UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 7:15-cv DAE Document 68 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 Randall J. Sunshine (SBN ) rsunshine@linerlaw.com Ryan E. Hatch (SBN ) rhatch@linerlaw.com Jason L. Haas (SBN 0) jhaas@linerlaw.com LINER LLP 00 Glendon Avenue, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00.0 Telephone: (0) 00-00 Facsimile: (0) 00-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC. SIGNAL IP, INC., a California corporation, vs. Plaintiff, VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. -cv-0 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc. ( Signal IP or Plaintiff ) brings this Complaint against Defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC ( Volvo or Defendant ), alleging as follows: PARTIES. Plaintiff Signal IP is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 00 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 0, Los Angeles, CA 00.. On information and belief, Defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at Volvo Drive, Rockleigh, New Jersey 0. Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 JURISDICTION, VENUE AND JOINDER. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C. and (a).. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. Defendant has conducted extensive commercial activities and continues to conduct extensive commercial activities within the State of California. Defendant is registered to do business in California. Additionally, on information and belief, Defendant, directly and/or through intermediaries (including Defendant s entities, subsidiaries, distributors, sales agents, partners and others), distributes, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises its products (including but not limited to the products and services that are accused of infringement in this lawsuit) in the United States, in the State of California, and in this judicial district, under the Volvo brand name. Defendant has purposefully and voluntarily placed one or more of their infringing products and services into the stream of commerce with the expectation that the products and services will be purchased or used by customers in California and within this judicial district. Accordingly, Defendant has infringed Signal IP s patents within the State of California and in this judicial district as alleged in more detail below.. Venue is proper in this district under U.S.C. and 00(b). BACKGROUND. Signal IP, Inc. is a California corporation with a principal place of business at 00 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 0, Los Angeles, CA 00. It is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to U.S. Patent Nos.,,;,,;,,0;,0,00; and,, (the Patents-in-Suit ).. On information and belief, Defendant is a direct or indirect subsidiary of global car manufacturer and distributor Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. ( Geely ), which is headquartered in Hangzhou, China. Geely manufactures and distributes cars in the United States under the Volvo brand name. Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the Patent). Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs through of this complaint as if set forth in full herein.. Signal IP is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent No.,, (the Patent), entitled Method of Improving Zone of Coverage Response of Automotive Radar. The Patent was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on February,. A true and correct copy of the Patent is attached as Exhibit A. 0. Defendant has directly infringed and continues to infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to the Blind Spot Information System (BLIS), used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, V0, and V0.. Defendant has contributorily infringed and is currently contributorily infringing the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to the Blind Spot Information System (BLIS), used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, V0, and V0.. Defendant has actively induced and is actively inducing the infringement of the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to the Blind Spot Information System (BLIS), used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, V0, and V0.. Defendant s infringement of the Patent has been and continues to Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 be willful, rendering this case exceptional within the meaning of U.S.C... Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendant will continue to infringe the Patent.. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s conduct, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. Plaintiff also has been damaged and, until an injunction issues, will continue to be damaged in an amount yet to be determined. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the Patent). Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs through of this complaint as if set forth in full herein.. Signal IP is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent No.,, (the Patent), entitled Technique for Limiting the Range of an Object Sensing System in a Vehicle. The Patent duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on August, 0. A true and correct copy of the Patent is attached as Exhibit B.. Defendant has directly infringed and continues to infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to collision prevention or avoidance systems, including but not limited to the Adaptive Cruise Control system, used in products including but not limited to the Volvo S0, S0, V0, XC0, and XC0.. Defendant has contributorily infringed and is currently contributorily infringing the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to collision prevention or avoidance systems, including but not limited to the Adaptive Cruise Control system, used in products including but Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 not limited to the Volvo S0, S0, V0, XC0, and XC0.. Defendant has actively induced and is actively inducing the infringement of the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to collision prevention or avoidance systems, including but not limited to the Adaptive Cruise Control system, used in products including but not limited to the Volvo S0, S0, V0, XC0, and XC0.. Defendant s infringement of the Patent has been and continues to be willful, rendering this case exceptional within the meaning of U.S.C... Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendant will continue to infringe the Patent.. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s conduct, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. Plaintiff also has been damaged and, until an injunction issues, will continue to be damaged in an amount yet to be determined. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the 0 Patent). Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs through of this complaint as if set forth in full herein.. Signal IP is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent No.,,0 (the 0 Patent), entitled Method and Control System for Controlling Propulsion in a Hybrid Vehicle. The 0 Patent was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on August 0, 0. A true and correct copy of the 0 Patent is attached as Exhibit C.. Defendant has directly infringed and continues to infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the 0 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems for hybrid vehicles disclosed and claimed in the 0 Patent, including but not limited to the Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 Volvo V0 Hybrid.. Defendant has contributorily infringed and is currently contributorily infringing the 0 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the 0 Patent, including but not limited to the Volvo V0 Hybrid.. Defendant has actively induced and is actively inducing the infringement of the 0 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the 0 Patent, including but not limited to the Volvo V0 Hybrid.. Defendant s infringement of the 0 Patent has been and continues to be willful, rendering this case exceptional within the meaning of U.S.C.. 0. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendant will continue to infringe on the 0 Patent.. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s conduct, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. Plaintiff also has been damaged and, until an injunction issues, will continue to be damaged in an amount yet to be determined. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the 00 Patent). Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs through of this complaint as if set forth in full herein.. Signal IP is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent No.,0,00 (the 00 Patent), entitled Occupant Detection Method and Apparatus for Air Bag System. The 00 Patent was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on January, 00. A true and correct copy of the 00 Patent is attached as Exhibit D.. Defendant has directly infringed and continues to infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the 00 Patent by making, using, offering Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the 00 Patent, including but not limited to the Occupant Weight Sensor, used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, V0, and V0.. Defendant has contributorily infringed and is currently contributorily infringing the 00 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the 00 Patent, including but not limited to the Occupant Weight Sensor, used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, V0, and V0.. Defendant has actively induced and is actively inducing the infringement of the 00 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the 00 Patent, including but not limited to the Occupant Weight Sensor, used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, V0, and V0.. Defendant s infringement of the 00 Patent has been and continues to be willful, rendering this case exceptional within the meaning of U.S.C... Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendant will continue to infringe on the 00 Patent.. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s conduct, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. Plaintiff also has been damaged and, until an injunction issues, will continue to be damaged in an amount yet to be determined. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the Patent) 0. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs through of this complaint as if set forth in full herein. Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0. Signal IP is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent No.,, (the Patent), entitled Method and Apparatus for Tire Pressure Monitoring and for Shared Keyless Entry Control. The Patent was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on October,. A true and correct copy of the Patent is attached as Exhibit E.. Defendant has directly infringed, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems for vehicles disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to the integrated Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) and Tire Pressure Monitor Systems (TPMS), used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, and V0.. Defendant has contributorily infringed the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to the integrated Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) and Tire Pressure Monitor Systems (TPMS), used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, and V0.. Defendant has actively induced infringement of the Patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States certain methods or systems disclosed and claimed in the Patent, including but not limited to the integrated Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) and Tire Pressure Monitor Systems (TPMS), used in products including but not limited to the Volvo C0, S0, S0, V0, XC0, XC0, XC0, and V0.. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s conduct, Plaintiff has suffered irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. Plaintiff also has been damaged in an amount yet to be determined. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, Signal IP respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 against Defendant as follows:. That Defendant has directly infringed the Patents-in-Suit;. That Defendant has contributorily infringed the Patents-in-Suit;. That Defendant has induced the infringement of the Patents-in-Suit;. That Defendant s infringement be adjudged willful and deliberate;. That Defendant and its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, successors, assigns, and all those acting in concert, participation, or privity with them or on their behalf, including customers, be enjoined from infringing, inducing others to infringe or contributing to the infringement of the Patents-in-Suit;. For damages, according to proof, for Defendant s infringement, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, as allowed by law and that such damages be trebled as provided by U.S.C. ;. That this Court determine that this is an exceptional case under U.S.C. and an award of attorneys fees and costs to Signal IP is warranted; and. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Dated: April, LINER LLP By: /s/ Ryan E. Hatch Randall J. Sunshine Ryan E. Hatch Jason L. Haas Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC. Case No. -cv-0

Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page 0 of 0 Page ID #:0 0 JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule (b), Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc. respectfully demands a jury trial on any and all issues triable as of right by a jury in this action. Dated: April, LINER LLP By: /s/ Ryan E. Hatch Randall J. Sunshine Ryan E. Hatch Jason L. Haas Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC. 0 Case No. -cv-0