IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. To: Thomas M. Christ, John A. Bennett, Margaret S. Olney and Gregory A.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS

9/29/2017 1:57:26 PM 17CV42542 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Petitioner, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 03, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Rebuttal to Assistant U.S. Attorney s Response to Petitioner s Objection and Removal

8/31/2018 2:12 PM 18CV38516 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

NO CRW STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT VS. ) 81ST/218TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JACK SMITH ) WILSON COUNTY, TEXAS

3/11/ :19 AM 19CV11254 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UE and OAR , and by this Petition asks the Public Utility Commission of

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA. STATE OF ALABAMA, ) ) ) ) v. ) CASE NO. CC ) ) ) MICHAEL GREGORY HUBBARD, ) ) Defendant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF KLAMATH. No.

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH UTCR CONFERRAL STATEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA. STATE OF ALABAMA, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CC ) FELIX BARRY MOORE, ) Defendant. ) MOTION TO DISMISS

The 2013 Florida Statutes

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Oregon State Bar Public Meeting Notice As of April 30, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. Opinion Number: 2011-NMSC-020. Filing Date: June 1, Docket No. 32,411

Robert W. Fairchild, Respondent 111 East 11th Street Lawrence, KS James McCabria, Respondent. 111 East 11th Street. Lawrence, KS 66044

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON

Repeals law prohibiting law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 20 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 132

If!~ PACIFIC POWER A DIVISION OF PACIFICORP

Rule Change #1998(14)

No. D-1-GN

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 7

1/1/2019 4:52 PM 19CV00011 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Oral Argument Requested

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Setting Aside Record of Arrest Oregon Revised Statute

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

15th Annual Litigation Institute & Retreat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT JURISDICTION AND VENUE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT. Count I. Dwi - Death Of Another ( Y

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 6:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

17CV14526 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF LANE

(Negligence, Negligence Per Se)

Labor and Employment Team: Bills Signed Into Law 2011 OREGON EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION UPDATE. General Employment. July 15, 2011

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Mike McCauley, Executive Director, League of Oregon Cities Mike McArthur, Executive Director, Association of Oregon Counties

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 10

Case No.: 2017SA305. Petitioner: Scott Smith. Respondents: Daniel Hayes and Julianne Page, and

CAUSE NO PC IN PROBATE COURT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff,

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE. NOW COMES Plaintiff, Stephen Torres, and files this, his Original Petition

1 HB By Representatives Givan, Davis and Shedd (Constitutional. 4 Amendment) 5 RFD: Constitution, Campaigns and Elections

Oregon Uniform Civil Jury Instructions

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION. Case No. OVERVIEW OF CASE

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Criminal Law - Bribery of a Public Officer

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Constitution. Statutes. Administrative Rules. Common Law

March 3, An extra copy of this cover letter is enclosed. Please date stamp the extra copy and return it to me in the envelope provided.

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

COUNCIL ON COURT PROCEDURES. Saturday, October 9, 1993 Meeting 9:30 a.m.

CITY OF TRACY Office of the City Attorney 325 East Tenth Street Tracy, CA fax

MERIT BRIEF OF APPELLEE, STATE OF OHIO EX REL. KEVIN B. TODD

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council December 9, 2014

IN THE JUSTICE COURT FOR JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. Plaintiff, This matter came before the court for trial on March 26, The question presented

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS. ----ooooo---- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -----

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING OF NEW SELLWOOD BRIDGE

f'l1> ~cit 01A-t- lw~h., s~ Fe~,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CHEROKEE NATION PETITION CHALLENGING ELECTION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY. CASE No. 07-CR-0043

Initiatives and Referenda Handbook

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE

U.S. District Court District of Oregon (Portland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:86-cv JU

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

CITY OF SAN DIEGO. (This Measure will appear on the ballot in the following form.)

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUES & RUNDELL VERSUS **********

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON THE STATE OF OREGON, Adverse Party-Plaintiff, Supreme Court No. S53089 Lane County No. 20 05 17842 vs. DANIEL LYMAN DAVIS, Relator-Defendant. State of Oregon ex rel DANIEL LYMAN DAVIS, PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND FOR WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO Plaintiff, vs. MARY ANN BEARDEN, JACK A. BILLINGS, CHARLES CARLSON, CYNTHIA CARLSON, TED CARP, GREGORY G. FOOTE, EVELEEN HENRY, BRYAN T. HODGES, LAUREN S. HODGES, DARRYL LARSON, KIP LEONARD, MAURICE K. MERREN, DOUGLAS S. MITCHELL, KARSTEN H. RASMUSSEN, and LYLE G. VELURE, Defendants. Attorney for Daniel Lyman Davis, Mandamus Relator and Quo Warranto Plaintiff: James E. Leuenberger, OSB 89154 JAMES E. LEUENBERGER PC 4800 SW Meadows Rd Ste 300 PO Box 1684 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (503) 542 7433 voice (503) 419 6415 fax jim@fights4rights.com Attorney for Adverse Party in Mandamus: Thomas A. Hermens, OSB 80260 Lane County District Attorney s Office 125 E 8th Ave Rm 400 Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 682 4261 voice (541) 682 3890 fax tom.hermens@co.lane.or.us Attorney for Quo Warranto Defendants: Mary H. Williams, OSB 91124 Solicitor General Oregon Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 (503) 378-4400 voice (503) 378 6306 fax mary.williams@doj.state.or.us

Petition Page 1 of 5 Facts Material to a Determination of Question Presented and Relief Sought From the effective date that Oregon Constitution Article VII was amended in 1910, circuit courts have not been constitutional courts. While, pursuant to Or. Const. Art VII (amended) 1, the legislature and the people have the power to create circuit courts neither the legislature nor the people have done so 1. Relator requests a peremptory writ of mandamus directing F. Douglas Harcleroad, Lane County District Attorney, and his deputies to cease seeking indictments for a non existent court. Relator requests a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the Circuit Judges in Lane County to cease conducting trials, to cease hearing motions, and to cease conducting any other court business until the legislature or the people create circuit courts. Plaintiff seeks a declaration in quo warranto that the men and women elected Circuit Judges in Lane County no longer exceed their authority by exercising powers of judges in court as opposed to the powers granted judges out of court. This declaration is sought because no circuit courts exist in Oregon unless and until either the people or the legislature create circuit courts pursuant to the power to create courts found in Or. Const. Art. VII (amended), 1. 1 To be more precise, it is possible that the legislature or the people may have, at some time since 1910, created circuit courts. If such courts were created since 1910, the post 1910 legislation creating circuit courts has been repealed as no such statute is now a part of the Oregon Revised Statutes.

Petition Page 2 of 5 Petitions for Peremptory Writs of Mandamus and for Writ of Quo Warranto are Timely Daniel Lyman Davis, relator and plaintiff, has been indicted in Lane County (Appendix page 1), has demurred to the charge on the basis that no court has jurisdiction to try a felony in Lane County (Appendix pages 2 4), and no further action has been taken in his case. These petitions will still be timely even if a Circuit Judge acts on Mr. Davis demurrer as no circuit court exists in Oregon and only a circuit court in and for Lane County could have jurisdiction to try a felony committed in Lane County. Application to the Circuit Court is Impossible as no Circuit Court Exists Relator / plaintiff is barred from seeking relief from a court that does not exist. Since no circuit court exists in Oregon, plaintiff cannot apply for relief from a circuit court. No Other Remedy is Available Relator / plaintiff has no other remedy available to him other than the remedies sought in these joint petitions. A court which does not exist has no jurisdiction 2. Since neither the people nor the legislature have created any circuit courts since Oregon Constitution Article VII was amended in 1910 3 2 Mr. Davis readily admits that once circuit courts are created, they will have the jurisdiction conferred on them by Or. Const. Art. VII (original), 9. Until circuit courts are created, however, they do not have and cannot have any jurisdiction. 3 If Or. Const. Art. VII was not amended in 1910, as argued by the plaintiff in Lincoln Loan Company v. City of Portland, S. Crt. No. S51666, these joint petitions have no merit and this court has no jurisdiction to even consider them since this court s power to entertain original petitions for writs of mandamus and quo warranto were conferred on this court by Or. Const. Art. VII (amended), 2.

Petition Page 3 of 5 and since a court must exist in order to have jurisdiction, any proceedings in any tribunal calling itself a circuit court would be a sham and a fraud. Mr. Davis is not and should not be required to participate in a fraudulent proceeding before he is allowed to petition this Supreme Court for a determination that the court the State of Oregon has indicted him into does not exist. Memorandum of Law From 1859 until 1910 Oregon had Circuits Courts. See Or. Const. Art. VII (original) 1. From 1859 to 1910 the Circuit Courts had [a]ll judicial power, authority, and jurisdiction not vested by [the Oregon Constitution], or by the laws consistent therewith, exclusively in some other Court. See Oregon Constitution Art. VII (original) 9. In 1910 the people of Oregon revised and amended Article VII of the Oregon Constitution. In particular, the 1910 measure eliminated Circuits Courts as constitutional courts. Oregon Constitution Art. VII (amended) 1 reads: The judicial power of the state shall be vested in one supreme court and in such other courts as may from time to time be created by law. The judges of the supreme and other courts shall be elected by the legal voters of the state or of their respective districts for a term of six years, and shall receive such compensation as may be provided by law, which compensation shall not be diminished during the term for which they are elected. From the effective date of the 1910 measure to the present, no provision of the Oregon Constitution creates a circuit court. There is no statute that creates a circuit court 4. Therefore, no circuit court exists in Oregon. 4 The legislature has created the court of appeals (ORS 2.510) and the tax court (ORS 305.405). The legislature has also authorized municipalities to create municipal courts (ORS 221.336). Municipalities have created municipal courts. See, for example, Springfield Charter Section 22(1). It cannot be said that the legislature does not know how to create courts or that

Petition Page 4 of 5 Mr. Davis recognizes that if and when the legislature or the people creates a circuit court or circuit courts, such court or courts will obtain the jurisdiction granted them by Oregon Constitution Art. VII (original) 9. That creation has not yet occurred. Mr. Davis recognizes that men and women have been elected Circuit Judges. The mere fact that such men and women have been elected Circuit Judges does not grant them the authority to try cases absent a court to try the case in. ORS 1.230 Powers of a judge out of court. A judge may exercise, out of court, all the powers expressly conferred upon a judge as distinguished from a court, and not otherwise. Prayer Relator, Daniel Lyman Davis, prays for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing F. Douglas Harcleroad and his deputies to cease and desist from seeking or obtaining indictments to initiate felony prosecutions in any circuit court until a circuit court is created in and for Lane County. Relator, Daniel Lyman Davis, prays for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the men and women who have been elected or appointed Circuit Judges in Lane County, Oregon to cease and desist from hearing and deciding motions, trying cases, or in any other way acting as if they are presiding in a court of law until a circuit court is created in and for Lane County. Plaintiff, Daniel Lyman Davis, prays for quo warranto declaring that the men and women who have been elected or appointed Circuit Judges in Lane County, Oregon have no authority to exercise any powers conferred upon a the legislature has not created courts. It just has not created a circuit court as of now.

Petition Page 5 of 5 court as distinguished from the powers conferred upon a judge until such time as a circuit court is created in and for Lane County. Dated this 3 rd day of January, 2006. JAMES E. LEUENBERGER PC Certificate of Delivery James E. Leuenberger OSB 89154 Attorney for Relator / Plaintiff, Daniel Lyman Davis I certify that I have delivered or will deliver a true copy of this document to counsel listed on the title page by hand delivery on January 3, 2006. James E. Leuenberger

r. DOUGLASS HARCLEROAD ane county ~istrict Attorney F'lm 25 E. 8"' Avenue hgene, OR 97401 05 DEC -6 Pfi 2: 1.0 541) 682-4261 (541) 682-3890 (&x) clrcu!l' i;<;i;:; i,:,, <:-:, FOR LAME COUNTY Inthe Circuit Court of the State of Oregon forlane Wty THE STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff, Appendix Page 1 of 4...- vs. DANIEL LYMAN DAVIS, Defendant. INDICTMENT 2005 17842 'he above named defendant is accused by the Lane County Grand Jury of the crime of: FLEEING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE POLICE WITH VEHICLE ommitted as follows: 'he defendant, on or about August 30,2005, in Lane County, Oregon, being an operator of a motor vehicle upon a mblic highway or premises open to the public, and having been given a visual or audible signal to stop by a imuing police officer who was wearing a &form, prominently displaying the officer's badge of office, or who wa iperating a vehicle appropriately marked showing it to be an official police vehicle, did while still in the vehicle inlawfully and knowingly flee or attempt to elude said officer; contrary to statute and against the peace and dignity if the State of Oregon. DATED December 2,2005 at Eugene, Lane County, Oregon. )RS 811.540(lA)/Class C Felony Vimess examined: ilichael Lee )OB: 09/21/1944 )A NO. 05-6679 bntrol: 41257909 F. DOUGLASS HARCLEROAD, District Attorney 7 By: - '~homas A. Hehens. OSB 80260 Assistant District ~ttorne~ Tom.Hennens@co.lane.or.us Alternate Foreman of the Grand Jury

1 Appendix Page 2 of 4 2 3 4 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF LANE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 THE STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff, vs. DANIEL LYMAN DAVIS, Defendant. Case No. 20 05 17842 AMENDED DEMURRER (Oral Argument Scheduled for January 3, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. before the Honorable Karsten H. Rasmussen) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendant, by and through counsel, demurs as follows. Points and Authorities This demurrer is pursuant to ORS 135.630(1) which reads: The defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: (1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county. The reason the crime alleged cannot be tried within Lane County is, the crime alleged is a felony and Lane County does not have a Circuit Court 1. From 1859 until 1910 Oregon had Circuits Courts. See Oregon Constitution Art. VII (original) 1. From 1859 to 1910 the Circuit Courts had [a]ll judicial power, authority, and jurisdiction not vested by [the Oregon Constitution], or by the laws consistent therewith, 1 Neither a justice court nor a municipal court is empowered to try felonies. ORS 51.050(3); ORS 221.339(3). Defendant is not aware that Lane County currently has a County Court or County Court Judge or whether such a court would be empowered to try felonies. JAMES E. LEUENBERGER, PC 4800 SW MEADOWS RD, STE 300 PO BOX 1684 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 503 542 7433 voice 503 419 6415 fax jim@fights4rights.com Page 1 of 3 Demurrer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Appendix Page 3 of 4 exclusively in some other Court. See Oregon Constitution Art. VII (original) 9. In 1910 the people of Oregon revised Article VII of the Oregon Constitution. In particular, the 1910 measure eliminated Circuits Courts as constitutional courts. Oregon Constitution Art. VII (amended) 1 reads: The judicial power of the state shall be vested in one supreme court and in such other courts as may from time to time be created by law. The judges of the supreme and other courts shall be elected by the legal voters of the state or of their respective districts for a term of six years, and shall receive such compensation as may be provided by law, which compensation shall not be diminished during the term for which they are elected. From the effective date of the 1910 measure to the present, no provision of the Oregon Constitution creates a circuit court. There is no statute that creates a circuit court 2. Therefore, no circuit court exists in Oregon. Defendant recognizes that if and when the legislature or the people (by referendum or initiative) creates a circuit court or circuit courts, such court or courts will obtain the jurisdiction granted them by Oregon Constitution Art. VII (original) 9. That creation has not yet occurred. Defendant recognizes that men and women have been elected to be Circuit Judges. The mere fact that such men and women have been elected Circuit Judges does not grant them the authority to try cases absent a court to try the case in. ORS 1.230 Powers of a judge out of court. A judge may exercise, out of court, all the powers expressly conferred upon a judge as distinguished from a court, and not otherwise. Because of the nature of this demurrer, which asserts that the court in which the demurrer is filed is not a court that actually exists, defendant is also filing a petition for writ of mandamus in /// /// 23 24 25 26 2 The legislature has created the court of appeals (ORS 2.510) and the tax court (ORS 305.405). The legislature has also authorized municipalities to create municipal courts (ORS 221.336). Municipalities have created municipal courts. See, for example, Springfield Charter Section 22(1). It cannot be said that the legislature does not know how to create courts or that the legislature has not created courts. It just has not created a circuit court as of now. JAMES E. LEUENBERGER, PC 4800 SW MEADOWS RD, STE 300 PO BOX 1684 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 503 542 7433 voice 503 419 6415 fax jim@fights4rights.com Page 2 of 3 Demurrer

1 2 Appendix Page 4 of 4 the Supreme Court to seek a writ of mandamus directing the Lane County District Attorney to stop seeking indictments into a non existent court. 3 4 5 Dated this 20 th day of December, 2005. JAMES E. LEUENBERGER PC 6 7 8 9 10 Certificate of Delivery James E. Leuenberger OSB 89154 Attorney for defendant I certify that I mailed a true copy of this document to the Lane County District Attorney s Office, 125 E 8th Ave Rm 400, Eugene, OR 97401. 11 12 James E. Leuenberger 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 JAMES E. LEUENBERGER, PC 4800 SW MEADOWS RD, STE 300 PO BOX 1684 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 503 542 7433 voice 503 419 6415 fax jim@fights4rights.com Page 3 of 3 Demurrer