The nuclear armament situation in France

Similar documents
ICAN CAMPAIGNERS MEETING VIENNA - APRIL THE URGENT HUMANITARIAN IMPERATIVE TO BAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS

COUNCIL OF DELEGATES OF THE INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT MOVEMENT

Aotearoa New Zealand

THE LAST TO DISARM? The Future of France s Nuclear Weapons

Role of Parliamentarians for Abolishing Nuclear Weapons

Thank you for showing your support and signing up to be a Ceasefire.ca Volunteer Campaigner!

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the French Republic hereinafter referred to as The Parties,

Key note address by Minister Ronald Sturm Foreign Ministry, Austria 27 August 2014

ADVOCACY GUIDE Second preparatory committee of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty 22 april - 3 may

This is a repository copy of European Nuclear Nationalism: The UK and France.

UK Nuclear Weapons: The UK Public Speaks

POLICY IMPERATIVES FOR AN ARCTIC NUCLEAR- WEAPON-FREE ZONE Only one circumpolar nation has NWFZ in its Arctic Policy - Next?

Steven Leeper Chairperson, Hiroshima Peace Culture Institute. Campaign Update

note n 19/2015 The NPT Review Conference: Analyzing the Outcome 7 October 2015 Emmanuelle Maître

Nuclear Disarmament: The Road Ahead International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA) April 2015

Check against delivery!

United Nations General Assembly 1st

2 May Mr. Chairman,

Lessons from William Wilberforce Priorities for Nuclear Weapons Abolition

Brief report of PSR-Iran activities

BASEL OSCE Forum. 4 July Session 3: Humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons

THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE

RESEARCH PAPER No. 49

NATO s tactical nuclear headache

PEOPLE FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT HUMAN SURVIVAL PROJECT (A JOINT PROJECT OF PND AND CENTRE FOR PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES)

For a Nuclear-Weapon Free, Peaceful, and Just World

Tuesday, 4 May 2010 in New York

IRELAND. Statement by. Mr. Breifne O'Reilly. Director for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Our Leaders decided at the Kananaskis Summit to launch a new G8 Global Partnership against the Spread

An international workshop organized by. Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs with the support of the Flemish Peace Institute

NPT/CONF.2015/PC.III/WP.29

H.E. President Abdullah Gül s Address at the Pugwash Conference

Remarks on the Role of the United Nations in Advancing Global Disarmament Objectives

BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN BAN TREATY SUPPORTERS AND STEP-BY-STEP APPROACHES TO ELIMINATING NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Montessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Middle School Thirteenth Session Sept First Committee Disarmament and International Security

International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War 1985

Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace

NPT/CONF.2020/PC.I/WP.9

The War in Ukraine - a catastrophe for the people in Ukraine and for peace in Europe

United Nations, Geneva 4 July Delivered by Maya Brehm, Article 36

Law and morality at the Vienna conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons

Building Bridges to Effective Nuclear Disarmament. Group of Eminent Persons on the Substantive Advancement of Nuclear Disarmament

Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy. Law s Imperative: A World Free of Nuclear Weapons

of the NPT review conference

BAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS AUSTRALIA S ROLE

Statement. Thematic Debate "Nuclear Weapons" First Committee 71 st United Nations General Assembly. New York, 13 October 2016

INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS

FRANCE AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

Bernard Laponche April 29, 2016

By Torbjørn Graff Hugo

WHY THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE IS A REAL WAR, AND HOW IT RELATES TO INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

Seventy years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Reflections on the consequences of nuclear detonation

Re-examining the 1996 ICJ Advisory Opinion: Concerning the Legality of Nuclear Weapons

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 7 December [on the report of the First Committee (A/70/460)]

Address by Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov at Plenary Meeting of Conference on Disarmament, Geneva, March 7, 2009

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3: Macro Report June 05, 2006

Mayors for Peace Action Plan ( )

STRATEGIC LOGIC OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION

Back to Basics? NATO s Summit in Warsaw. Report

"Multilateral Initiatives to Achieve a Nuclear Weapons Free World and the Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear Weapons"

Working Group 1 Report. Nuclear weapons and their elimination

Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons: Overcoming the Inhumanity of Nuclear Weapons

The United Nations and the Future of Nuclear Disarmament

Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations

Civil Society s Perspective. Dr. Charles D. Ferguson. President, Federation of American Scientists. 3 December 2010

Disarmament and Deterrence: A Practitioner s View

Remarks by Federica Mogherini at the press conference following the Informal Meeting of EU Ministers of Defence

Perspective for a World Free from Nuclear Weapons and for Integral Disarmament. Vatican City 10/11 November 2017 Brief Symposium Report

Secretary of State Saudabayev, Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

Back to Earth: Nuclear Weapons in the 2010s (ARI)

APRIL 2018 PARLIAMENTARY BRIEFING. Leading by Example. Reforming UK Nuclear Declaratory Policy. Maxwell Downman and Sebastian Brixey-Williams

Ontario Model United Nations II. Disarmament and Security Council

Presentation to NFLA All-Ireland Forum 19 th March 2010

Contact Person. Address nam. SNP 33 Postal Code

WELCOMING REMARKS. Sergio Balanzino. NATO Deputy Secretary General

1-5 December December 1997 Original: ENGLISH DECISION

VOTES and PROCEEDINGS

UNESCO 36th General Conference Kingdom of Belgium H. Exc. Mr. Kris Peeters, Minister-President of the Government of Flanders 27 th October 2011

James Reston: New York Times

ESPANA INTERVENCION DEL MINISTRO DE ASUNTOS EXTERIORES Y DE COOPERACION EXCMO. SENOR DON MIGUEL ANGEL MORATINOS

Disarmament and Non-Proliferation as Instruments of International Peace and Security

Security at the Crossroads; National Security vs. Human Security Jacqueline Cabasso, Western States Legal Foundation, USA

Address for a service of prayer and reflection On the Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 St Paul s Cathedral, 6 August 2009

THE NUCLEAR WEAPON BAN TREATY AND THE NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY

The Permanent Mission would also like to transmit herewith the five-year plan on the implementation of resolution 1540 (2004).

Lesson Title: Working for Nuclear Disarmament- Understanding the Present Status

Ban Nuclear Weapons in the Netherlands

Urban sociology Prof. Claire Lévy-Vroelant

Keynote Speech. Angela Kane High Representative for Disarmament Affairs

Letter dated 5 October 2010 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the General Assembly

INFORMATION SERIES Issue No. 427 February 7, 2018

Luncheon Address. Toward a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: A United Nations Perspective

Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Peacebuilding and Reconstruction Polls. Poll Report #5, January Content:

Outcome of IKV Pax Christi Recommendations to the 2010 NPT Review Conference

REFLECTIONS REGARDING SANCTIONS STIPULATED IN THE INTERNATIONAL TREATIES CONCERNING DISARMAMENT

Report of the 10th International Student/Young Pugwash (ISYP) Conference. Astana, Kazakhstan, August 2017

Nations Unies et ONG:

Brazil, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand and South Africa: draft resolution

Réunion spéciale de l APE, amendements de la constitution Mardi 9 octobre h00 - Bibliothèque Jules- Verne. Heure Sujet Discussion Suivi

Transcription:

15 th International Castiglioncello Conference Critical Issues in the Pathway to Nuclear Disarmament Pugwash-USPID Joint meeting September 27-29, 1913 Castello Pasquini Castiglioncello (Livorno) The nuclear armament situation in France as seen by «Armes Nucléaires STOP» Luigi MOSCA 1

First a short reminder : - France signed the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1992, the Treaty stopping the production of fissile materials in 1996, and the Treaty stopping the Nuclear weapons tests of any type in 1998. - France in addition decreased the number of its weapons from 600 to about 300 units and dismantled the Plateau d Albion terrestrial launching base in 1996. - France present armament consist of : 3 submarines x 16 missiles x 6 weapons 300 weapons with at least 1 submarine permanently in state of alert 2

The French doctrine about Nuclear deterrence is essentially invariant under right or left governments and is based on the need of defending the vital interests of the French Nation, so that Nuclear deterrence is considered a kind of life insurance of the Nation. The former President, Nicolas Sarkozy, considered also the possibility of a first nuclear strike in case these vital interests would be threatened by an enemy. But an increasing number of opponents is raising up : not only NGO s, but also politicians and military officers, such as Michel Rocard (former Prime minister), General Norlain, Paul Quilès (former Defence minister!),.. and this new situation is now admitted even by the French President, François Hollande. 3

Here are some examples of this voice of the opponents : Pour un désarmement nucléaire mondial, seule reponse à la prolifération anarchique by Alain Juppé, Bernard Norlain, Alain Richard et Michel Rocard - Le Monde du 14 Octobre 2009 EXIGEZ! Un désarmement nucléaire total by Stéphane Hessel and Albert Jacquard (with L. Mosca and D. Lalanne as co-authors) - Observatoire des armements - April 2012 Nucléaire, un mensonge français (Réflexions sur le désarmement nucléaire) by Paul Quilès - April 2012 Arrêtez la bombe by Paul Quilès, with Bernard Norlain and Jean-Marie Collin - February 2013 4

On the other hand, the Senate, after having recommended to maintain the deterrence force at least until 2070, pursues with the following incroyable statement : «S il nous fallait dessiner aujourd hui un format d armées partant de zéro, il est fort probable que la nécessité d acquérir une force de frappe nucléaire, avec de surcroît deux composantes, ne ferait pas par3e de nos ambi3ons de défense. Nous concentrerions vraisemblablement nos efforts pour contrer des cyber- acaques, la grande criminalité ou les groupes terroristes agissant sur notre territoire.» («Senate Information Report Nb. 668, 12 July 2012, page 37) 5

Several associations are very active in order to reach an awareness of the public opinion to produce a pressure at the political level : - Le mouvement de la Paix - Armes Nucléaires STOP (network of 20 associations) - Observatoire des armements - Maison de vigilance - IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) - MAN (Mouvement pour une Alternative Non-violente) - Sortir du Nucléaire - Pugwash - Global Zero - The ICAN-France Campaign -.. 6

Here are some examples of their initiatives : - Colloque : Dissuasion nucléaire : ouvrons le débat - 25 Janvier 2013 à l Assemblée Nationale (EELesVerts, Observatoire des armements, PNND France) - Participation au Forum Social Mondial à Tunis - Mars 2013 (Mouvement de la Paix, ICAN-France, Armes Nucléaires STOP, IPPNW) - Participation to the PrepCom NPT, Geneva, April 2013 (Armes Nucléaires STOP, IPPNW, ICAN-France, Mouvement de la Paix - Conference : Science, technologie et culture de la paix Université d Evry 22-23 May 2013 (link : http://www.culturedelapaix.univ-evry.fr/?page_id=266) (Armes Nucléaires Stop -IPPNW, etc.) - Fast for Hiroshima and Nagasaki memory and for disarmament : from 6 to 9 August 2013 in Paris, Burghfield (UK) and Büchel NATO base (Germany) (Armes Nucléaires STOP, Sortir du Nucléaire, ICAN, Action AWE, JETZT) - «Croisière de la Paix» à Paris, sur la Seine - 22 Septembre 2013 (Mouvement de la Paix, ICAN- France, Armes Nucléaires STOP, IPPNW) 7

Moreover, at Armes Nucléaires STOP, we are at the origin of the little book for a large audience: EXIGEZ! Un désarmement nucléaire total, then finalized with Albert Jacquard and Stéphane Hessel (15 000 copies sold in 2012 // an Italian updated version should hopefully be published in December, this year) On the other hand we obtained from François Hollande to be received at the Élysée by his Defence adviser, Christian Lechervy, in order to discuss about our divergences. This quite informal meeting (of 1.5 hours) has been interesting especially because Mr Lechervy openly mentioned the difficulties they meet in maintaining their strategy for the nuclear deterrence (la force de dissuasion ). A first urgent problem is to find something to be done which can demonstrate that France is contributing to a nuclear disarmament in the world : this in view of the NPT revision in 2015. (They are thinking about ) 8

Our analysis is that Nuclear Deterrence is a suicidal illusion, and also a driving force of proliferation, while the French Government consider that its first priority is to stop the proliferation process BEFORE stopping the modernisation of its nuclear armament and perform a real disarmament : a really bootstrap and so impasse situation! A second problem is the risk that UK decide not to renew its nuclear armament (Trident ) : this is the reason of the French-UK cooperation Teutatès (Valduc - Aldermaston) started by the former French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, and now continued with François Hollande. A similar attitude of France concerns a possible elimination of the NATO weapons based in Europe The essential motivation of these attitudes of the French government is to avoid the risk that France could stay alone as nuclear military State in Europe and so support alone the responsibility of the Russian maintain of their tactical weapons! 9

Recently two events open a window of hope towards a nuclear disarmament : 1) the Oslo Conference on the humanitarian consequences of a nuclear war, organized last March (2013) by Norway with several NGO s and the participation of about 130 countries, Conference which will be followed by a second session in Mexico next year (February 2014) 2) the creation by the ONU General Assembly of an «Open- Ended-Working-Group» (OEWG), with the scope of formulating new proposals for the disarmament, approved by the majority of countries. The unanimity not being required, there will be no possibility of vetoes! 10

The hope is that these two initiatives could lead to the possibility of obtaining a Treaty forbidding the production, the maintenance, the modernisation, the threat and a fortiori the use of nuclear armaments. The interesting point is that such a Treaty (as in the case of the antipersonnel mines) would apply also to the countries which didn t sign it! Conclusion : let s be optimistic. also if, at least for the moment, the French government is not favourable to this approach 11

23/05/2013 12