Case 1:15-cv WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv WMS

Similar documents
Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv BMC Document 8 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 93 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Civil Action No JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Transcription:

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 002152706 ONTARIO LIMITED and JEC DISTRIBUTORS INC., FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv-00020-WMS CHANGER & DRESSER, INC., Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Plaintiffs 002152706 Ontario Limited and JEC Distributors Inc. ( JEC ), for their complaint against defendant Changer & Dresser, Inc. ( C&D ), allege as follows: PARTIES 1. 002152706 Ontario Limited is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business at 1416 Rebecca Street, Oakville, Ontario, Canada. 2. JEC is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business at 1416 Rebecca Street, Oakville, Ontario, Canada. 3. JEC is a technical advisor and supplier to the North American automotive manufacturing industry, holding direct OEM vendor codes with major automotive manufacturers including Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Toyota and Volkswagen. 4. Among other things, plaintiffs have developed, designed, manufactured and sold various products including Cap Changers, Tip Dressers, Sensors, Weld Gun Covers, Cutter Blades and Holders, and Force Gauges, and JEC distributes for Electricomn, Mountz, Packers Kromer, Parker Hannifin, Recap, Rocon, Telwin Welding, Tessonics and Watteredge. 5546071_1

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 2 of 8 5. Plaintiffs have sold Cap Changers to customers in New York State and in this District. 6. Upon information and belief, C&D is an Alabama corporation with its principal place of business at 1527 ITC Way, Anniston, Alabama, and a registered agent at 1400 Commerce Blvd, Suite 25, Anniston, Alabama. 7. Upon information and belief, C&D is a subsidiary of Kyokutoh Co., Ltd. ( Kyokutoh ), which has a principal place of business at 2-2225, Higashi Kaminokura, Midoriku, Nagoya, Aichi 458-0808 Japan. 8. Upon information and belief, C&D makes, distributes, sells and offers to sell in the United States and the State of New York, and/or imports into the United States and the State of New York, various manual and automatic tip dressers, and tip changers including C&D s KIKK- tip changer, KIKK-EL tip changer, DH-SURZ tip changer and DH-SV tip changer. 9. Upon information and belief, Kyokutoh makes outside the United States and distributes, sells and offers to sell in the United States and/or imports into the United States various tip changers including the KIKK- tip changer and DH-SV tip changer. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and particularly 35 U.S.C. 271. 11. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338. 12. This Court has personal jurisdiction over C&D. On information and belief, C&D, by or through its agents and affiliates, regularly transacts, solicits and engages in business in New York, including the Western District of New York; contracts to supply goods in this - 2 -

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 3 of 8 jurisdiction; advertises and markets infringing goods within this jurisdiction through an interactive website; derives substantial revenue from sales in this jurisdiction; and/or knows or expects its actions to have consequences in this jurisdiction, and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; such that the maintenance of personal jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 13. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). THE PATENTS IN SUIT 14. On June 3, 2014, U.S. Patent Number 8,742,281, entitled SPOT WELDING CAP CHANGER ( the 281 patent ), was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 281 patent is attached as Exhibit A. 15. On October 27, 2015, U.S. Patent Number 9,168,609, entitled SPOT WELDING CAP CHANGER ( the 609 patent ), was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 609 patent is attached as Exhibit B. 16. On July 19, 2016, U.S. Patent Number 9,393,639, entitled SPOT WELDING CAP CHANGER ( the 639 patent ), was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the 639 patent is attached as Exhibit C. 17. 2152706 Ontario Limited is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in and to each of the patents-in-suit with the right to sue for past, present, and future infringement. 18. JEC is the non-exclusive licensee of, among other things, each of the patents-insuit. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,742,281 19. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 18 above. - 3 -

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 4 of 8 20. Upon information and belief, C&D has been making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing, without license or authority from JEC, in this District and elsewhere in the United States, tip changers, including at least Model No. KIKK- and DH- tip changers, that embody the inventions claimed in the 281 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271. 21. By virtue of at least its sale and offer for sale of Model No. KIKK- and DH- tip changers, C&D has been and still is directly infringing the 281 patent, including without limitation claim 21 thereof. 22. At least as early as June 22, 2014, C&D was notified of its infringement by JEC. 23. Accordingly, C&D has actual knowledge of the contents of the 281 patent, and C&D s prior and continuing infringement of the 281 patent was and is willful and deliberate, and without any objectively reasonable defense to infringement, rendering this case exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285. Such acts entitle plaintiffs to an award of enhanced damages and reasonable attorneys fees. 24. C&D has profited from its infringement of the 281 patent. As a result of C&D s unlawful infringement, plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount yet to be determined, and will continue to be damaged by that infringement unless enjoined by this Court. 25. Upon information and belief, C&D will continue to directly infringe the 281 patent, and plaintiffs will continue to be irreparably harmed unless C&D is enjoined by the Court. COUNT II INDUCEMENT WITH RESPECT TO U.S. PATENT NO. 8,742,281 26. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 25 above. 27. At least as early as June 22, 2014, C&D was notified of its infringement by JEC. - 4 -

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 5 of 8 28. Upon information and belief, C&D has knowingly induced, and continues to knowingly induce, others to infringe the 281 patent, and at least claim 21 thereof, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b), by taking active steps with specific intent to encourage and facilitate direct infringement by others, such as manufacturers, distributors, customers and others in the chain of distribution, selling or offering to sell KIKK- and DH-SV tip changers. 29. For example, upon information and belief, C&D has encouraged and facilitated direct infringement by Kyokutoh by contracting for the distribution of KIKK- and DH-SV tip changers manufactured by Kyokutoh and causing and/or actively encouraging Kyukutoh to import such tip changers into the United States; and encouraged and facilitated direct infringement by C&D s customers by knowingly instructing its customers to use the infringing tip changers. 30. C&D has actual knowledge of the contents of the 281 patent, and C&D s prior and continuing indirect infringement of the 281 patent was and is willful and deliberate, and without any objectively reasonable defense to infringement, rendering this case exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285. Such acts entitle plaintiffs to an award of enhanced damages and reasonable attorneys fees. 31. C&D has profited from its infringement of the 281 patent. As a result of C&D s unlawful infringement, plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount yet to be determined, and will continue to be damaged by that infringement unless enjoined by this Court. 32. Upon information and belief, C&D will continue to induce infringement of the 281 patent, and plaintiffs will continue to be irreparably harmed unless C&D is enjoined by the Court. - 5 -

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 6 of 8 COUNT III INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,168,609 33. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 34. Upon information and belief, C&D has been making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing, without license or authority from JEC, in this District and elsewhere in the United States, tip changers, including at least Model No. KIKK- and DH- tip changers, that embody the inventions claimed in the 609 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271. 35. By virtue of at least its sale and offer for sale of Model No. KIKK- and DH- tip changers, C&D has been and still is directly infringing the 609 patent, including without limitation claims 1, 2, 5, 19, 20, 21, 23 and 25 thereof. 36. C&D has profited from its infringement of the 609 patent. As a result of C&D s unlawful infringement, plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount yet to be determined, and will continue to be damaged by that infringement unless enjoined by this Court. 37. Upon information and belief, C&D will continue to directly infringe the 609 patent, and plaintiffs will continue to be irreparably harmed unless C&D is enjoined by the Court. COUNT IV INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,393,639 38. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 37 above. 39. Upon information and belief, C&D has been making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing, without license or authority from JEC, in this District and elsewhere in the United States, tip changers, including at least Model No. KIKK- and DH- tip changers, that embody the inventions claimed in the 639 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271. - 6 -

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 7 of 8 40. By virtue of at least its sale and offer for sale of Model No. KIKK- and DH- tip changers, C&D has been and still is directly infringing the 639 patent, including without limitation claims 1-16 and 35-60 thereof. 41. C&D has profited from its infringement of the 639 patent. As a result of C&D s unlawful infringement, plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount yet to be determined, and will continue to be damaged by that infringement unless enjoined by this Court. 42. Upon information and belief, C&D will continue to directly infringe the 639 patent, and plaintiffs will continue to be irreparably harmed unless C&D is enjoined by the Court. JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs demand a jury trial on all issues so triable. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray that the Court enter judgment in their favor and against C&D and grant relief as follows: (A) that the Court enter judgment against C&D and in favor of plaintiffs with respect to all relief requested in this complaint; (B) that the Court declare that C&D and its parents, subsidiaries, officers, agents, servants, employees, licensees, customers, distributors, affiliates, and all other persons acting or attempting to act in active concert or participation therewith, including without limitation Kyokutoh Co., Ltd., have infringed and continue to infringe, either directly or indirectly, the patents-in-suit; (C) (D) that the Court declare and order that the patents-in-suit are valid and enforceable; that the Court preliminarily and permanently enjoin C&D, its parents, subsidiaries, officers, agents, servants, employees, licensees, customers, distributors, Kyokutoh - 7 -

Case 1:15-cv-00020-WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 8 of 8 Co., Ltd., and all other persons acting or attempting to act in active concert or participation therewith, from further infringement and inducement of infringement of the patents-in-suit; (E) that plaintiffs be awarded all damages caused by C&D s infringement pursuant to 35 USC 285, to the extent allowable by law; (F) that the Court find this case to be exceptional pursuant to 35 USC 285, and award plaintiffs treble damages, as well as plaintiffs costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys fees in this action, pursuant to 35 USC 284 and 285 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d); (G) (H) that plaintiffs be awarded pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; and that the Court grant plaintiffs such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate. Dated: November 1, 2016 HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP By: s/ Michael J. Berchou Michael J. Berchou Rowland Richards Daniel Altieri 50 Fountain Plaza Suite 1000 Buffalo, New York 14202 (716) 853-1616 mberchou@hselaw.com rrichards@hselaw.com daltieri@hselaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs - 8 -