EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Similar documents
EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

)

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

United States of America v. City of Lubbock, Texas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

EEOC v. Scrub Inc. Cornell University ILR School. Judge Susan Cox

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CONSENT DECREE. I. Background

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, d/b/a Preferred People Staffing

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 5-27-2009 EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc Judge Patricia C. Fawsett Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc Keywords Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Paul Steven Reed, Scott Giacomin, Dillard's Inc., 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK, Consent Decree, Hostile Work Environment, Sex, Male, Retail, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/392

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION Case No. 6:07-cv-1496-PCF-KRS UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, DILLARD S, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE I. THE LITIGATION 1. This Consent Decree ( Decree ) is made and entered into by and between Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( Commission or "EEOC ), and Dillard s, Inc. ( Defendant ). The Commission and Defendant are collectively referred to as the Parties throughout this Decree. 2. Plaintiff EEOC filed this action alleging Dillard s violated Title VII of the Civil Rights o f 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 when it discriminated against Charging Party Paul Steven Reed ( Reed ) and Scott Giacomin ( Giacomin ) by subjecting them to a hostile work environment because of their sex. 3. In the interest of resolving this matter and as a result of having engaged in comprehensive settlement negotiations, the parties have agreed that this action should be finally resolved by entry o f this Consent Decree. This Decree resolves claims filed by EEOC in this action arising from the Charge of Discrimination, EEOC Charge No. 150-2006-00272, filed by Reed against Dillard s, Inc. The Parties further agree that this Decree does not resolve any future

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 2 of 11 or pending Charges of Discrimination other than the Charge referred to in this paragraph, with the exception of any claim of harassment or discrimination which could have been brought by Giacomin against Defendant. II. FINDINGS 4. Having carefully examined the terms and provisions of this Decree, and based on the pleadings, record, and stipulations of the parties, the Court finds the following: a. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the parties. b. No party shall contest the jurisdiction of this Federal Court to enforce this Decree and its terms or the right of EEOC to bring an enforcement suit upon an alleged breach of any term(s) of this Decree. c. The terms of this Decree are and shall be binding upon the present and future representatives, agents, directors, successors, assigns, officers, and subsidiaries of Dillard s, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: III. MONETARY RELIEF FOR PAUL REED AND SCOTT GIACOMIN 5. Defendant shall pay an aggregate of One Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars (SI 10,000.00) to resolve this litigation no later than ten (10) calendar days from the Court s execution o f this Decree, the payment of which shall be made in the following manner: a. Defendant shall pay a total of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to Paul Steven Reed as follows: (1) Defendant shall pay Reed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) and shall issue Reed an IRS Form W-2 for that amount, which shall represent Reed s lost wages and from which Defendant shall withhold appropriate income tax and shall pay the employer s share 2

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 3 of 11 of any federal income tax and social security withholdings; (2) Defendant shall pay Reed Fortyfive Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) and shall issue Reed an IRS Form 1099 for that amount, which shall represent compensatory damages. b. Defendant shall pay Scott Giacomin a total of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) and shall issue Giacomin an IRS Form 1099 for that amount, which shall represent compensatory damages. 6. Defendant shall mail the payments described in paragraph 5(a) directly to Paul Steven Reed by Certified Mail (Return Receipt) at the following address: 95 Wymore Road, Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714. Copies of the payments made and the IRS Forms issued pursuant to paragraph 5(a) shall be forwarded to the attention o f Nora E. Curtin, Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 2700, Miami, FL 33131 within five (5) calendar days of issuance. 7. Defendant shall mail the payment described in paragraph 5(b) directly to Scott Giacomin by Certified Mail (Return-Receipt) at the following address: 2760 Galatian Place, Orlando, Florida 32817. Copies of the payment made and the IRS Form issued pursuant to paragraph 5(b) shall be forwarded to the attention of Nora E. Curtin, Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 2700, Miami, FL 33131 within five (5) calendar days of issuance. 8. If Defendant fails to tender the payments described in paragraphs 5 through 7, then Defendant shall pay interest on the defaulted payment at the rate calculated pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Section 6621(b) until the same is paid, and bear any additional costs incurred by or caused by the non-compliance or delay o f the Defendant. 3

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 4 of 11 IV. GENERAL INJUNCTIVE PROVISIONS A. Scope 9. The terms of this Decree shall apply to the Dillard s store currently in the Dillard s Fashion Square Mall Store in Orlando, Florida (the Fashion Square Store or Dillard s ). 10. During the term of this Consent Decree, Dillard s, its officers, agents, successors and other persons in active concert or participation with it, or any of them, are enjoined from engaging in sexual harassment in any context. 11. During the term of this Consent Decree, Dillard s, its officers, agents, successors and other persons in active concert or participation with them, or any of them, are enjoined from engaging in reprisal or retaliation of any kind against any person because of such person s opposition to any practice made unlawful under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, because of such person s filing a charge, testifying or participating in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, hearing or lawsuit under any of these statutes, because such person was identified as a witness or possible witness for the Commission, because such person participated in any manner in this action or in the investigation giving rise to this action, or because such person is designated as an aggrieved individual under this Decree. B. A nti-h arassm ent Policy 12. Dillard s shall adopt and/or maintain a policy proscribing harassment and proscribing retaliation against any employee who complains about harassment or who files a charge alleging harassment ( Anti-Harassment Policy ). Dillard s shall post and keep posted for the duration of this Decree, in a conspicuous place where notices to employees and applicants for employment are customarily kept or posted, a copy of the Anti-Harassment Policy. Within thirty 4

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 5 of 11 (30) days of entry of this Decree, Dillard s shall provide a copy of its Anti-Harassment Policy to all employees and will provide the policy to newly hired employees within ten ( 10) days of their hire. Within forty-five (45) days of entry of this Decree, Dillard s shall forward a copy of the Anti-Discrimination Policy to the Commission with a letter indicating that the Anti- Discrimination Policy has been posted and distributed. C. Sexual Harassment Complaints 13. Dillard s shall: (1) require that all complaints o f sexual harassment be permanently maintained in an alleged harasser s file and, in the event an employee against whom a sexual harassment complaint has been made transfers to another Dillard s location, provide notice of the complaint to the new Store Manager; (2) permit employees to complain about sexual harassment to any management official; and (3) whenever a complaint of sexual harassment is made, unless the complaint is found to have no merit, the alleged harasser will receive a minimum of two (2) hours of sexual harassment training within thirty (30) days of the complaint. Employees who violate the policy are subject to discipline up to and including termination. Dillard s shall also notify management officials that they have a duty to report observations o f sexual harassment. D. Training 14. Beginning no more than one hundred and twenty (120) days after entry of this Consent Decree, Dillard s shall conduct annual training for all of its employees on what constitutes discrimination and sexual harassment. At least 50% of the training shall address harassment. Training will include notification of the Dillard s policy and procedures for asserting complaints of sexual harassment. Dillard s agrees that said training will also include advising employees on the penalties of engaging in harassing behavior. Dillard s agrees that said 5

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 6 of 11 training will include the Dillard s non-retaliation policy. All training under this Paragraph shall be at Dillard s expense, conducted by outside vendors or by video training which, upon request, may be reviewed by the EEOC. a. The training will be conducted as follows: i. Non-raanagcrial Employees During the term of this Consent Decree, Dillard s shall require non-managerial employees to receive a total of two (2) hours of sexual harassment training annually. The first one hour of training shall be held within six (6) months after entry of this Consent Decree and one (1) hour every six (6) months thereafter. AH new hires shall continue to receive sexual harassment training currently provided by Dillard s during its new hire orientation. DiUard s shall provide the EEOC with a copy of the employee training and shall provide such copy within sixty (60) days o f its implementation. ii. M anagerial and Supervisory Employees During the term of this Consent Decree, Dillard s shall require all individuals who work in a managerial or supervisory capacity to receive four hours total of annual interactive live broadcast sexual harassment and non-retaliation training. Two (2) hours o f this training shall be provided within three (3) months after entry of this Decree and two (2) hours every six (6) months thereafter. Dillard s shall provide the EEOC with a copy of the training agenda, the names of the trainers, and the date(s) of the training in advance of the training. An EEOC representative may attend the training. iii. Employees Responsible for Investigating Allegations of Sexual Harassm ent Dillard s shall provide four (4) hours of investigation training for the Store Manager, the District Manager, and any other employee who may conduct sexual harassment 6

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 7 of 11 investigations. Dillard s shall administer this training within six (6) months of the entry of this Decree. Dillard s shall provide EEOC with notification of the date of the training no fewer than seven (7) days prior to the training. An EEOC representative may attend and participate in this training. No Dillard s store manager shall conduct an investigation into allegations of sexual harassment until he or she has received investigation training. b. In accordance with the reports required under the Reporting provisions of this Decree, Dillard s shall submit copies of the agenda of the training programs, identify the individuals providing the training, and provide the registries of attendance. E. Posting of Notice 15. Within five (5) business days of the entry of this Consent Decree, Dillard s shall post in a conspicuous place where notices to employees and applicants for employment are customarily kept or posted, the Notice attached to this Decree. The Notice shall be posted and shall remain posted for the duration of this Decree. If the Notice becomes defaced or illegible, Dillard s will replace it with a clean copy. Dillard s shall certify to the Commission, in writing, within twenty (20) days of entry of this Decree that the Notice has been properly posted and shall provide recertification in each of the semi-annual reports required under the Reporting provision of this Consent Decree. F. Record Keening And Reporting Provisions 16. For the duration of this Decree, Dillard s shall maintain all records concerning implementation of this Decree. The Commission shall have the right to interview any personnel employed by Dillard s for the purpose of determining Dillard s compliance with the terms of this Decree. In the event the Commission exercises its right to interview personnel at Dillard s premises, EEOC will provide Dillard s at least twenty-four (24) hours prior notice, and will 7

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 8 of 11 cooperate with Dillard s to schedule such interviews at mutually convenient times and to ensure a minimum of disruption to operation of the business. 17. Each party shall bear its own costs in conjunction with the maintenance of records, preparation o f any report, access or copying of records, or interviews o f employees. 18. Dillard s shall provide semi-annual reports for each six-month period following the entry of the Decree. The reports shall be due thirty (30) days following the respective sixmonth period, except the final report which shall be submitted to the Commission two weeks prior to the date on which the Consent Decree is to expire. 19. Each report shall provide the following information: a. Complaints o f Sexual Harassment For purposes of this Paragraph, the term sexual harassment will include any written or verbal complaint which alleges harassment based on gender, or alleges conduct which Dillard s recognizes as presenting an allegation of sexual harassment. The name, address and telephone number of each person making a complaint of sexual harassment to Dillard s or to any federal, state, or local government agency; and Copies of all documents memorializing or referring to the complaint, investigation and/or resolution thereof. b. Training For each training program required under this Decree and conducted during the reporting period, Dillard s shall submit a registry o f attendance. For each training program conducted during the reporting period, Dillard s will identify the vendor and provide a copy o f the program agenda. 8

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 9 of 11 c. Posting o f Notice Dillard s shall re-certify to the Commission that the Notice required to be posted under this Decree has been properly posted, or if removed, was promptly replaced, during the duration o f the reporting period. 20. Nothing contained in this Decree shall be construed to limit any obligation Defendant may otherwise have to maintain records under Title VII or any other law or regulation. V. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 21. In the event EEOC believes that Defendant has failed to comply with any provisions) of the Decree, EEOC shall have the right to seek Court intervention. Additionally, no party shall contest the Court s jurisdiction to hear a dispute arising from the Decree nor challenge EEOC s ability to bring an action to enforce the terms o f the Decree in this Court. VI. DURATION OF THE DECREE AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 22. All provisions of this Decree shall be in effect for a period o f three (3) years immediately following entry of the Decree. 23. Each party to this Decree shall bear its own expenses, costs and attorneys fees. 9

Case 6:07-cv-01496-PCF-GJK Document 100-2 Filed 05/27/2009 Page 10 of 11 For U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: For Defendant: -^lq O R A E. CURTIN Regional Attorney United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 808-1789 MARIA KATE BOEHRINGER Supervisory Trial Attorney United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 2700 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 808-1790 ) '~ y - LYNN S' MCCREARY, ESQ," MO Bar No. 46629 BRYAN CAVE LLP 1200 Main Street, Ste. 3200 Kansas City, Missouri 64105 Telephone: (816)374-3200 Facsimile: (816)374-3300 Counsel for Defendant DARRELL E. GRAHAM Trial Attorney MN Bar No. 290890 United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 129 W. Trade Street, Ste. 400 Charlotte, NC 28202 Telephone: (704) 344-6885 Facsimile: 1704) 344-6780 DATED: ENTE THE HONORABLE PATRICIA C. UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO W SETT IT JUDGE 10

<fia^& -p7a-^14^-jp 4 ^^ijj& u R E P sc «fn «Q t 100-2 Filed 05/27/2flQ9a92Rag 11 of U 2009-05-19 15:08» 772 692 6910 P 1/1 2 / 2 EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO ALL DILLARD S. INC. EMPLOYEES POSTED PURSUANT TO CONSENT DECREE --------- This-Notjce-is-bsing-postcd-pursuant-to-a-Consent-Dccreft-entered-by-thc-United-States. District Court in EEOC v. Dillard s. Inc.. Civil Action No. 6:07-cv-149-PCF-KRS. In the lawsuit, EEOC alleged that Dillard s, Inc. discriminated against Paul Reed and Scott Giacomin by subjecting them to a sexually hostile work environment because of their sex. Under the terms of the Consent Decree, Dillard s, Inc. made a monetary payment to Paul Reed and Scott Giacomin and agreed to adopt a policy that prohibits discrimination against employees. Title VII protects individuals from employment discrimination based on their sex. Appropriate corrective action, up to and including termination, based upon the circumstances involved, shall be taken against any employee (including management personnel) found to have violated Dillard s, Inc. policy prohibiting discrimination. EEOC enforces the federal laws against discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, race, color, religion, national origin, sex, and age. If you believe you have been discriminated against, you may contact EEOC at (305) 808-1740. EEOC charges no fees and has employees who speak languages other than English. This Notice must remain posted for three (3) years from the date below and must not be altered, defaced or covered by any other material. Any questions about this Notice or compliance with its terms may be directed to: Dillard s, Inc., c/o Nora E. Curtin, Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 2700/Miami, FL 33131. Page 2 of 2 receivod on 5/19/2009 3:31:48 PM [Eastorn Daylight Time] for 8553306.