, 3430, 3454, 3455, 3458, 3463, 3464, 3467, 3472, 3481, 3484, 3485, 3487, 3496, 3498. MR. BRAUCHLER ASKS IF THE COURT HAS MADE ANY DECISIONS REGARDING WHETHER IT WILL TAKE TIME OFF AFTER INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE PRIOR TO GROUP VOIR DIRE, AND AFTER GROUP VOIR DIRE PRIOR TO OPENING STATEMENTS. THE COURT HAS NOT MADE ANY DECISIONS. FURTHER, THE COURT NOTES THAT IN MOTION D- 275A, THE DEFENSE ASKS FOR A 1-WEEK OR 2-WEEK RECESS BETWEEN GROUP VOIR DIRE AND OPENING STATEMENTS. AFTERNOON SESSION: THE DEFENDANT AND THE SAME ATTORNEY S ARE PRESENT. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING SEVERAL PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE REPORTED THIS AFTERNOON. THE COURT CONDUCTS INDIVIDUAL VOIR VIRE OF PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4739 REGARDING HIS MEDICAL CONCERNS AND ABILITY TO SERVE AS A JUROR. THE COURT CONDUCTS INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE OF PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4618 REGARDING HER MEDICAL CONCERNS AND ABILITY TO SERVE AS A JUROR. THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTIVE JURORS ARE EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 4539, 4739, 4750, 4562, 4618, AND 4633. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE AFTERNOON GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING THE MORNING INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE FOLLOWING 86 PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ARE DISMISSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 3010, 3056, 3112, 3152, 3161, 3174, 3178, 3193, 3206, 3218, 3221, 3223, 3225, 3227, 3237, 3238, 3240, 3245, 3247, 3248, 3494, 3505, 3506, 3513, 3518, 3521, 3522, 3526, 3527, 3532, 3534, 3544, 3545, 3550, 3560, 3569, 3579, 3580, 3584, 3590, 3591, 3592, 3600, 3601, 3603, 3618, 3620, 3622, 3625, 3629, 3630, 3632, 3636, 3640, 3642, 3653, 3654, 3660, 3665, 3668, 3669, 3670, 3671, 3673, 3674, 3675, 3677, 3679, 3682, 3687, 3688, 3689, 3699, 3705, 3707, 3708, 3709, 3714, 3716, 3719, 3720, 3724, 3728, 3730, 3733, 3738. THE PARTIES ANTICIPATE MAKING A RECORD ON MOTION C-182 TOMORROW. THE HEARING ON MOTION D-275A IS SET ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2015, AT 9 AM. 02/03/2015 Exhibits - Trial/Hearing Event ID: 000616 E-Filed: N COURT EXHIBITS 1 AND 2 FOR HEARING DATE 1 30 15. JUDGE SAMOUR AND REPORTER MARTIN EXHIBIT ENVELOPE #15 /LKO

02/03/2015 Order Event ID: 000617 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA FOR LAURA NELSON (C-182). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, CHRISTINA TAYLOR, CYNTHIA COFFMAN, AND KATIE ALLISON. 02/03/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000618 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 11 JUDGE SAMOUR REPORTER MARTIN THE DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEY S DAN KING, KRISTEN NELSON, KATHERINE SPENGLER, REBEKKA HIGGS, AND TAMARA BRADY. THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY GEORGE BRAUCHLER, JACOB EDSON, KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, AND LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE. MORNING SESSION: REGARDING PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE REPORTED THIS MORNING AND OTHER ISSUES. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 4978 AND 5148 ARE EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4756 IS BROUGHT INTO THE COURTROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE REGARDING A MEDICAL NOTE SHE PROVIDED TO THE COURT AND WILL BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4753 IS BROUGHT INTO THE COURTROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE REGARDING USE OF HER PHONE IN THE COURTROOM. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4758 HAS ONE OF HER GRANDCHILDREN WITH HER BECAUSE SHE CANNOT OBTAIN CHILD CARE AND WILL BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 1746 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 2/9/15 PM. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 1518 WILL RETURN ON 2/6/15 AT 3:00 P.M. TO COMPLETE HER QUESTIONNAIRE. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE MORNING GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING MONDAY AFTERNOON'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE COURT MAKES AN ADDITIONAL RECORD REGARDING PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4758. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4758 IS RELEASED WITHOUT OBJECTION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4196 HAS APPEARED THIS MORNING AND WILL COMPLETE A QUESTIONNAIRE. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3810 HAS ALSO RETURNED THIS MORNING AND WILL COMPLETE A QUESTIONNAIRE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF COURT STAFF. THE FOLLOWING 62 PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ARE DISMISSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 3309, 3319, 3337, 3381, 3425, 3480, 3563, 3752, 3766, 3768, 3780, 3786, 3792, 3796, 3797, 3809, 3819, 3829, 3831, 3835, 3836, 3839, 3842, 3843, 3848, 3853, 3856, 3862, 3863, 3866, 3877, 3883, 3903, 3904, 3905, 3906, 3908, 3909, 3915, 3916, 3919, 3922, 3924, 3930, 3935, 3938, 3942, 3944, 3950, 3951, 3954, 3957, 3965, 3968, 3971, 3972, 3973, 3975, 3978, 3985, 3991, 3998. NEXT, THE COURT INFORMS THE PARTIES THAT EVERY WEEK ON FRIDAY AFTERNOON ITS STAFF WILL PROVIDE THE PARTIES WITH THE FOLLOWING WEEK'S INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE SCHEDULE. COURT STAFF WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULE. AFTERNOON SESSION: THE DEFENDANT AND THE SAME ATTORNEY S ARE PRESENT. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING SEVERAL PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO ARE HERE FOR THIS AFTERNOON'S SESSION AND OTHER ISSUES. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 5112 AND 5113 ARE EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5182 IS BROUGHT INTO THE COURTROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE REGARDING A MEDICAL NOTE HE PROVIDED TO THE COURT

AND WILL BE RESCHEDULED To A LATER SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3917 FAILED TO APPEAR ON 01/30/15 AM AND WILL PARTICIPATE IN THIS AFTERNOONS SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4756 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 2/6/15 PM. THE COURT ADVISES THE PARTIES THAT PROSPECTIVE JUROR 4728, WHO REPORTED YESTERDAY, LEFT WITHOUT COMPLETING A QUESTIONNAIRE. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE AFTERNOON GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING THE MORNING'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE PARTIES INFORM THE COURT THAT THEY HAVE STIPULATED TO EXCUSE 58 PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO APPEARED FOR PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS; THE PROSPECTIVE JURORS DISMISSED ARE AS FOLLOWS: 3514, 3520, 3536, 3564, 3609, 3614, 3626, 4002, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4021, 4022, 4029, 4033, 4035, 4039, 4041, 4049, 4053, 4056, 4057, 4058, 4062, 4063, 4076, 4080, 4087, 4099, 4112, 4115, 4124, 4136, 4138, 4139, 4143, 4144, 4145, 4150, 4151, 4158, 4166, 4169, 4179, 4182, 4197, 4201, 4207, 4212, 4218, 4225, 4232, 4237, 4243, 4246, 4247. THE PARTIES HAVE REACHED A STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION C-182. MS. SPENGLER TENDERS THE STIPULATION AND ATTACHED DOCUMENTS TO THE COURT. THE STIPULATION IS READ INTO THE RECORD. THE STIPULATION AND ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE MARKED C-TR-3. THE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO THE STIPULATION ARE SUPPRESSED. THE COURT WILL ISSUE AN ORDER DENYING THE MOTION FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO QUASH THE SUBPOENA SERVED ON LAURA NELSON BY THE DEFENDANT (MOTION C-182) AS MOOT BASED ON THE STIPULATION REACHED BY THE PARTIES. HOWEVER, IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT THE PERSON SUBPOENAED IS CALLED BY THE DEFENSE AS A WITNESS AT TRIAL, THE MOTION MAY BE RE-RAISED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. MR. KING RAISES AN ISSUE REGARDING THE COURT'S SEQUESTRATION ORDER AS IT APPLIES TO EXPERT WITNESSES DURING TRIAL. THE DEFENSE WOULD LIKE TO EXEMPT EXPERT WITNESSES FROM THE SEQUESTRATION ORDER. THE PEOPLE ASK TO HAVE UNTIL TOMORROW TO TAKE A POSITION ON THE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST. THE PEOPLE'S REQUEST IS GRANTED. AFTER THE HEARING, THE COURT DISCOVERS THAT ONLY 57 PROSPECTIVE JUROR NUMBERS WERE INCLUDED ON THE LIST OF STIPULATED EXCUSALS READ INTO THE RECORD DURING THE PROCEEDINGS THIS AFTERNOON. THE COURT WILL MAKE THIS CORRECTION ON THE RECORD TOMORROW. 02/04/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000620 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 12 JUDGE SAMOUR REPORTER TROYANEK THE DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEYS DAN KING, KRISTEN NELSON, KATHERINE SPENGLER, REBEKKA HIGGS, AND TAMARA BRADY. THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY GEORGE BRAUCHLER, JACOB EDSON, KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, AND LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE. MORNING SESSION: REGARDING PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE REPORTED THIS MORNING AND OTHER ISSUES. THE COURT CONDUCTS INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE OF PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5496 REGARDING HER DOCTOR'S NOTE. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 5297 AND 5496 ARE RELEASED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 4793, 5633, AND 4382 WERE SCHEDULED FOR OTHER SESSIONS, BUT WILL PARTICIPATE IN THIS MORNING'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3921, WHO WAS SCHEDULED FOR AN EARLIER SESSION, IS RELEASED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 1876, WHO WAS ORIGINALLY RESCHEDULED TO 2/12, HAS INFORMED THE JURY COMMISSIONER THAT SHE CANNOT BE RESCHEDULED TO ANY OF THE REMAINING INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS BECAUSE SHE WILL BE OUT OF TOWN.

THE COURT WILL SEE IF THIS JUROR CAN PROVIDE PROOF THAT SHE IS TRAVELING. MR. ORMAN STATES THAT HE AGREES WITH THE REQUEST MR. KING MADE YESTERDAY TO EXEMPT EXPERT WITNESS FROM THE COURT'S SEQUESTRATION ORDER. THE COURT AMENDS THE SEQUESTRATION ORDER TO ALLOW EXPERT WITNESSES TO TALK TO EACH OTHER ABOUT THE CASE AND BE PRESENT IN THE COURTROOM WHILE OTHERS ARE TESTIFYING. THE COURT WILL ALSO ISSUE A WRITTEN ORDER AMENDING THE SEQUESTRATION ORDER. THE COURT GIVES THE PARTIES COPIES OF EMAILS RECEIVED BY THE JURY COMMISSIONER FROM PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO HAVE ALREADY COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES. THOSE EMAILS ARE LABELED PROSPECTIVE JUROR EMAIL #3, #4, #5, #6, AND #7. THE PARTIES WILL REVIEW THE EMAILS AND LET THE COURT KNOW HOW THEY WOULD LIKE THE JURY COMMISSIONER TO RESPOND. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE MORNING GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING TUESDAY AFTERNOON'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE FOLLOWING 67 PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS ARE DISMISSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES: 4256, 4258, 4259, 4262, 4266, 4271, 4279, 4281, 4282, 4285, 4291, 4292, 4293, 4294, 4295, 4296, 4298, 4302, 4308, 4309, 4310, 4312, 4314, 4324, 4325, 4329, 4335, 4339, 4341, 4349, 4356, 4357, 4358, 4368, 4373, 4377, 4379, 4383, 4386, 4392, 4398, 4400, 4401, 4402, 4409, 4414, 4416, 4417, 4422, 4423, 4433, 4442, 4443, 4444, 4446, 4450, 4453, 4458, 4461, 4467, 4469, 4476, 4479, 4486, 4490, 4496, 4498. MR. ORMAN REQUESTS COPIES OF PROSPECTIVE JUROR EMAILS #1 AND #2 AS WELL AS A COPY OF THE RESPONSE TO PROSPECTIVE JUROR EMAIL #1. THE COURT WILL PROVIDE COPIES OF THOSE DOCUMENTS TO THE PARTIES. AFTERNOON SESSION: THE DEFENDANT AND THE SAME ATTORNEY S ARE PRESENT. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING SEVERAL PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO ARE HERE FOR THIS AFTERNOON'S SESSION. THE COURT CONDUCTS INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE OF PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5635 REGARDING HER MEDICAL CONDITION AND ABILITY TO SERVE AS A JUROR. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 5635, 5560, 5671, 5685, 5522, 5692, AND 5586 ARE EXCUSED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. PROSPECTIVE JURORS 5362 AND 5319 WERE SCHEDULED FOR OTHER SESSIONS, BUT WILL PARTICIPATE IN THIS AFTERNOON'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE COURT MAKES ITS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE AFTERNOON GROUP OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS. OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS, THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING QUESTIONS SUBMITTED ON YELLOW JUROR QUESTION FORMS DURING THE MORNING'S INTRODUCTORY SESSION. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5559 IS BROUGHT INTO THE COURTROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE REGARDING A QUESTION FORM SHE SUBMITTED AFTER THE COURT'S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5559 IS RELEASED BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO EXCUSE THREE PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO EMAILED THE JURY COMMISSIONER AFTER FILLING OUT A QUESTIONNAIRE: 146, 2085, AND 1354. THE PARTIES WILL MAKE A RECORD TOMORROW REGARDING HOW THEY WISH TO RESPOND TO OTHER EMAILS RECEIVED BY THE JURY COMMISSIONER. MR. KING ASKS THE COURT TO CLARIFY A PROSPECTIVE JUROR'S NUMBER WHO WAS EXCUSED THIS MORNING: PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3921 IS EXCUSED, NOT PROSPECTIVE JUROR 3291. THE COURT MAKES A RECORD REGARDING PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5103. PROSPECTIVE JUROR 5103 WAS EXCUSED ON JANUARY 22 BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES DUE TO HER RELATIONSHIP WITH A VICTIM IN THIS CASE. HOWEVER, SHE APPEARED AND FILLED OUT A QUESTIONNAIRE DURING THE 2/3/15 PM INTRODUCTORY SESSION. THE PARTIES INFORM THE COURT THAT THEY HAVE STIPULATED TO EXCUSE 52 PROSPECTIVE JURORS WHO APPEARED FOR PREVIOUS INTRODUCTORY SESSIONS:

1473, 3807, 3869, 3898, 4156, 4238, 4244, 4443, 4506, 4519, 4521, 4523, 4525, 4558, 4564, 4577, 4578, 4579, 4580, 4595, 4596, 4597, 4606, 4610, 4615, 4617, 4622, 4637, 4639, 4643, 4644, 4646, 4673, 4674, 4682, 4687, 4695, 4696, 4701, 4703, 4704, 4708, 4712, 4713, 4717, 4729, 4731, 4735, 4736, 4738, 4742, 4745. AFTER THE HEARING, THE COURT DISCOVERS THAT ONLY 51 PROSPECTIVE JURORS WERE EXCUSED THIS AFTERNOON. PROSPECTIVE JUROR NUMBER 4443 WAS ON THE PARTIES STIPULATED LIST OF EXCUSALS READ ON THE RECORD THIS MORNING. THE COURT WILL MAKE THIS CORRECTION ON THE RECORD TOMORROW. 02/05/2015 Response Event ID: 000619 E-Filed: N PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION (D-275A) STD 201 2 5 15 /JR End of Case: 2012 CR 201522