Marketa Trimble Injunctive Relief, Equity, and Misuse of Rights

Similar documents
Southern Methodist University. From the SelectedWorks of Lance E Wyatt Jr. Lance E Wyatt, Jr. Winter 2014

Injunctions, Compulsory Licenses, and Other Prospective Relief What the Future Holds for Litigants

Post-EBay: Permanent Injunctions, Future Damages

The Truth About Injunctions In Patent Disputes OCTOBER 2017

Injunctive Relief in U.S. Courts

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

Patent Enforcement in the US

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Case 2:04-cv TJW Document 424 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 1 of 5

Reasonable Royalties After EBay

Winning at the Outset: Improving Chances of Success on a Preliminary Injunction Motion. AIPLA Presentation October 2010 Lynda Zadra-Symes

EBAY INC. v. MERC EXCHANGE, L.L.C. 126 S.Ct (2006)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Infringement Assertions In The New World Order

The Changing Face of U.S. Patent Litigation

Fed. Circ. Should Clarify Irreparable Harm In Patent Cases

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT S DECISION IN EBAY V. MERCEXCHANGE: HOW IRREPARABLE THE INJURY TO PATENT INJUNCTIONS? RICHARD B. KLAR I.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Nine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations?

Case 2:08-cv GAF-AJW Document 253 Filed 01/06/2009 Page 1 of 6

Re: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No

AN ANALYTIC STUDY ON PERMANENT INJUNCTION IN PATENT LITIGATIONS Huang-Chih Sung

Remedies for Patent Infringement in the Medical Sector

ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS TRADEMARK

SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATING METHOD OF USE PATENTS IN THE U.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:08-cv DAK Document 56 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

An Assignment's Effect On Hypothetical Negotiation

Case 1:16-cv JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X. Plaintiffs,

Case: 3:11-cv bbc Document #: 487 Filed: 11/02/12 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:02-cv AC Document 176 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

the Patent Battleground:

The Irreparably Harmed Presumption? Why the Presumption of Irreparable Harm in Trademark Law Will Survive ebay and Winter

Reeling in the Patent Troll: Was Ebay v. MercExchange Enough?

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

The Aftermath of ebay: Predicting When District Courts Will Grant Permanent Injunctions in Patent Cases

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 293 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv JSR Document 252 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 18

TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

#21(6/12 hrg off) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Federal Procedure - Standing to Sue in Environmental Protection Suits. Sierra Club v. Hickel, 433 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1970)

2010 PATENTLY O PATENT LAW JOURNAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MEMORANDUM ORDER

Putting the Law (Back) in Patent Law

Respecting Patent Rights: Model Behavior for Patent Owners

Oklahoma Law Review. Jean Carlos Lopez. Volume 60 Number 3

Patent Litigation Before the International Trade Commission: Latest Developments

United States District Court

Enjoining Life Sciences Competition: A Review and Discussion

Permanent Injunctions in Patent Litigation After ebay: An Empirical Study

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. THIRD PARTY UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION S STATEMENT ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST

Broadcam Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc. 543 F.3D 683 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Seeking Disapproval: Presidential Review Of ITC Orders

International Trade Daily Bulletin

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

RCEs HAVE NO IMPACT ON PTA IF FILED AFTER THE THREE YEAR DEADLINE HAS PASSED

AN INTRODUCTION TO REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS IN SECTION 337 INVESTIGATIONS AT THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Plaintiff Liberty Power Corporation, LLC ( Plaintiff or LPC ) moves for a preliminary

Case 2:16-cv BJR Document 34 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Permanent Injunctions: A Discretionary Remedy for Patent Infringement in the Aftermath of the Ebay Decision

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Fee Shifting & Ethics. Clement S. Roberts Durie Tangri LLP December 11, 2015

CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. WEBSTER R. McGEE, and WRM & ASSOCIATES, d/b/a/ EMS - Card Service on the Caprock, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1294 v.

BUFFALO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW JOURNAL. Permanent Injunctions in Patent Cases

Case 2:10-cv RAJ -TEM Document 62 Filed 03/01/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 1155

Injunctive Relief in the Post-Ebay World

APLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions

June 29, 2011 Submitted by: Julie P. Samuels Staff Attorney Michael Barclay, Reg. No. 32,553 Fellow Electronic Frontier Foundation

Case 2:08-cv GAF-AJW Document 250 Filed 01/05/2009 Page 1 of 13

Business Method Patents on the Chopping Block?

Equitable Concerns of ebay v. Mercexchange: Did the Supreme Court Successfully Balance Patent Protection against Patent Trolls

Injunctions for patent infringement after the ebay decision Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto

Case 3:11-cv BR Document 39 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 565

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 290 Filed: 06/21/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:7591

Patent Injunctions on Appeal: An Empirical Study of the Federal Circuit's Application of ebay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

The Where, When And What Of DTSA Appeals: Part 2

NOTE: CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT

2015 IP Law Year In Review John B. Sganga, Jr.

Case 2:12-cv JAD-PAL Document 41 Filed 01/11/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

High-Tech Patent Issues

ITC Litigation in the U.S. MIP Global IP Briefing August 26, 2015, Singapore

Throughout the history of the United States, innovation

Supreme Court of the United States

United States District Court

Paper Entered: May 1, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

European Patent Litigation: An overview

Case 1:14-cv CMA Document 14 Filed 05/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-CV Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants.

Transcription:

Injunctive Relief, Equity, and Misuse of Rights 33. Tagung für Rechtsvergleichung Grenzen der Rechtsdurchsetzung im Immaterialgüterrecht 16 September 2011

[T]he very essence of the right conferred by the patent [ ] is the privilege of any owner of property to use or not use it, without question of motive. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U.S. 405 (S. Ct. 1908)

Without the right to obtain an injunction, the right to exclude granted to the patentee would have only a fraction of the value it was intended to have, and would no longer be as great an incentive to engage in the toils of scientific and technological research. Smith International, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573, 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

Injunctive relief pre-ebay Irreparable injury Inadequate remedies at law Balance of hardships Public interest presumed damages prevention of economic waste interest in a functioning patent system

Pre-eBay Development City of Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, 69 F.2d 577 (7th Cir. 1934), cert. denied (sewage plant) Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories., Inc., 601 F. Supp. 964, 971 (C.D. Cal. 1985) (bubble blood oxygenators) Schneider (Europe) AG v. SciMed Life Systems, Inc., 852 F. Supp. 813, 869 (D. Minn. 1994) (balloon dilatation catheters)

ebay ebay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006) Plaintiff (MercExchange) non-practicing entity A business method patent (an electronic market designed to facilitate the sale of goods between private individuals ) Unsuccessful licensing proposals by MercExchange Defendant (ebay) willful infringer No preliminary injunction requested

ebay Marketa Trimble S.Ct. Reversal traditional equitable considerations CAFC Reversal injunction issued as a general rule EDVA No injunction traditional equitable principles No injunction

Injunctive relief pre-ebay Irreparable harm Inadequate remedy at law Balance of hardships Public interest presumed?? damages interest? in a functioning patent system

Post-eBay Development Patent infringement cases - decisions on permanent injunctions issued during the period between the ebay decision (2006) and 11 April 2011 Permanent injunctions granted 132 75% Permanent injunctions denied 44 25% Patstats, University of Houston Law Center, 20 July 2011

Post-eBay Development Predictability of awards of injunctions: Practicing entity Direct competitor Offer to license A small component of the infringing product Douglas Ellis et. Al., The Economic Implications (and Uncertainties) of Obtaining Permanent Injunctive Relief After ebay v. MercExchange, 17 Fed. Cir. B.J. 437 (2008) Benjamin Petersen, Injunctive Relief in the Post-eBay World, 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 193 (2008) Rachel M. Janutis, The Supreme Court s Unremarkable Decision in ebay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 14 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 597 (2010)

Post-eBay Development Copyright cases: Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68 (2 nd Cir. 2010) Perfect 10 Inc. v. Google Inc., (9 th Cir. 2011) no presumption of irreparable harm Trademark case: Marlyn Nutraceuticals Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH, 571 F.3d 873 (9 th Cir. 2009)

Post-eBay Development Impact of patent trolls / non-practicing entities / patent asserting entities on patent law Availability of injunctive relief Rules of standard setting organizations Calculation of damages Work-product doctrine Venue rules ITC proceedings Defensive patent pooling Organizing of the victims Calls for better examination of patent applications

Post-eBay Development International Trade Commission Section 337 proceedings Only limited injunctive relief Possible parallel proceedings Issue of standing of non-practicing entities In the Matter of Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, ITC No. 337-TA-694, 22 July 2011

Injunctive Relief, Equity, and Misuse of Rights Marketa Trimble Associate Professor of Law William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada, Las Vegas marketa.trimble@unlv.edu