The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.

Similar documents
Translation from Norwegian

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 429 persons in January 2018, and 137 of these were convicted offenders.

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

Return of convicted offenders

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

World Refugee Survey, 2001

Good Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-

ASYLUM STATISTICS MONTHLY REPORT

Regional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001

GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

MIGRATION IN SPAIN. "Facebook or face to face? A multicultural exploration of the positive and negative impacts of

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

Collective Intelligence Daudi Were, Project

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

GLOBAL PRESS FREEDOM RANKINGS

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

LIST OF CHINESE EMBASSIES OVERSEAS Extracted from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People s Republic of China *

My Voice Matters! Plain-language Guide on Inclusive Civic Engagement

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. First Quarter, 2005

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 2008

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Geoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita

ASYLUM STATISTICS JANUARY Date of publication: 10 February 2014 Contact: Tine Van Valckenborgh

Proposed Indicative Scale of Contributions for 2016 and 2017

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

2018 Social Progress Index

TAKING HAPPINESS SERIOUSLY

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 1997

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

Asylum Trends. Monthly Report on Asylum Applications in The Netherlands. February 2018

2017 Social Progress Index

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Status of National Reports received for the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III)

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

2017 BWC Implementation Support Unit staff costs

SLOW PACE OF RESETTLEMENT LEAVES WORLD S REFUGEES WITHOUT ANSWERS

Country Participation

UNHCR, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

CAC/COSP/IRG/2018/CRP.9

TD/B/Inf.222. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Membership of UNCTAD and membership of the Trade and Development Board

India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka: Korea (for vaccine product only):

IOM International Organization for Migration OIM Organisation Internationale pour les Migrations IOM Internationale Organisatie voor Migratie REAB

Copyright Act - Subsidiary Legislation CHAPTER 311 COPYRIGHT ACT. SUBSIDIARY LEGlSLA non. List o/subsidiary Legislation

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2012.

Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region

Countries for which a visa is required to enter Colombia

Asia Pacific (19) EMEA (89) Americas (31) Nov

STATUS OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

Voluntary Scale of Contributions

Embassies and Travel Documents Overview

Publisher: Office of the

REPORT OF THE FOURTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES

Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS estimates and data, end 2001

INCOME AND EXIT TO ARGENTINA

Human Resources in R&D

Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities

1994 No DESIGNS

VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

corruption perceptions index

Proforma Cost for national UN Volunteers for UN Partner Agencies

ASYLUM IN THE EU Source: Eurostat 4/6/2013, unless otherwise indicated ASYLUM APPLICATIONS IN THE EU27

corruption perceptions index

The World s Most Generous Countries

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2013

1994 No PATENTS

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

The Henley & Partners - Kochenov GENERAL RANKING

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2014

Open Doors Foreign Scholars

Dashboard. Jun 1, May 30, 2011 Comparing to: Site. 79,209 Visits % Bounce Rate. 231,275 Pageviews. 00:03:20 Avg.

UNITED NATIONS FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. UN Cash Position. 18 May 2007 (brought forward) Alicia Barcena Under Secretary-General for Management

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN THE AMERICAS: THE IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS

ANNEX IV: RATES APPLICABLE FOR UNIT CONTRIBUTIONS

A Practical Guide To Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 45, SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 14 JUNE parties.

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

58 Kuwait 83. Macao (SAR China) Maldives. 59 Nauru Jamaica Botswana Bolivia 77. Qatar. 63 Bahrain 75. Namibia.

Election of Council Members

Proforma Cost for National UN Volunteers for UN Partner Agencies for National UN. months) Afghanistan 14,030 12,443 4,836

ALLEGATO IV-RATES APPLICABLE FOR UNIT CONTRIBUTIONS

ANNEX IV: RATES APPLICABLE FOR UNIT

Overview of the status of UNCITRAL Conventions and Model Laws x = ratification, accession or enactment s = signature only

Montessori Model United Nations - NYC Conference March 2018

2018 Global Law and Order

-Ms. Wilkins. AP Human Geography Summer Assignment

OFFICIAL NAMES OF THE UNITED NATIONS MEMBERSHIP

Transcription:

Statistics March 2018: Forced returns from Norway The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders. The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway. The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (NDI) is responsible for assisted returns, previously called voluntary returns. Assisted returns are not included in these statistics. Compared with 2017: Forced returns As at 31 March 2017 1439 As at 31 March 2017 1186 Change in percent -17% Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher. Convicted offenders In March, the police returned 136 convicted offenders, approx. 36% of all returnees that month. The most common nationalities among convicted returnees were Polish (14%), Romanian (13%) and Lithuanian (12%). Convicted offenders returned over the last four years 250 200 150 100 50 0 2018 2017 2016 Return of convicted offenders over the last four years 1

Minors A total of 21 minors were returned in March. All 21 were returned with their families. As a rule, Norwegian authorities do not attempt to verify the age of unaccompanied minors when they are to be returned to an European country under the Dublin Regulation. All returned unaccompanied minors must be met by either family members or s who will care for them, e.g. representatives of relevant institutions or the child welfare services in the country in question. 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 10 11 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Måned 2 4 januar 2018 februar 2018 mars 2018 2 4 24 23 januar 2018 februar 2018 mars 2018 januar 2018 februar 2018 2 1 Returned minors so far in 2018. Forced returns on chartered flights Three chartered return flights have taken place so far in 2018. The various returnee categories The NPIS returns persons who have no legal right to stay in Norway, i.e. not only persons who have had their application for asylum and any appeals rejected. 1) all persons who have applied for protection (asylum) in Norway and who have had their application processed and rejected in Norway and who have exhausted all avenues of appeal. This category also includes persons subject to an expulsion order. 2) Dublin anyone returned under the Dublin Regulation. This also includes persons subject to an expulsion order. The Dublin Regulation applies in the EU, Norway and Iceland, and governs where an application for asylum will be processed. The purpose of the Regulation is to prevent asylum seekers from applying in multiple countries, but also to ensure that one of the countries assumes responsibility for the asylum seeker. The statistics include both returns under the Dublin Regulation and returns to "safe third countries". The latter are cases where the asylum 2

applicant already has a residence permit (refugee status or form of permit) in a country that is considered safe. 3) Refused entry persons who have been refused entry into Norway as they are not permitted to stay here. This may be for various reasons, but persons who are refused entry are not banned from Norway. 4) Expelled anyone expelled from Norway who has not applied for protection (asylum) or who is not subject to the Dublin Regulation. Most of those who fall into this category have been expelled due to a criminal conviction and are banned from Norway for a specific period of time. Violating the re-entry ban is a punishable offence. 5) Other persons not covered by any of the categories. Forced returns so far in 2018 by nationality Dublin/safe third country Afghanistan 6 20 65 Albania 5 69 74 Algeria 5 2 4 11 Angola 1 1 Armenia 2 2 4 Azerbaijan 3 1 4 Australia 2 2 Bangladesh 1 2 3 Bosnia- Herzegovina 7 9 16 Brazil 3 3 Bulgaria 4 4 Canada 2 2 Chile 2 2 Colombia 5 4 9 Cuba 3 3 Denmark 1 1 Dominican Republic 1 1 Ecuador 1 1 Egypt 5 2 7 Equatorial Guinea 1 1 El Salvador 3 3 Ivory Coast 1 1 2 Eritrea 1 8 7 16 Estonia 4 4 Ethiopia 11 5 6 22 The Philippines 19 19 France 4 4 3

Forced returns so far in 2018 by nationality Dublin/safe third country The Gambia 3 2 7 12 Georgia 4 18 22 Ghana 5 5 Guinea 1 4 2 7 Guinea-Bissau 1 1 Greece 1 1 Honduras 2 2 Belarus 9 9 India 2 7 9 Indonesia 1 1 Iraq 29 11 36 76 Iran 4 4 5 13 Iceland 1 1 Israel 2 2 Italy 1 1 Yemen 1 2 3 Cameroon 1 1 Kazakhstan 3 1 4 Kenya 3 3 China 3 10 13 Kyrgyzstan 1 1 Democratic Republic of the Congo 7 2 9 Kosovo 1 8 9 Croatia 1 1 Latvia 1 1 Lebanon 2 2 Liberia 1 1 Libya 2 2 Lithuania 53 53 Macedonia 1 10 11 The Maldives 1 1 Mali 1 1 Morocco 10 2 20 32 Mexico 2 2 Moldova 1 13 14 Mongolia 4 11 15 Montenegro 2 2 The Netherlands 9 9 Nepal 4 4 Nigeria 5 21 26 4

Forced returns so far in 2018 by nationality Dublin/safe third country Pakistan 1 1 16 18 Peru 3 3 Poland 68 68 Romania 66 66 Russia 3 9 62 74 Rwanda 1 1 Saudi Arabia 1 1 2 Senegal 2 2 4 Serbia 16 16 Sierra Leone 1 1 Somalia 11 1 27 39 Spain 5 5 Sri Lanka 2 1 1 4 Stateless 5 18 23 United Kingdom 1 2 3 Sudan 1 1 Sweden 5 5 Syria 16 14 30 South Korea 1 1 Tajikistan 1 1 Tanzania 2 2 Thailand 17 17 The Czech Republic 3 3 Tunisia 1 1 6 8 Turkey 3 1 16 20 Germany 13 13 Uganda 1 1 Unknown 1 1 Ukraine 7 39 46 USA 3 13 16 Uzbekistan 1 2 3 Venezuela 1 1 2 Vietnam 2 12 14 Zimbabwe 8 1 9 191 120 875 1186 Forced returns so far in 2018 by destination 5

Dublin/safe third country Afghanistan 38 1 39 Albania 5 65 70 Algeria 5 1 6 Angola 1 1 Armenia 2 2 4 Azerbaijan 1 1 Australia 2 2 Bahrain 1 1 Belgium 7 2 9 Bosnia-Herzegovina 7 8 15 Brazil 3 3 Bulgaria 5 5 Canada 2 2 Chile 2 2 Colombia 5 1 6 Denmark 4 4 8 Egypt 5 1 6 El Salvador 3 3 Eritrea 1 1 Estonia 2 11 13 Ethiopia 11 3 14 The Philippines 16 16 Finland 8 2 10 France 1 8 13 22 The Gambia 3 1 4 Georgia 4 17 21 Ghana 1 1 Guinea 1 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 1 Greece 11 9 20 Honduras 2 2 Belarus 5 5 India 4 4 Indonesia 1 1 Iraq 23 3 26 Iran 4 2 6 Iceland 1 1 Israel 2 2 Italy 1 25 71 97 Kenya 1 1 China 3 3 Democratic Republic of the Congo 1 1 6

Forced returns so far in 2018 by destination Dublin/safe third country Kosovo 1 8 9 Croatia 1 1 Kuwait 5 5 Latvia 6 6 Lebanon 5 5 Liberia 1 1 Lithuania 2 53 55 Luxembourg 1 1 Macedonia 1 10 11 The Maldives 1 1 Mali 1 1 Morocco 10 8 18 Mexico 2 2 Moldova 1 6 7 Mongolia 4 8 12 Montenegro 1 1 The Netherlands 1 9 10 Nepal 1 1 Nigeria 5 3 8 Pakistan 1 6 7 Peru 2 2 Poland 2 78 80 Portugal 4 3 7 Qatar 1 1 Romania 66 66 Russia 3 70 73 Saudi Arabia 1 1 Serbia 15 15 Sierra Leone 1 1 Slovakia 2 2 Slovenia 1 1 Somalia 11 5 16 Spain 3 34 37 Sri Lanka 2 2 United Kingdom 1 11 12 Sweden 17 77 94 South Korea 1 1 Tajikistan 1 1 Taiwan 2 2 Tanzania 2 2 Thailand 8 8 7

Forced returns so far in 2018 by destination Dublin/safe third country The Czech Republic 1 5 6 Tunisia 1 2 3 Turkey 3 13 16 Germany 5 24 23 52 Uganda 1 1 Ukraine 4 28 32 Hungary 1 1 USA 3 18 21 Uzbekistan 1 1 2 Venezuela 1 1 Vietnam 2 7 9 191 120 875 1186 By destination we mean the country the person is returned to, not necessarily the person's home country (or country of nationality). 8