Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, d/b/a Preferred People Staffing

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Houston Area Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Defendant.

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Zale Corporation

EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

United States of America v. City of Lubbock, Texas

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 12-27-2004 Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics Judge John D. Rainey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics Keywords EEOC, Formosa Plastics, US Contractors, 6:03-cv-00077, consent decree, disparate treatment, hostile work environment, sexual harassment, sex, female, manufacturing, employment law, title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/339

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION ^S[ ^SwfwmM &4TBH) DEC 2 7 2004 ELVA GRIFFIN, ANITA HERRIGES, ANIYERITZA VELAZQUEZ, AND LYNN MottMlN.Wfey,CI«fc of Court STOEBNER, Plaintiffs, vs. FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS, FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, U.S.A., U.S. CONTRACTORS, INC., AND VS. CONTRACTORS, LTD., Defendants, CONSOLIDATED CASE NO. V-03-77 AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. VS. CONTRACTORS, LTD., S Defendant CONSENT DECREE A. The parties to this Consent Decree ("Decree") are the Plaintiffs, Elva Griffin, Anita Herriges, Aniyeritza Velazquez, Lynn Stoebner, Amy Shipp and Avelina (Abby) Garza ("Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, Stoebner, Shipp and Garza"), Plaintiff, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), and Defendant, U.S. Contractors, Ltd. O'USC"). This Decree resolves the allegations raised by the EEOC and Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, Stoebner, Shipp and Garza in the above-referenced Civil Action No. V-03-77.

o B. The EEOC, Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, Stoebner, Shipp, Garza and USC wish to settle this action, without the risks, uncertainties and expenses of continued litigation, under the terms in the Decree. C. This Decree resolves all issues raised in the EEOC's Complaint, including those claims brought on behalf of the class members Garza and Shipp, and the Complaints of Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, and Stoebner. The EEOC, Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, Stoebner, Shipp and Garza waive further litigation of all issues raised in the above-referenced complaints. The EEOC expresslyreservesitsright,however, to process and litigate any charges which may now be pending or may in the future be filed against Defendant USC. D. USC denies it discriminated against or engaged in any unlawful employment practices against Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, Stoebner, Shipp and Garza and/or a class of similarly situated females, as alleged in the Complaints. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and the parties, venue is proper, and all administrative prerequisites to the EEOC's filing of this action have been met. The parties stipulate to the Court's jurisdiction. SCOPE OF CONSENT DFCRFF. 2. The duration of this Decree shall be three (3) years from the date of its filing with the Court. This Court shallretainjurisdiction of this action during the period of this Decree and may enter further orders or modifications as may be appropriate. Should any disputes under this Decree remain unresolved after this three-year period, the term of the Decree shall be automatically 2

extended, and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the Decree, until such time as all disputes have been resolved. INJUNCTION 3. Defendant USC shall provide its employees with a place of employment free of discrimination on the bases of sex and/or retaliation. 4. Defendant USC is enjoined from retaliating in any manner whatsoever against any employee, past, present or future, for opposing any employment practice made unlawful by Title VH f or for complaining of harassment or other unlawful discrimination, filing a discrimination charge, giving testimony or assistance, or participating in any lawful manner in any investigation, proceeding, hearing or action under Title VII. 5. Defendant USC is enjoined from discriminating against any employee, past, present or future, on the basis of sex, female, and from engaging in any other act or practice which has the purpose or effect of unlawfully discriminating against any past, present, or future employee on the basis of sex, including engaging in sexual harassment which can create or foster a hostile work environment. SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY 6. Defendant USC agrees to modify its policy prohibiting sexual harassment to broaden the scope of management personnel to whom complaints of sexual harassment may be submitted and which includes an affirmative statement prohibiting retaliation against those who submit sexual harassment complaints. The adopted policy is attached to this Decree as Exhibit "A." 3

MONETARY RELIEF 7. Defendant USC, in settlement of this dispute, shall pay to each Class Member the sum of money as set out by their name, for a total of $530,000.00, in a check, within ten days of the filing date of this Decree. Such payment shall be mailed directly to each Class Member at the following addresses: a. Elva Griffin $124,000,00 c/o Mr. William L. Sciba, m Cole, Cole & Easley, P.C. Attorney at Law 302 West Forrest Victoria, Texas 77902 b. Anita Heniges $76.000.00 c/o Mr. William L. Sciba, rh Cole, Cole & Easley, P.C. Attorney at Law 302 West Forrest Victoria, Texas 77902 c. Lynn Stoebner $76.000.00 c/o Mr. William L. Sciba, m Cole, Cole & Easley, P.C. Attorney at Law 302 West Forrest Victoria, Texas 77902 d. Aniyeritza Velazquez $124,000.00 c/o Mr. William L. Sciba, III Cole, Cole & Easley, P.C. Attorney at Law 302 West Forrest Victoria, Texas 77902 e. Amy Shipp $90.000.00 811 South Highway 35, Apt. 311 Rockport, Texas 78382 4

o f. Avelina (Abby) Garza $40.000.00 1114 Houston Street Livingston, Texas 77351-2433 A copy of each check and accompanying transmittal papers shall be contemporaneously forwarded to Robert B. Harwin, Regional Attorney, EEOC, 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229. TRAINING 8. Within 90 days of the entry of this Decree, USC shall provide to the EEOC evidence that all of its employees at the Formosa Plastics Olefins H facility have reviewed materials explaining that it is unlawful to do any of the following: (a) to have a hostile work environment on the basis of sex; (b) to demote or terminate an employee because of their sex; and (c) to retaliate against an employee because he or she complains of harassment or discrimination. These materials will identify what activities and conduct is protected under Title VH, and will explain the damaging effects which sex discrimination and retaliation have on its victims, their families, their co-workers, and the workplace environment. The EEOC shall approve the materials to be used, prior to this review. 9. Within ninety (90) days from the entry of this Decree, USC will provide two (2) hours of training to all officers, managers, and supervisory personnel of USC at the Formosa Plastics Olefins H facility. This training will be administered by the Law Offices of BAKER & HOSTETLER, L.L.P. and it shall explain the law relating to employment provisions of Title VH, including sex-based discrimination, hostile work environment, sexual harassment and retaliation. 5

o 10. Within ten (10) days after the completion of the training or review session, USC shall certify to EEOC, in writing, that die required training or review session has taken place and that required personnel attended. Such certification shall include: a. The date, location and duration of the training or review session; b. A copy of the registry of attendance which shall include the name and position or tide of each person in attendance; and c. Training materials. POSTING REQUIREMENT 11. Within ten (10) business days after entry of this Decree, USC shall post copies of the Notice attached as Exhibit "B" to this Decree at its Port Lavaca, Texas employment office in a conspicuous location easily accessible to and commonly frequented by employees. The Notice shall remain posted for the duration of this Decree. USC shall ensure that the posting is not altered, defaced or covered by any other material. MTXrKT.T ANEOUS PROVISIONS 12. USC shall bear the costs associated with administering and implementing the provisions of this Decree. 13. Except as provided in paragraph 12 of this Decree, the parties to this Decree shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Furthermore, the parties agree that pursuant to Section 706(k) of Tide VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(k), there is no "prevailing party" in this action or proceeding. 14. The terms of this Decree shall be binding upon the EEOC, Griffin, Herriges, Velazquez, Stoebner, Shipp, Garza, USC and their agents, officers, employees, servants, successors, and assigns, as to the issues resolved herein. 6

15. When this Decree requires the submission by USC of documents or other materials to EEOC, such documents or other materials shall be mailed to Robert B. Harwin, Regional Attorney, 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229. The Clerk shall furnish a copy hereof to each attorney of record. SO ORDERED AND ENTERED this Jl2 day of /Jl^*-mJk~-. JOHND.RAINEY" STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Respectfully Submitted, ERIC S. DRETBAND General Counsel JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel NANCY K PATTERSON Attorney-in-Charge State Bar No. 15603520 Federal I.D. No. 10221 V DfinCDTB WAOWTNI ROBERT B. HARWIN Regional Attorney District of Columbia Bar No. 076083 C. DEANS HERMS, JR. State Bar No. 24002265 Federal I.D. No. 27461 BAKER & HOSTETLER, L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana, Suite 2000 Houston, Texas 77002-5009 Telephone: (713)646-1339 Telecopier: (713)751-1717 G. TAYLORJ srvisory Trial Attdjfcey feas State Bar No. 19708300 Federal I.D. No. 14850 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, U.S. CONTRACTORS, LTD. 7

DAVID C. RIVELA Attomey-in-Charge Texas Slate Bar No. 00797324 Federal I.D. No. 32914 JENNIFER RANDALL Trial Attorney Colorado State Bar No. 033240 Federal I.D. No. 36033 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Antonio District Office 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 78229-3555 Telephone: (210) 281-7619 Telecopier: (210) 281-7669 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EEOC AMYSHJPP 811 South Highway 35, Apt. 311 Rockport, Texas 78382 AVEUNA (ABBY) GARZA 1114 Houston Street Livingston, Texas 77351-2433 WILLIAM L. SCIBA Attorney-in-Charge State Bar No. 00792824 Federal I.D. 19044 COLE, COLE & EASLEY, P.C. 302 West Forrest Street P.O. Drawer 510 Victoria, Texas 77902-0510 Telephone: (361)575-0551 Telecopier: (361)575-0986 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS, ELVA GRIFFIN, ANITA HERRIGES, ANIYERITZA VELAZQUEZ AND LYNN STOEBNER 8

Die-M-M 11:31; FrarEEOC c Z10-281-TG6! T-K3 P 013/014 F-H* JENNIFER RANDALL Trial Attorney Colorado State Bar No. 033240 Federal IX>. No. 36033 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Antonio District Office 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 78229-3555 Telephone: (210) 281-7619 Telecopier: (210) 281-7669 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFr EEOC AMY SHUT 811 South Highway 35, Apt. 311 Rockport, Texas 78382 AVELINA (ABBY) GARZA* 1114 Houston Street Livingston, Texas 77351-2433 WILLIAM L.SOBA Attorney-m-Charge State Bar No. 00792824 Federal LD. 19044 COLE, COLE & EASLEY. P.C. 302 West Forrest Street P.O. Drawer 510 Victoria, Texas 77902-0510 Telephone: (361)575-0551 Telecopier: (361)575-0986 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS, ELVA GRIFFIN, ANITA HBRRIGES, ANTYERITZA VELAZQUEZ AND LYNN STOEBNER C'orutnt D*cr*e PagnS

*ev*23-w tmsfw Frora-EEQC o 210-281-7668 T-211 P.OU/OU F-T1T JENNIFEB. RANDALL Trial Attorney Colorado State Bar No. 033240 Federal IJ3. No. 36033 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Antonio District Office 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 78229-3555 Telephone: (210) 281-7619 Telecopier (210) 28 V-7669 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EEOC Jw\ff AMYS: 811 South^tighway 35. Ap t 311 Rockpon, Texas 78382 AVELINA (ABBY) GARZA 1114 Houston Street Livingston, Texas 77351-2433 WILLIAM L. SCIBA Attoraey-in-Charge State Bar No. 00792824 Federal LD. 19044 COLE, COLE & EASLEY, P.C. 302 West Forrest Street P.O. Drawer 510 Victoria, Texas 77902-0510 Telephone: (361)575-0551 Telecopier: (361)575-0986 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS, ELVA GRIFFIN, ANTTA HERRICES, ANTYER1TZA VELAZQUEZ AND LYNN STOEBNER dmftnt decree Page 3