August Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011

Similar documents
Sample: n= 2,251 national adults, age 18 and older, including 750 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Survey questions. January 9-12, 2014 Pew Research Center Internet Project. Ask all. Sample: n= 1,006 national adults, age 18 and older

SNS and Facebook Survey 2010 Final Topline 12/2/10 Data for October 20 November 28, 2010

Spring Tracking Survey 2008 Final Topline 5/19/08 Data for April 8 May 11, 2008

Criminal and Civil Contempt Second Edition

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): 2014 Minnesota Domestic Violence Firearm Law i I. INTRODUCTION

RESOLUTION OF PETROBRAS EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING

The Constitution of the Chamber of Midwives

COLLECTION OF INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER LEGAL TEXTS CONCERNING REFUGEES AND DISPLACED PERSONS

Queensland Competition Authority Annexure 1

AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLOMBIA AND THE STATES OF THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (ICELAND, LIECHTENSTEIN, NORWAY AND SWITZERLAND) TABLE OF CONTENTS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PERU AND THE STATES OF THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (ICELAND, LIECHTENSTEIN, NORWAY AND SWITZERLAND)

STANDING RULES OF THE THIRTY-FIRST GENERAL SYNOD As approved by the United Church of Christ Board of Directors March 19, 2016

CURRENT PAGES OF THE LAWS & RULES OF THE MOBILE COUNTY PERSONNEL BOARD

Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and Ukraine

TOWN OF WHEATLAND CODE OF ORDINANCES CONTENTS

Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments Civil Rights. Amendments Civil Rights

RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

v. DECLARATORY RELIEF

THE WEST PAKISTAN REPEALING ORDINANCE, 1970

THE US RESPONSE TO HUMAN TRAFFIC. A list of federal organizations and government proposals

1. The First Step Act Requires The Development Of A Risk And Needs Assessment System

Copyright Government of Botswana

Student Bar Association General Body Meeting September 9, :00 p.m. 119 Advantica, Carlisle / 333 Beam, University Park Agenda

PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS IN MOBILE EQUIPMENT ON MATTERS SPECIFIC TO SPACE ASSETS. Signed in Berlin on 9 March 2012

International Law Association The Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers Helsinki, August 1966

Human Trafficking Statistics Polaris Project

ARTICLE I 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY

MYANMAR COMPANIES LAW. (Unofficial Translation)

International Legal Framework Statement

The Summary Offences Procedure Regulations, 1991

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

CANNIMED THERAPEUTICS INC. (the Corporation ) COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

AGREEMENT. between THE CITY OF NEW ARK NEW JERSEY. and THE NEW ARK FIREFIGHTERS UNION, INC.

Electronic Service of Process: A Practical and Affordable Option

Joint Submission Prepared for 2 nd cycle of Universal Periodic Review of Thailand 25 th session of the Human Rights Council (Apr-May 2016)

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Department for Legal Affairs

CHARTER AND STATUTES FITZWILLIAM COLLEGE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

SINOVILLE COMMUNITY POLICE FORUM. CONSTITUTION (Incorporating approved amendments up to 12 November 2015)

LAKES AND PINES COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL, INC. BYLAWS ARTICLE 1 NAME OF ORGANIZATION AND AREA TO BE SERVED

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PROMOTION MISSION TO THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

An assessment of the situation regarding the principle of ensuring that no one is left behind

Association Agreement

ORDINANCE NO. I. In Chapter 27, Part 2 at Section , A. ADD the following definitions:

BYLAWS OF CENTRAIS ELÉTRICAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. - ELETROBRAS. CHAPTER I Name, Organization, Headquarters, and Social Object

RESOLUTION OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSION

Assembly Resolutions no Longer in Force (as of 8 October 2010)

THE GAP BETWEEN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DEMANDS AND WIPO S FRAMEWORK ON TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE INSIDE THIS BRIEF

Minutes. Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy. Miller Senate Office Building Annapolis, MD June 25, 2013

Case 3:16-cv BAS-DHB Document 3 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 9

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 36 OF 2011 THE KARNATAKA REPEALING (REGIONAL LAWS) ACT, 2011 Arrangement of Sections Statement of Objects and Reasons Sections: 1.

It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act which is hereby published for general information:-

CURRICULUM VITAE. University of Wales Aberystwyth (UK). University of the Punjab, Lahore

NGO Forum The progress in policy has not translated into progress in impact [ ] Corruption and the culture of impunity remain rampant vii

COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON, VIRGINIA 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE INDEX

Arguments in Favor of Allowing Prosecutor-Introduced Evidence of Battering and Its Effects

10 ways being in the EU strengthens UK defence

Cornell University Student Assembly Minutes of the Thursday, March 1, 2018 Meeting 4:46pm-6:45pm in Willard Straight Hall: Memorial Room

THE PAKISTAN STATUTES

SUMA BYLAWS CONSOLIDATED

Submission for Bahrain s List of Issues Prior to Reporting (LOIPR) under the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

THE CONSTRUCTION BAR ASSOCIATION OF IRELAND MICHEÁL MUNNELLY BL 1 THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ACT, 2013

THE RISKS OF REPRESENTING DIFFERENT CLIENTS HAVING SIMILAR TECHNOLOGIES IN PATENT PROSECUTION. Presented By ANTONY P. NG Dillon & Yudell LLP

Iowa Fence Requirements: A Legal Review By Kristine A. Tidgren i July 27, 2016

SRI LANKA Code of Intellectual Property Act

Rethinking The Principles Of Duty And Privity For Contractual Liability In The 21st Century

Human Displacement and Climate Change

ARTICLE I Name. This organization, incorporated as PILOT INTERNATIONAL, INC. may use the name Pilot International.

Sale of goods. Vienna Convention United Nations Convention on the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna, 11 April 1980)

The Pennsylvania State Modern Language Association (PSMLA) Manuscript Group 118

THE INCOME SUPPORT (GUERNSEY) LAW, The States are asked to decide:- EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

Summary of the Shareholders Meeting Resolutions CENTRAIS ELETRICAS BRASILEIRAS S/A CNPJ: / PUBLIC COMPANY

A Summary of the Constitution of the United States of America

Evaluation of the Solihull Pilot

SRI LANKA. Country Overview. Yes. Yes

SERBIA DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. As submitted by the Ministry of Justice of Serbia on 12 October 2018

Contents. Preface to the 2018 Edition...iii Table of Cases... xlv. Copyright Act SHORT TITLE...1

NO. 130 OF 1993: COMPENSATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND DISEASES ACT, No October 1993

State Capacity and Civil Unrest: A Political Economy Approach

03 Rules, Regulations, Instructions, Manuals and Records held by the Board under its control or used for discharging its functions

THE YINDJIBARNDI PEOPLE

[on-line]. Ithica, NY: Cornell Law School, accessed 25 March 2007; available at

GUIDELINES FOR COURT USERS COMMITTEES

The Assistance of Counsel a Defendant s Right

APPROVED 8/8/2017 MINUTES AND SUMMARY OF THE BUILDING AND CONTRACTS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BALTIMORE COUNTY. Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Executive Summary The Death Penalty and the Right to Life

Course of Degree in Business Economics Academic Year 2015/16

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 16, 2017

SEEKING ASYLUM IN THE UNITED STATES

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

The Impact of the Federal Food Stamp Ban in Georgia

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

The Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers

U and T Visa Certification Procedures

UNITED STATES LUGE ASSOCIATION, INC. BY LAWS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appendix A Company Predictions on Mine Activity

FC5 (P7) Trade Mark Law Mark Scheme 2015

COUNCIL. Note on the Methods of Work of the Council

Transcription:

August Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011 Data for July 25 August 26, 2011 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American Life Project Sample: n=2,260 national adults, age 18 and older, including 916 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates: 07.25.2011 08.26.2011 Margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points for results based on Total [n=2,260] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on internet users [n=1,716] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone owners [n=1,948] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on SNS or Twitter users [n=1,047] INTUSE Do you use the internet, at least occasionally? EMLOCC Do you send or receive email, at least occasionally? 1 Does not use uses internet internet Current 78 22 May 2011 78 22 January 2011 i 79 21 December 2010 ii 77 23 November 2010 iii 74 26 September 2010 74 26 May 2010 79 21 January 2010 iv 75 25 December 2009 v 74 26 September 2009 77 23 April 2009 79 21 December 2008 74 26 November 2008 vi 74 26 August 2008 vii 75 25 July 2008 viii 77 23 May 2008 ix 73 27 April 2008 x 73 27 January 2008 xi 70 30 December 2007 xii 75 25 September 2007 xiii 73 27 February 2007 xiv 71 29 December 2006 xv 70 30 November 2006 xvi 68 32 August 2006 xvii 70 30 April 2006 xviii 73 27 February 2006 xix 73 27 December 2005 xx 66 34 September 2005 xxi 72 28 June 2005 xxii 68 32 February 2005 xxiii 67 33 1 Prior to January 2005, question wording was Do you ever go online to access the Internet or World Wide Web or to send and receive email?

January 2005 xxiv 66 34 Nov 23-30, 2004 xxv 59 41 November 2004 xxvi 61 39 June 2004 xxvii 63 37 February 2004 xxviii 63 37 November 2003 xxix 64 36 August 2003 xxx 63 37 June 2003 xxxi 62 38 May 2003 xxxii 63 37 March 3-11, 2003 xxxiii 62 38 February 2003 xxxiv 64 36 December 2002 xxxv 57 43 November 2002 xxxvi 61 39 October 2002 xxxvii 59 41 September 2002 xxxviii 61 39 July 2002 xxxix 59 41 March/May 2002 xl 58 42 January 2002 xli 61 39 December 2001 xlii 58 42 November 2001 xliii 58 42 October 2001 xliv 56 44 September 2001 xlv 55 45 August 2001 xlvi 59 41 February 2001 xlvii 53 47 December 2000 xlviii 59 41 November 2000 xlix 53 47 October 2000 l 52 48 September 2000 li 50 50 August 2000 lii 49 51 June 2000 liii 47 53 May 2000 liv 48 52

WEB1 Next... Please tell me if you ever use the internet to do any of the following things. Do you ever use the internet to [INSERT; RANDOMIZE]? / Did you happen to do this yesterday, or not? 2 Based on all internet users [N=1,716] total have ---------- ever DONE DID have not don t THIS YESTERDAY done this know refused Use a social networking site like MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn3 Current 64 43 35 * 0 May 2011 65 43 35 * 0 January 2011 61 n/a 39 0 0 December 2010 62 n/a 38 * 0 November 2010 61 37 39 * * September 2010 62 39 38 * 0 May 2010 61 38 39 0 0 January 2010 57 32 43 * 0 December 2009 56 33 44 0 * September 2009 47 27 52 * * April 2009 46 27 54 * * December 2008 35 19 65 * -- November 2008 37 19 63 0 0 August 2008 33 17 67 * -- July 2008 34 n/a 66 * -- May 2008 29 13 70 * -- August 2006 16 9 84 * -- September 2005 11 3 88 1 -- February 2005 8 2 91 1 -- Use Twitter Current 12 5 88 * 0 May 2011 13 4 87 * 0 January 2011 10 n/a 90 * * December 2010 12 n/a 88 * 0 November 2010 8 2 92 0 * Q20 Thinking about how you use social networking sites... On which social networking site or sites do you have an account? [PRECODED OPEN-END] 4 2 Prior to January 2005, question wording was Please tell me if you ever do any of the following when you go online. Do you ever?/did you happen to do this yesterday, or not? Unless otherwise noted, trends are based on all internet users for that survey. 3 In December 2008, item wording was Use a social networking site like MySpace or Facebook. In August 2006, item wording was Use an online social networking site like MySpace, Facebook or Friendster. Prior to August 2006, item wording was Use online social or professional networking sites like Friendster or LinkedIn 4 May 2011 question was asked of SNS or Twitter users who have an SNS profile and wording was: [IF HAVE PROFILE ON ONE SNS SITE:] On which social networking site do you ly have a profile? / [IF HAVE PROFILES

Based on SNS or Twitter users May 2011 SEPT 2009 % 87 Facebook 93 73 14 MySpace 23 48 11 Twitter 11 6 10 Linked In 11 14 2 Yahoo / Yahoo Messenger 2 1 2 Google Buzz 1 n/a 2 Google/Google Plus n/a n/a 1 YouTube 2 1 1 Tumblr * n/a * Tagged 2 1 * My Yearbook 1 n/a * Classmates.com * 1 0 Ustream 0 n/a 0 Flickr * 1 n/a Bebo 0 * n/a Digg 0 * n/a Last.FM * * 5 Other (SPECIFY) 9 10 4 Don t have my own profile on a social networking site n/a n/a 2 Don t know 1 1 2 Refused 2 3 [n=1,047] [n=975] [n=680] Note: Total may exceed 100% due to multiple responses. Q21 About how often do you visit social networking sites? [READ 1-6] % 33 Several times a day 22 About once a day 15 3 to 5 days a week 15 1 to 2 days a week 7 Every few weeks 8 Less often * (DO NOT READ) Don t know * (DO NOT READ) Refused ON MULTIPLE SITES:] On which social networking sites do you ly have a profile? September 2009 question was asked of SNS users only and wording was On which social networking site do you have a profile? / On which Social Networking sites do you have a profile?

Q22 Overall, in your experience, are people mostly KIND or mostly UNKIND to one another on social networking sites? % 85 People are mostly kind 5 People are mostly unkind 5 Depends (VOL.) 4 Don t know 1 Refused Q23 When you re on a social networking site, how often do you see people being generous or helpful... frequently, sometimes, only once in a while or never? % 39 Frequently 36 Sometimes 18 Only once in a while 5 Never 2 Don t know Q24 And when you re on a social networking site, how often do you see people being MEAN or CRUEL... frequently, sometimes, only once in a while or never? % 7 Frequently 18 Sometimes 44 Only once in a while 29 Never 2 Don t know Q25 How often do you see people using language, images or humor on social networking sites that you find offensive... frequently, sometimes, only once in a while or never? % 11 Frequently 15 Sometimes 38 Only once in a while 35 Never 1 Don t know

Tell the person to stop 21 27 24 22 6 1 Defend the person or group who is being harassed or insulted 22 32 23 15 7 1 Join in the mean or offensive behavior 10 26 31 28 5 * Just ignore the behavior 45 28 13 8 6 1 Q26 When people on social networking sites are being mean or offensive, how often, if ever, do others [INSERT FIRST ITEM; RANDOMIZE]... frequently, sometimes, only once in a while or never? How often do others... [INSERT NEXT ITEM]? [READ AS NECESSARY: Frequently, sometimes, only once in a while or never?] Based on SNS or Twitter users who have seen others being mean, cruel or offensive on SNS [N=825] frequently s while never know sometime once in a don t refused Q27 And how about you personally? When people on social networking sites are being mean or offensive, how often do you...[insert FIRST ITEM; RANDOMIZE IN SAME ORDER AS Q26]? How often do you...[insert NEXT ITEM]? [READ AS NECESSARY: Frequently, sometimes, only once in a while or never?] Based on SNS or Twitter users who have seen others being mean, cruel or offensive on SNS [N=825] frequently s while never know sometime once in a don t refused Tell the person to stop 23 22 17 34 2 1 Defend the person or group who is being harassed or insulted 24 27 16 29 3 2 Join in the mean or offensive behavior 2 5 8 84 1 * Just ignore the behavior 45 23 13 16 2 1 Q28 In the past 12 months, when you have been on a social networking site, has anyone been mean or cruel to you personally? % 13 Yes 86 No 1 Don t know Q29 Have you, personally, ever had an experience on a social networking site that [INSERT ITEMS; RANDOMIZE]? yes no don t know refused Resulted in a face to face argument or confrontation with someone 12 88 * * Caused a problem with your family 11 88 * * Resulted in a physical fight with someone else 3 96 * * Ended your friendship with someone 15 85 * * Made you feel closer to another person 61 38 1 *

Got you in trouble at work 3 97 * * Made you feel good about yourself 68 31 1 * Q30 Have you ever decided NOT to post something online because you were concerned that it might reflect badly on you? Based on all internet users [N=1,716] % 45 Yes 54 No 1 Don t know

Endnotes i January 2011 trends based on the Pew Internet Project/Project for Excellence in Journalism/Knight Foundation Local News survey, conducted January 12-25, 2011 [N=2,251, including 750 cell phone interviews]. ii December 2010 trends based on the Social Side of the Internet survey, conducted November 23 December 21, 2010 [N=2,303, including 748 cell phone interviews]. iii November 2010 trends based on the Post-Election Tracking Survey 2010, conducted November 3-24, 2010 [N=2,257, including 755 cell phone interviews]. iv January 2010 trends based on the Online News survey, conducted December 28, 2009 January 19, 2010 [N=2,259, including 562 cell phone interviews]. v December 2009 trends based on the Fall Tracking E-Government survey, conducted November 30 December 27, 2009 [N=2,258, including 565 cell phone interviews]. vi November 2008 trends based on the Post-Election 2008 Tracking survey, conducted November 20-December 4, 2008 [N=2,254]. vii viii August 2008 trends based on the August Tracking 2008 survey, conducted August 12-31, 2008 [N=2,251]. July 2008 trends based on the Personal Networks and Community survey, conducted July 9-August 10, 2008 [N=2,512, including 505 cell phone interviews] ix May 2008 trends based on the Spring Tracking 2008 survey, conducted April 8-May 11, 2008 [N=2,251]. x April 2008 trends based on the Networked Workers survey, conducted March 27-April 14, 2008. Most questions were asked only of full- or part-time workers [N=1,000], but trend results shown here reflect the total sample [N=2,134]. xi January 2008 trends based on the Networked Families survey, conducted December 13, 2007-January 13, 2008 [N=2,252]. xii December 2007 trends based on the Annual Gadgets survey, conducted October 24-December 2, 2007 [N=2,054, including 500 cell phone interviews]. xiii September 2007 trends based on the Consumer Choice survey, conducted August 3-September 5, 2007 [N=2,400, oversample of 129 cell phone interviews]. xiv February 2007 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted February 15-March 7, 2007 [N=2,200]. xv December 2006 trends based on daily tracking survey, conducted November 30 - December 30, 2006 [N=2,373]. xvi November 2006 trends based on Post-Election tracking survey, conducted Nov. 8-Dec. 4, 2006 [N=2,562]. This includes an RDD sample [N=2,362] and a cell phone only sample [N=200]. Results reflect combined samples, where applicable. xvii xviii August 2006 trends based on daily tracking survey, conducted August 1-31, 2006 [N=2,928]. April 2006 trends based on the Annual Gadgets survey, conducted Feb. 15-Apr. 6, 2006 [N=4,001]. xix February 2006 trends based on the Exploratorium Survey, conducted Jan. 9-Feb. 6, 2006 [N=2,000]. xx December 2005 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted Nov. 29-Dec. 31, 2005 [N=3,011]. xxi xxii xxiii September 2005 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted Sept. 14-Oct.13, 2005 [N=2,251]. June 2005 trends based on the Spyware Survey, conducted May 4-June 7, 2005 [N=2,001]. February 2005 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted Feb. 21-March 21, 2005 [N=2,201]. xxiv January 2005 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted Jan. 13-Feb.9, 2005 [N=2,201]. xxv November 23-30, 2004 trends based on the November 2004 Activity Tracking Survey, conducted November 23-30, 2004 [N=914]. xxvi November 2004 trends based on the November Post-Election Tracking Survey, conducted Nov 4-Nov 22, 2004 [N=2,200]. xxvii June 2004 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted May 14-June 17, 2004 [N=2,200].

xxviii February 2004 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted February 3-March 1, 2004 [N=2,204]. xxix November 2003 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted November 18-December 14, 2003 [N=2,013]. xxx August 2003 trends based on E-Government survey conducted June 25-August 3, 2003 [N=2,925]. xxxi xxxii xxxiii June 2003 trends based on Internet Spam survey conducted June 10-24, 2003 [N=2,200]. May 2003 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted April 29-May 20, 2003 [N=1,632]. March 3-11, 2003 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted March 3-11, 2003 [N=743]. xxxiv February 2003 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted February 12-March 2, 2003 [N=1,611]. xxxv December 2002 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted Nov. 25 Dec. 22, 2002 [N=2,038]. xxxvi xxxvii xxxviii November 2002 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted October 30-November 24, 2002 [N=2,745]. October 2002 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted October 7-27, 2002 [N=1,677]. September 2002 trends based on daily tracking survey conducted September 9-October 6, 2002 [N=2,092]. xxxix July 2002 trends based on Sept. 11 th -The Impact Online survey conducted June 26-July 26, 2002 [N=2,501]. xl xli March/May 2002 trends based on daily tracking surveys conducted March 1-31, 2002 and May 2-19, 2002. January 2002 trends based on a daily tracking survey conducted January 3-31, 2002 [N=2,391]. xlii December 2001 trends represent a total tracking period of December 1-23, 2001 [N=3,214]. This tracking period based on daily tracking surveys conducted xliii December 17-23, 2001 and November 19-December 16, 2001. November 2001 trends represent a total tracking period of November 1-30, 2001 [N=2,119]. This tracking period based on daily tracking surveys conducted October 19 November 18, 2001 and November 19 December 16, 2001. xliv October 2001 trends represent a total tracking period of October 1-31, 2001 [N=1,924]. This tracking period based on daily tracking surveys conducted September 20 October 1, 2001, October 2-7, 2001, October 8-18, 2001, and October 19 November 18, 2001. xlv September 2001 trends represent a total tracking period of September 1-30, 2001 [N=742]. This tracking period based on daily tracking surveys conducted August 13-September 10, 2001, September 12-19, 2001 and September 20 October 1, 2001. xlvi August 2001 trends represent a total tracking period of August 12-31, 2001 [N= 1,505 ]. tracking survey conducted August 13-September 10, 2001. xlvii xlviii This tracking period based on a daily February 2001 trends based on a daily tracking survey conducted February 1, 2001-March 1, 2001 [N=2,096]. December 2000 trend s based on a daily tracking survey conducted December 2-22, 2000 [N=2,383]. xlix November 2000 trend s based on a daily tracking survey conducted Nov ember 2, 2000 December 1 [N=6,322]. l li lii liii October 2000 trend s based on a daily tracking survey conducted October 2 Nov ember 1, 2000 [N=3,336]. September 2000 trend s based on a daily tracking survey conducted September 15 October 1, 2000 [N=1,302]. August 2000 trends based on a daily tracking survey conducted July 24 August 20, 2000 [N=2,109]. June 2000 trends based on a daily tracking survey conducted May 2 June 30, 2000 [N=4,606]. liv May 2000 trends based on a daily tracking survey conducted April 1 May 1, 2000 [N=2,503].