CIRCUIT COURT William T. Newman, Jr. FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Similar documents
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT Paul Ferguson, Clerk

Our Mission: To see that the innocent go free and the guilty are convicted

OFFICE OF THE MAGISTRATE Bruce Adam, Chief Magistrate

OFFICE OF THE ELECTORAL BOARD AND VOTER REGISTRATION Linda Lindberg, Registrar. FY 2016 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures. OFFICE OF THE ELECTORAL BOARD AND VOTER REGISTRATION Linda Lindberg, Registrar

OFFICE OF THE ELECTORAL BOARD AND VOTER REGISTRATION Linda Lindberg, Registrar. FY 2020 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Court Support Agencies Organization Department Summary

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY WITH NO PERMIT

17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

IMPROVE OVERSIGHT OF THE TEXAS COUNTY JUDGE SALARY SUPPLEMENT

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 388

S S S1627-3

The Administrative Office of the Courts: Overview. William Childs Fiscal Research Division

Supreme Court of Virginia CHART OF ALLOWANCES

63rd District Court 1950 East Beltline Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

17 th Judicial Circuit of Virginia

A QUICK GUIDE TO THE COURT

Prince William County 2004 Adult Detention Services SEA Report

Justice and Public Safety Subcommittee Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

What Happens After Conviction: Traffic and Criminal Divisions

MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT 2008

Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council Summary of Recommendations - House Historical Funding Levels (Millions)

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS

Each specialized docket is presided over by one of the six elected judges. The presiding judge may refer the specialized docket to a magistrate.

State of the Judiciary Report

SPARTANBURG ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

17 th Judicial Circuit of Virginia

63M Creation -- Members -- Appointment -- Qualifications.

The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

District Attorney. FY Budget Presentation Presented By: John Foote

PLAN OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. In Implementation of. The Criminal Justice Act

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE BILL NO. 18

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

Rule No. 1: Family Court Commissioner Assignments and Stipulated Hearing Procedures

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Receipts and Expenditures of Civil Division 3. Receipts and Expenditures of Criminal Division 4, 5

Bell County, Texas. Proposed Budget

Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2005 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note (G.S )

FY 2007 targets for key goals of this service area, as established in the FY 2007 Adopted Budget, are shown below.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (4500)

ICAOS Rules. General information

How States Can Achieve More Effective Public Safety Policies

WORKING GROUP ON RESOURCES, FACILITIES AND PERSONNEL. REPORT to the VERMONT COMMISSION on JUDICIAL OPERATION

TEXAS TASK FORCE ON INDIGENT DEFENSE

2014 Kansas Statutes

State of Minnesota Department of Finance

2012 Judicial Conference. Swift and Sure Sanctions Pilot Program (SSSP)

Criminal Justice Reform and Reinvestment In Georgia

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1960

FY 2011 Performance Oversight Hearing

Definitions. The following definitions apply to this rule: (2) After a judgment has become final means:

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page MESSAGE FROM THE CLERK... 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ON MARION COUNTY... 2 STRUCTURE OF FLORIDA S COURT SYSTEM...

STATE COURTS SYSTEM FY LEGISLATIVE BUDGET REQUEST updated January 28, 2015

Expenditure Account Codes for FY Reporting

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1875

Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 55, No. 84, 14th July, 2016

Fill The Gap. Annual Report Court Services Division Administrative Office of the Courts Arizona Supreme Court

BELL COUNTY Fiscal Year Budget Cover Page August 11, 2017

18 USC 3006A. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Criminal Justice in the 21 st Century

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. (1) The chief judge shall be a circuit judge who possesses administrative ability.

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Court Costs, Fees and Fines

6/13/2016. Second Chances Setting Aside a Juvenile Adjudication. Why Expunge an Adjudication (aren t juvenile records sealed)?

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee

Glossary. FY Statistical Reference Guide 11-1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

The Judiciary State of Hawai i Annual Report Statistical Supplement

TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES FULL PARDON APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Circuit Court Fee and Assessments Table April 2015 CIVIL FEES Fee or Assessment. Distribution. Waivable 1

7A-304. Costs in criminal actions.

IC Chapter 2.5. Single County Executive

Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission Current Enabling Statute Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

A GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT SYSTEM IN VIRGINIA

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

ALLEGAN COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

Clerk Collection Best Practices

Oregon Branches of Government

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Introduction. Criminal Traffic Distribution. Justice System Assessment. Fees, Costs, & Assessments District / Municipal Court.

TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT CHAPTER 1 1 TOWN COURT ADMINISTRATION 2

GARFIELD HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL COURT 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

PICKENS COUNTY. MISSION The mission of the Clerk of Court is to aid county citizens who are affected by the court system.

REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

-DENVER DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OVERVIEW

Draft Rules on Privacy and Access to Court Records

CRIMINAL BUREAU CUSTOMER SERVICE FEES AND CRIMINAL COURT FEES

Small Claims Handbook A citizen s guide to handling small claims complaints in Kentucky

Transcription:

William T. Newman, Jr. 1425 N. COURTHOUSE RD.,SUITE 12-100, ARLINGTON, VA 22201 703-228-7000 Our Mission: To Provide an Independent, Accessible, Responsive Forum for Just Resolution of Disputes in Order to Preserve the Rule of Law and to Protect All Rights and Liberties Guaranteed by the United States and Virginia Constitutions. The 17 th Judicial Circuit is comprised of three judges with jurisdiction over Arlington County and the City of the Falls Church. The Circuit Court is a trial court of general jurisdiction and the highest court in the County for both civil and criminal cases. The Circuit Court has jurisdiction concerning civil claims exceeding $4,500, with exclusive original jurisdiction for claims exceeding $25,000. The Circuit Court also has jurisdiction over all equity related matters, which include, but are not limited to, divorce, child custody, child and spousal support and maintenance, guardianship, conservatorship, and disputes concerning wills and estates. Additionally, the court has jurisdiction over all civil cases appealed from the General District Court. The appellate jurisdiction is de novo which means that, notwithstanding a final civil judgment in the General District Court, once the case is appealed to the Circuit Court, there is a new or de novo trial in the Circuit Court, as if the trial below never occurred. For criminal cases, the Circuit Court has original jurisdiction over all felonies and misdemeanors originally charged in Circuit Court, plus all misdemeanor cases, criminal bond motions, and traffic cases previously adjudicated by the General District Court but appealed to the Circuit Court. Additionally, the Circuit Court has jurisdiction over juveniles aged 15 years and older who are charged with felonies and whose cases have been certified by a Judge of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court for trial in Circuit Court and all properly appealed cases previously adjudicated by the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. The Circuit Court operates an Adult Drug Treatment Court (Drug Court) for probation violators. The Drug Court is an intensive, community-based treatment, rehabilitation, and supervision program for felony drug defendants. The mission of the drug treatment court is to enhance public safety by providing a cost-effective, integrated system of treatment and judicial supervision in order to reduce recidivism. FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures Environmental Services 8% Public Safety 11% Non-Departmental, Regionals, Metro 9% Management & Administration 4% Human Services 11% Community Services 4% Planning & Development 2% Debt, Capital 6% Courts & Constitutionals 6% Circuit Court 0.1% Net Tax Support: 96% Federal/State Support: 0% Schools 39% Other: 4% book 175 web 247

DEPARTMENT BUDGET SUMMARY LINES OF BUSINESS Circuit Court Judiciary Drug Court The FY 2019 proposed expenditure budget for the Circuit Court is $1,200,357, an eight percent increase from the FY 2018 adopted budget. The FY 2019 proposed budget reflects: Personnel increases are due to employee benefits and base pay adjustments, an increase in the County s cost for employee health insurance, and retirement contributions based on current actuarial projections. Non-personnel increases due to adjustments to the annual expense for the maintenance and replacement of County vehicles ($7,629). Fee revenue decreases due to lower projections in Falls Church reimbursements based on the FY 2019 budget and reconciliation of prior year payments with actual expenditures ($1,490). PROGRAM FINANCIAL SUMMARY FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 % Change Adopted Proposed '18 to '19 Personnel $966,484 $1,032,007 $1,109,302 7% Non-Personnel 86,120 83,426 91,055 9% Total Expenditures 1,052,604 1,115,433 1,200,357 8% Fees 48,443 46,868 45,378-3% Grants 36,530 - - - Total Revenues 84,973 46,868 45,378-3% Net Tax Support $967,631 $1,068,565 $1,154,979 8% Permanent FTEs 9.50 10.00 10.00 Temporary FTEs 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total Authorized FTEs 9.80 10.30 10.30 book 176 web 248

JUDICIARY PROGRAM MISSION To provide an independent, accessible, responsive forum for just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and to protect all rights and liberties guaranteed by the United States and Virginia Constitutions. The Circuit Court is the trial court of general jurisdiction, and the highest court in Arlington County for both civil and criminal cases. The Circuit Court has appellate jurisdiction over all cases from the General District Court and the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. The Court s three judges preside over criminal and civil matters, including motions, evidentiary hearings, non-jury trials, jury trials, criminal dispositions, and sentencing. Court personnel are responsible for reviewing and approving court orders, maintaining daily court dockets, conducting legal research, preparing legal memoranda as required by the judges, reviewing and managing statistical information, and administering court programs. Interfacing with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Sheriff s Office, and members of the Bar on a daily basis. SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES Personnel increases are due to employee benefits and base pay adjustments, an increase in the County s cost for employee health insurance, and retirement contributions based on current actuarial projections. Non-personnel increases due to adjustments to the annual expense for the maintenance and replacement of County vehicles ($7,629). Fee revenue decreases due to lower projections in Falls Church reimbursements based on the FY 2019 budget and reconciliation of prior year payments with actual expenditures ($1,490). PROGRAM FINANCIAL SUMMARY FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 % Change Adopted Proposed '18 to '19 Personnel $966,484 $1,032,007 $1,109,302 7% Non-Personnel 86,120 83,426 91,055 9% Total Expenditures 1,052,604 1,115,433 1,200,357 8% Fees 48,443 46,868 45,378-3% Grants 36,530 - - - Total Revenues 84,973 46,868 45,378-3% Net Tax Support $967,631 $1,068,565 $1,154,979 8% Permanent FTEs 9.50 10.00 10.00 Temporary FTEs 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total Authorized FTEs 9.80 10.30 10.30 web 249

JUDICIARY PERFORMANCE MEASURES Judiciary Critical Measures CY 2014 CY 2015 CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 Estimate Number of Filings 9,028 9,643 10,721 11,097 11,151 Civil cases adjudicated 1,526 1,415 1,312 1,694* 2,230 Civil cases jury days 43 31 41 23 50 Criminal cases adjudicated 4,111 4,039 4,425 4,784* 5,575 Criminal cases jury days 49 61 108 87 100 Administrative Processing /Closure 2,611 2,329 3,890 4,360* 3,345 *The total number of case closures is 10,838. The number of civil cases adjudicated, criminal cases adjudicated, and Administrative Processing/Closure, which are a breakdown of total number of case closures, are not available until mid-february. Supporting Measures Misdemeanor cases concluded within 180 days Felony cases concluded within 365 days Misdemeanor cases concluded within 120 days Civil, domestic relations, felony, and misdemeanor cases concluded within 180 days Civil, domestic relations, and felony cases concluded within 365 days Civil cases concluded within 540 days CY 2014 CY 2015 CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 Estimate N/A 75% 56% 98% 98% N/A 90% 82% 98% 98% N/A 75% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 75%/90%/ 90%/98% 90%/98%/ 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% N/A 98% 98% 98% 98% Performance measures for the Circuit Court are reported per calendar year due to caseload statistical reporting guidelines set forth by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Official performance measures data for CY 2017 will be available by the Office of the Executive Secretary of the Virginia Supreme Court in February 2018. Supporting measures for general litigation (civil and domestic relations) and criminal (felony misdemeanor) cases show parameters established by the Commonwealth of Virginia for how quickly these cases should be resolved. Various factors go into the resolution of a case and everyone from the parties, judges, attorneys, and court staff plays an important role in achieving these benchmarks. In particular, the number of misdemeanor cases concluded within 120 days is not applicable to the Circuit Court but is recorded here to follow state records. Drug Court In 2006, performance measures were standardized for the operations of drug courts. Four measures were adopted to analyze performance: Retention, Sobriety, In-program Recidivism, and Units of Service. Retention is necessary to keep drug court participants in treatment long enough to realize an effect. Research indicates that three months of drug treatment may be the minimal amount web 250

JUDICIARY of time to see a clinical impact and twelve months is the threshold for seeing meaningful, long-term clinical impact. Sobriety is the main goal of the drug treatment court because it promotes offender rehabilitation, public safety, and offender accountability. Sobriety is measured both during participation in the court and after by assessing the average length of continuous sobriety and the average number of failed drug tests. In-Program Recidivism - Producing low rates of in-program recidivism is critical to drug treatment courts. This measure sets drug courts aside from traditional case processing. Recidivism is defined by the rate at which drug court participants are rearrested during the course of participation. Given the short period of time the Drug Court has been held, there is not enough data to estimate what in-program and post-exit recidivism will be in future years of operation. Units of Service - Reducing time from referral to entering treatment decreases chances of relapse and increases efficiency for the court. Treatment and ancillary services must be delivered in sufficient doses in order to have an impact on participants. All participants have weekly treatment, probation and/or court obligations. Additionally, all participants are provided a case manager, who provides referrals to ancillary services for housing, employment, mental health, and other healthcare services. Critical Measures CY 2014 CY 2015 CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 Estimate Retention rate 63% 65% 67% 77% 85% In-Program recidivism 0% 0% 3.5% 0% 0% Sobriety - Percent positive drug 19.0% 2.0% 2.8% 5.0% 3.0% tests Post-exit recidivism 29% 11% 23% 5% 2% Average length of time in program for graduates Average length of time in program for terminated participants 10 months 15 months 18 months 20 months 23 months N/A 6 months 8 months 6 months 8 months Supporting Measures CY 2014 CY 2015 CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 Estimate Community service hours 500 500 310 1,104 900 performed Fees and fines collected $10,575 $10,000 $7,410 $7,907 $7,400 Participants employed while participating in program Days between arrest and/or probation violation and admission Days between admission and treatment entry Number of jail days used as sanctions 63% 95% 95% 95% 100% 12 14 17 20 21 5 5 5 5 5 30 49 163 104 90 In CY 2017, the Arlington County Drug Treatment Court Program moved from a four phase to a five phase structure. The goal was to provide a gradual reduction in supervision and connect web 251

JUDICIARY the participants to the community through the use of community supports and probation. As a result of the move, the program increased on paper from a 12 month to a 15 month program. Typically, participants have set backs which is why we expect an increase of the total amount of time in program. The amount of fines and fees collected is expected to decrease in CY 2018 because program participants are expected to remain in the program longer and are able to complete their financial requirements during that time. The increase in community service hours performed between CY 2016, and CY 2017, is a result of participants who are unable to find employment and must complete a required number of community service hours per week. web 252

TEN-YEAR HISTORY EXPENDITURE, REVENUE, NET TAX SUPPORT AND FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT TRENDS $1,400 FTEs EXP REV NTS 40 $1,200 $1,000 30 $800 $600 20 $400 10 $200 $0 0 FY 2018 Adopted Budget FY 2019 Proposed Budget $ in 000s FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 EXP $394 $438 $421 $489 $580 $703 $978 $1,053 $1,115 $1,200 REV $25 $21 $20 $26 $27 $161 $134 $85 $47 $45 NTS $369 $417 $401 $462 $553 $543 $844 $968 $1,069 $1,155 FTEs 5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 6.80 9.80 9.80 10.30 10.30 web 253

TEN-YEAR HISTORY Fiscal Year Description FTEs FY 2010 The County Board added funding for a one-time lump-sum payment of $500 for employees ($19,219). Eliminated a Court Specialist and a Judgment Clerk positions in the Clerk s Office ($120,549). Decreased revenue in Court Excess Fee ($850,011) due to reduced court activity and a change in the State formula for how fees are remitted to localities; reduced projections in miscellaneous state grants ($40,000), Falls Church reimbursements ($5,548) and transfer fees ($1,500), partially offset by an increase in Compensation Board reimbursements ($9,704). Includes elimination of a part-time Court Assistant position in the Civil Division as part of FY 2009 state cuts. (2.0) (0.5) FY 2011 Eliminated a vacant limited-term position ($99,884). (1.0) Encumbered a Deputy Clerk position with a lower level position which saves $34,183. Non-personnel reductions include operating supplies ($5,793), travel ($5,000), postage ($2,000), and jury funds (miscellaneous court costs) ($24,000). Increased revenues in Court Fees ($21,899), Commonwealth reimbursements ($34,683), and Falls Church reimbursements ($4,860) partially offset decreases in State grant reimbursements ($40,000). FY 2012 The County Board added funding for a one percent one-time lump sum payment for employees at the top step. Added funding for maintenance and support fees for the audio/video recording system installed in the courts ($45,000) and for day forward redaction of social security and other sensitive information from court records ($57,000). Increased revenues in Falls Church reimbursements ($57,227) and State reimbursements for technology ($55,000) partially offset by a decrease in the State Compensation Board reimbursements ($19,710) and court fines ($3,000). FY 2013 The County Board added funding for replacement of the land record system ($450,000 one-time funding, $70,000 ongoing funding), partially offset with $70,000 in anticipated new fee revenue. The County Board added funding for an electronic court records system ($326,000 one-time funding, $95,000 ongoing funding), partially offset with $40,000 in anticipated new fee revenue. The County Board added one-time funding for a Jury Coordinator position ($79,000 one-time funding). A limited term position was eliminated. Falls Church revenue decreased ($13,068). 1.0 (1.0) web 254

TEN-YEAR HISTORY Decreases are included for State Compensation Board reimbursements ($4,900) and Technology Trust Fund grant funding ($6,000). FY 2014 The County Board added ongoing funding for a Jury Coordinator / Information Clerk position ($80,378). Eliminated FY 2013 one-time funding for a Jury Coordinator / Information Clerk position ($79,000). Eliminated FY 2013 one-time funding for replacement of the land records system ($450,000) and electronic court records system ($326,000). Fee revenue decreased for the land records ($70,000). Fee revenues increased for reimbursement to the locality of excess copy fees ($14,000) and interest on criminal fees ($3,000). Fee revenues increased for Falls Church reimbursements ($4,131). Grant revenues increased for State Compensation Board reimbursements ($66,460). Reduced contractual maintenance for microfilm equipment ($8,960). Eliminated non-personnel funding in the Clerk s Office for equipment purchase ($15,104). 1.0 (1.0) FY 2015 The County Board added funding for a part-time Administrative Assistant ($21,752). The County Board added one-time funding for travel and training supplies ($17,500). Added a limited term grant funded Drug Court Coordinator ($89,495) funded by a Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant. Added funding ($22,907) for operating supplies and miscellaneous costs funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance grant. Fall Church revenue increased ($1,626). Grant revenue increased due to a Bureau of Justice Assistance grant ($112,402). 0.5 1.0 FY 2016 The County Board added funding for 1.5 FTEs to support the Circuit Court s high performing court initiative ($100,000). The County Board added one-time funding to continue to grow the Arlington County Drug Court Program ($250,000). In addition to the 1.5 FTEs, the $250,000 one-time funding added by the County Board also funds a Deputy Sheriff added in the Sheriff s Office to support the expansion of the Drug Court Program. The salary for this position will be fully charged to the Circuit Court. Eliminated one-time funding for travel and training and office supplies ($17,500). Increased funding to miscellaneous costs ($2,250) due to the Bureau of Justice Assistance grant for Arlington County Drug Court. Fee revenue increased for Falls Church reimbursements ($7,935). 1.5 1.5 web 255

TEN-YEAR HISTORY Grant revenue increased due to the Bureau of Justice Assistance grant for Arlington County Drug Court ($3,722). FY 2017 Increased fee revenue due to higher projections in Falls Church reimbursements based on the FY 2016 budget and reconciliation of prior year payments with actual expenditures ($7,247). Grant revenue decreased due to the September 2016 expiration of the Bureau of Justice Assistance grant for the Arlington County Drug Court ($89,394). FY 2018 The County Board adding $15,000 for offices supplies, travel, and training. Converted an Administrative Assistant from part-time to full-time and reclassified that position to a Drug Court Probation Officer ($55,482). Prior to 2016, this service was provided in-kind by the state. Increased fee revenue due to higher projections in Falls Church reimbursements based on the FY 2018 budget and reconciliation of prior year payments with actual expenditures ($822) and the addition of Drug Court participant fees not previously budgeted ($2,500). Decreased grant revenue due to the September 2016 expiration of the Bureau of Justice Assistance grant for the Arlington County Drug Court ($26,730). 0.5 web 256