IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Filing # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

3:18-cv MGL Date Filed 07/31/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

Case 0:17-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

Case 2:14-cv NVW Document 1 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.

D-1-GN Cause No. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

/ Court: 055

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

DC NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONROE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/13/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

Filing # E-Filed 01/09/ :13:29 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 269 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patrick Hardy, by and through his attorney, Joshua D.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 6:19-cv ADA-JCM Document 1 Filed 01/22/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

Case: 4:18-cv JAR Doc. #: 1-1 Filed: 02/20/18 Page: 1 of 22 PageID #: 7. Exhibit A - Pleadings Served on Apple

2/25/2019 4:13 PM 19CV08567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION. Defendants. )

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

: : : : : : FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. COMES NOW TIANNA SMITH, Plaintiff in the above-captioned action, and hereby INTRODUCTION

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Filing # E-Filed 08/31/ :25:22 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

2013 WL (N.Y.Sup.) (Trial Pleading) Lillyan ROSENBERG and Gerald Rosenberg, Plaintiffs,

Case 5:15-cv gwc Document 1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Case 3:15-cv SMY-DGW Document 1 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 46 Page ID #1

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 3:13-cv Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/22/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Plaintiff, for his cause of action against Defendants, alleges that: PARTIES

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

Plaintiff, JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Pro Se, hereby files this Response to the Motion to. Introduction

Case 2:12-cv ABJ Document 1 Filed 05/02/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

Case 2:17-cv JS-GRB Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

CAUSE NO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

SUMMONS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION 2017-CP-42- COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv B Document 1 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

CC A CAUSE NO. STEVEN AKIN, IN COUNTY COURT

Case 3:17-cv SRU Document 1 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. ADRIAN LOVELL, Civil Action No.

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND. Plaintiffs Furlandare Singleton, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI CANDACE J. HIGGINS, individually, and as next friend of CAYLEE STRONG, Cause No. a minor, Division No. 1 Plaintiffs, v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEEP DISCOUNTS, LLC Serve: Registered Agent Elliott E. Curtis 988 Keeneland Road Florissant, M0 63034 and DEEP DISCOUNTS WAREHOUSE RETAILER, LLC Serve: Registered Agent Elliott E. Curtis 988 Keeneland Road Florissant, M0 63034 and PELONIS APPLIANCES, INC. Serve: Registered Agent Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company 211 E. 7 th Street, Suite 620 Austin, TX 78701 and 1722-CC11847

PELONIS USA, LTD. Serve: Sam S. Pelonis Treasurer and last known officer 97 Great Valley Parkway Malvern PA 19355 and PELONIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Serve: Officer or Person in Charge 444 Creamery Way, Suite 500 Exton, PA 19341 and SAM PELONIS d/b/a PELONIS HEATING PRODUCTS Serve: Sam Pelonis 97 Great Valley Parkway Malvern PA 19355 MIDEA (U.S.A., INC. Serve: Registered Agent Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company 211 E. 7 th Street, Suite 620 Austin, TX 78701 and MIDEA AMERICA CORP. Serve: Registered Agent Mitchell F. Green 4000 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 485 South Hollywood, FL 33021 2

and BETTY ELDER Serve: Betty Elder 10107 Viscount Dr. St. Louis, MO 63136 Defendants. PETITION COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, and for their Petition against Defendants, state as follows: PARTIES 1. At all times pertinent hereto, Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins is a resident of the State of Missouri, is the surviving natural mother of the decedent, Cadis Strong, a minor, (hereinafter, Cadis, authorized by RSMo 537.080 to bring this cause of action on behalf of the decedent and also the natural mother, legal guardian and next friend of Caylee Strong, a minor. 2. At all times pertinent hereto, Defendant Deep Discounts, LLC (hereinafter, Deep Discounts was a Missouri Limited Liability Company, a resident and citizen of the State of Missouri, engaged in the business of selling merchandise and products, including space heaters, to the public. 3. At all times pertinent hereto, Defendant Discounts Warehouse Retailer, LLC (hereinafter, Deep Discounts Warehouse was a Missouri Limited Liability Company, a resident and citizen of the State of Missouri, engaged in the business of selling merchandise and products, including space heaters, to the public. 4. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Pelonis Appliances, Inc. (hereinafter, Pelonis Appliances was a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Texas, 3

doing business in Missouri, and engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling Pelonis electric radiator heaters, including model HO-0250H, which is the subject of this lawsuit. (hereinafter, Space Heater. 5. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Pelonis USA, LTD (hereinafter, Pelonis USA was a New York company, with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania, doing business in Missouri, and engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling the Space Heater. 6. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Pelonis Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter, Pelonis Technologies was a New York company, with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania, doing business in Missouri, and engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling the Space Heater. 7. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Sam Pelonis, d/b/a Pelonis Heating Products (hereinafter, Pelonis Heating was a resident and citizen of the State of Pennsylvania, doing business as Pelonis Heating Products in Missouri, and engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling the Space Heater. 8. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Midea (U.S.A., Inc. (hereinafter, Midea U.S.A. was a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Texas, doing business in Missouri, and engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling Pelonis electric radiator heaters, including the Space Heater. 9. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Midea America Corp. (hereinafter, Midea America was a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida, doing business in Missouri, and engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling Pelonis electric radiator heaters, including the Space Heater. 4

10. At all pertinent times hereto, Defendant Betty Elder, (hereinafter, Elder was a resident and citizen of the State of Missouri. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 11. At all pertinent times, Defendants Pelonis Appliances, Pelonis USA, Pelonis Technologies, Pelonis Heating, Midea (U.S.A., Midea America were engaged in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, distributing, marketing and selling electric space heaters, including, the Space Heater, which was sold in Missouri and harmed Plaintiffs in Missouri. 12. At all pertinent times, Defendants Pelonis Appliances, Pelonis USA, Pelonis Technologies, Pelonis Heating, Midea (U.S.A., and Midea America regularly transact business in the State of Missouri, maintain continuous and systematic business contacts within the State of Missouri, derive a substantial revenue from goods used or consumed in the State of Missouri, and purposely directs business activities, including the sale of electric space heaters to Missouri residents and businesses. This cause of action arises out of these contacts with the State of Missouri as this action relates to the sale of the Space Heater which was sold in the State of Missouri to a Missouri resident for use in Missouri, where the death and injuries in question occurred. 13. Plaintiffs were first injured and harmed in the City of St. Louis from Defendants actions/omissions and/or the Space Heater and therefore venue is proper in the City of St. Louis. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS 14. On January 8, 2015, Defendants Deep Discounts and Deep Discounts Warehouse sold the Space Heater at their store located in the City of St. Louis for use at Plaintiffs residence located at 3965a N. 21 st Street, in the City of St. Louis. (hereinafter, Residence. 5

15. On or about February 13, 2015 at 4:45 a.m., the Plaintiffs were asleep in their Residence when the Space Heater overheated, and exploded, causing a fire, with extensive smoke, resulting in the death of Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins daughter, Cadis Strong, an 8 year old little girl, and injuring Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins daughter, Caylee Strong, a 7 year old little girl. (hereinafter, Occurrence. COUNT I NEGLIGENCE AGAINST DEFENDANTS DEEP DISCOUNTS AND DEEP DISCOUNTS WAREHOUSE COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count I of their Petition against Defendants Deep Discounts and Deep Discounts Warehouse, state the following: 16. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 17. Defendants inspected, distributed, marketed, and sold the Space Heater for use in Plaintiffs Residence and Defendants, by and through their agents, servants and/or employees, who were at all times pertinent hereto, acting within the course and scope of their employment. 18. Defendants failed to exercise ordinary care in the inspection, distribution, marketing and sale of the Space Heater, and that Defendants were negligent in one or more of the following respects: a. Defendants marketed and sold the Space Heater, a model of which had been known to overheat and explode; b. Defendants failed to adequately inspect the Space Heater; or c. Defendants failed to adequately warn Plaintiffs of the dangers of the Space Heater, including prior incidents, where the model had exploded. 19. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death, as a result of her injuries; Cadis 6

sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiffs Candace J. Higgins and Caylee have incurred the loss of their daughter and sister Cadis consortium, services, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 20. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace Gamble have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT II STRICT LIABILITYAGAINST DEFENDANTS DEEP DISCOUNTS AND DEEP DISCOUNTS WAREHOUSE COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count II of their Petition against Defendants Deep Discounts and Deep Discounts Warehouse, state the following: 21. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 22. The Space Heater was distributed and sold by Defendants in an unreasonably dangerous and defective condition when put to a reasonably anticipated use in one or more of the following respects: 7

a. The Space Heater design allowed it to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard; b. The materials specified in the design and/or used in the manufacture of the Space Heater, specifically the Overheat Protection System, (hereinafter, OPS, were insufficient and inappropriate for their intended use, in that they did not adequately allow adequate pressure release before overheating causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard. 23. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective design and manufacture of the Space Heater, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death; Cadis sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiffs Candace J. Higgins has incurred the loss of her daughter Cadis consortium, services, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 24. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective design and manufacture of the Space Heater, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace Higgins have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 8

COUNT III STRICT LIABILITY FAILURE TO WARN - AGAINST DEFENDANTS DEEP DISCOUNTS AND DEEP DISCOUNTS WAREHOUSE COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count III of their Petition against Defendants Deep Discounts and Deep Discounts Warehouse, state the following: 25. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 26. Defendants sold the Space Heater in the course of Defendants business. 27. The Space Heater was unreasonably dangerous when put to its reasonably anticipated use without knowledge of its characteristics. 28. The Space Heater did not have adequate instructions or warnings concerning the safe methods of use and/or an adequate warning of the dangers, as referenced herein, specifically it failed to have proper warnings regarding its propensity to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, which could release hot oil, a fire hazard, and/or failed to warn regarding the insufficiency of the materials used to manufacture the Space Heater. 29. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective warnings of the Space Heater, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death; Cadis sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiffs Candace J. Higgins has incurred the loss of her daughter Cadis consortium, services, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 30. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective warnings of the Space Heater, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace J. 9

Higgins have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT IV NEGLIGENCE AGAINST DEFENDANTS PELONIS APPLIANCES, PELONIS USA, PELONIS TECHNOLOGIES, PELONIS HEATING, MIDEA (U.S.A., MIDEA AMERICA COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count IV of their Petition against Defendants Pelonis Appliances, Pelonis (U.S.A., Pelonis Technologies, Pelonis Heating, Midea USA, and Midea America, state the following: 31. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 32. Defendants designed, tested, manufactured, inspected, distributed, marketed, and sold the Space Heater for use in Plaintiffs Residence and Defendants, by and through their agents, servants and/or employees, who were at all times pertinent hereto, acting within the course and scope of their employment. 33. Defendants failed to exercise ordinary care in the design, testing, manufacturing, inspection, distribution, marketing and sale of the Space Heater, and that Defendants were negligent in one or more of the following respects: a. Defendants negligently designed the Space Heater s OPS, by allowing it to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard; 10

b. Defendants negligently tested the Space Heater, by allowing it to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard; c. Defendants negligently manufactured the Space Heater s OPS, using improper materials, which allowed it to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard; d. Defendants negligently inspected the Space Heater, which allowed it to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard; e. Defendants negligently distributed, marketed and sold the Space Heater, which had been known to overheat and explode; f. Defendants negligently failed to adequately warn consumers, including Plaintiffs, of the dangers of the Space Heater, including prior incidents where the model had exploded; or g. Defendants negligently failed to recall the Space Heater. 34. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death; Cadis sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins has incurred the loss of her daughter Cadis consortium, services, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 35. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace J. Higgins have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. 11

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT V STRICT LIABILITYAGAINST AGAINST DEFENDANTS PELONIS APPLIANCES, PELONIS USA, PELONIS TECHNOLOGIES, PELONIS HEATING, MIDEA (U.S.A., AND MIDEA AMERICA COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count V of their Petition against Defendants Pelonis Appliances, Pelonis USA, Pelonis Technologies, Pelonis Heating, Midea (U.S.A. and Midea America state the following: 36. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 37. The Space Heater was designed, tested, manufactured, inspected, distributed, marketed and sold by Defendants in an unreasonably dangerous and defective condition when put to a reasonably anticipated use in one or more of the following respects: a. The Space Heater s design, allowed it to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard; b. The materials specified in the design and/or used in the manufacture of the Space Heater s OPS were insufficient and inappropriate for their intended use, in that they did not adequately allow adequate pressure release before overheating causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard. 38. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective design and manufacture of the Space Heater, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death; Cadis sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins has incurred the loss of her daughter Cadis consortium, services, 12

companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 39. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective design and manufacture of the Space Heater, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace J. Higgins have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT VI STRICT LIABILITY FAILURE TO WARN - AGAINST DEFENDANTS PELONIS APPLIANCES, PELONIS USA, PELONIS TECHNOLOGIES, PELONIS HEATING, MIDEA (U.S.A., AND MIDEA AMERICA COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count VI of their Petition against Defendants Pelonis Appliances, Pelonis USA, Pelonis Technologies, Pelonis Heating, Midea (U.S.A., and Midea America, state the following: 40. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 41. Defendants designed, tested, manufactured, inspected, distributed and sold the Space Heater in the course of Defendants business. 42. The Space Heater was unreasonably dangerous when put to its reasonably anticipated use without knowledge of its characteristics. 13

43. The Space Heater did not have adequate instructions or warnings concerning the safe methods of use and/or an adequate warning of the dangers, as referenced herein, specifically it failed to have proper warnings regarding its propensity to overheat, without shutting off, causing the chambers to rupture and explode, which released hot oil, a fire hazard, and/or failed to warn regarding the insufficiency of the materials used to manufacture the Space Heater. 44. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective warnings of the Space Heater, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death; Cadis sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins has incurred the loss of her daughter Cadis consortium, services, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 45. As a direct and proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective warnings of the Space Heater, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace J. Higgins have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 14

COUNT VII NEGLIGENCE AGAINST DEFENDANT ELDER COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, pleading in the alternative, and for Count VII of their Petition against Defendant Elder, state the following: 46. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 47. At all pertinent times Defendant Elder owned the Residence. 48. Prior to the Occurrence, beginning on or about January 6, 2015, Plaintiffs were tenants and/or guests of tenants in the Residence. 49. The Residence was inspected, maintained, repaired and leased by Defendant Elder, by and through her agents, servants and employees, who had the duty to use ordinary care to inspect, maintain and repair the Residence before leasing it, which included providing working smoke detectors. 50. Defendant Elder failed to exercise ordinary care in the inspection, repair, maintenance, and/or lease of the Residence, and was negligent in one or more of the following respects: a. Defendant Elder negligently failed to inspect the Residence; b. Defendant Elder negligently failed to maintain or repair the Residence; c. Defendant Elder negligently failed to obtain building permits or other required inspections by the City of St. Louis before leasing the Residence; d. Defendant Elder negligently hired, trained, and supervised employees or third parties to inspect, maintain, repair, and/or warn of dangers in the Residence before leasing it; or e. Defendant Elder negligently failed to adequately warn tenants and/or guests of tenants, including Plaintiffs, of the dangers of the Residence, including that it lacked operational smoke detectors. 15

51. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant Elder, as described herein, Cadis was injured, eventually resulting in her death; Cadis sustained substantial pain and suffering until her death; and Plaintiff Candace J. Higgins has incurred the loss of her daughter Cadis consortium, services, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training and support arising from her death. 52. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant Elder, as described herein, Caylee was injured from the smoke and fire and underwent substantial medical treatment; Plaintiff Caylee sustained substantial pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life from the Occurrence; Plaintiffs Caylee and Candace J. Higgins have sustained emotional trauma and injury as a result of the Occurrence in witnessing the death of their daughter and sister Cadis, which is medically significant, ongoing and permanent. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendant Elder, in a just and reasonable sum in excess of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00, together with costs herein expended, and for such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT VIII AGGRAVATED DAMAGES - AGAINST DEFENDANTS PELONIS APPLIANCES, PELONIS USA, PELONIS TECHNOLOGIES, PELONIS HEATING, MIDEA (U.S.A., AND MIDEA AMERICA COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, and for Count VIII of their Petition against Defendants Pelonis Appliances, Pelonis USA, Pelonis Technologies, Pelonis Heating, Midea (U.S.A., and Midea America, state the following: 53. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege as if fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1-15 of Plaintiffs Petition. 54. Defendants knew of the defective condition and danger of the the Space Heater model in that the materials specified in the design and used in its manufacture were insufficient 16

and inappropriate for their intended use, because they did not allow adequate pressure release before overheating causing the chambers to rupture and explode, releasing hot oil, a fire hazard. 55. Defendants showed complete indifference to or conscious disregard for the safety of others by continuing to manufacture, distribute, market and sell the model of the Space Heater which Defendants should have known created a high degree of probability of injury to decedent due to prior similar complaints regarding the Space Heater model. 56. Plaintiffs are entitled to exemplary damages to punish Defendants and to deter Defendants and other businesses from like conduct. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court enter a judgment against Defendants for aggravated damages in a sufficient amount to punish and deter Defendants and other similarly situated corporations from like conduct and for any other relief that this Court deems just and proper. O LEARY, SHELTON, CORRIGAN, PETERSON, DALTON & QUILLIN, LLC By: /s/ James D. O Leary James D. O Leary, #45964 The University Tower 1034 South Brentwood, Blvd. Penthouse 1-A, 23 rd Floor St. Louis, MO 63117 Tel: (314 405-9000 Fax: (314 405-9999 Oleary@osclaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 17

BOSLEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC Freeman R. Bosley, Jr., #29341 9100 Overland Plaza Overland, MO 63114 Phone: (314 467-0527 bosleyllc@sbcglobal.net LAW OFFICES OF SMITH BROWN, LLC Daniel R. Brown, #59749 9100 Overland Plaza Overland, MO 63114 Phone: (314 467-0527 dbrown@smithbrownllc.com Co-counsel for Plaintiffs 18