IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 667 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv RGA Document 48 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 486 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE OPTICAL DEVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT TOSHIBA CORPORATION AND TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. 1. Plaintiff Optical Devices, LLC ( Optical Devices or Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, hereby demands a jury trial and complains of Defendants Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. ( Defendants as follows: 2. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271, et seq., to obtain injunctive relief and damages resulting from Defendants unauthorized manufacture, use, sale, offer to sell, and/or importation into the United States of products that infringe one or more claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,809,995 ( the 995 Patent, attached as Exhibit A, 6,847,597 ( the 597 Patent, attached as Exhibit B, 6,904,007 ( the 007 Patent, attached as Exhibit C, 6,970,410 ( the 410 Patent, attached as Exhibit D, 7,196,979 ( the 979 Patent, attached as Exhibit E, 7,839,729 ( the 729 Patent, attached as Exhibit F, 8,416,651 ( the 651 Patent, attached as Exhibit G, RE40,927 ( the 927 Patent, attached as Exhibit H, RE42,913 ( the 913 Patent, attached as Exhibit I, and RE43,681 ( the 681 Patent, attached as Exhibit J (the Asserted Patents.

3. This is an action for direct On information and belief, Defendants manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import into the United States products that infringe the Asserted Patents either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. 4. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to prevent Defendants from continuing to infringe Plaintiff s patents. In addition, Plaintiff seeks to recover monetary damages resulting from Defendants past infringement of these patents. THE PARTIES 5. Plaintiff Optical Devices is a Delaware limited liability company having a place of business at 20 Depot Street, Suite 2A, Peterborough, New Hampshire 03458. 6. Plaintiff is the lawful assignee of all substantial rights, title, and interest in and to the Asserted Patents. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendant Toshiba Corporation is a Japanese corporation having a place of business located at 1-1, Shibaura 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8001, Japan. 8. Upon information and belief, Defendant Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. is a subsidiary of Toshiba Corporation. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. is a California corporation having a place of business located at 9740 Irvine Blvd., Irvine, CA 92618. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. s registered agent for service of process is The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. 9. Plaintiff has been and will continue to be irreparably harmed by Defendants infringement of the Asserted Patents. Moreover, Defendants unauthorized and infringing uses of Plaintiff s patented systems and methods have threatened the value of this intellectual property because Defendants conduct results in Plaintiff s loss of its lawful patent -2-

right to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented inventions. 10. Defendants disregard for Plaintiff s property rights threatens Plaintiff s relationships with potential licensees of Plaintiff s patents, including the Asserted Patents. The Defendants will derive a competitive advantage over any of Plaintiff s future licensees from infringing Plaintiff s patented technology. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 11. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this patent infringement action pursuant to 28 USC 1331 and 1338(a. 12. Upon information and belief, Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in the state of Delaware because they individually, or through one or more subsidiaries or affiliates, transact business in this judicial district and/or regularly conduct or solicit business in this judicial district by, among other things, selling and offering products for sale, including products infringing the Asserted Patents, or deriving substantial revenue from products used or consumed in this judicial district, including products infringing the Asserted Patents. For example, such products may be purchased in and shipped to Delaware via at least Bestbuy.com (see attached Exhibit K and Amazon.com (see attached Exhibit L. In addition, Defendants have committed acts of infringement of one or more of the claims of one or more of the Asserted Patents in this judicial district. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. is also registered to do business in Delaware and so is subject to jurisdiction in the State of Delaware for this additional reason. 13. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b, 1391(c, and 1400(b because Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district, and have committed acts of infringement in this district. Venue is also proper in this judicial district -3-

because Toshiba Corporation is an alien and because Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. is registered to do business in the State of Delaware. COUNT I (Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,809,995 14. Paragraphs 1 through 13 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 15. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 995 Patent, the 995 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 995 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 995 Patent. 16. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 17. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 18. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT II (Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,847,597-4-

19. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 20. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 597 Patent, the 597 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claim of the 597 Patent. 21. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 22. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 23. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT III (Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,904,007 24. Paragraphs 1 through 23 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 25. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 007 Patent, the 007 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or -5-

directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 007 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 007 Patent. 26. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 27. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 28. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT IV (Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,970,410 29. Paragraphs 1 through 28 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 30. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 410 Patent, the 410 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 410 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 410 Patent. -6-

31. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 32. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 33. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT V (Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,196,979 34. Paragraphs 1 through 33 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 35. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 979 Patent, the 979 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 979 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 979 Patent. 36. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 37. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of -7-

38. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT VI (Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,839,729 39. Paragraphs 1 through 38 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 40. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 729 Patent, the 729 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 729 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 729 Patent. 41. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 42. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 43. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT VII (Infringement of United States Patent No. 8,416,651-8-

44. Paragraphs 1 through 43 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 45. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 651 Patent, the 651 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 651 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 651 Patent. 46. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 47. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 48. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT VIII (Infringement of United States Patent No. RE40,927 49. Paragraphs 1 through 48 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 50. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 927 Patent, -9-

the 927 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 927 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 927 Patent. 51. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 52. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 53. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT IX (Infringement of United States Patent No. RE42,913 54. Paragraphs 1 through 53 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 55. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 913 Patent, the 913 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 913 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 913 Patent. -10-

56. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 57. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of 58. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the COUNT X (Infringement of United States Patent No. RE43,681 59. Paragraphs 1 through 58 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 60. Upon information and belief, Defendants directly infringe the 681 Patent, the 681 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or directly infringe one or more of the claims of the 681 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendants practice one or more method claims of the 681 Patent. 61. Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable 62. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prevent any further acts of -11-

63. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendants, granting Plaintiff the following relief: A. That this Court adjudge and decree that Defendants have infringed each of the Asserted Patents; B. That this Court permanently enjoin Defendants, and their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors and assigns, and each of their officers, directors, employees, representatives, agents, attorneys and all persons acting in concert or active participation with, or on their behalf, or within their control, from making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, or advertising products that infringe any of the claims of the Asserted Patents, or otherwise engaging in acts of infringement of the Asserted Patents, all as alleged herein; C. That this Court order an accounting, including a post-verdict accounting, to determine all damages and costs to be awarded Plaintiff as a result of Defendants infringement; D. That this Court, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, enter an award to Plaintiff of such damages as it shall prove at trial against Defendants that is adequate to compensate Plaintiff for said infringement; said damages to be no less than a reasonable royalty and costs; E. That this Court assess pre-judgment interest and costs against Defendants, together with an award of such interest and costs; F. That this Court grant such other, further, and different relief as the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances. -12-

JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all matters to which it is entitled to trial by jury pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38. Dated: September 3, 2013 Respectfully submitted, /s/ James G. McMillan, III Edmond D. Johnson (No. 2257 James G. McMillan, III (No. 3979 PEPPER HAMILTON LLP Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100 1313 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1709 Wilmington, DE 19899-1709 Tel. No. (302 777-6500 johnsone@pepperlaw.com mcmillaj@pepperlaw.com William D. Belanger Robert A. Brooks Noah Malgeri PEPPER HAMILTON LLP 19th Floor, High Street Tower 125 High Street Boston, MA 02110-2736 Tel. No. (617 204-5100 Goutam Patnaik PEPPER HAMILTON LLP Hamilton Square 600 Fourteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2004 Tel. No. (202 220-1200 Attorneys for Plaintiff Optical Devices, LLC -13-