Legislation & Regulation (Section 4) Fall 2013 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, [WCC 1015] SYLLABUS

Similar documents
Legislation & Regulation (Section 2) Fall 2012 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, WCC 1010 SYLLABUS

Legislation and Regulation

CONTENTS. Acknowledgments CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1

The Regulatory State: Introduction to Legislation, Statutory Interpretation, and Administration Spring 2013 Professor Jodi Short

Legislative Process Spring 2009 Professor Carolyn Shapiro SYLLABUS

Administrative Law Notes 1

Leg Reg Outline 9/03-04 Textualists=Positivists-follow the letter of the law, to do otherwise leads to unpredictability. Judges start doing what they

Office hours: My office is Room 432, 715 Broadway; Telephone: My office hours are Tuesdays, 1:30-3:00, or by appointment.

SEMINAR: ANTONIN SCALIA JUDGE, SCHOLAR, WRITER, CONSTITUTIONALIST. Law (Spring 2018) Monday 2:00 3:50 p.m.

Contents. Administrative Agencies and Administrative Law 1

2006] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 361

Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Practice 2017 Review Questions and Answers

In The Supreme Court of the United States

THE POLITICS of ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. V / V Spring Broadway, Rm Broadway, Rm 726

Administrative Law (Law 116 Sec. 002)

RULEMAKING th Annual Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Institute. May 18, 2017

AP Government Interest Groups Study Guide

Disciplining Delegation after Whitman v. American Trucking Ass ns

Chevron Deference: A Primer

Administrative Law Prof. Kumar, Fall Assistant: Robin Huff Office: MPS 201R

In Defense of the Short Cut

Brief for Cato Institute et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, City of Arlington Texas et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.

The Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: The Chevron Doctrine

BRIEF FOR INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS

Mastering Administrative Law

ConLaw I: Structure of Government LAW 121 (002) Prof. Greve Fall Welcome

2000 H Street, NW (202)

ADVISING LEGISLATORS ON FEDERALISM. Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative Services NCSL Legislative Summit August 7, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. ALFRED PROCOPIO, JR., Claimant-Appellant,

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW R. Miller Fall 2004

POL 743: Constitutional Law I. Dr. Carrington Office Hours: M-W 2:00pm-3:00pm

ANALYSIS. A. The Census Act does not use the terms marriage or spouse as defined or intended in DOMA.

2000 H Street, NW (202)

Chevron and Agency Norm-Entrepreneurship

In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

THE TWO FACES OF CHEVRON

No IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Administrative Law Prof. Kumar, Spring Assistant: Melissa Fleet: Office: MPS 201D

A (800) (800)

Supreme Court of the United States

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Law Commons

Supreme Court of the United States

Chevron Deference: Court Treatment of Agency Interpretations of Ambiguous Statutes

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } }

2000 H Street, NW (202)

As-Applied Nondelegation

Part I: Multiple Choice [80 points] Choose the best concluding phrase or statement for any 20 of the following questions.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

Interpreting Appropriate and Necessary Reasonably under the Clean Air Act: Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTE CWA AND ESA: NINE IS A PARTY, TEN IS A CROWD NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, 127 S. CT (2007).

Class Hours: Monday & Wednesday, 4:30 5:50 (Tureaud Hall, rm. 215) Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday, 6:00 7:00 (Stubbs, rm. 330), and by appointment

THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT: AN INTRODUCTION. Gillian Metzger, Columbia Law School 1

No IN THE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Respondents.

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Pol Sci 3325 Topics in Politics: Constitutional Politics in the United States

Spurious Interpretation Redux: Mead and the Shrinking Domain of Statutory Ambiguity

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EPA S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON DEFERENCE

LAW 524, LEGISLATION: LAW & POLITICS (FALL 2018) Mon. & Wed., 2:50-4:20, Rm. 215; Prof. Anthony Johnstone, Rm. 312 (x6711)

ORAL ARGUMENT TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 13-15, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. DAVID KING, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Take it to the Limit: The Illegal Regulation Prohibiting the Take of Any Threatened Species Under the Endangered Species Act

Northern Illinois University Zulauf 403. DU 459 Office Hrs: Tues 2-5 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I

On Hunting Elephants in Mouseholes

CHEVRON S GENERALITY PRINCIPLES

POWERING DOWN CHEVRON? CHEVRON DEFERENCE AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN LITIGATION by Julia E. Stein *

OSH-Related Cases Applying the Chevron Doctrine 2017 CONN MACIEL CAREY LLP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

No IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Nos , , , , (consolidated) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

CHEVRON S REGRETS: THE PERSISTENT VITALITY OF THE NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Nos , IN THE. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, ET. AL., Respondents, MARKLE INTERESTS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Copyright 2012 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. UNDERSTANDING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Case 1:08-cv VM Document 15 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 30. v. 08 Civ (VM)

NO IN THE. NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, et al., Respondents.

Administrative Law LAW Syllabus Spring Professor Jennifer L. Mascott

Administrative Agencies: A Comparison of New Hampshire and Federal Agencies History, Structure and Rulemaking Requirements

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Colombia Circuit

SEMINOLE ROCK AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Fordham Law Review. Michael Dorfman-Gonzalez Fordham University School of Law. Volume 82 Issue 2 Article 19. Recommended Citation

LAW REVIEW AND OTHER SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. ALFRED GOBEILLE, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the Vermont Green Mountain Care Board,

Chevron and Agency Norm-Entrepreneurship

D.C. Circuit Revives Nondelegation Doctrine Or Does It?

Chevron's Sliding Scale in Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct (2009)

Final Revision, 11/7/16

No In the Supreme Court of the United States

see 15 U.S.C. 57(b), as an alternative to its own adjudicative process, id. 45(b).

Chevron and Preemption

Case 3:16-cv L Document 23 Filed 08/19/16 Page 1 of 43 PageID 376

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD POL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I: POWERS and INSTITUTIONS FALL SEMESTER 2015

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM I GVPT 431. Course Content. Course Requirements

Transcription:

Legislation & Regulation (Section 4) Fall 2013 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, [WCC 1015] Course Description: This course is an introduction to lawmaking in the modern administrative state. It will examine how Congress and administrative agencies adopt binding rules of law (statutes and regulations, respectively) and the ways that implementing institutions courts and administrative agencies interpret and apply these laws. The course will consider the justifications for modern regulation, the structure of the modern administrative state, the incentives that influence the behavior of the various actors, and the legal rules that help to structure the relationships among Congress, the agencies, and the courts. The text for the course is MANNING & STEPHENSON EDS., LEGISLATION AND REGULATION, 2D EDITION (Foundation Press 2013). SYLLABUS Part I: Legislation A. The Legislative Process and Theories of Interpretation Wed., Sept. 11 th Introduction to Statutory Interpretation pp. 2-3 (introductory note), 18-26, and 184-197 (United States v. Marshall, through end of note 4) Thurs., Sept. 12 th Text and Purpose pp. 27-44 (Riggs v. Palmer, Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States) Fri., Sept. 13 th Text and Purpose, cont d pp. 77-93 (United States v. Kirby, Public Citizen v. Department of Justice) and 44-60 (West Virginia University Hospitals v. Casey) Wed. Sept. 18 th Ordinary Meaning, Special Meaning, and Context pp. 101-105 (Nix v. Hedden), 176-179 (Corning Glass Works v. Brennan), 183-184 (notes 3-4 on Corning), and 115-127 (Smith v. United States) Thurs., Sept 19 th The Legislative Process and Legislative History pp. 127-128 (introductory note), 136-160 (Blanchard v. Bergeron, Continental Can Co. v. Chicago Truck Drivers, through end of note 4). 1

Fri., Sept. 20 th The Legislative Process and Legislative History, cont d pp. 160-175 (remaining notes on Blanchard and Continental Can, Exxon Mobil v. Allapattah), re-skim 175-179 (Corning Glass), 179-183 (notes 1-2 on Corning) [NO MEETINGS SEPT. 25-27] B. Canons of Construction Tues., Oct. 1 st [WCC 1010] Semantic Canons pp. 202-207 (McBoyle v. United States) and 215-231 (Gustafson v. Alloyd) Wed., Oct. 2 nd Semantic Canons, cont d pp. 208-215 (Silvers v. Sony Pictures) and 232-247 (People v. Smith, Circuit City Stores v. Adams) Thurs., Oct. 3 rd Substantive Canons: Avoiding Constitutional Questions pp. 247-267 (NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago) Fri., Oct. 4 th Substantive Canons: State Sovereignty pp. 267-284 (Gregory v. Ashcroft) [CLASSES CANCELLED WEEK OF OCT. 7-11] Wed., Oct. 16 th Substantive Canons: Preemption of State Law pp. 284-303 (Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator, Cippollone v. Liggett Group) Thurs., Oct. 17 th Scope and Application of Substantive Canons pp. 313-329 (Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Lines) Part II: Regulation A. The Constitutional Position of Administrative Agencies Fri., Oct. 18 th The Administrative State and the Delegation Problem pp. 332-334 (introductory note), 351-363 (J.W. Hampton, Jr. Co. v. United States), 348-351 (notes 4 & 5 after the Constitution excerpt), 363-364 2

(introductory note before Schechter Poultry), and 375-385 (note 3 after Schechter Poultry, Whitman v. American Trucking Ass ns, Inc.) Tues., Oct. 22 nd [WCC 1010] The Administrative State and the Delegation Problem, cont d pp. 385-406 (Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute) Wed., Oct. 23 rd Congressional Control of Agencies: The Legislative Veto pp. 406-425 (INS v. Chadha) Thurs., Oct. 24 th Appointment and Removal of Agency Officials pp. 425-427 (introductory note), 435-465 (Myers v. United States, Humphrey s Executor v. United States) Fri., Oct. 25 th Appointment and Removal of Agency Officials, cont d pp. 477-510 (Morrison v. Olson, Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB) Tues., Oct. 29 th [WCC 1010] Presidential Oversight of the Administration pp. 510-539 (section on presidential control of agencies) Wed., Oct. 30 th The Administrative Procedure Act and the Forms of Agency Action pp. 542-563 (United States v. Florida East Coast Railway); also skim pp. 893-906 (sections of the Administrative Procedure Act) Thurs., Oct. 31 st Notice & Comment Rulemaking pp. 563-564 (introductory note), 584-598 (Chocolate Manufacturers Ass n v. Block) B. The Administrative Rulemaking Process Fri., Nov. 1 st Notice & Comment Rulemaking, cont d pp. 564-584 (United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp.) Tues., Nov. 5 th [WCC 1010] Alternatives to Notice & Comment Rulemaking: Adjudication 3

pp. 598-627 (SEC v. Chenery Corp., Bell Aerospace v. NLRB, NLRB v. Bell Aerospace) Wed., Nov. 6 th Alternatives to Notice & Comment Rulemaking: Guidance Documents pp. 627-650 (PG&E v. FPC, Chamber of Commerce v. Dep t of Labor) Thurs., Nov. 7 th Alternatives to Notice & Comment Rulemaking: Interpretive Rules pp. 650-668 (AMC v. MSHA, Hoctor v. Dep t of Agriculture) C. Judicial Review of Agency Action Fri., Nov. 8 th Introduction to Judicial Review of Agency Decisions pp. 668-689 (Ethyl Corp. v. EPA) Tues., Nov. 12 th [WCC 1010] Judicial (Non-)Regulation of Agency Procedures pp. 689-703 (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC) Wed., Nov. 13 th Hard Look Review pp. 703-735 (Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Ass n v. State Farm) Part III: Legal Interpretation in the Administrative State Thurs., Nov. 14 th Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretation: Early Cases pp. 738-755 (NLRB v. Hearst, Skidmore v. Swift & Co.) Fri., Nov. 15 th Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretation: The Modern Framework pp. 756-776 (Chevron v. NRDC) Tues., Nov. 19 th [WCC 1010] Deference and Textual Interpretation: Finding Ambiguity pp. 776-791 (MCI v. AT&T) Wed., Nov. 20 th Deference, Semantic Canons and Terms of Art pp. 791-803 (Babbitt v. Sweet Home), 822-825 (note on Chevron and legislative history) Thurs., Nov. 21 st Deference and Structural/Purposive Interpretation 4

pp. 803-822 (FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.) Supplemental page on City of Arlington v. FCC. Fri., Nov. 22 nd Deference and Substantive Canons: Constitutional Avoidance pp. 825-836 (DeBartolo v. Fla. Gulf Coast Building & Trades, Rust v. Sullivan) [NO CLASSES NOV. 27-29 THANKSGIVING BREAK] Wed., Dec. 4 th Deference and Substantive Canons: State Autonomy pp. 837-852 (SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers, Smiley v. Citibank) Thurs., Dec. 5 th Limits on Chevron s Domain pp. 852-874 (United States v. Mead Corp.) Fri., Dec. 6 th Flex Class/Review 5