August 7, Re: File No. SR-NASD Dear Ms. England:

Similar documents
File No. SR-NASD Extension of Time to Pass Series 55 Examination, Equity Trader

July 7, Dear Ms. England:

November 11, File No. SR-NASD Amendments to Schedule B to the NASD By-Laws. Dear Ms. England:

Re: SR-NASD , Amendment No. 1 - Technical Amendment to NASD Rule 2710

June 7, Dear Ms. England:

File No. SR-NASD Revisions to NASD By-Laws Extending Existing Pilot Program for the Regulatory Fee and the Trading Activity Fee

File No. SR-NASD Chief Executive Officer and Chief Compliance Officer Certification Proposal

Re: File No. SR-NASD Amendments to NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure Rules and 10205(h) Relating to Injunctive Relief

47064 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 1998 / Notices

File No. SR-NASD

File No. SR-NASD-98-74, Amendment No. 1 - Amendments to Rule 3110(f) Governing Predispute Arbitration Agreements with Customers

(1) The Amendment modifies the proposed Rule 2130(b) as follows (new language underlined):

Description. Contact Information. Signature. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C Form 19b-4. Page 1 of * 20

Description. Contact Information. Signature. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C Form 19b-4. Page 1 of * 13

Section 19(b)(3)(A) * Section 19(b)(3)(B) * Section 19(b)(2) * Rule. 19b-4(f)(1) 19b-4(f)(2) (Title *) Vice President and Associate General Counsel

May 7, Dear Ms. England:

NASD Notice to Members Executive Summary

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing Amendment

Section 19(b)(3)(A) * Section 19(b)(3)(B) * Section 19(b)(2) * Rule. 19b-4(f)(1) 19b-4(f)(2) 19b-4(f)(3) 19b-4(f)(4) VP, Associate General Counsel

Section 19(b)(3)(A) * Section 19(b)(3)(B) * Section 19(b)(2) * Rule. 19b-4(f)(1) 19b-4(f)(2) (Title *)

1000. MEMBERSHIP, REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Application and Membership Interview

ULLICO INC. BYLAWS. (Adopted October 14, 1987, with revisions through August 11, 2016) ARTICLE I PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES

BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL NASD REGULATION, INC. DECISION. District No. 7

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

Re: File No. SR-NASD Response to Comments and Amendment No. 1

AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Regulatory Notice 09-19

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

CARTOGRAM, INC. VOTING AGREEMENT RECITALS

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL

MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY $ Multi-Modal Subordinated General Revenue Bonds Series REMARKETING AGREEMENT

Model Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement

SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

FEDERATED NATIONAL HOLDING COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets. * * * * *

National Futures Association: Proposed Technical Amendments to NFA Registration Rule 802

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-A, AS AMENDED

NASD Notice to Members Executive Summary

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT

main. July 6, 2017

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. LCB File No. R016-02

AMENDED AND RESTATED LIQUIDITY AGREEMENT. between TEXAS PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY. and TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Model Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K/A (Amendment No. 1)

NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES

Health Planning Chapter STATE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER REVIEW PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-K

OMEGA FLEX, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

BRU FUEL AGREEMENT RECITALS

DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE CONSERVATION EASEMENTS 4 CCR 725-4

PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT

PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT. by and between VALLEJO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. and. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Paying Agent. Dated July 1, 2017

RESOLUTION AGREEMENT. I. Recitals

Model Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1642 Houston, TX

$ GROVER BEACH IMPROVEMENT AGENCY INDUSTRIAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AREA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS SERIES 2011B PURCHASE CONTRACT, 2011

PART II SECURITIES AND FUTURES MARKETS

CODE OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

TEMPLATE: DO NOT SEND TO NFA NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION

PRIVATE PLACEMENT AGREEMENT. relating to

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff. Appendix B.3 Net Scheduled Participating Generator Agreement

8 No. IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING 9 PROVISIONS WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10

BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff. Appendix B.16 Pseudo-Tie Participating Generator Agreement

ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 18 CFR Part 33. [Docket No. RM ]

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST

BYLAWS COOLISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware Corporation. Effective as of August 1, 2017

Notice to Members. Annual Certification of Compliance and Supervisory Processes. Executive Summary. Questions/Further Information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BRU FUEL AGREEMENT RECITALS

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT SELLING GROUP AGREEMENT

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff. Appendix B.5 Dynamic Scheduling Agreement for Scheduling Coordinators

NOTE- All drafts must be pre-approved by Vectren before final execution. Please contact Vectren Credit Risk for assignment of document number.

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

Realogy Holdings Corp. Realogy Group LLC

[[COMPANY NAME]] ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. [[Date of Board Consent]]

AFME Model Block Trade Agreement (Without Backstop)

DISCRETIONARY INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

PROXIES - REPUBLIC OF IRELAND. Contents. Introduction 1 4. Scope 5. Principles 6. General Updated 11

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

AMENDMENT NO. 3 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

Guarantee of Payment Agreement for Individual Accounts

Guaranty Agreement. 2. Guaranty Absolute. The liability of Guarantor under this Guaranty shall be absolute and unconditional irrespective of:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA105 FERC 61,307 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Attachment A. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets.

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER. dated as of FEBRUARY 23, by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC,

7ORDINANCE NO. OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MARPLE, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

FORM 8-K JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC

EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT

NOBLE ENERGY, INC. Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated August 8, 2017

SEANERGY MARITIME HOLDINGS CORP. Filed by UNITED CAPITAL INVESTMENTS CORP.

Transcription:

August 7, 1998 Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Mail Stop 10-1 Re: File No. SR-NASD-98-58 Dear Ms. England: Pursuant to Rule 19b-4, enclosed herewith is the above-numbered rule filing. Also enclosed is a 3-l/2" disk containing the rule filing in Microsoft Word 7.0 to facilitate production of the Federal Register release. If you have any questions, please contact Eric Moss, Office of General Counsel, NASD Regulation, Inc., at (202) 728-8982; e-mail mosse@nasd.com. The fax number of the Office of General Counsel is (202) 728-8264. Very truly yours, Joan C. Conley Secretary Attachment

File No. SR-NASD-98-58 Consists of 12 Pages SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. Form 19b-4 Proposed Rule Change by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. Pursuant to Rule 19b-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Page 3 of 12 1. Text of Proposed Rule Change (a) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act"), National Association of Securities Dealers Regulation, Inc. ("NASD Regulation") is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC or Commission ) a proposed rule change to amend Rules 9269 and 9360 of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD" or "Association") to eliminate the requirement for personal service of decisions in cases involving bars and expulsions. NASD Regulation is also filing, concurrently, related proposed rule changes in File No. SR-NASD- 98-57. Below is the text of the proposed rule change, which treats the language in SR- NASD-98-57 as having already been approved. Proposed new language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets. 9000. CODE OF PROCEDURE 9200. DISCIPLINARY PROCEDINGS 9269. Default Decisions (a) through (c) No change. (d) Final Disciplinary Action of the Association; Effectiveness of Sanctions If a default decision is not appealed pursuant to Rule 9311 or called for review pursuant to Rule 9312 within 25 days after the date the Office of Hearing Officers serves it on the Parties, the default decision shall become the final disciplinary action of the Association for purposes of SEC Rule 19d-1(c)(1). Unless otherwise provided in the default decision, the sanctions shall become effective 30 days after the default decision becomes the

Page 4 of 12 final disciplinary action of the Association, except that a bar or expulsion shall become effective immediately upon the default decision becoming the final disciplinary action of the Association. The Association shall serve the decision on a Respondent by overnight courier, facsimile or other means likely to obtain prompt service when the sanction is a bar or an expulsion. 9360. Effectiveness of Sanctions Unless otherwise provided in the decision issued under Rule 9349 or Rule 9351, a sanction (other than a bar or an expulsion) specified in a decision constituting final disciplinary action of the Association for purposes of SEC Rule 19d-1(c)(1) shall become effective 30 days after the date of service of the decision constituting final disciplinary action. A bar or an expulsion shall become effective upon service of the decision constituting final disciplinary action of the Association for purposes of SEC Rule 19d-1(c)(1), unless otherwise specified therein. The Association shall [take reasonable steps to obtain personal service of] serve the decision on a Respondent by overnight courier, facsimile or other means reasonably likely to obtain prompt service when the sanction is a bar or an expulsion. (b) Not applicable. (c) Not applicable. 2. Procedures of the Self-Regulatory Organization (a) The proposed rule change was approved by the Board of Directors of NASD Regulation at its meeting on March 19, 1998, which authorized the filing of the rule change with the SEC. The Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. has been provided an opportunity to consult

Page 5 of 12 with respect to the proposed rule change, pursuant to the Plan of Allocation and Delegation of Functions by the NASD to its Subsidiaries. The NASD Board of Governors had an opportunity to review the proposed rule change at its meetings on March 19, 1998. No other action by the NASD is necessary for the filing of the proposed rule change. Section 1(a)(ii) of Article VII of the NASD By-Laws permits the NASD Board of Governors to adopt amendments to NASD Rules without recourse to the membership for approval. This rule change will become effective 30 days following SEC approval. The NASD will announce the rule change in a Notice to Members promptly after receiving SEC approval. (b) Questions regarding this rule filing may be directed to Eric Moss, NASD Regulation, Office of General Counsel, at (202) 728-8982. 3. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change (a) Purpose The proposed changes to Rules 9269 and 9360 would establish that in cases involving bars or expulsions, service of decisions should be done by overnight courier, facsimile or other means likely to obtain prompt service. Rule 9269 does not presently contain language addressing the means by which service of default decisions in cases involving bars and expulsions should be accomplished. Rule 9360 currently requires that the Chief Hearing Officer serve all final disciplinary decisions, and that reasonable efforts be made to personally serve (hand delivery) all final decisions imposing a bar or expulsion. Rule 9360 s personal service provision for final decisions imposing bars or expulsions was created because these decisions become effective immediately.

Page 6 of 12 With respect to final default decisions imposing bars or expulsions, reasonable efforts at personal service (hand delivery) are generally not successful, and with respect to litigated decisions the most effective type of service is a method such as overnight courier or facsimile. (b) Statutory Basis NASD Regulation believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the Association rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(7) in that they further the statutory mandate that the Association establish rules providing that its members and persons associated with its members shall be appropriately disciplined for violation of any provision of this title, the rules or regulations thereunder, the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, or the rules of the Association. The rule changes are consistent with Section 15A(b)(8) in that they further the statutory goals of providing a fair procedure for disciplining members and persons associated with members. 4. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition NASD Regulation does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. 5. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

Page 7 of 12 6. Extension of Time Period for Commission Action Not applicable. 7. Basis for Summary Effectiveness Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3) or for Accelerated Effectiveness Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) Not applicable. 8. Proposed Rule Change Based on Rules of Another Self-Regulatory Organization or of the Commission Not applicable. 9. Exhibits 1. Completed notice of proposed rule change for publication in the Federal Register. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, NASD Regulation has duly caused this filing to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. NASD REGULATION, INC. BY: Joan C. Conley, Secretary Date: August 7, 1998

Page 8 of 12 EXHIBIT 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Release No. 34- ; File No. SR-NASD-98-58) Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to The Elimination of the Requirement for Personal Service of Decisions in Cases Involving Bars and Expulsions Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act"), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on, NASD Regulation, Inc. ("NASD Regulation") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD Regulation. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATION'S STATEMENT OF THE TERMS OF SUBSTANCE OF THE PROPOSED RULE CHANGE NASD Regulation is proposing to amend Rules 9269 and 9360 of the Code of Procedure of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD" or "Association"), to eliminate the requirement for personal service of decisions in cases involving bars and expulsions. NASD Regulation has also filed a related rule change with the Commission in File No. SR-NASD-98-57. Below is the text of the proposed rule change, which treats the language in SR-NASD-98-57 as already having been approved. Proposed new language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets. 9000. CODE OF PROCEDURE 9200. DISCIPLINARY PROCEDINGS

Page 9 of 12 9269. Default Decisions (a) through (c) No change. (d) Final Disciplinary Action of the Association; Effectiveness of Sanctions If a default decision is not appealed pursuant to Rule 9311 or called for review pursuant to Rule 9312 within 25 days after the date the Office of Hearing Officers serves it on the Parties, the default decision shall become the final disciplinary action of the Association for purposes of SEC Rule 19d-1(c)(1). Unless otherwise provided in the default decision, the sanctions shall become effective 30 days after the default decision becomes the final disciplinary action of the Association, except that a bar or expulsion shall become effective immediately upon the default decision becoming the final disciplinary action of the Association. The Association shall serve the decision on a Respondent by overnight courier, facsimile or other means likely to obtain prompt service when the sanction is a bar or an expulsion. 9360. Effectiveness of Sanctions Unless otherwise provided in the decision issued under Rule 9349 or Rule 9351, a sanction (other than a bar or an expulsion) specified in a decision constituting final disciplinary action of the Association for purposes of SEC Rule 19d-1(c)(1) shall become effective [on a date established by the Chief Hearing Officer, which shall not be earlier than] 30 days after the date of service of the decision constituting final disciplinary action. A bar or an expulsion shall become effective upon service of the decision constituting final disciplinary action of the Association for purposes of SEC Rule 19d-1(c)(1), unless otherwise

Page 10 of 12 specified therein. The Association shall [take reasonable steps to obtain personal service of] serve the decision on a Respondent by overnight courier, facsimile or other means reasonably likely to obtain prompt service when the sanction is a bar or an expulsion. II. SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATION'S STATEMENT OF THE PURPOSE OF, AND STATUTORY BASIS FOR, THE PROPOSED RULE CHANGE In its filing with the Commission, NASD Regulation included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NASD Regulation has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. (A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change (1) Purpose The proposed changes to Rules 9269 and 9360 would establish that in cases involving bars or expulsions, service of decisions should be done by overnight courier, facsimile or other means likely to obtain prompt service. Rule 9269 does not presently contain language addressing the means by which service of default decisions in cases involving bars and expulsions should be accomplished. Rule 9360 currently requires that the Chief Hearing Officer serve all final disciplinary decisions, and that reasonable efforts be made to personally serve (hand delivery) all final decisions imposing a bar or expulsion. Rule 9360 s personal service provision for final decisions imposing bars or expulsions was created because these decisions become effective immediately.

Page 11 of 12 With respect to final default decisions imposing bars or expulsions, reasonable efforts at personal service (hand delivery) are generally not successful, and with respect to litigated decisions the most effective type of service is a method such as overnight courier or facsimile. (2) Statutory Basis NASD Regulation believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the Association rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The NASD believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with Section 15A(b)(7) in that they provide for reasonable means to notify parties of default decisions. The rule changes are consistent with Section 15A(b)(8) in that they further the statutory goals of providing a fair procedure for disciplining members and persons associated with members. (B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition NASD Regulation does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. (C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

Page 12 of 12 III. DATE OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPOSED RULE CHANGE AND TIMING FOR COMMISSION ACTION Within thirty-five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) by order approve such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. SOLICITATION OF COMMENTS Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All submissions should refer to the file number in the caption above and should be submitted by [insert date 21 days from the date of publication].

Page 13 of 12 For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority, 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Jonathan G. Katz Secretary