S AN ACT. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

Similar documents
Australia and Japan Cooperating for peace and stability Common Vision and Objectives

ASEAN. Overview ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE NINTH ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM SECURITY POLICY CONFERENCE PHNOM PENH, CAMBODIA, 25 MAY 2012

Trans-Pacific Trade and Investment Relations Region Is Key Driver of Global Economic Growth

17TH ASIA SECURITY SUMMIT THE IISS SHANGRI-LA DIALOGUE FIRST PLENARY SESSION US LEADERSHIP AND THE CHALLENGES OF INDO- PACIFIC SECURITY

Joint Statement of the 22 nd EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Brussels, Belgium, 21 January 2019

Japan s Position as a Maritime Nation

JOINT STATEMENT OF THE ASEAN-AUSTRALIA SPECIAL SUMMIT: THE SYDNEY DECLARATION. Sydney, Australia, 18 March 2018

Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2005

Cooperation on International Migration

The Missing Link: Multilateral Institutions in Asia and Regional Security

Japan s defence and security policy reform and its impact on regional security

Hearing on the U.S. Rebalance to Asia

Overview East Asia in 2006

Adopted on 14 October 2016

CHINA POLICY FOR THE NEXT U.S. ADMINISTRATION 183

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT ON THE FOURTH ASEAN DEFENCE MINISTERS MEETING-PLUS (4 TH ADMM-PLUS) MANILA, 24 OCTOBER 2017

Philippines U.S. pawn in its looming clash with China?

Partnering for Change, Engaging the World

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue: An Alignment of Policies for Common Benefit Ambassador Anil Wadhwa Vivekananda International Foundation

The Asia-Pacific as a Strategic Region for the European Union Tallinn University of Technology 15 Sep 2016

VISIONIAS

Joint Statement of the Ninth Mekong-Japan Summit

PRESS STATEMENT. BY THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE 9th ASEAN SUMMIT AND THE 7th ASEAN + 3 SUMMIT BALI, INDONESIA, 7 OCTOBER 2003

UN ESCAP Trade Facilitation Work programme: Selected tools for logistics performance improvement

Japan-Malaysia Joint Statement on Strategic Partnership May 25, 2015, Tokyo

Political-Security Pillar of ASEAN

Defense Minister s Participation in the 16th IISS Asia Security Summit and the Bilateral and Trilateral Defense Ministerial Meetings

American Legion Support for a U.S. Foreign Policy of "Democratic Activism"

CICP Policy Brief No. 8

8 September 2016, Vientiane, Lao PDR. Turning Vision into Reality for a Dynamic ASEAN Community

Asian Pacific Islander Catholics in the United States: A Preliminary Report 1

Trade Facilitation and Better Connectivity for an Inclusive Asia and Pacific

JAPAN-RUSSIA-US TRILATERAL CONFERENCE ON THE SECURITY CHALLENGES IN NORTHEAST ASIA

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen Remarks Prepared for Delivery to Chinese National Defense University Beij ing, China July 13,2000

What Defence White Papers have said about New Zealand: 1976 to 2009

Annex III: Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone

Workshop on implementation of resolution 1540 (2004) ASEAN Regional Forum 1, San Francisco, February 2007

Presented by Sarah O Keefe External Relations Officer European Representative Office Frankfurt, Germany

The Beijing Declaration on South-South Cooperation for Child Rights in the Asia Pacific Region

Summary of Policy Recommendations

Co-Chairs Summary Report

NPT/CONF.2015/PC.III/WP.29

Japan-Thailand Joint Press Statement on the Occasion of the Visit by Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha

Units 3 and 4: Global Politics

Issue: American Legion Statement of U.S. Foreign Policy Objectives

STI POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY MFT 1023

Globalization GLOBALIZATION REGIONAL TABLES. Introduction. Key Trends. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2009

The IISD Global Subsidies Initiative Barriers to Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Lessons Learned from Asia

Meeting of APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Sapporo, Japan 5-6 June Statement of the Chair

Contents. Preface... iii. List of Abbreviations...xi. Executive Summary...1. Introduction East Asia in

Strengthening Economic Integration and Cooperation in Northeast Asia

อาเซ ยน บทบาทในการเสร มสร างความม นคงในภ ม ภาค และความส มพ นธ ก บมหาอ านาจ 31 ต ลาคม 2556 อ. ภ ญญ ศ รประภาศ ร คณะร ฐศาสตร มหาว ทยาล ยธรรมศาสตร

APPENDIXES. 1: Regional Integration Tables. Table Descriptions. Regional Groupings. Table A1: Trade Share Asia (% of total trade)

Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Asia and the Pacific. Implementation Strategy

Unmasking the Regional Trade Agreements in Asia and the Pacific

Proliferation of FTAs in East Asia

ASEAN 2015: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Regionalism and multilateralism clash Asian style

SOCHI DECLARATION of the ASEAN-Russian Federation Commemorative Summit to Mark the 20 th Anniversary of ASEAN-Russian Federation Dialogue Partnership

Non-Traditional Maritime Security Cooperation in Southeast Asia

Population. C.4. Research and development. In the Asian and Pacific region, China and Japan have the largest expenditures on R&D.

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT OF THE 10 TH EAST ASIA SUMMIT KUALA LUMPUR, 22 NOVEMBER 2015 OUR PEOPLE, OUR COMMUNITY, OUR VISION

Visit of the President of the Republic of Chile, Ms. Michelle Bachelet, to Japan Joint Press Statement

Trade Mark Snapshot. Filing, Non-Use & Opposition ASIA PACIFIC 2016

Implementing the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Non-proliferation and regional security

The Development of Sub-Regionalism in Asia. Jin Ting 4016R330-6 Trirat Chaiburanapankul 4017R336-5

APEC s Bogor Goals Mid-Term Stock Taking and Tariff Reduction

United Nations Regional Centre for Peace and Disarmament in Asia and the Pacific

Second Regional Ministerial Conference on People Smuggling, Trafficking in Persons and Related Transnational Crime

SECURITY CHALLENGES IN THE ASIA- PACIFIC REGION: A US PERSPECTIVE

U.S.- Gulf Cooperation Council Camp David Joint Statement

Asian Development Bank

Information Meeting of States Parties to the World Heritage Convention. Friday 22 January 2003 Paris UNESCO Room IV

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT OF THE 5 TH EAST ASIA SUMMIT FOREIGN MINISTERS MEETING KUALA LUMPUR, 6 AUGUST 2015 OUR PEOPLE, OUR COMMUNITY, OUR VISION

Overview East Asia in 2010

ASEAN ANALYSIS: ASEAN-India relations a linchpin in rebalancing Asia

CSCAP WORKSHOP ON UNCLOS AND MARITIME SECURITY IN EAST ASIA MANILA, MAY 27, 2014

South China Sea: Realpolitik Trumps International Law

Aid for Trade and the Asian Development Bank. Asian Development Bank

Joint Statement between Japan and the State of Kuwait on Promoting and Expanding Cooperation under the Comprehensive Partnership

2017 National Security Strategy: Question and Answer

RESPONSES BY PRIME MINISTER LEE HSIEN LOONG TO QUESTIONS FROM AUSTRALIAN MEDIA

Basic Maritime Zones. Scope. Maritime Zones. Internal Waters (UNCLOS Art. 8) Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone

Honourable Minister of State for External Affairs, General VK Singh, Director of USI, LT Gen PK Singh, Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,

Brazil, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand and South Africa: draft resolution

U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

PLENARY SESSION FIVE Tuesday, 31 May Rethinking the Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality (ZOPFAN) in the Post-Cold War Era

External Partners in ASEAN Community Building: Their Significance and Complementarities

ASEAN: One Community, One Destiny.

ASEAN LEADERS VISION FOR A RESILIENT AND INNOVATIVE ASEAN

Asia- Pacific and the missing stability of the Pacific Asia. Stefano Felician Beccari

ASEAN Regional Forum. Work Plan for Counter Terrorism. and Transnational Crime

Remarks by Mr Sumio Kusaka, Ambassador of Japan Japan-U.S.-Australia relations and the Indo-Pacific Symposium Perth USAsia Centre

Chairs Summary of the PALM Third Ministerial Interim Meeting Tokyo, JAPAN 17 January 2017

Japan s Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy: What does it mean for the European Union?

Thailand s Contribution to the Regional Security By Captain Chusak Chupaitoon

REFERENCE NOTE. No.5/RN/Ref./March/2018 INDIA AND ASEAN

Inclusive Green Growth Index (IGGI): A New Benchmark for Well-being in Asia and the Pacific

Ⅰ Strategic Partnership for Shared Principles and Goals

Transcription:

TH CONGRESS D SESSION S. AN ACT To develop a long-term strategic vision and a comprehensive, multifaceted, and principled United States policy for the Indo-Pacific region, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 01. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS. The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec.. Findings. TITLE I UNITED STATES POLICY AND DIPLOMATIC STRATEGY IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION Sec. 1. Policy. Sec.. Diplomatic strategy. TITLE II PROMOTING UNITED STATES SECURITY INTERESTS IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION Sec. 01. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 0. Treaty alliances in the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 0. United States-China relationship. Sec. 0. United States-India strategic partnership. Sec. 0. United States-ASEAN strategic partnership. Sec. 0. United States-Republic of Korea-Japan trilateral security partnership. Sec. 0. Quadrilateral security dialogue. Sec. 0. Enhanced security partnerships in Southeast Asia. Sec. 0. Commitment to Taiwan. Sec.. North Korea strategy. Sec.. New Zealand. Sec. 1. The Pacific Islands. Sec. 1. Freedom of navigation and overflight; promotion of international law. Sec. 1. Combating terrorism in Southeast Asia. Sec. 1. Cybersecurity cooperation. Sec. 1. Nonproliferation and arms control in the Indo-Pacific region. TITLE III PROMOTING UNITED STATES ECONOMIC INTERESTS IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION Sec. 01. Findings; sense of Congress. Sec. 0. Trade negotiations, multilateral agreements, and regional economic summits. Sec. 0. United States-ASEAN economic partnership. Sec. 0. Trade capacity building and trade facilitation. Sec. 0. Intellectual property protection. Sec. 0. Energy programs and initiatives. Sec. 0. Lower Mekong initiative. Sec. 0. Sense of Congress on economic growth and natural resource conservation. Sec. 0. Sense of Congress in support of women s economic rights. S ES

TITLE IV PROMOTING UNITED STATES VALUES IN THE INDO- PACIFIC REGION Sec. 01. Findings. Sec. 0. Trafficking-in-persons. Sec. 0. Freedom of the press. Sec. 0. Democracy, human rights, and labor personnel. Sec. 0. Bilateral and regional dialogues; people-to-people engagement. Sec. 0. Association of Southeast Asian Nations Human Rights Strategy. Sec. 0. Freedom of information to North Korea. Sec. 0. Sense of Congress on imposition of sanctions and suspension of United States assistance. Sec. 0. Authorization of appropriations. Sec.. Indo-Pacific human rights defenders. Sec.. Young leaders people-to-people initiatives. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SEC.. FINDINGS. Congress makes the following findings: (1) The Indo-Pacific region (A) represents nearly 0 percent of the global population; (B) is home to some of the most dynamic economies in the world; and (C) poses security challenges that threaten to undermine United States national security interests, regional peace, and global stability. () The core tenets of the United States-backed international system are being challenged, including by (A) China s illegal construction and militarization of artificial features in the South China Sea and coercive economic practices; (B) North Korea s acceleration of its nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities; and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (C) the increased presence throughout Southeast Asia of the Islamic State (referred to in this Act as ISIS ) and other international terrorist organizations that threaten the United States. () The economic order in the Indo-Pacific region continues to transform, presenting opportunities and challenges to United States economic interests. () The United States has a fundamental interest in defending human rights and promoting the rule of law in the Indo-Pacific region. Although many countries in the region have improved the treatment of their citizens, several Indo-Pacific governments continue to commit human rights abuses and place restrictions on basic human rights and political and civil liberties. () Without strong leadership from the United States, the international system, fundamentally rooted in the rule of law, may wither, to the detriment of United States, regional, and global interests. It is imperative that the United States continue to play a leading role in the Indo-Pacific region by (A) defending peace and security; (B) advancing economic prosperity; and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (C) promoting respect for fundamental human rights. () In 0, the Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate held a series of hearings on United States leadership in the Indo-Pacific region, in which (A) experts, including Representative Randy Forbes, Ambassador Robert Gallucci, Ms. Tami Overby, Dr. Robert Orr, Ambassador Derek Mitchell, Ambassador Robert King, Mr. Murray Hiebert, and others detailed the security challenges, economic opportunities, and imperatives of promoting the rule of law, human rights, and democracy, in the Indo-Pacific region; and (B) Dr. Graham Allison, the Douglas Dillon Professor of Government at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, testified, As realistic students of history, Chinese leaders recognize that the role the United States has played since World War II as the architect and underwriter of regional stability and security has been essential to the rise of Asia, including China itself. But they be- S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 lieve that as the tide that brought the United States to Asia recedes, America must leave with it. Much as Britain s role in the Western Hemisphere faded at the beginning of the twentieth century, so must America s role in Asia as the region s historic superpower resumes its place.. () The United States National Security Strategy (referred to in this Act as the National Security Strategy ), which was released in December 0, states (A) A geopolitical competition between free and repressive visions of world order is taking place in the Indo-Pacific region. The region, which stretches from the west coast of India to the western shores of the United States, represents the most populous and economically dynamic part of the world. The United States interest in a free and open Indo-Pacific extends back to the earliest days of our republic. ; and (B) Our vision for the Indo-Pacific excludes no nation. We will redouble our commitment to established alliances and partnerships, while expanding and deepening relationships with new partners that share respect for sovereignty, fair and reciprocal trade, and the rule S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 of law. We will reinforce our commitment to freedom of the seas and the peaceful resolution of territorial and maritime disputes in accordance with international law. We will work with allies and partners to achieve complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula and preserve the non-proliferation regime in Northeast Asia.. TITLE I UNITED STATES POL- ICY AND DIPLOMATIC STRAT- EGY IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION SEC. 1. POLICY. It is the policy of the United States to develop and commit to a long-term strategic vision and a comprehensive, multifaceted, and principled United States policy for the Indo-Pacific region that (1) secures the vital national security interests of the United States and our allies and partners; () promotes American prosperity and economic interests by advancing economic growth and development of a rules-based Indo-Pacific economic community; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () advances American influence by reflecting the values of the American people and universal human rights; () supports functional problem-solving regional architecture; and () accords with and supports the rule of law and international norms. SEC.. DIPLOMATIC STRATEGY. It is the diplomatic strategy of the United States (1) to work with United States allies (A) to confront common challenges; (B) to improve information sharing; (C) to increase defense investment and trade; (D) to ensure interoperability; and (E) to strengthen shared capabilities; () to strengthen relationships with partners who (A) share mutual respect for the rule of law; (B) agree with fair and reciprocal trade; and (C) understand the importance of civil society, the rule of law, the free and reliable flow of information, and transparent governance; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () to support functional problem-solving regional architecture, including through the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, and the East Asia Summit; () to emphasize the commitment of the United States (A) to freedom of navigation under international law; (B) to promote peaceful resolutions of maritime and territorial disputes; and (C) to expand security and defense cooperation with allies and partners, as appropriate; () to pursue diplomatic measures to achieve complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea; () to improve civil society, strengthen the rule of law, and advocate for transparent governance; () to develop and grow the economy through private sector partnerships between the United States and Indo-Pacific partners; () to pursue multilateral and bilateral trade agreements in a free, fair, and reciprocal manner and build a network of partners in the Indo-Pacific committed to free markets; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () to work with and encourage Indo-Pacific countries (A) to pursue high-quality and transparent infrastructure projects; (B) to maintain unimpeded commerce, open sea lines or air ways, and communication; and (C) to seek the peaceful resolution of disputes; and () to sustain a strong military presence in the Indo-Pacific region and strengthen security relationships with allies and partners throughout the region. TITLE II PROMOTING UNITED STATES SECURITY INTERESTS IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION SEC. 01. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. (a) DEFINED TERM. In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means (1) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; () the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; () the Committee on Finance of the Senate; () the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and () the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated for the Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, and, as appropriate, the Department of Defense, $1,00,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 01 through 0, which shall be used (1) to advance United States foreign policy interests and objectives in the Indo-Pacific region in recognition of the value of diplomatic initiatives and programs in the furtherance of United States strategy; () to improve the defense capacity and resiliency of partner nations to resist coercion and deter and defend against security threats, including through foreign military financing and international military education and training programs; () to conduct regular bilateral and multilateral engagements, particularly with the United States most highly-capable allies and partners, to meet strategic challenges, including S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 (A) certain destabilizing activities of the People s Republic of China; and (B) emerging threats, such as the nuclear and ballistic missile programs of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea; () to build new counterterrorism partnership programs in Southeast Asia to combat the growing presence of ISIS and other terrorist organizations that pose a significant threat to the United States, its allies, and its citizens interests abroad; () to help partner countries strengthen their democratic systems, with a focus on good governance; () to ensure that the regulatory environments for trade, infrastructure, and investment in partner countries are transparent, open, and free of corruption; () to encourage responsible natural resource management in partner countries, which is closely associated with economic growth; and () to increase maritime domain awareness programs in South Asia and Southeast Asia (A) by expanding the scope of naval and coast guard training efforts with Southeast Asian countries; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 (B) by expanding cooperation with democratic partners in South Asia, including Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka; (C) through intelligence sharing and other information-sharing efforts; and (D) through multilateral engagements, including by involving Japan, Australia, and India in such efforts. (c) COUNTERING CHINA S INFLUENCE TO UNDER- MINE THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM. Amounts appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) shall be made available for United States Government efforts to counter the strategic influence of the People s Republic of China, in accordance with the strategy required under section 0(e)() of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 01 (division K of Public Law ; 1 Stat. ) and in consultation with the appropriate committees of Congress. (d) BURMA. None of the amounts appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) may be made available for International Military Education and Training and Foreign Military Financing Programs for the armed forces of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (historically known as Burma ). S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (e) PHILIPPINES. 1 (1) IN GENERAL. None of the amounts appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) may be made available for counternarcotics assistance for the Philippine National Police unless the Secretary of State determines and reports to the appropriate committees of Congress that the Government of the Philippines has adopted and is implementing a counternarcotics strategy that is consistent with international human rights standards, including investigating and prosecuting individuals who are credibly alleged to have ordered, committed, or covered up extrajudicial killings and other gross violations of human rights in the conduct of counternarcotics operations. () EXCEPTION. The limitation under paragraph (1) shall not apply to funds made available (A) for drug demand reduction, maritime programs, or transnational interdiction programs; or (B) to support for the development of such counternarcotics strategy, after consultation with the appropriate committees of Congress. (f) CAMBODIA. None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) may be made S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 available for United States assistance programs that benefit the Government of Cambodia unless the Secretary of State certifies and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that the requirements under section 0(b)(1) of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 01 (Public Law ) have been met. SEC. 0. TREATY ALLIANCES IN THE INDO-PACIFIC RE- GION. (a) UNITED STATES-JAPAN ALLIANCE. The United States Government (1) is committed to the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan, done at Washington, January 1,, and all related and subsequent bilateral security agreements and arrangements concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act; () recognizes the vital role of the alliance between the United States and Japan in promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region; and () calls for the strengthening and broadening of diplomatic, economic, and security ties between the United States and Japan. (b) UNITED STATES-REPUBLIC OF KOREA ALLI- ANCE. The United States Government S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 (1) is committed to the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea, done at Washington October 1, 1, and all related and subsequent bilateral security agreements and arrangements concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act; () recognizes the vital role of the alliance between the United States and South Korea in promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region; and () calls for the strengthening and broadening of diplomatic, economic, and security ties between the United States and the Republic of Korea. (c) UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA ALLIANCE. The United States Government (1) is committed to the Security Treaty Between Australia and the United States of America, done at San Francisco September 1,, and all related and subsequent bilateral security agreements and arrangements concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act; () recognizes the vital role of the alliance between the United States and Australia in promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region; and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () calls for the strengthening and broadening of diplomatic, economic, and security ties between the United States and Australia. (d) UNITED STATES-PHILIPPINES ALLIANCE. The United States Government is committed to the Mutual Defense Treaty between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America, done at Washington August 0,, and all related and subsequent bilateral security agreements and arrangements concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act, including the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, done at Manila April, 01. (e) THAILAND. The United States Government is committed to (1) the Agreement Respecting Military Assistance Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Thailand, done at Bangkok October, ; () the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, done at Manila September, 1; and () all related and subsequent bilateral security agreements and arrangements concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act, including the Joint Vision Statement for the Thai-United S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 States Defense Alliance, issued in Bangkok November 1, 01. SEC. 0. UNITED STATES-CHINA RELATIONSHIP. (a) IN GENERAL. The United States Government (1) expresses grave concerns with Chinese actions that seek (A) to further constrain space for civil society and religion within China; and (B) to undermine a rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific region; () encourages China to play a constructive role in world affairs by demonstrating consistent respect for the rule of law and international norms; () seeks to build a positive, cooperative, and comprehensive relationship with China (A) by expanding areas of cooperation; and (B) by addressing areas of disagreement, including over human rights, economic policies, and maritime security; and () is committed to working with China on shared regional and global challenges, especially (A) upholding and strengthening the rulesbased international system; and (B) the denuclearization of North Korea. S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that the United States should (1) welcome a decision by China to change course and pursue a responsible results-oriented relationship with the United States and engagement on global issues; () encourage China to play a constructive role in the Indo-Pacific region and globally; and () continue to call out Chinese actions that undermine the rules-based international system. SEC. 0. UNITED STATES-INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP. (a) IN GENERAL. The United States Government (1) recognizes the vital role of the strategic partnership between the United States and India in promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region; () calls for the strengthening and broadening of diplomatic, economic, and security ties between the United States and India; and () is committed to (A) the New Framework for the United States-India Defense Relationship, done at Arlington, Virginia on June, 00; (B) the United States-India Defense Technology and Trade Initiative, launched in 01; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 (C) the Joint Strategic Vision for the Indo- Pacific and Indian Ocean Region, announced on January, 01; (D) the United States-India Joint Statement on Prosperity Through Partnership, issued on June, 0; and (E) all related and subsequent bilateral and security agreements and arrangements concluded as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) INDIA AS MAJOR DEFENSE PARTNER. Congress makes the following findings: (1) Section 1(a)(1)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 0 (Public Law ; Stat. ; U.S.C. 1 note) requires the recognition of India as a major defense partner. () The designation of India as a major defense partner, which is unique to India (A) institutionalizes the progress made to facilitate defense trade and technology sharing between the United States and India; (B) elevates defense trade and technology cooperation between the United States and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 India to a level commensurate with the closest allies and partners of the United States; (C) facilitates technology sharing between the United States and India, including licensefree access to a wide range of dual-use technologies, after taking into account national security concerns; and (D) facilitates joint exercises, coordination on defense strategy and policy, military exchanges, and port calls in support of defense cooperation between the United States and India. SEC. 0. UNITED STATES-ASEAN STRATEGIC PARTNER- SHIP. (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that the United States should (1) support and reaffirm the elevation of the United States-Association of Southeast Asian Nations (referred to in this section as ASEAN ) relationship to a strategic partnership; () recommit to ASEAN centrality by helping build a strong, stable, politically cohesive, economically integrated, and socially responsible community of nations that has common rules, norms, procedures, and standards which are consistent with S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 international law and the principles of a rules-based Indo-Pacific community; () urge ASEAN to continue its efforts to foster greater integration among its members; () recognize the value of (A) ASEAN engagement with economic, political, and security partners within Asia and elsewhere, including Australia, Canada, the European Union, India, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan; and (B) strategic economic initiatives, such as activities under the United States ASEAN Trade and Investment Framework Arrangement and the United States-ASEAN Connect, which demonstrate a commitment to ASEAN and the ASEAN Economic Community and build upon economic relationships in the Indo-Pacific region; () support efforts by the nations comprising ASEAN (A) to address maritime and territorial disputes in a constructive manner; and (B) to pursue claims through peaceful, diplomatic, and legitimate regional and international arbitration mechanisms, consistent S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 with international law, including through the adoption of a code of conduct in the South China Sea to further promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region; () support efforts by United States partners and allies in ASEAN (A) to enhance maritime capability and maritime domain awareness; (B) to protect unhindered access to, and use of, international waterways in the Asia-Pacific region that are critical to ensuring the security and free flow of commerce; (C) to counter piracy; (D) to disrupt illicit maritime trafficking activities such as the trafficking of persons, goods, and drugs; and (E) to enhance the maritime capabilities of countries or regional organizations to respond to emerging threats to maritime security in the Asia-Pacific region; and () urge ASEAN member states to develop a common approach to reaffirm the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration s ruling with respect to the case between the Republic of the Philippines and the People s Republic of China. S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (b) REPORT ON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR EN- GAGEMENT WITH ASEAN. (1) IN GENERAL. Not later than days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the following years, the Secretary of State, in consultation with other Federal agencies, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees on a strategic framework to administer programs, projects, and activities of the United States to support diplomatic and economic engagement between the United States and ASEAN member countries for the -year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. () ELEMENTS. The report required under paragraph (1) shall address the following elements of United States strategy: (A) Promoting commercial engagement between the United States and member countries of ASEAN. (B) Helping member countries of ASEAN use sustainable, efficient, and innovative technologies in their respective energy sectors. (C) Supporting economic conditions in member countries of ASEAN that promote innovation, the creation of new businesses, sus- S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 tainable growth, and the education of the region s future innovators, entrepreneurs, and business leaders. (D) Working with member countries of ASEAN to improve the policy and regulatory environment for growth, trade, innovation, and investment. (E) Supporting the regional integration objectives of member countries of ASEAN under the ASEAN Economic Community. (F) Partnership opportunities with the governments of other countries friendly to the United States that have committed to a high set of standards for investment and development with ASEAN, as determined by the Secretary of State. SEC. 0. UNITED STATES-REPUBLIC OF KOREA-JAPAN TRI- LATERAL SECURITY PARTNERSHIP. It is the sense of Congress that the President should develop a strategy to deepen the trilateral security cooperation between the United States, South Korea, and Japan, including missile defense, intelligence-sharing, and other defense-related initiatives. SEC. 0. QUADRILATERAL SECURITY DIALOGUE. It is the sense of Congress that S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (1) the security dialogue between the United States, Australia, India, and Japan is vital to address pressing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region in order to promote (A) a rules-based order; (B) respect for international law; and (C) a free and open Indo-Pacific; and () such a dialogue is intended to augment, rather than to replace, current mechanisms. SEC. 0. ENHANCED SECURITY PARTNERSHIPS IN SOUTH- EAST ASIA. (a) INDONESIA. The United States Government is committed to (1) the United States-Indonesia Comprehensive Partnership, done in Washington November, 0; () the Joint Statement on Comprehensive Defense Cooperation, done in Washington October, 01; and () all related and subsequent bilateral and security agreements and arrangements between the United States and Indonesia concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) MALAYSIA. The United States Government is committed to S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (1) the United States-Malaysia Comprehensive Partnership, done at Putrajaya April, 01; () the Joint Statement for Enhancing the Comprehensive Partnership between the United States of America and Malaysia, done in Washington September 1, 0; and () all related and subsequent bilateral and security agreements and arrangements between the United States and Malaysia concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) SINGAPORE. The United States Government is committed to (1) the Strategic Framework Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Singapore for a Closer Cooperation Partnership in Defense and Security, done at Washington July 1, 00; () the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, done at Arlington, Virginia December, 01; and () all related and subsequent bilateral and security agreements and arrangements between the United States and Singapore concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act. S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (d) VIETNAM. The United States Government is committed to (1) the United States-Vietnam Comprehensive Partnership, done at Washington December 1, 01; () the United StatesVietnam Joint Vision Statement on Defense Relations, done at Hanoi on June 1, 01; () the United StatesVietnam Joint Vision Statement, done at Washington May 1, 0; and () all related and subsequent bilateral and security agreements and arrangements between the United States and Vietnam concluded on or before the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that the United States should deepen diplomatic, economic, and security cooperation, especially in the areas of maritime security and counterterrorism, with Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam. SEC. 0. COMMITMENT TO TAIWAN. (a) UNITED STATES COMMITMENT TO TAIWAN. It is the policy of the United States (1) to support the close economic, political, and security relationship between Taiwan and the United States; S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () to faithfully enforce all existing United States Government commitments to Taiwan, consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act of (Public Law ), the joint communiques, and the Six Assurances agreed to by President Ronald Reagan in July 1; and () to counter efforts to change the status quo and to support peaceful resolution acceptable to both sides of the Taiwan Strait. (b) ARMS SALES TO TAIWAN. The President should conduct regular transfers of defense articles to Taiwan that are tailored to meet the existing and likely future threats from the People s Republic of China, including supporting the efforts of Taiwan to develop and integrate asymmetric capabilities, as appropriate, including mobile, survivable, and cost-effective capabilities, into its military forces. (c) TRAVEL. The President should encourage the travel of highlevel United States officials to Taiwan, in accordance with the Taiwan Travel Act (Public Law 1). SEC.. NORTH KOREA STRATEGY. (a) FINDINGS. Congress makes the following findings: S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 (1) The Government of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea has flagrantly defied the international community by illicitly developing its nuclear and ballistic missile programs, in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1 (00), 1 (00), 0 (01), 0 (01), 0 (01), 1 (01), 1 (0), (0), and (0). () The Government of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea engages in gross human rights abuses against its own people and citizens of other countries, including the United States, the Republic of Korea, and Japan. () The United States is committed to pursuing a peaceful denuclearization of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea through a policy of maximum pressure and engagement, in close concert with its partners. (b) POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO SANCTIONS AGAINST THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE S RE- PUBLIC OF KOREA. (1) STATEMENT OF POLICY. It is the policy of the United States to continue to impose sanctions with respect to activities of the Government of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea, persons act- S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 ing for or on behalf of such government, or other persons in accordance with Executive Order (0 U.S.C. 01 note; relating to blocking property of certain persons with respect to North Korea), Executive Order 1 (0 U.S.C. 01 note; relating to imposing additional sanctions), Executive Order 1 (0 U.S.C. 01 note; relating to blocking the property of certain persons engaging in significant malicious cyberenabled activities), Executive Order (0 U.S.C. 01 note; relating to blocking the property of the Government of North Korea and the Workers Party of Korea, and prohibiting certain transactions with respect to North Korea), and Executive Order 0 ( Fed. Reg. 0; relating to imposing additional sanctions with respect to North Korea), as such Executive orders are in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, until the Democratic People s Republic of Korea is no longer engaged in the illicit activities described in such Executive orders, including actions in violation of the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1). () REPORT. Not later than 0 days after terminating any sanction with respect to the activities S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 of the Government of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea, a person acting for or on behalf of such government, or any other person provided for in an Executive order listed in subsection (a), the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees justifying the termination of the sanction and explaining the relationship between such termination and the cessation of any illicit activity that violates any of the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1) by such Government or person. The reporting requirement under this paragraph shall terminate on the date that is years after the date of the enactment of this Act. () RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the authority of the President pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (0 U.S.C. 01 et seq.). (c) POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO NEGOTIATION ON THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE S RE- PUBLIC OF KOREA S NUCLEAR AND BALLISTIC MISSILE PROGRAMS. It is the policy of the United States that the objective of negotiations with respect to the nuclear and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ballistic missile programs of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea be the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantlement of such programs. (d) REPORT ON A STRATEGY TO ADDRESS THE THREATS POSED BY, AND THE CAPABILITIES OF, THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF KOREA. (1) IN GENERAL. Not later than 0 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every days thereafter for the following years, the Secretary of State, or a designee of the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that describes actions taken by the United States to address the threats posed by, and the capabilities of, the Democratic People s Republic of Korea. () ELEMENTS. Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include (A) a summary of ongoing efforts by the United States to identify strategies and policies, including an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of such strategies and policies (i) to achieve peaceful denuclearization of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea; and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (ii) to eliminate the threat posed by the ballistic missile program of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea; (B) an assessment of (i) potential road maps toward peaceful denuclearization of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea and the elimination of the nuclear and ballistic missile threats posed by the Democratic People s Republic of Korea; and (ii) specific actions that the Democratic People s Republic of Korea would need to take for each such roadmap to become viable; (C) a summary of the United States strategy to increase international coordination and cooperation, whether unilaterally, bilaterally, or multilaterally, including sanctions enforcement and interdiction, to address the threat posed by the nuclear and ballistic missile programs of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea, which shall include (i) a description of the actions taken by the Secretary of State, or designees of the Secretary, to consult with governments S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 around the world, with the purpose of inducing such governments to fully implement the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1); (ii) a description of the actions taken by such governments to fully implement United Nations Security Council resolutions related to the Democratic People s Republic of Korea; (iii) a list of countries with governments that the Secretary has determined are noncooperative with respect to implementing the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1); and (iv) a plan of action to engage, and increase cooperation with respect to the Democratic People s Republic of Korea, with the governments of the countries on the list described in clause (iii); (D) an assessment of the adequacy of the national export control regimes of countries that are members of the United Nations, and multilateral export control regimes, that are necessary to enforce sanctions imposed with re- S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 spect to the Democratic People s Republic of Korea pursuant to the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1); and (E) an action plan to encourage and assist countries in adopting and using authorities necessary to enforce export controls required by United Nations Security Council resolutions. () FORM OF REPORT. Each report required under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (e) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that (1) representatives of the United States shall use the voice and vote of the United States in all international organizations, as appropriate, to advocate for the expulsion of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea from such organizations, until such time as the Democratic People s Republic of Korea meets its commitments under the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1); and () the Secretary of State should work to induce countries to meet their commitments under the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 to in subsection (a)(1), including by considering appropriate adjustments to the diplomatic posture and foreign assistance of the United States with governments that the Secretary has determined are noncooperative with respect to implementing the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to in subsection (a)(1). SEC.. NEW ZEALAND. The United States Government is committed to (1) the Wellington Declaration, signed on November, 0, which reaffirmed close ties and outlined future practical cooperation between the United States and New Zealand; () the Washington Declaration, signed on June 1, 01, which strengthened the defense relationship by providing a framework and strategic guidance for security cooperation and defense dialogues; and () all related and subsequent bilateral and security agreements and arrangements between the United States and New Zealand concluded on or before the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 1. THE PACIFIC ISLANDS. (a) IN GENERAL. It is the sense of Congress that the United States should S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (1) support strong United States engagement with the nations of the South Pacific, including Fiji, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu; () deepen its cooperation with the nations of the South Pacific in areas of mutual interest, including (A) fisheries and marine resource conservation; (B) environmental challenges and resilience; (C) global health; (D) development and trade; and (E) people-to-people ties; and () continue to provide assistance to the Pacific Islands, as appropriate, to support the rule of law, good governance, and economic development. (b) UNITED STATES-COMPACTS OF FREE ASSOCIA- TION. It is the sense of Congress that the Compacts of Free Association entered between the United States and the Freely Associated States (Republic of Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau) S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (1) enhance the strategic posture of the United States in the Western Pacific; () reinforce United States regional commitment; () preempt potential adversaries from establishing positional advantage; and () further self-governance, economic development, and self-sufficiency of the Freely Associated States. SEC. 1. FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION AND OVERFLIGHT; PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. (a) FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION. It is the policy of the United States (1) to conduct, as part of its global Freedom of Navigation Program, regular freedom of navigation, and overflight operations in the Indo-Pacific region, in accordance with applicable international law; and () to promote genuine multilateral negotiations to peacefully resolve maritime disputes in the South China Sea, in accordance with applicable international law. (b) JOINT INDO-PACIFIC DIPLOMATIC STRATEGY. It is the sense of Congress that the President should develop a diplomatic strategy that includes working with United States allies and partners to conduct joint mari- S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 time training and freedom of navigation operations in the Indo-Pacific region, including the East China Sea and the South China Sea, in support of a rules-based international system benefitting all countries. SEC. 1. COMBATING TERRORISM IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. (a) DEFINITIONS. In this section: (1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CON- GRESS. The term appropriate committees of Congress means (A) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and (D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. () ISIS. The term ISIS means the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. (b) REPORT. Not later than days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and other appropriate Federal officials, shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress that contains an assessment of the current S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 and future capabilities and activities of ISIS-linked, al- Qaeda-linked, and other violent extremist groups in Southeast Asia that pose a significant threat to the United States, its allies, and its citizens interests abroad. (c) ELEMENTS. The report required under subsection (b) shall include (1) the current number of ISIS-linked, al- Qaeda-linked, and other violent extremist group-affiliated fighters in Southeast Asia; () an estimate of the number of ISIS-linked, al-qaeda-linked, and other violent extremist groupaffiliated fighters expected to return to Southeast Asia from fighting in the Middle East; () an analysis of the amounts and sources of ISIS-linked, al Qaeda-linked, and other various extremist group affiliated-fighters in Southeast Asia; () the current resources available to combat the threat of ISIS-linked, al-qaeda-linked, and other violent extremist group-affiliated fighters in Southeast Asia, and the additional resources required to combat such threat; () a detailed assessment of the capabilities of ISIS-linked, al-qaeda-linked, and other violent extremist group-affiliated fighters to operate effectively S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 in the Indo-Pacific region, including the Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia; () a description of the capabilities and resources of governments in Southeast Asia to counter violent extremist groups; and () a list of additional United States resources and capabilities that the Department of Defense and the Department of State recommend providing to governments in Southeast Asia to combat violent extremist groups. SEC. 1. CYBERSECURITY COOPERATION. (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that there should be robust cybersecurity cooperation between the United States and nations in the Indo- Pacific region (1) to effectively respond to cybersecurity threats, including state-sponsored threats; () to share best practices to combat such threats; () to strengthen resilience against cyberattacks, misinformation, and propaganda; and () to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure. (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated $0,000,000 for each S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 of the fiscal years 01 through 0 to enhance cooperation between the United States and Indo-Pacific nations for the purposes of combatting cybersecurity threats. SEC. 1. NONPROLIFERATION AND ARMS CONTROL IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION. (a) IN GENERAL. The United States Government (1) recognizes that the spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, and their means of delivery, constitutes a threat to international peace and security; () seeks to peacefully address the unique challenge posed to regional and global stability by the illicit use, and the proliferation to and from North Korea, of sensitive nuclear and missile technologies, and other weapons of mass destruction; () notes efforts by China and Russia (A) to expand and modernize their respective nuclear arsenals, including through significant research and development resources in hypersonic glide vehicles and other advanced technologies; and (B) to pursue sales of commercial nuclear technologies; and S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 () recognizes the legitimate pursuit by many countries in the Indo-Pacific region of nuclear energy for a variety of peaceful applications. (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government should undertake all reasonable and appropriate efforts to pursue effective arms control and nonproliferation policies in the Indo- Pacific region to limit the further spread of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. TITLE III PROMOTING UNITED STATES ECONOMIC INTER- ESTS IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION SEC. 01. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS. (a) FINDINGS. Congress makes the following findings: (1) According to the United States Chamber of Commerce, by 00 (A) percent of the global middle class population will be living in Asia; and (B) percent of middle class consumption will take place in Asia. () According to the Asian Development Bank S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (A) Asian countries have signed bilateral or regional trade agreements; and (B) more trade agreements with Asian countries are under negotiation or concluded and awaiting entry into force. () Free trade agreements between the United States and nations in the Indo-Pacific region (Australia, Singapore, and the Republic of Korea) have entered into force. () The member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (referred to in this section as ASEAN ), as a group (A) represent the fifth largest economy in the world; and (B) have a combined gross domestic product of $,00,000,000,000. () The economy comprised of ASEAN member states grew by percent between 00 and 01, and the total value of bilateral trade between the United States and ASEAN member states has increased by percent since 00. () In 01, the trade surplus of goods sold by companies in ASEAN member states to consumers in the United States was $,000,000,000, while the United States 01 trade surplus of services pro- S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 vided to consumers in ASEAN member states was $,000,000,000. () According to US-ASEAN Business Council, goods and services exported from the United States to ASEAN member states support 0,000 jobs in the United States. () According to the Business Roundtable (A) the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam were responsible for a combined 0 percent of global gross domestic product in 0; and (B) United States bilateral trade with the other nations referred to in subparagraph (A) supports 1,00,000 jobs in the United States. () According to the United States National Security Strategy (A) ASEAN and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation remain centerpieces of the Indo- Pacific s regional architecture and platforms for promoting an order based on freedom ; and (B) the United States will work with partners to build a network of states dedicated to free markets and protected from forces that would subvert their sovereignty.. S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that trade between the United States and the nations in the Indo-Pacific region is vitally important to the United States economy, United States exports, and jobs in the United States. SEC. 0. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS, MULTILATERAL AGREE- MENTS, AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMITS. Congress supports (1) multilateral, bilateral, or regional trade agreements that increase United States employment and expand the economy; () formal economic dialogues that include concrete, verifiable, and measured outcomes; () high-standard bilateral investment treaties between the United States and nations in the Indo- Pacific region; () negotiations of the Trade in Services Agreement and the Environmental Goods Agreement that include several major Asian economies; and () the proactive, strategic, and continuing high-level use of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, the East Asia Summit, and the Group of 0 to pursue United States economic objectives in the Indo-Pacific region. S ES

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 SEC. 0. UNITED STATES-ASEAN ECONOMIC PARTNER- SHIP. The President should seek to develop to negotiate a comprehensive economic engagement framework with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. SEC. 0. TRADE CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRADE FACILI- TATION. (a) IN GENERAL. The President is encouraged to produce a robust and comprehensive trade capacity building and trade facilitation strategy, including leveling the playing field for American companies competing in the Indo-Pacific region. (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out subsection (a). SEC. 0. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION. (a) IN GENERAL. The President should takes steps to strengthen the enforcement of United States intellectual property laws as a top priority, including taking all appropriate action to deter and punish commercial cyberenabled theft of intellectual property. (b) ANNUAL REPORT. Not later than days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the following years, the President shall submit a report to Congress that S ES