AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 ORDINANCE No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, California Government Code Section provides, in pertinent

AGENDA ITEM E-1 Community Development

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

of any and all adopted City of Concord ( City ) zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations; and

On April 6, 2015, the City Council introduced on first reading Ordinance No

City of Calistoga Staff Report

ORDINANCE NO

WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE RETURN TO CITY OF MANTECA, 1001 W. CENTER ST. MANTECA, CA ATTENTION: JOANN TILTON, MMC CITY CLERK

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

AGENDA ITEM NO. 12. A duly noticed public hearing (Attachment 1) was conducted on September 12, 2017, and the public hearing was closed.

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CALIMESA AND MESA VERDE RE VENTURES, LLC FOR THE MESA VERDE PROJECT

Administrative Report

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

WHEREAS, the Township has elected to exercise these redevelopment entity powers directly, as permitted by Section 4 of the Redevelopment Law; and

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4673

~EV~~RLY AGENDA REPORT. Jonathan Lait, AICP, Assistant Director of Community Development

RESOLUTION WHEREAS, The George, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, is owner of the property; and

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: To: From: Subject:

CHAPTER 7 ANNEXATION Chapter Outline

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT ORDINANCE NO

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and between THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOUGLAS EMMETT MANAGEMENT, LLC dated as of

AGENDA ITEM No. 13 ORDINANCE No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

Resolution of the County Board of Kankakee County, Illinois

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CITY PLACE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

COUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF NOVI ORDINANCE NO. 03- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE (Planned Rezoning Overlay)

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO O13

Staff Report. Jeff Lewis, Director of Information Technology

City of Westminster 2018Page

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

ORDINANCE NO. O

Ordinance No. 544 Public Hearing to Renew the Moratorium on Single Family Residential Subdivisions That Do Not Meet Minimum Lot Sizes

ORDINANCE NO

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO

HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION ED GALLAGHER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PASO ROBLES COLLISION CENTER)

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Elizabeth Corpuz, Director of Planning and Building Services

Item 08D 1 of 6

City of Miami. Legislation. Resolution: R

TOWNSHIP COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. October 15, 2018 Municipal Building, 600 Bloomfield Avenue

Ordinance Fact Sheet

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

ORDINANCE has duly considered the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement, and has recommended that the same be approved; and

Planning Commission Motion HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2013

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 8

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION. John Montgomery, Director (949)

The applicant is proposing the following modifications of the North Park Isles Community Unit district:

CITY OF SHELBYVILLE ANNEXATION PACKET SHELBYVILLE PLAN COMMISSION 44 WEST WASHINGTON STREET SHELBYVILLE, INDIANA OFFICE

ARTICLE 26 AMENDMENT PROCEDURES

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1279

CITY OF MONTICELLO PIATT COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

SECOND AMENDMENT TO GRAND HAVEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT

MAYOR KAO AND THE HONORABLE COUNCILMEMBERS

ORDINANCE NO

timely access to information opportunities to address the various legislative bodies prior to decisions being made and easy and timely

EXHIBIT 1. IN RE: Vacation of a [Portion of] street, a public street located in the City of Chillicothe, Missouri. PETITION FOR VACATION

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO OF THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF EPHRATA LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor & City Council Laurence S Wiener, City Attorney AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS. To:

ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REQUESTS

AGREEMENT RECITALS. E. The Development Agreement expired by its terms on or about September 8, / SOF Gate Agreement / v2-clean

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT

DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

CITY OF ROCKWALL ORDINANCE NO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. S -138 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CITY Of RANCHO SANTA MAR GAR IT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Primary Nominating Election of the City of Los Angeles is scheduled to be held on March 7, 2017; and

ORDINANCE Ordinance Page 1 of 10 Prepared by Bond Attorney; Edited by City Clerk

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Commission Memorandum

-Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America- Third graders from Hilltop Elementary

City of Coral Gables Planning Department Staff Report

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa supports the full participation of all residents in electing Members of the City Council; and

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

MINUTES FROM A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF MUSCLE SHOALS, ALABAMA, HELD October 20, 2003

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERCULES AND LD HERCULES LAND, LLC FOR THE CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS [MUIR POINTE /PARCEL C ]

CITY OF WARRENVILLE DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE APPROVING PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (JUSTIN MASON 29W602 BUTTERFIELD ROAD)

BILL NO ORDINANCE NO. 5244

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds, with respect to the Development Agreement that

ORDINANCE NO

City of Carpinteria. COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT April 27, 2015

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

City of Daytona Beach Shores Life is Better Here A Premier, Friendly Place to Be

Item 8C 1 of 17

STAFF REPORT FROM: BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ~

ORDINANCE NO DRAFT

BRISTOL, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL 300 Lee Street, Bristol, Virginia December 19, 2017

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, a public hearing for consideration of such proposed area rezoning is necessary and proper. NOW, THEREFORE,

CITY OF FREEPORT STEPHENSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO

Req. # SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

OPELIKA CITY COUNCIL CALLED MEETING AGENDA 204 South 7th Street September 14, 2016 TIME: 8:30 AM

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO)

Transcription:

AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 ORDINANCE No. 1978 CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL For the meeting of October 26, 2010 Originating Department: Planning & Community Development City Manager: James Mitsch Department Head: Gregg McClain SUBJECT: An Amendment to the development agreement for the Century Business Center for purposes of excluding property on which the proposed 9to5 project will be developed from the development agreement. RECOMMENDED MOTION: 1. Open and close Public Hearing 2. First reading of Ordinance No. 1978 NOTICING PROCEDURES: Advertising and notification of the Public Hearing for the application was conducted in compliance with Chapter 17.06, Title 17 of the HMC. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 2. Draft, First Amendment to Development Agreement for the Century Business Center Project 3. Legal Notice 4. Planning Commission Resolution PC 2010-14 5. Ordinance No. 1978

Staff Report City of Hawthorne To: Through: From: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jim Mitsch, City Manager Gregg McClain, Acting Director of Planning & Community Development Date: October 26, 2010 Subject An Amendment to the development agreement for the Century Business Center for purposes of excluding property on which the proposed 9to5 project will be developed from the development agreement. Recommendation 3. Open and close Public Hearing 4. First reading of Ordinance No. 1978 Summary Report The original Development Agreement was made between the City and MS Kearny Northrop Avenue, LLC pursuant to the authority of Sections 65864 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California. The development agreement encompassed approximately 86 acres north of Jack Northrop Boulevard, south of the Hawthorne Municipal Airport, west of Crenshaw Boulevard, and east of Prairie Avenue. This amendment excludes the property that will be developed for 9to5 Furniture from the development agreement that was entered into between the City and MS Kearny Northrop Avenue, LLP in 2006. The justification for approving this amendment to the development agreement with MS Kearney Northrop Avenue, LLC, is to facilitate the sale of land to 9to5 Furniture, who is prepared to construct a new manufacturing building at the site. All unfulfilled obligations of the development agreement will remain the responsibility of Kearney.

ORDINANCE NO. 1978 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CENTURY BUSINESS CENTER FOR PURPOSES OF EXCLUDING PROPERTY ON WHICH THE PROPOSED 9TO5 PROJECT WILL BE DEVELOPED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, MS Kearny Northrop Avenue, LLC (the Applicant ) has requested approval of an amendment to the Development Agreement for the Century Business Center Project to exclude from the Development Agreement the property that the Applicant proposed to convey to MIR RE, LLC for purposes of developing a 9 to 5 manufacturing project. The proposed Amendment is to be known as the First Amendment to the Development Agreement (the Application ) and is known as (Development Agreement Amendment No. 2010DA01); WHEREAS, the Century Business Center is located on approximately 86 acres of property bounded by Crenshaw Boulevard to the east, Jack Northrop Avenue to the south, Prairie Avenue to the west, and the Hawthorne Municipal Airport to the north (the Property ); WHEREAS, on September 12, 2006, the City of Hawthorne entered into a Development Agreement (Development Agreement No. 2006DA01) with the Applicant, which Agreement applied to the Property and which will expire on December 31, 2016. The Agreement was recorded on April 9, 2007 as Document No. 20070845022; WHEREAS, the portion of the Property that will be conveyed to MIR RE, LLC for the proposed 9 to 5 Project is described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B; WHEREAS, the remaining unfulfilled obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement will remain the obligation of the Applicant; WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) under CEQA, State Clearinghouse No. 2005091123 was prepared for the Development Agreement, Specific Plan and related uses. Thereafter an Addendum to that FEIR was prepared in connection with the consideration and adoption of the Third Amendment to the Specific Plan. A further Addendum (a second addendum) was prepared in connection with the Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan; 1

WHEREAS, a duly noted public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, of the right to submit comments thereon and of the date of the public hearing on the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement was given by publication in the Hawthorne Herald on September 2, 2010. Notice was mailed on August 25, 2010 as required by law. In accordance with that Notice, the public hearing was held by the Planning Commission to consider the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement was held on September 15, 2010; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC2010-14 recommending to the City Council approval of the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, evidence was heard and presented from all persons in favor of the application, from all persons opposed to the application and from members of the City staff; and that the Planning Commission having heard and received all of said evidence, testimony and statements and being fully informed in the applications. Thereafter the public hearing was closed on September 15, 2010. WHEREAS, a duly noted public hearing was held by the City Council, of the right to submit comments thereon and of the date of the public hearing on the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement was given by publication in the Hawthorne Herald on October 15, 2010. Notice was mailed on October 15, 2010, as required by law. In accordance with that Notice, the public hearing was held by the City Council to consider the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement was held on October 26, 2010; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hawthorne ordains as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this resolution are true and correct. Section 2. Based on this analysis and the information contained in this Addendum, there is no evidence that the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement requires major changes to the FEIR. Comparison of the Development Agreement with the First Amendment to the Development Agreement indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts associated with adoption of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the circumstances under which the project is undertaken have substantially changed and there is no evidence of new or more severe environmental impacts arising out of the proposed changes to the Development Agreement. This is because the First Amendment to the Development Agreement is deleting property from the scope of the Development Agreement while leaving the obligations contained in the 2

Development Agreement to remain with the original developer of the Property (MS Kearny Northrop Avenue, LLP). For these reasons, the City Council finds that no additional environmental review is required for the Fourth Amendment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Section 3. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council decision is based, which include, but are not limited to, the staff reports for the Project and all of the materials that support the staff reports for the Project, are located in the Office of the Planning Director of the City of Hawthorne, at 4455 West 126th Street, Hawthorne, California 90250. The custodian of these documents is the Director of Planning of the City of Hawthorne. Section 4. Based on all the evidence in the record, the City Council finds that the First Amendment to the Development Agreement is appropriate for the following reasons: (a) The Development Agreement No. 2006DA-01 as amended by the First Amendment will still comply with the requirement of the State Planning and Zoning Law for consistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance because the Development Agreement allows for uses and development that is consistent with the land use designation and policies of the Hawthorne Comprehensive General Plan. (b) The Development Agreement as amended by the First Amendment will still be appropriate for this site because it will allow for the continued conversion of approximately 86 acres of property formerly used for airplane manufacturing to be used for a variety of retail, commercial, and industrial uses which are compatible with each other and compatible with the surrounding uses. The Hawthorne Municipal Airport to the north and the retail development to the east of the project will be positively impacted by the potential for increased airport related businesses and by an increased number of potential retail customers as employment at the Center increases. (c) The type of development that would be allowed under the Development Agreement as amended by the First Amendment will continue to be industrial, hangars, recreational vehicle storage, self storage, commercial, and office uses. These uses will be developed through the adaptive reuse of several of the existing larger buildings and the construction of a number of various sized smaller buildings. This type of a comprehensive development ensures that the site is developed in a cohesive and compatible manner. (d) The Development Agreement as amended by the First Amendment will result in the creation of increased permanent job opportunities in the City, temporary construction jobs, improved economic use of the site over the current 3

uses, and the generation of additional property taxes for the state and local governments. Section 5. The City Council further finds that Development Agreement No. 2006DA01 as amended by the First Amendment to the Development Agreement does comply with the requirements of California Government Code Sections 65865 through 65869.5 in that the Development Agreement does specify in detail and contains the following: (a) Provisions are included in Section 14 of the Development Agreement requiring periodic review of the Agreement at least every twelve months, at which time the applicant shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement (California Government Code Section 65865.1). (b) The term of the Development Agreement is specified in Section 8(a) of the Agreement and, with respect to the CBC Project Phase I Property, shall extend until December 31, 2016, and with respect to the CBC Project Phase II Property, shall extend until the later to occur of (i) the seventh anniversary of the date upon which the Lease expires or terminates and Vought vacates the CBC Project Phase II Project, or (ii) December 31, 2016 (Government Code Section 65865.2). (c) The permitted uses of the property, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of the proposed structures, and other required provisions are referred to in Section 6(b) of the Development Agreement (Government Code Section 65865.2). (d) The Development Agreement includes conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions in Section 6 (a), (c) and (d) of the Agreement (Government Code Section 65865.2). Section 6. Based on all the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Sections 1 through 5 of this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Century Business Center Specific Plan, subject to the provisions of Section 7 of this Resolution. Section 7. The City Council s approval of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement shall be subject to (i) the City Attorney s approval as to form, and (ii) a condition that it not become effective unless and until the 9 to 5 Project owner has closed escrow and taken title to the portion of the Property described in Exhibit A and depicted on Exhibit B. 4

Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, shall mail a copy of this Resolution to the applicant, and shall forward a copy to the City Manager and City Attorney. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of, 2010. LARRY M. GUIDI, MAYOR City of Hawthorne, California ATTEST: NORBERT HUBER, City Clerk City of Hawthorne, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: RUSSELL MIYAHIRA, Acting City Attorney City of Hawthorne, California 5