County Commissioners Association November 23, 2015

Similar documents
Right-to-Know Law & Sunshine Act September 15, 2016

Public Utility Commission CLE June 1, 2017

Costs to Implement the Right-to-Know Law Study

Phone Number: http: //openrecords.pa.gov

Annual Report. (717) Commonwealth Keystone Building 400 North Street, Plaza Level Harrisburg, PA

Right to Know Law Legal Update

Right-to-Know Law, 65 P.S , et. seq.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FINAL DETERMINATION : : : : : : : : : : INTRODUCTION. Amanda St. Hilaire, a reporter for ABC27 News (collectively, the Requester ), submitted

WHAT EVERY IN-HOUSE COUNSEL NEEDS TO KNOW

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FINAL DETERMINATION. Docket No.: AP INTRODUCTION. Nolan Finnerty, Esq. ( Requester ) submitted a request ( Request ) to the Pennsylvania

FINAL DETERMINATION INTRODUCTION. Amanda St. Hilaire, a reporter for ABC27 NEWS (collectively, the Requester ),

LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION

PSBA Judicial Advocacy Report: Status of court cases in which PSBA is participating as Amicus Curiae or has brought suit on behalf of members

Library System of Lancaster County Bylaws

By

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CITY OF ANAHEIM PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD

Determine 2-3 ideal dates for the meeting

Redistricting Matters: A Nonpartisan Consensus for Cumberland County

CREATING YOUR GRASSROOTS STRATEGY GABRIEL SNOW NRECA POLITICAL AFFAIRS

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

~...,. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Presents Senator David Harrington of the Maryland General Assembly

FINAL DETERMINATION INTRODUCTION. Robert Kalinowski and The Citizens Voice (collectively Requester ) submitted a

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN DANIEL TRISTAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff. v. TRAVIS COUNTY

Board of Directors - Guidelines for Meetings (Procedures based on organizational bylaws)

B 3 BOARD OF REGENTS MEETING. Open Government Training. For information only BACKGROUND

Mock Trial Practice Law Test


Federal Contracting Resources

Conflict Disclosures for Board Members and District Employees 1

CONFLICTS BETWEEN INTERPRETERS AND CONSUMERS: WHEN YOU VE TRIED EVERYTHING

Oswego County. Official Annual Statistical Summary & Narrative Report of Election Operations

Pennsylvania House of Representatives Policies on the Right to Know Law

CITIZEN S GUIDE. PRESUMPTION OF OPENNESS: Records are Public Unless.

Bexar county probate court records online

BELIZE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 95:01 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

Court s in Session: Jury Trials for Clerks OBJECTIVES. About having a Jury Trial? Texas Municipal Courts Education Center.

Candidate s Guide (F0405)

Time to Engage with Legislators

Few people think of IEEE

The Alabama Open Meetings Act

School Board Policy Basics

WORKING WITH SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS: IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM THE BENCH

Guidance for the public, FDA Advisory Committee Members, and FDA Staff: The Open Public Hearing at FDA Advisory Committee Meetings

The Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011

The County of Chester Office of the Controller Internal Audit Department

NEVADA LEGISLATIVE MANUAL

Data Protection Policy. Malta Gaming Authority

Colorado Campaign and Political Finance Manual

Municipal Records And Open Records. Zindia Thomas Assistant General Counsel Texas Municipal League

Making Government Work For The People Again

Post-Election Survey Findings: Americans Want the New Congress to Provide a Check on the White House, Follow Facts in Investigations

RECOMMENDS A YES VOTE ON

Paperless Courts. Shelia Norman Bell County District Clerk BCBA Paralegal Meeting, May 8, 2014

WHEELING CREEK WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PREVENTION DISTRICT COMPACT

CORRESPONDING SECRETARY TRAINING SESSION 2014

2013 Spring Meetings Recap

Freedom of Information. How it works inside the box

IFRIC Interpretations: An Update. Michael Bradbury Unitec New Zealand Private Bag Auckland

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CHIEF OF POLICE SURVEY 2018 SELECTION CRITERIA SURVEY RESULTS

Overview of Open Government in Washington State:

FINAL DETERMINATION. IN THE MATTER OF : : JOSHUA PRINCE, ESQ. : Requester : : v. : Docket No.: AP : CITY OF HARRISBURG, : Respondent :

Delegation of Authority By-law. Presented by: Peter Simmons Chief Corporate Services Officer

Compare This. Diagnostic Assessment #1 For the Unit, We The People (Reading) Table of Contents

Agencies, Board and Commissions

MODULE 8: REPORT WRITING

Democratic Engagement

BROWN ACT AND OAKLAND SUNSHINE ORDINANCE OVERVIEW v1 January

REAL ID ACT STATE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

PA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY

Closing Argument Practice Tips

Fixing the U.S. Congress by Embracing Earmarks

Roles and responsibilities

Senator Ralph Hise. Legislative Update 47 th District, North Carolina Senate

California Grand Jurors Association Board of Directors Meeting August 28, 2012 M I N U T E S

#THEBERKSKIDS ACTIVISM TOOLKIT SPRING 2018

Candidate Certification & Ballot Drawing 2016 Primary

2018 Tenth Annual AIPLA Trademark Boot Camp. AIPLA Quarles & Brady LLP USPTO

COMMUNICATION TIPS. Tips for Writing Your Legislator

FINAL DETERMINATION. Docket No.: AP INTRODUCTION. Michael Buffer and The Citizens Voice (collectively Requester ) submitted a request

Everyone Votes PA. Everyone.VotesPA.com

2009BargagliottieMAA6up.pdf 1

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

Stamp Duties Consolidation Act Part 2: Charging and Stamping of Instruments Executed on or after 7 July 2012

RIGHTS & LIABILITY OF SURETY

48TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2007

Topics we will cover:

BE THE MEDIA GUIDE - PAYCHECK DECEPTION

PENNSYLVANIA: SMALL GOP LEAD IN CD01

Registered Voters in Central PA

Florida Public Records Law

Provincial Offences Act Part III Charges. Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

Transcription:

Erik Arneson, Executive Director County Commissioners Association November 23, 2015 http://openrecords.pa.gov @ErikOpenRecords @OpenRecordsPA earneson@pa.gov (717) 346-9903

Don t Fear Transparency Embracing transparency is the best policy The goal of the Right-to-Know Law (as said by the Supreme Court) is to empower citizens by affording them access to information concerning the activities of their government Constituents expect transparency

Cut RTK Requests Up Front Many records can/should be instantly available Constituents want information online Meeting minutes Budget documents, including spending RFPs and contracts Election results Job openings Park maps

Look at Other County Websites No need to reinvent the wheel Counties with very good websites include: Lancaster County Montgomery County Think like a constituent, not an official How do I? section on website

Have a Good AORO AORO = Agency Open Records Officer Sometimes called Right-to-Know Officer A good AORO is absolutely vital Job responsibilities: Communicating with requesters Understanding agency record-keeping Meeting tight, inflexible deadlines

Understand the Right-to-Know Law All gov t records are presumed to be public Exceptions 30 exceptions in RTKL itself Other state statutes Federal law Court orders

Exceptions to the RTKL Exceptions in the RTKL include: Public safety & personal safety Social Security #s, driver s license #s Employee performance reviews Medical records Internal, predecisional deliberations Certain investigative records

How the RTKL Applies to You A record is information, regardless of physical form or characteristics, that documents a transaction or activity of an agency and that is created, received or retained pursuant to law or in connection with a transaction, business or activity of the agency

How the RTKL Applies to You The Right-to-Know Law Doesn t distinguish between emails & paper Doesn t distinguish between agency devices & personal devices It only cares if the document / email / whatever is a record and then if that record is a public record

Best Practice Whenever possible: Use agency devices for agency work Dramatically simplifies process of responding to RTK requests and the process of gathering documents for any other purpose

Record Retention The RTKL does not address record retention Goal is a strong, effective retention policy Must balance agency needs & transparency Can t simply say 0 days for everything PHMC has a County Records Manual Fantastic starting point PHMC staff can be a great resource

Sunshine Act Complementary to the Right-to-Know Law RTKL = Open Records Act Sunshine Act = Open Meetings Act When agencies must hold public meetings OOR website s Sunshine Act page offers practical tips about the law

Training from the OOR Training on the RTKL & Sunshine Act OOR website filled with information www.openrecords.pa.gov OOR also provides on-site training Details on OOR website Or call George Spiess, 717-346-9903

Don t Feel Overwhelmed It can be a lot, but it s manageable In 2014, OOR heard 2,017 appeals Total appeals, not total requests Nearly 60% involved local agencies Only 13.4% (271) involved counties On average, each county had ~4 appeals to the OOR in 2014

Don t Feel Overwhelmed

The Office of Open Records One of my goals is to simplify the RTK process for agencies & requesters http://openrecords.pa.gov Constantly updating content New AORO Guidebook for agencies Sample affidavit forms for agencies Suggestions welcome

Open Records in PA Blog Discussing RTKL & other transparency issues http://openrecordspa.wordpress.com Significant OOR Final Determinations Significant court decisions OOR statistics and data Open Records in Pennsylvania podcast @ErikOpenRecords & @OpenRecordsPA

Mediation Goal: Resolve more cases informally OOR authorized to establish mediation Limited resources made this difficult in past Resources still limited, but moving forward No harm in agreeing to mediation Worst-case scenario: FD is slightly delayed

Who Files Appeals? In 2014, appeals were filed by: 45.1% average citizens 38.8% inmates (likely >40% in 2015) 8.4% companies 7.2% reporters / media 0.5% government officials

Senate Bill 411 Significant amendments to the RTKL Separate fees for commercial requesters Limits on inmate requests OOR procedural improvements Numerous clarifications State-related universities: online databases Supported by CCAP

Erik Arneson, Executive Director THANK YOU http://openrecords.pa.gov @ErikOpenRecords @OpenRecordsPA earneson@pa.gov (717) 346-9903