In the Name of Allah the Most Beneficent and the Most Merciful

Similar documents
Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines

Outline of PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination PCT Workshop Tokyo February 27-March

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Patent Examination

Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination. Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section

and Examination Reports

Criteria for Patentability

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

WIPO International Symposium on IP and Sustainable Development Documentation and Registration of TK and TCEs

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs

Procedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

PATENTS COMMITTEE REPORT MALAYSIA By Clara Yip and Caroline Francis. 1. Legislative Changes

Foundation Certificate

Part I PPH using the national work products from the JPO

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

Procedures to file a request to the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT (RAISING THE BAR ACT) 2012

Designs. A Global Guide. Malaysia. Henry Goh & Co Sdn Bhd Dave A Wyatt

Part VIII International Patent Application

Topic 9: Utilizing Claims of Granted Patents

3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.)

Candidate's Answer - DI

PATENT. Copyright Henry Goh & Co Sdn Bhd

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Working Guidelines Q217. The patentability criteria for inventive step / non-obviousness

Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Korean Intellectual Property Office

Patent Claims. Formal requirements and allowable amendments. 2005Jaroslav Potuznik

The application which is filed with the KIPO and on which the applicant files a request for the PCT-PPH must satisfy the following requirements:

PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:

Explanatory material of Global PPH Matrix

Intellectual property defense and

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

Procedures to file a request to the SPTO (Spanish Patent and Trademark Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application.

SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE

Recent EPO Decisions: Part 1

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB

Attachment: Opinions on the Draft Amendment of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry

The European Patent Office An overview on the procedures before the EPO: up to grant, opposition and appeal

Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

Guide to WIPO Services

The European patent system

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 206 of 2017 PATENTS (AMENDMENT) RULES 2017

MULTIPLE AND PARTIAL PRIORITIES. Robert Watson FICPI 17 th Open Forum, Venice October 2017

Title: The patentability criterion of inventive step / non-obviousness

Procedures to file a request to the EPA (The Estonian Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program. Part I

THE ACTS ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT */**/***/****/*****/******/*******

Framework Provisions for the Global Patent Prosecution Highway System

Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System

DRAFT PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Outline of the Patent Examination

The programme commenced on 15 Jun 2009 and was revised on 15 Apr It will continue to be reviewed regularly.

MALAYSIA IP HANDBOOK

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

Chapter 3 Amendment Changing Special Technical Feature of Invention (Patent Act Article 17bis(4))

Overview of Trial for Invalidation and Opposition Systems in Japan. March 2017 Trial and Appeal Department Japan Patent Office

Understanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office

Part I - PPH using the national work products from the SIPO

Jordanian Patent Office

Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan

AZERBAIJAN Law on Patent Date of Text (Enacted): July 25, 1997 ENTRY INTO FORCE: August 2, 1997

Rejected in India: Dr. Feroz Ali, Dr. Sudarsan Rajagopal, Mohamed Mustafa and Chinnasamy Prabhu WHAT THE INDIAN PATENT OFFICE GOT

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

Patent protection in Latin America: Main provisions and recommended strategy

Bangkok, August 22 to 26, 2016 (face-to-face session) August 29 to October 30, 2016 (follow-up session)

Practice for Patent Application

AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE PATENTS ACT AND RULES

Patent Prosecution Procedures: China & Canada Compared

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Guidebook. for Japanese Intellectual Property System 2 nd Edition

AIPPI World Intellectual Property Congress, Toronto. Workshop V. Patenting computer implemented inventions. Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Comments on Proposed Changes to Restriction Practice in Patent Applications

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14

Measures for Expediting Patent Examination in India. By Dr. Rajeshkumar H. Acharya

Substantive patent law harmonization: focus on grace period

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (PHILIPPINES)

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

Chapter 2 Internal Priority

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

Industry IP5 Consensus Proposals to the IP5 Patent Harmonization Experts Panel (PHEP)

COMPARATIVE STUDY REPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURE AND CLAIMS - 1 -

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE

(SUCCESSFUL) PATENT FILING IN THE US

Transcription:

In the Name of Allah the Most Beneficent and the Most Merciful 1 Government of Pakistan IPO Pakistan-Cabinet Division Intellectual Property Organization Pakistan WIPO Sub-Regional Workshop on the Utilization of Patent Examination Results to Enhance Patent Examination Capacities and Increase the Quality of Patents, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 29- December 01, 2011 2 The Patent Office: 2 nd Floor Kandawala Building, M.A. Jinnah Road, Karachi.

IPO Pakistan Presented by: UROOJ FATIMA (PATENT EXAMINER) MUHAMMAD ZIA-UL-HAQ (PATENT EXAMINER) 3 THE PATENT OFFICE KARACHI. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION PAKISTAN. Contents Statistics On Examination Flow Of Patent Applications Patent Prosecution / Examination Procedures Staffing Of Patent Office Examination Guidelines Deferred Examination 4

Continued Request For Information From The Applicant Databases Used For Examination Results Timelines Hearings With Applicants Types Of Claims Advisory Services Challenges In Substantive Examination 5 Statistics On Examination 6

Patent Applications For The Year 2005 Received 1287 Granted 168 Withdrawn 86 Foreign Applications 1144 National Applications 143 7 Patent Applications For The Year 2006 Received 1739 Granted 170 Withdrawn 95 Foreign Applications 1652 National Applications 87 8

Patent Applications For The Year 2007 Received 1558 Granted 147 Withdrawn 85 Foreign Applications 1456 National Applications 102 9 Patent Applications For The Year 2008 Received 1545 Granted 121 Withdrawn 77 Foreign Applications 1378 National Applications 167 10

Patent Applications For The Year 2009 Received 1212 Granted 45 Withdrawn 29 Foreign Applications 1104 National Applications 108 11 Patent Applications For The Year 2010 Received 1094 Granted 06 Withdrawn 09 Foreign Applications 981 National Applications 113 12

Patent Prosecution/Examination Procedures Patents are granted on new inventions only. International search is made to ascertain the novelty of the invention. a) Formal examination Formal Examination check list A. Application: Kind of application B. Patent of addition and Divisional Application: C. Application under Section: (86) Country of origin. D. Authorization: E. Specification: Does it comply with Rule 7(1)? F. Drawings: Are they reproducible? G. General Memorandum regarding documents sent

Continued b) Substantive Examination Check List of Substantive Examination by the Patent Examiner; Definitions Patentable Inventions U/S 7(1) Not Patentable Invention U/S 7(2) Patent shall not be granted U/S 7(4) Novelty U/S 8 Industrial Application U/S 10 Continued 16 Single Invention U/S 13(3) Divisional Application U/S 13(4) Contents of the Specification U/S 15 Drawing U/S 15(2) Amendment with the permission of Controller U/S 42 Priority U/S 86 Certified copy of Priority documents U/S 88 Language g of the certified copy other than English U/S 88(2)

Staffing Of Patent Office Total number of Examiners = 12 17 Pharmacy = 4 Engineering = 2 Biochemistry = 2 Chemistry = 1 Agriculture = 2 Information Technology = 1 Examination Guidelines No examination guidelines in addition to Patent Ordinance 2000 and Patent Rules 2003, and any case law applicable for interpreting them, are provided. 18

Deferred Examination Deferred Examination is not allowed, i.e. it is not possible to file an application and request examination at a later stage. 19 Request For Information From The Applicant 20 U/S 20 of the Patents Ordinance 2000, the applicant shall, when required by the Controller, furnish him with the date and number of any application for a patent filed by him abroad. He may also be required to submit the following documents: () (i) a copy of any communication received by the applicant concerning the results of any search or examination i carried out in respect of the foreign application;

Continued (ii) a copy of the patent granted on the basis of the foreign application; and (iii) a copy of any final decision rejecting the foreign application. 21 The applicant shall, when required ed by the Controller, furnish him with a copy of any final decision invalidating ada the patent granted ga on the basis of foreign application. Continued The legislation does not explicitly authorize granting of patents based on claims granted by other patent offices. However, preference is given to patent applications granted in EP, US, Germany and Australia, if they so comply with the requirments of Patents Ordinance 2000. 22

Databases Used For Examination Results Espacenet Epoline Patentscope US PAIR AIPN Google patents 23 WIPO ARDI and WIPO ASPI are not used. Timelines At the present time, no official timelines for actions by the examiner or the applicant are in exercise. Hence the applicant is not bound to reply within a certain time limit. 24

Hearings With Applicants 25 The Controller, U/S 53 of the Patents Ordinance 2000, shall give to any applicant for a patent or for amendment of a specification, if within the prescribed time the applicant so requires, an opportunity of being heard before exercising adversely to the applicant. Frequency of hearings varies, and hearings are conducted d within ihi 10 to15 days after receiving of request from the applicant. Types Of Claims 26 According to Section 15(4) of the Patents Ordinance 2000, the claim or claims of a complete specification shall relate to a single invention, shall be clear and succinct and shall be fairly based on the matter disclosed in the specification. Usually 3 independent claims are allowed, but there is no bounding from the Patents Odi Ordinance 2000.

Advisory Services The Patent Office Karachi, has established an IP helpline to provide support services to the R&D institutions as well as individual researchers in getting their inventions and creations registered for protection and commercialization. 27 Challenges In Substantive Examination 28 International Search Report (ISR) interpretation International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) interpretation Judgment/interpretation of novelty & inventive step from specification, embodiments and diagram. How to differentiate e ethat an invention lacks novelty/inventive step or both?

Continued How to raise objections: i) If we want applicant to limit claims. ii) Scope of "Markush Claims' too wide. iii) To avoid selection patent. iv) When diagrams are not clear 29 What is information disclosure statement and why it is needed? d? Continued Parameters for fair basis of claims How much detail of a process should be there in claims Unity of Invention Key words used to search international patent databases like Patentscope, Espacenet, USPTO 30

THANK YOU 31 Tel: +92 21 9215488 Fax: +92 21 9215489 E-mail: info@ipo.gov.pk URL: www.ipo.gov.pk UROOJ FATIMA (PATENT EXAMINER) MUHAMMAD ZIA-UL-HAQ (PATENT EXAMINER) PATENT OFFICE KARACHI, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (IPO)-PAKISTAN.