PL2022/2222 Foreign Policy Analysis

Similar documents
THE DOMESTIC SOURCES OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY

Foreign Policy Analysis

Historical unit prices - Super - Australian Shares

7 May Questions 1-16 released separately

National Security and the 2008 Election

UNDERSTANDING FOREIGN POLICY: THE DIPLOMACY OF WAR, PROFIT AND JUSTICE (IR105)

Cairns Airport financial year passenger totals.

SUB Hamburg B/ Foreign Policy. Theories, Actors, Cases SECOND EDITION. Edited by. Steve Smith Amelia Hadfield Tim Dunne OXJORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

13 May Questions 1-14 released separately

Making U.S. Foreign Policy. A graduate course proposed for the Department of American Studies at Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Overview: Graded Components: INTL Foreign Policy Decision Making. Jeffrey D. Berejikian. Department of International Affairs.

OSO Political Science 2014.xlsx

TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

Guidelines for Comprehensive Exams in International Relations Department of Political Science Pennsylvania State University.

GOVT INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Tariff 9900: OHD Percentage Based Fuel Cost Adjustment Historical Schedule ( )

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL

American Government. Chapter 11. The Presidency

6. 9. How frustrated and upset are you with [ITEM] these days? (RANDOMIZE)

THE POLITICO-GWU BATTLEGROUND POLL

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? Republicans 28% Democrats 84% 10 6

FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1 AT 4 PM

First-Term Average 61% 29

POLITICAL SCIENCE (POLI)

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Northeast Asian Politics: Security and Cooperation RPOS 204 (9194)

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 26 January 06

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 10 August 06

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS/WASHINGTON POST MAY OSAMA BIN LADEN SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE May 2, 2011 N=654

(READ AND RANDOMIZE LIST)

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing on the economy? Approve Disapprove (Don t know) Sep 10 40% 56 Democrats 75%

Political Science 245: The United States in World Politics

How Energy Issues Might Affect This Election

Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Connecticut, 2007-

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 28 September 06

PSC 346: Individuals and World Politics

FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? May 09 60% 30 9 Democrats 84% 11 6

First-Term Average 61% 29

Press Release. The Canadian Political Scene

Spring 2011 PLS 422 American Foreign Policy (Writing Intensive Course)

PAD 6025 Theoretical Perspectives in Public Policy

ASYLUM STATISTICS 2016

PUBLIC DIPLOMACY

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17 AT 12:30 PM

FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, JULY 22 AT NOON

MONTHLY MIGRATION TRENDS

Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 67% 56% 51% 51% 49% 49%

TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Charles Schumer is handling his job as United States Senator? (* High also 69%)

VITA. GEORGE W. DOWNS JR. September 2006

Approved by the Board on March 27, 2014 Page 1

POLS 477: American Foreign Policy Spring 2013 Professor Stephen Shulman Department of Political Science Southern Illinois University

POL 3: Introduction to International Relations Fall Course Website:

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 10 November 05

Each seminar participant must write summaries and questions for every assigned reading.

FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, MARCH 25 AT 7 PM

Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Connecticut, 2007-

Associate Professor of Political Science and Director, Humanities House Learning Community.

FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2 AT 2 PM

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Congress is doing? Sep 08 17% 73 9 Democrats 28% Sep 08 23% 68 8 Republicans 10% 87 3

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Charting Singapore s Economy, 1Q 2016 Publication Date: December 8 th, 2015 Number of pages: 58

THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG. Course Outline

Specific Qualifications Listing

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 1 February 08

DCC Foreign Policy Analysis (Revised as of 1 October 2014)

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Bachelor of Arts in Political Science

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Congress is doing?

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Politics: big yellow flag

Florida Statewide January 2016

Rep Dem Party Party DK/NA

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN POLICY

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? 3-4 Mar 09 63% Democrats 93% 5 2

Analyzing American Democracy

Week of Working Group I Report Working Group II Report Working Group III Report Synthesis Report

Chart A Initial Release Decisions for Criminal Justice Reform Eligible Defendants January 1 December 31, 2017

Asia Pacific Travel & Tourism: A 2014 Update on Key Metrics

Presentations 25% Final examination Paper (10 pages) 1.5 space 40%

Political Science 6040 AMERICAN PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS Summer II, 2009

RPOS 370: International Relations Theory

Images of the European Union as a Development Actor in Kenya. Patrick Kimunguyi Monash University

The situation of refugees in Austria. WAPES Conference, Integration of refugees into the labour market

Course Title: Foreign Policy Analysis

PLS 492 (306) Congress and the Presidency Fall 2010

MONTHLY MIGRATION TRENDS

Course Schedule Spring 2009

Obama vs. Romney: Is It the Economy, Stupid?

Office Hours : Tuesday, Thursday 1-3, Friday 2:30 to 4 (comps priority) -- Google Calendar Time Selection

The American Legislature PLS Fall 2008

M.A. Political Science Syllabus FIRST SEMESTER. India s Constitution and Contemporary Debates

EKOS/CBC Poll. The Federal Landscape and Liberal Leadership. January 19 th, 2003

Transcription:

PL2022/2222 Foreign Policy Analysis View Online [1] [2] S. Smith, A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne, Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [3] C. Alden, Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=368750 [4] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [5] J. N. Rosenau, The scientific study of foreign policy, Rev. and enl. ed. London: Pinter, 1980. [6] 1/16

[7] S. Smith, A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne, Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [8] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [9] V. M. Hudson, Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory, Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. [10] G. Giacomello, F. Ferrari, and A. Amadori, With friends like these: foreign policy as personal relationship, Contemporary Politics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 247 264, Jun. 2009. [11] V. M. Hudson, Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1 30, Feb. 2005. [12] C. David, Who was the real George Bush? Foreign policy decision making under the bush administration, Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 197 220, Mar. 1996. [13] Q. Zhang, Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: bringing leadership personality back in, Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 23, no. 89, pp. 902 922, Sep. 2014. 2/16

[14] A. Ş. Görener and M. Ş. Ucal, The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy, Turkish Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 357 381, Sep. 2011. [15] B. Rottinghaus, Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk, Political Communication, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 138 157, Apr. 2008. [16] A. Pravda, Is there a Gorbachev foreign policy?, Journal of Communist Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 100 120, Dec. 1988. [17] M. E. Gallagher and S. H. Allen, Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1 21, Jan. 2014. [18] S. B. DYSON, Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair s Iraq Decisions, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 289 306, Jul. 2006. [19] [20] C. Alden, Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. [21] V. M. Hudson, Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory, Second edition. 3/16

Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. [22] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [23] J. A. Garrison, Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We ve Been and Where We're Going, International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155 202, Jun. 2003. [24] M. Clarke and B. White, Understanding foreign policy: the foreign policy systems approach. Aldershot: Elgar, 1989. [25] Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin, Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications, World Politics, vol. 24, pp. 40 79, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2010559 [26] B. Hocking, Adaptation and the foreign policy bureaucracy: The experience of federal states, Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47 72, Mar. 1994. [27] H. Lai and S.-J. Kang, Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy, Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 23, no. 86, pp. 294 313, Mar. 2014. [28] D. Badie, Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 277 296, Sep. 2010. 4/16

[29] J. GARRISON, Constructing the National Interest in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105 126, Apr. 2007. [30] J. Kaarbo and R. K. Beasley, Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67 81, Jan. 2008. [31] K. Marsh, Obama s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 265 288, Jul. 2014. [32] [33] V. M. Hudson, Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory, Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. [34] C. Alden, Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. [35] A. Hadfield, British foreign policy, national identity, and neoclassical realism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/doc?id=10435057 5/16

[36] M. Mattes and M. Rodríguez, Autocracies and International Cooperation, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 527 538, Sep. 2014. [37] J. N. Rosenau, Domestic sources of foreign policy. New York: Free Press, 1967. [38] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [39] D. Reiter, Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history?, International Interactions, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 39 62, Feb. 1995. [40] J. L. Ungerer, Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program, International Studies Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1 31, Mar. 2012. [41] S. CHAN and W. SAFRAN, Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 137 156, Apr. 2006. [42] Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller, War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis, The American Political Science Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 638 646, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/1964127 6/16

[43] K. N. Waltz, Foreign policy and democratic politics: the American and British experience. Harlow: Longmans, 1968. [44] S. Lee, Canadian values in Canadian foreign policy, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1 9, Jan. 2002. [45] [46] S. Smith, A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne, Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [47] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [48] C. Alden, Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. [49] M. Nincic and J. M. Ramos, Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 119 141, Jun. 2010. [50] W. Thorngate, The social psychology of policy analysis, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 85 112, Jun. 2001. 7/16

[51] R. N. Lebow, Psychological dimensions of post Cold War foreign policy, Israel Affairs, vol. 2, no. 3 4, pp. 46 56, Mar. 1996. [52] M. Schafer, Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking, International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155 202, Jun. 2003. [53] Jack S. Levy, Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield, International Organization, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 279 312, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2706933 [54] B. Goldsmith, Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy, International Interactions, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 237 267, Jul. 2003. [55] K. Oppermann and A. Spencer, Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39 56, Jan. 2013. [56] T. M. Dolan, Emotion and Strategic Learning in War, Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a n/a, Aug. 2014. [57] K. P. O?Reilly, Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the Rogue State Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 295 315, Oct. 2007. 8/16

[58] [59] V. M. Hudson, Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory, Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. [60] R. Langhorne, The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors, Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 331 339, Jun. 2005. [61] Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü, Privatizing Foreign Policy, World Policy Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 34 52, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/40209975?origin=api [62] Y. Kim, How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations, Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a n/a, Aug. 2014. [63] S. L. McMillan, Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 227 253, Jul. 2008. [64] J. True and M. Mintrom, Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 27 57, Mar. 2001. [65] R. Price, Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines, 9/16

International Organization, vol. 52, no. 03, pp. 613 644, Jun. 1998. [66] M. E. S. Hoffman, Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy, The Journal of Policy Reform, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 175 188, Sep. 2005. [67] C. M. Warner and S. G. Walker, Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 113 135, Jan. 2011. [68] J. Joachim, Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women s Rights, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 247 274, Jun. 2003. [69] Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones, Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems, The Journal of Politics, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1044 1074, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2131866 [70] P. Nelson and E. Dorsey, New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 187 216, Jun. 2007. [71] [72] S. Smith, A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne, Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 10/16

[73] E. GILBOA, The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations, Political Communication, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 27 44, Feb. 2005. [74] P. Robinson, The CNN Effect Revisited, Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 344 349, Oct. 2005. [75] E. Gilboa, Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects, Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1 28, Jun. 2001. [76] J. N. Rosenau, Domestic sources of foreign policy. New York: Free Press, 1967. [77] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [78] P. Robinson, Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy, European Journal of Communication, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 523 544, Dec. 2001. [79] S. Hjarvard and N. N. Kristensen, When media of a small nation argue for war, Media, War & Conflict, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51 69, Apr. 2014. [80] 11/16

J. Wang and X. Wang, Media and Chinese Foreign Policy, Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 23, no. 86, pp. 216 235, Mar. 2014. [81] S. Murray, Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion, Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a n/a, Apr. 2013. [82] The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39 [Online]. Available: http://www.annualreviews.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.06 0406.214132 [83] S. Baru, The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy, India Review, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 266 285, Aug. 2009. [84] [85] S. Smith, A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne, Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [86] J. Cable, Foreign policy making: Planning or reflex?, Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 357 381, Nov. 1992. [87] J. Kleiner, The Inertia of Diplomacy, Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 321 349, 12/16

Jun. 2008. [88] John G. Tower, Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 229 246, 1981 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20041078?search=yes&resultite mclick=true&searchtext=ongress&searchtext=versus&searchtext=the&searchtext=pre sident:&searchtext=the&searchtext=formulation&searchtext=and&searchtext=implem entation&searchtext=of&searchtext=american&searchtext=foreign&searchtext=policy &searchuri=%2faction%2fdobasicsearch%3fquery%3dongress%2bversus%2bthe%2bpre sident%253a%2bthe%2bformulation%2band%2bimplementation%2bof%2bamerican%2b Foreign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000070%26amp%3BSe arch%3dsearch%26amp%3bwc%3don%26amp%3bfc%3doff%26amp%3bglobalsearch%3 D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D [89] M. Breuning, Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 307 325, Jul. 2013. [90] Charles F. Hermann, Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3 21, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2600403?search=yes&resultitem Click=true&searchText=Changing&searchText=Course:&searchText=When&searchText= Governments&searchText=Choose&searchText=to&searchText=Redirect&searchText=Fo reign&searchtext=policy&searchuri=%2faction%2fdobasicsearch%3fquery%3dchangin g%2bcourse%253a%2bwhen%2bgovernments%2bchoose%2bto%2bredirect%2bforeign %2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100193%26amp%3BSearch%3D Search%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26am p%3bsbbbox%3d%26amp%3bsbjbox%3d%26amp%3bsbpbox%3d [91] J. D. Hagan, P. P. Everts, H. Fukui, and J. D. Stempel, Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy, International Studies Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169 216, Sep. 2001. [92] 13/16

S. M. Saideman and R. W. Ayres, Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 189 210, Jul. 2007. [93] Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again, International Security, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 143 171 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/international_security/summary/v018/18.4.zelikow.html [94] E. K. Stern, Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges, International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155 202, Jun. 2003. [95] T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford, Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 705 727, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/4092800?search=yes&resultitem Click=true&searchText=Changing&searchText=Course:&searchText=When&searchText= Governments&searchText=Choose&searchText=to&searchText=Redirect&searchText=Fo reign&searchtext=policy&searchuri=%2faction%2fdobasicsearch%3fquery%3dchangin g%2bcourse%253a%2bwhen%2bgovernments%2bchoose%2bto%2bredirect%2bforeign %2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100193%26amp%3BSearch%3D Search%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26am p%3bsbbbox%3d%26amp%3bsbjbox%3d%26amp%3bsbpbox%3d [96] Hill, Christopher, The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe s international role., Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 31, no. 3 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&an=94 08291165&site=ehost-live [97] 14/16

[98] L. Neack, The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era, 2nd ed., vol. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. [99] K. J. Holsti, National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 233 309, 1970 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013584 [100] V. M. Hudson, Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory, Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. [101] L. E. Wehner and C. G. Thies, Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles, International Studies Review, p. n/a n/a, Aug. 2014. [102] M. E. Carranza, Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status, Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a n/a, Jun. 2014. [103] E. Jordaan, The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers, Politikon, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 165 181, Nov. 2003. [104] M. Sussex, The impotence of being earnest? Avoiding the pitfalls of creative middle power diplomacy, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 545 562, Nov. 2011. 15/16

[105] P. Gecelovsky, Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 77 93, Jan. 2009. [106] M. Beeson, Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 563 577, Nov. 2011. [107] J. S. Nye, Power and foreign policy, Journal of Political Power, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9 24, Apr. 2011. [108] Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy, International Security, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 63 95 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/international_security/v034/34.4.larson.h tml [109] C. Brown, Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency, Global Society, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5 19, Jan. 2004. 16/16