State of the Congressional Battleground

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 1 October 16, 2009 State of the Congressional Battleground 55 Democratic-Held Seats, 20 Republican-Held Seats

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 2 Methodology Survey in the Congressional Battleground 2,000 likely voters (2,010 unweighted) in 55 Democratic-held battleground House districts and 20 Republican-held battleground House districts 500 Democratic Tier 1 (503 unweighted) 500 Democratic Tier 2 (486 unweighted) 500 Democratic Tier 3 (535 unweighted) 500 Republican (486 unweighted) October 6-11, 2009 Margin of Error: 2.2% (4.5% within each tier and GOP battleground)

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 3 Tier 1: 20 most competitive Democratic-held congressional districts STATE AND DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT 2008 CONG. 2006 CONG. 2008 PRES. INCUMBENT SINCE MARGIN MARGIN MARGIN ALABAMA 02 Bobby Bright 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +39 McCain +26 ALABAMA 05 Parker Griffith 2008 Dem. +4 unopposed McCain +23 COLORADO 04 Betsy Markey 2008 Dem. +12 Rep. +3 McCain +1 FLORIDA 08 Alan Grayson 2008 Dem. +4 Rep. +7 Obama +6 FLORIDA 24 Suzanne Kosmas 2008 Dem. +16 Rep. +16 McCain +2 IDAHO 01 Walt Minnick 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +5 McCain +26 LOUISIANA 03 OPEN n/a unopposed Dem. +15 McCain +24 MARYLAND 01 Frank Kratovil 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +38 McCain +18 MISSISSIPPI 01 Travis Childers 2008 Dem. +11 Rep. +32 McCain +25 NEW HAMPSHIRE 01 Carol Shea-Porter 2006 Dem. +6 Dem. +2 Obama +6 NEW HAMPSHIRE 02 OPEN n/a Dem. +15 Dem. +7 Obama +13 NEW JERSEY 03 John Adler 2008 Dem. +4 Rep. +17 Obama +5 NEW MEXICO 02 Harry Teague 2008 Dem. +12 Rep. +19 McCain +1 NEW YORK 24 Mike Arcuri 2006 Dem. +4 Dem. +9 Obama +2 NEW YORK 29 Eric Massa 2008 Dem. +2 Rep. +2 McCain +2 OHIO 01 Steve Driehaus 2008 Dem. +5 Rep. +4 Obama +10 OHIO 15 Mary Jo Kilroy 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +0.5 Obama +9 PENNSYLVANIA 03 Kathy Dahlkemper 2008 Dem. +2 Rep. +12 McCain +0.01 VIRGINIA 02 Glenn Nye 2008 Dem. +5 Rep. +3 Obama +2 VIRGINIA 05 Tom Perriello 2008 Dem. +0.2 Rep. +19 McCain +2 TOTAL DEMOCRATIC BATTLEGROUND TIER 1: DEM. +6 REP. +6 McCain +5

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 4 Tier 2: 20 next most competitive Democratic-held congressional districts STATE AND DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT 2008 CONG. 2006 CONG. 2008 PRES. INCUMBENT SINCE MARGIN MARGIN MARGIN ARIZONA 01 Ann Kirkpatrick 2008 Dem. +16 Rep. +9 McCain +10 ARIZONA 05 Harry Mitchell 2006 Dem. +10 Dem. +4 McCain +5 CALIFORNIA 11 Jerry McNerney 2006 Dem. +11 Dem. +6 Obama +9 GEORGIA 08 Jim Marshall 2002 Dem. +14 Dem. +2 McCain +13 ILLINOIS 11 Debbie Halvorson 2008 Dem. +24 Rep. +10 Obama +8 ILLINOIS 14 Bill Foster 2008 Dem. +16 Rep. +20 Obama +11 INDIANA 09 Baron Hill 2006 Dem. +19 Dem. +5 McCain +1 MICHIGAN 07 Mark Schauer 2008 Dem. +2 Rep. +4 Obama +6 MICHIGAN 09 Gary Peters 2008 Dem. +9 Rep. +6 Obama +13 NEVADA 03 Dina Titus 2008 Dem. +5 Rep. +1 Obama +13 NEW MEXICO 01 Martin Heinrich 2008 Dem. +11 Rep. +0.4 Obama +20 NEW YORK 13 Mike McMahon 2008 Dem. +27 Rep. +14 McCain +2 NEW YORK 19 John Hall 2006 Dem. +17 Dem. +2 Obama +2 NEW YORK 20 Scott Murphy 2009 Dem. +0.5 Dem. +6 Obama +3 NORTH CAROLINA 08 Larry Kissell 2008 Dem. +11 Rep. +0.3 Obama +6 OHIO 16 John Boccieri 2008 Dem. +11 Rep. +16 McCain +3 PENNSYLVANIA 7 OPEN n/a Dem. +19 Dem. +13 Obama +13 TEXAS 17 Chet Edwards 1990 Dem. +7 Dem. +18 McCain +35 TEXAS 23 Ciro Rodriguez 2006 Dem. +14 Dem. +8 Obama +3 WISCONSIN 08 Steve Kagen 2006 Dem. +8 Dem. +2 Obama +8 TOTAL DEMOCRATIC BATTLEGROUND TIER 2: DEM. +13 REP. +1 Obama +3

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 5 Tier 3: 15 Entrenched Democratic incumbents in conservative districts STATE AND DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT 2008 CONG. 2006 CONG. 2008 PRES. INCUMBENT SINCE MARGIN MARGIN MARGIN ARKANSAS 01 Marion Berry 1996 unopposed Dem. +38 McCain +20 ARKANSAS 02 Vic Snyder 1996 unopposed Dem. +21 McCain +10 CALIFORNIA 47 Loretta Sanchez 1996 Dem. +11 Dem. +25 Obama +22 FLORIDA 02 Allen Boyd 1996 Dem. +14 unopposed McCain +10 KANSAS 03 Dennis Moore 1998 Dem. +24 Dem. +31 Obama +2 KENTUCKY 06 Ben Chandler 2004 Dem. +16 unopposed McCain +12 MISSOURI 04 Ike Skelton 1976 Dem. +19 Dem. +38 McCain +23 NEW YORK 01 Tim Bishop 2002 Dem. +2 Dem. +24 Obama +4 NORTH DAKOTA AL Earl Pomeroy 1992 Dem. +9 Dem. +31 McCain +9 OREGON 04 Peter DeFazio 1986 unopposed Dem. +25 Obama +10 TENNESSEE 04 Lincoln Davis 2002 Dem. +11 Dem. +33 McCain +30 TENNESSEE 08 John Tanner 1988 unopposed Dem. +46 McCain +13 VIRGINIA 09 Rick Boucher 1982 unopposed Dem. +36 McCain +19 WEST VIRGINIA 01 Alan Mollohan 1982 unopposed Dem. +29 McCain +15 WISCONSIN 03 Ron Kind 1996 Dem. +11 Dem. +30 Obama +17 TOTAL DEMOCRATIC BATTLEGROUND TIER 3: DEM. +45 DEM +35 McCain +7

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 6 Republican districts: 20 most competitive Republican-held seats STATE AND DISTRICT REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT 2008 CONG. 2006 CONG. 2008 PRES. INCUMBENT SINCE MARGIN MARGIN MARGIN CALIFORNIA 03 Dan Lungren 2004 Rep. +5 Rep. +21 Obama +0.5 CALIFORNIA 44 Ken Calvert 1992 Rep. +2 Rep. +23 Obama +1 CALIFORNIA 45 Mary Bono Mack 1998 Rep. +17 Rep. +22 Obama +5 CALIFORNIA 50 Brian Bilbray 1994 Rep. +5 Rep. +10 Obama +4 DELAWARE AL OPEN n/a Rep. +23 Rep. +18 Obama +25 FLORIDA 10 Bill Young 1970 Rep. +21 Rep. +32 Obama +4 FLORIDA 12 OPEN n/a Rep. +15 Rep. +50 McCain +4 ILLINOIS 10 OPEN n/a Rep. +5 Rep. +6 Obama +23 LOUISIANA 02 Joseph Cao 2008 Rep. +3 Dem. +14 Obama +49 MICHIGAN 11 Thad McCotter 2002 Rep. +6 Rep. +11 Obama +9 MINNESOTA 03 Erik Paulsen 2008 Rep. +8 Rep. +30 Obama +6 MINNESOTA 06 Michele Bachmann 2006 Rep. +3 Rep. +8 McCain +9 MISSOURI 09 Blaine Luetkemeyer 2008 Rep. +3 Rep. +25 McCain +11 NEBRASKA 02 Lee Terry 1998 Rep. +5 Rep. +10 Obama +1 OHIO 02 Jean Schmidt 2005 Rep. +7 Rep. +1 McCain +19 OHIO 12 Patrick Tiberi 2000 Rep. +13 Rep. +14 Obama +7 PENNSYLVANIA 06 OPEN n/a Rep. +4 Rep. +2 Obama +17 PENNSYLVANIA 15 Charlie Dent 2004 Rep. +17 Rep. +11 Obama +14 TEXAS 10 Michael McCaul 2004 Rep. +11 Rep. +15 McCain +11 WASHINGTON 08 Dave Reichert 2004 Rep. +6 Rep. +2 Obama +15 TOTAL REPUBLICAN BATTLEGROUND: REP. +13 REP. +16 Obama +6

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 7 The 40 most competitive Democratic-held seats and the GOP battleground Page 7 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 8 Incumbents lead named vote, but below 50 percent; GOP as well I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress next year, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for (DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE) or (REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE)? Democratic Candidate Republican Candidate Dem. +3 Dem. +3 Dem. +3 Rep. +9 48 45 47 44 48 45 44 40 43 39 44 41 39 37 48 44 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democratic Districts Dem. Tier 1 Dem. Tier 2 Republican Districts *Note: The 2008-elected incumbent was inserted as the Democratic Candidate for all Democratic-held districts with the generic Republican Candidate as the challenger, and as the Republican Candidate for all Republican-held districts with the generic Democratic Candidate as the challenger. In districts where the incumbent has announced s/he will not run for re-election, the generic identified was inserted.

October 16, October 2009 16, Page 2009 9 Incumbents in Tier 2 falling short of 2008 vote share I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress next year, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for (DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE) or (REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE)? Democratic Candidate Republican Candidate Margin Shift -3 Margin Shift -10 Margin Shift +5 52 55 46 47 44 42 48 45 53 39 39 48 2008 Actual Vote 2010 Survey Vote 2008 Actual Vote 2010 Survey Vote 2008 Actual Vote 2010 Survey Vote Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts *Note: For each district, the incumbents names were inserted, preceded by their party identification, and were matched against a generic candidate from the opposition party. The 2008 actual vote comes from official reports by the secretaries of state.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 10 Incumbents losing ground since in tier 2, but holding in tier 1 I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress next year, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for (DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE) or (REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE)? Democratic Candidate Republican Candidate Margin Shift -1 Margin Shift -4 Margin Shift -3 47 47 49 48 43 44 42 45 47 48 41 39 October October October Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts *Note: For each district, the incumbents names were inserted preceded by their party identification, matched against a generic candidate of opposition party. Data from the common districts between the two waves.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 11 Class of 2006 in better shape than class of 2008 I know it s a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in 2010, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for (Democratic Candidate) or (Republican Candidate)? Democratic Candidate Republican Candidate Dem. +8 Dem. +2 50 46 42 38 47 43 45 40 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican 2006 Democratic Pick-Up Districts 2008 Democratic Pick-Up Districts *Note: Democratic districts only. The named incumbents, preceded by party identification, were matched against a generic candidate of opposition party. Where incumbents have announced intentions not to seek reelection, both candidates were generic.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 12 Voter choice scales: Democratic tiers 1 & 2 Democrat Not Democrat 38 19 17 3 8 9 2 3 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable Republican Not Republican 33 19 20 2 4 13 4 5 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable

High number of Democratic winnables in GOP districts October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 13 Democrat Not Democrat 37 20 16 19 1 2 3 2 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable Republican Not Republican 34 18 19 2 9 10 3 5 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 14 Voters uncertain whether to re-elect incumbents, even GOP As you may know, there will be an election for your Representative to Congress in November next year. Do you think you will definitely vote to re-elect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) to Congress, probably vote to re-elect (HOUSE INCUMBENT), probably vote for someone else, or definitely vote for someone else? Definitely Reelect Definitely Vote Someone Else Don't Know/Refused/Depends 40 45 41 44 39 47 40 40 22 22 22 21 14 15 14 16 14 15 13 20 Reelect Someone Else Democratic Districts DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts *Note: Actual incumbent s name inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection. DK/Ref

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 15 Voters beginning to pull away from incumbents in battleground As you may know, there will be an election for your Representative to Congress in November next year. Do you think you will definitely vote to re-elect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) to Congress, probably vote to re-elect (HOUSE INCUMBENT), probably vote for someone else, or definitely vote for someone else? Definitely Reelect Definitely Vote Someone Else Don't Know/Refused/Depends 38 45 39 40 43 40 41 39 11 18 22 22 21 14 15 14 16 18 19 14 Reelect Someone Else DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else October DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else October DK/Ref Democratic Districts Republican Districts *Note: Actual incumbent s name inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection. Shows only common districts between the and October surveys.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 16 Dem. tiers divided on incumbent re-elect, GOP leans someone new Now I m going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. First Statement: Next year, I WILL vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is doing a good job and addressing issues that are important to us.* Second Statement: Next year, I CAN'T vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because we need new people that will fix Washington and get things done. Democratic Districts Vote Democrat Strongly Vote Republican Strongly First Second 44 31 35 48-4 Democratic Tier 1 45 32 35 46-1 Democratic Tier 2 43 30 36 49-6 Republican Districts 39 26 37 50-11 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 Note: The pro-incumbent vote shown on left-hand side of the graph and coded per party. Actual incumbent s name inserted. Not asked in seats where incumbent is not seeking reelection.

Shift against incumbent s good job in Democratic tier 2 October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 17 First Statement: Next year, I WILL vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is doing a good job and addressing issues that are important to us.* Second Statement: Next year, I CAN'T vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because we need new people that will fix Washington and get things done. First statement strongly Second statement strongly Margin Shift +2 Margin Shift +5 42 45 45 46 42 41 43 49 25 33 32 35 28 30 30 35 WILL vote to re-elect CAN'T vote to re-elect WILL vote to re-elect CAN'T vote to re-elect WILL vote to re-elect CAN'T vote to re-elect WILL vote to re-elect CAN'T vote to re-elect October October Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 18 Large shift against GOP incumbent s productivity, job performance First Statement: Next year, I WILL vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is doing a good job and addressing issues that are important to us.* Second Statement: Next year, I CAN'T vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because we need new people that will fix Washington and get things done. First statement strongly Second statement strongly Margin Shift +10 42 42 40 50 27 26 27 36 WILL vote to re-elect CAN'T vote to re-elect WILL vote to re-elect CAN'T vote to re-elect October *Note: Actual incumbent s name inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection. Shows only common districts between the and October surveys.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 19 Battleground divided over change vs. rubber stamp in Congress First statement strongly Second statement strongly Republican +1 Democrat +5 45 46 49 44 40 34 37 36 Next year I will vote for (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is fighting for change and making progress addressing the problems our nation is facing. Next year I really want to be able to vote for a Republican for Congress because at least he or she won't be a rubber stamp for national Democrats and all of their wasteful spending. Democratic Districts Next year I really want to be able to vote for a Democrat for Congress because at least he or she will work with President Obama to bring the change we need. Next year I will vote for (House Incumbent) because the Democratic Congress is just business as usual in Washington and more of the same tax and spend policies. Republican Districts

First statement strongly Second statement strongly October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 Top tier sees incumbent for change; tier 2 leans toward Republican Now I m going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. Second Statement: Next year I really want to be First Statement: Next year I will vote for (HOUSE able to vote for a Republican for Congress because INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is fighting for at least he or she won't be a rubber stamp for change and making progress addressing the national Democrats problems our nation Margin is facing.* Shift +6 Margin and all of Shift their 0 wasteful spending. +3 +4 47 44 44 48 35 36 39 33 Democrat incumbent for change and progress Republican won't be rubber stamp for wasteful spending Democrat incumbent for change and progress Republican won't be rubber stamp for wasteful spending Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 *Note: Asked only in Democratic-held districts. For each district, the incumbent s name was inserted, Page 20 with Greenberg party identification. Quinlan Rosner Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 21 Movement away from change message, against spending First Statement: Next year I will vote for (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is fighting for change and making progress addressing the problems our nation is facing.* Second Statement: Next year I really want to be able to vote for a Republican for Congress because at least he or she won't be a rubber stamp for national Democrats and all of their wasteful spending. First statement strongly Second statement strongly Margin Shift -4 Margin Shift -10 47 40 47 44 48 41 45 48 31 30 35 36 32 32 34 38 Incumbent for change, progress Rep not rubber stamp, wasteful Incumbent for change, progress Rep not rubber stamp, wasteful October Incumbent for change, progress Rep not rubber stamp, wasteful Incumbent for change, progress Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 October Rep not rubber stamp, wasteful

In Republican battleground, little movement on re-election October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 22 First Statement: Next year I really want to be able to vote for a Democrat for Congress because at least he or she will work with President Obama to bring the change we need. Second Statement: Next year I will vote for (House Incumbent) because the Democratic Congress is just business as usual in Washington and more of the same tax and spend policies. First statement strongly Second statement strongly Margin Shift -2 49 42 49 44 40 37 35 31 Democrat will work with president for change For incumbent because Dems are business as usual Democrat will work with president for change October For incumbent because Dems are business as usual *Note: Actual incumbent s name inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection. Shows only common districts between the and October surveys.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 23 Image of incumbent members Page 23 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Incumbent job approval: all positive but Dems short of 50 October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 24 Do you approve or disapprove of the way (HOUSE INCUMBENT) is handling his/her job as a member of the U.S. Congress? Strongly Approve Strongly Disapprove 47 48 51 33 33 28 22 20 21 18 18 19 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts *Note: For each district, the incumbents names were inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 25 Tier 2 incumbent favorability score drops below 50 Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. Therm. Mean Warm - Cool Percent Know Cool Warm Democratic Districts 31 35 50.3 +4 85 Democratic Tier 1 Districts 30 36 51.2 +6 86 Democratic Tier 2 Districts 33 35 49.4 +2 85 Republican Districts 28 38 51.2 +10 83 50 25 0 25 50 *Note: Actual names of house incumbents were inserted.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 26 Dem incumbent favorability trending down; GOP falls after spike Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with 100 meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and 50 meaning not particularly warm or cold. 60 40 District Democratic Battleground Republican Districts Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 55 53.9 53.7 55.1 54.8 50 53.6 54.1 52.9 51.7 52.3 51.4 50.5 52.3 51.2 50.3 49.5 45 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 *Note: From Democracy Corps battleground surveys conducted this year. Shows data from common districts over the course of the year. Data reflects MEAN favorability score.

Dem. Incumbent on constituent s side, but split on values October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 27 Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes (HOUSE INCUBMENT) very well, well, not too well or not well at all Not well at all Very well Well Not Well Fights for people here 37 15 21 51 +14 On your side 43 21 16 46 +3 Shares your values Supports too much government spending Will raise my taxes Puts party in Washington ahead of people here 45 21 15 44-1 37 14 26 50 +13 38 16 27 48 +10 40 15 24 46 +6 Too liberal *Note: Those circled in red emerged as top drivers of the vote in our statistical regression modeling. 42 14 24 46 +4 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 28 Some big differences between the Democratic tiers Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes (HOUSE INCUBMENT) very well, well, not too well or not well at all Not well at all Very well Well Not Well Shares your values Tier 1 Tier 2 43 19 16 46 +3 47 23 15 42-5 Supports too much government spending Tier 1 Tier 2 36 16 26 51 +15 38 11 26 48 +10 Will raise my taxes Tier 1 Tier 2 41 16 25 46 +4 34 16 30 51 +17 Too liberal Tier 1 Tier 2 45 14 25 45 0 39 14 23 47 +8 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 29 Key Democratic positives falling in top 40 districts Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes (HOUSE INCUBMENT) very well, well, not too well or not well at all Not well at all Very well Shift in Total Well On your side Oct. 44 21 16 46-5 31 12 20 51 Shares your values Oct. 45 21 15 44-3 36 16 16 47 Too liberal Oct. 43 14 24 45 42 16 16 34 +11 Will raise my taxes Oct. 38 16 27 48 32 11 25 46 +2 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 30 Republican incumbents fight for constituents, share their values Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes (HOUSE INCUBMENT) very well, well, not too well or not well at all Not well at all Very well Well Not Well Fights for people here 36 19 22 50 +14 Shares your values 38 19 21 50 +12 On your side 39 20 18 47 +8 Too conservative For the wealthy, big business not middle class Puts party in Washington ahead of people here Not offering new ideas to fix country s problems 45 17 20 44-1 42 18 16 38-4 44 15 20 38-6 50 22 13 35-15 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

Republican incumbents fare better than competitive Dems October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 31 Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes (HOUSE INCUBMENT) very well, well, not too well or not well at all Not well at all Very well Well Not Well Fights for people here Dem Districts 37 15 21 51 +14 Rep Districts 36 19 22 50 +14 On your side Dem Districts 43 21 16 46 +3 Rep Districts 39 20 18 47 +8 Shares your values Dem Districts Rep Districts 45 21 15 44-1 38 19 21 50 +12 Puts party in Washington ahead of people here Dem Districts Rep Districts 40 15 24 46 +6 44 15 20 38-6 *Note: Actual names of house incumbents were inserted. 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 32 President Obama Page 32 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 33 Obama favorability dips below 50 in Dem top 40; still warm in GOP Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold Barack Obama. Therm. Mean Warm - Cool Cool Warm Democratic Districts 44 47 49.6 +3 Democratic Tier 1 46 45 48.2-1 Democratic Tier 2 41 48 50.9 +7 Republican Districts 42 50 51.5 +8 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 34 Obama approval split in competitive districts Do you approve or disapprove of the job being done by Barack Obama as president? Strongly Approve Strongly Disapprove 48 49 49 50 46 48 49 47 44 41 38 37 32 31 33 31 51 37 43 34 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Democratic Districts Dem. Tier 1 Dem. Tier 2 Republican Districts National* *Note: National data from Democracy Corps survey of 1,200 2008 voters nationwide conducted September 12-16, 2009. Data reflects results from 1,044 likely 2010 voters.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 35 Obama s approval sees some decline overall Do you approve or disapprove of the job being done by Barack Obama as president? Strongly Approve Strongly Disapprove 49 49 45 47 46 47 46 40 35 36 32 31 31 30 49 43 52 49 42 34 34 32 48 38 58 36 36 29 50 31 46 35 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove October October October October Democratic Districts Dem. Tier 1 Dem. Tier 2 Republican Districts *Note: Shows only the common districts between the October and surveys.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 36 Obama and Democrats still dealing with inherited problems Now I m going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. First Statement: President Obama and the Democrats are mainly dealing with problems they inherited. Second Statement: President Obama and the Democrats are mainly dealing with problems of their own creation. First statement strongly Second statement strongly +18 +16 +20 +19 56 56 56 57 49 38 47 40 33 35 51 36 48 38 30 32 Problems inherited Problems of own creation Problems inherited Problems of own creation Problems inherited Problems of own creation Problems inherited Problems of own creation Democratic Districts Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 37 Problems still inherited, but voters less certain in GOP districts Now I m going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. First Statement: President Obama and the Democrats are mainly dealing with problems they inherited. Second Statement: President Obama and the Democrats are mainly dealing with problems of their own creation. First statement strongly Second statement strongly +21 +16 +36 +19 64 56 55 57 50 35 49 39 52 28 34 28 22 48 38 32 Problems inherited Problems of own creation Problems inherited Problems of own creation Problems inherited Problems of own creation Problems inherited Problems of own creation Democratic Districts October Republican Districts October *Note: Shows only the common districts between the October and surveys.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 38 The parties Page 38 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 39 Little difference on social issues, but Reps hold on spending, taxes Now I am going to ask you something different. I am going to read a list of issues and I want you to tell me whether, overall, you think the Democrats or the Republicans would do a better job with this issue. If you do not know, just tell me and we will move on to the next item. Dems Reps Medicare Republicans much better Democrats much better Dem Districts Rep Districts 40 18 25 43 35 20 27 46 +3 +11 Health care Dem Districts Rep Districts 43 31 31 44 45 29 29 44 +1-1 The economy Dem Districts Rep Districts 46 27 23 42 44 25 26 43-4 -1 The budget deficit Dem Districts Rep Districts 47 29 19 38 43 27 28 39-9 -4 Government spending Dem Districts Rep Districts 47 25 19 37 49 27 18 35-10 -14 Taxes *Note: Those circled in red emerged as top drivers of the vote in our statistical regression modeling. Dem Districts Rep Districts 49 30 20 37 51 31 23 38 75 50 25 0 25 50 75-12 -13

Little shift on issues since summer in Democratic battleground October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 40 Now I am going to ask you something different. I am going to read a list of issues and I want you to tell me whether, overall, you think the Democrats or the Republicans would do a better job with this issue. If you do not know, just tell me and we will move on to the next item. Republicans much better Democrats much better Change in Dem - Rep The economy Oct. 46 27 23 42 44 24 24 40 +2 Government spending Oct. 47 25 19 37 48 31 16 35 +2 The budget deficit Oct. 47 28 19 38 44 25 20 37 +1 Health care Oct. 43 31 31 44 41 26 30 43 +1 Taxes Oct. 50 30 20 37 50 31 16 37 0 *Note: Shows only the common districts between the October and surveys. 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 41 Big shift against Dems on health care, economy in GOP-held districts Now I am going to ask you something different. I am going to read a list of issues and I want you to tell me whether, overall, you think the Democrats or the Republicans would do a better job with this issue. If you do not know, just tell me and we will move on to the next item. Taxes Oct. Republicans much better Democrats much better 52 32 23 38 51 26 14 35 Change in Dem - Rep +2 The budget deficit Oct. 42 27 28 39 39 21 20 42-6 Government spending Oct. 49 28 18 34 43 21 13 36-8 Health Care Oct. 45 29 28 43 37 19 37 51-16 The economy Oct. 44 24 26 42 36 18 20 50-16 *Note: Shows only the common districts between the October and surveys. 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

Parties and Congress equally unpopular in battleground October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 42 Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. Therm. Mean Warm - Cool Cool Warm Democratic Party Dem. Districts Rep. Districts 49 45 37 40 43.4 45.7-12 -5 The Democratic Congress Dem. Districts Rep. Districts 49 49 35 34 41.1 41.4-14 -15 Republican Party Dem. Districts 45 32 43.8-13 Rep. Districts 47 31 42.9-16 Republicans in Congress Dem. Districts Rep. Districts 46 48 30 28 42.6 40.7-16 -20 60 40 20 0 20 40 60

Dems image weakened, but no increase in favorability for Reps October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 43 Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. Democratic Party Republican Party Dem. Districts Dem. Tier 1 Dem. Tier 2 GOP Districts Dem. Districts Dem. Tier 1 Dem. Tier 2 GOP Districts *Note: Shows only the common districts between the October and surveys. Oct. Oct. Oct. Oct. Oct. Oct. Oct. Oct. 49 45 50 45 48 44 45 40 45 43 46 42 44 43 45 46 Cool 37 40 37 40 37 40 40 43 31 35 32 35 30 35 31 32 Warm 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 Therm. Mean 43.4 46.5 42.6 46.3 44.3 46.7 45.9 49.0 43.7 45.0 44.0 44.6 43.4 45.3 43.1 44.2 Warm - Cool -12-5 -13-5 -11-4 -5 +3-14 -8-14 -7-14 -8-14 -14

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 44 The economy Page 44 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Voters very divided on the path, position of the economy October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 45 Now, thinking about the nation s economy, do you believe the economy has already bottomed out and is starting to improve, is at the bottom but is not yet getting any better or has not yet bottomed out and will still get worse? 39 35 36 34 32 34 30 31 30 30 30 28 Starting to improve At bottom, not getting better Will still get worse Starting to improve At bottom, not getting better Will still get worse Starting to improve At bottom, not getting better Will still get worse Starting to improve At bottom, not getting better Will still get worse Democratic Districts Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts

Voters split on if Obama s policies averted a worse crisis October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 46 Now I m going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. First Statement: President Obama's economic policies helped avert an even worse crisis, and are laying the foundation for our eventual economic recovery. Second Statement: President Obama's economic policies have run up a record federal deficit while failing to end the recession or slow the record pace of job losses. First statement strongly Second statement strongly +3 +9 +2 +1 49 52 46 43 42 44 37 35 49 47 46 47 40 39 36 39 Helped avert a worse crisis Have run up deficit, failed Helped avert a worse crisis Have run up deficit, failed Helped avert a worse crisis Have run up deficit, failed Helped avert a worse crisis Have run up deficit, failed Democratic Districts Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 47 Voters split on effect of stimulus Now let me ask you about the economic recovery plan, also known as the stimulus package, that was passed by Congress and became law. In your opinion, do you feel that the economic recovery plan is starting to have a positive impact on the economy, will eventually have a positive impact on the economy but has not yet, will not have any real impact on the economy or do you feel that the economic recovery plan is hurting the economy? Starting to have positive impact Will eventually have positive impact Will not have any real impact Is hurting economy Having/Will Have Positive Impact: 46 Having/Will Have Positive Impact: 43 Having/Will Have Positive Impact: 49 Having/Will Have Positive Impact: 48 21 25 30 31 29 28 27 28 23 21 20 20 20 21 21 20 Democratic Districts Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Republican Districts

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 48 Rebalancing economy, middle class convincing economic arguments Now I'm going to read you some things that Democrats might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. Very convincing Protected middle class by extending health care and unemployment, and cutting taxes 26 56 Working to rebalance the economy to work for middle class so wealthy pay fair share 26 54 Economy was too reliant on financial bubbles; must change for true long-term growth 21 53 Actions have stemmed job losses, but cannot rest until economy producing high quality jobs 20 53 Have averted the worst and now fixing the broken system to help middle class, small business 17 49 Decisive action pulled economy back from the brink 16 43 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 49 Rebalancing economy, protecting middle class top arguments Now I'm going to read you some things that Democrats might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. Protected middle class by extending benefits We inherited an economy that has left far too many Americans struggling to make ends meet, so we are acting to help them get through this crisis by extending unemployment and health care benefits to Americans who lost their jobs, cutting taxes for 95 percent of working families, and preventing thousands of police officers, teachers and firefighters from being laid off. And as we move forward we are working to make sure that the economy starts to create new jobs again as it begins to pull out of this recession. Very Convincing 56 26 Total Convincing Working to rebalance the economy to work for middle class Even before the financial crisis the economy wasn't working for too many middle class Americans. That's why we are working to rebalance the economy to make sure it works for regular Americans by asking the very wealthy and big corporations to pay their fair share while cutting taxes and reducing health care costs for working families and small businesses and creating quality, middle class jobs in alternative energy. Very Convincing 54 26 Total Convincing

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 50 Long-term growth and curbing job loses also key Now I'm going to read you some things that Democrats might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. Changing from bubble economy to one for true long-term growth The financial crisis showed that our economy was too reliant on unsustainable financial bubbles. We are working to change that and lay the groundwork for true long-term prosperity by reforming health care to bring down costs for business and consumers and making America the leader in alternative energy like wind and solar so the jobs and industries of the future are built right here, not in China or India. Very Convincing 53 21 Total Convincing Actions stemmed job losses, now building stronger When President Obama was sworn in, almost 750 thousand Americans were losing their job every month. The actions we've taken have cut that number by two-thirds, so we've made progress in stemming the loss of jobs. But we are not satisfied and a jobless recovery isn't good enough for us or the American people; that is why we won't stop fighting until our economy is once again creating high quality jobs. Very Convincing 53 20 Total Convincing

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 51 Talk about economy back from the brink falls flat Now I'm going to read you some things that Democrats might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. Averted the worst, now fixing the broken system to help middle class Last year our economy was on the verge of collapse so we had to make the tough choices and act, even though we knew it would be unpopular because it would help Wall Street. Now that we've averted the worst, we're working to fix this broken system so it rewards the hard work of middle class Americans and small businesses that play by the rules instead of the big bankers that abused the system to get ahead. Very Convincing 49 17 Total Convincing Decisive action pulled economy back from the brink This past winter our nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, 700,000 jobs were being lost per month and our financial system was on the verge of collapse. We still have a long way to go and we will not rest until those Americans who seek jobs can find them, but thanks to the bold and decisive actions we have taken since January, we have pulled this economy back from the brink. Very Convincing 43 16 Total Convincing

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 52 Wasteful spending, bailout argument carry weight against Dems Now I'm going to read you some things that Republicans might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. Very convincing Democrats have approved 5 trillion in wasteful, irresponsible spending that undermines economy 32 58 Democrats more concerned with helping out Wall Street, not Main Street 28 55 Democrats said spending would create jobs, but unemployment still rising 35 53 Democrats only solution to severe recession is greater government control, socialism 33 52 0 25 50 75

Democrats helping Wall Street, not Main Street The Democrats in Congress are more interested in bailing out Detroit, Wall Street and the housing industry with taxpayers' dollars than they are in helping regular Americans during these difficult times. Democrats even let insurance giant AIG use taxpayer dollars to give millions in bonuses to its top executives. It's time Democrats start helping out Americans on Main Street, not Wall Street. October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 53 Wasteful spending and bailouts are strong attacks against Dems Now I'm going to read you some things that Republicans might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. 5 trillion in wasteful, irresponsible spending that undermines economy Democrats in Congress have approved 5 trillion dollars in spending this year alone, adding over a trillion dollars to our deficit that will leave mountains of debt for our grandchildren to pay back, money that America is borrowing from China and the Middle East. This irresponsible, wasteful spending undermines our economic stability by forcing us to rely on hostile foreign governments to lend us money. Very Convincing 58 32 Total Convincing Very Convincing 55 28 Total Convincing

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 54 Rising unemployment, socialism also potent Now I'm going to read you some things that Republicans might say about the economy, after each one please tell me if you find the statement to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, just a little convincing, or not at all convincing. Dems said spending would create jobs, but unemployment still rising The Democrats said all of their spending would create jobs, but their trillion-dollar stimulus plan, four-trilliondollar budget and government bailouts have created more debt than at any other time in our history and yet unemployment is still rising and will soon top 10 percent. And they want to pay for all of this by making middle class Americans pay higher taxes on everything from energy to health care. Very Convincing 53 35 Total Convincing Democrats only solution is greater government control, socialism Our economy is in a severe recession but the Democrats only solution is greater government control. The federal government runs General Motors and has nationalized several banks. Democrats say they're doing what it takes to get our economy back on track but what they're really doing is pushing us on a path toward socialism, increasing the size of our federal government to levels only seen in European countries. Very Convincing 52 33 Total Convincing

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 55 Democratic Tier 3 Page 55 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 56 Tier 3 incumbents hold double-digit margin but don t crack 50 I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress next year, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for (DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE) or (REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE)? Democratic Candidate Republican Candidate Dem. +3 Dem. +3 Dem. +12 47 44 48 43 44 46 39 41 45 50 38 34 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Democratic Tier 3 *Note: The 2008-elected incumbent was inserted as the Democratic Candidate for all Democratic-held districts with the generic Republican Candidate as the challenger, and as the Republican Candidate for all Republican-held districts with the generic Democratic Candidate as the challenger. In districts where the incumbent has announced s/he will not run for re-election, the generic identified was inserted.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 57 Voter choice scales: many winnables for Reps in Dem tier 3 Democrat Not Democrat 33 17 20 3 9 9 2 6 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable Republican Not Republican 33 14 18 3 3 19 6 5 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable *Note: Any note needed enter here or delete if unneeded

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 58 Despite vote lead still only 43 percent reelect for Tier 3 incumbents As you may know, there will be an election for your Representative to Congress in November next year. Do you think you will definitely vote to re-elect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) to Congress, probably vote to re-elect (HOUSE INCUMBENT), probably vote for someone else, or definitely vote for someone else? Definitely Reelect Definitely Vote Someone Else Don't Know/Refused/Depends 40 45 41 44 43 39 22 22 14 16 19 14 15 15 17 Reelect Someone Else Democratic Tier 1 DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else DK/Ref Reelect Someone Else Democratic Tier 2 Democratic Tier 3 DK/Ref *Note: Actual incumbent s name inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection.

Democratic member job approval: positive but short of 50 October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 59 Do you approve or disapprove of the way (HOUSE INCUMBENT) is handling his/her job as a member of the U.S. Congress? Strongly Approve Strongly Disapprove 47 48 48 33 33 31 22 20 22 18 18 19 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Democratic Tier 3 *Note: For each district, the incumbents names were inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 60 Obama approve/disapprove tied in tier 3 Do you approve or disapprove of the job being done by Barack Obama as president? Strongly Approve Strongly Disapprove 46 49 50 48 46 47 44 31 33 38 36 26 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Democratic Tier 1 Democratic Tier 2 Democratic Tier 3 *Note: For each district, the incumbents names were inserted. Question not asked in districts where the incumbent has announced they are not running for reelection.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 61 Incumbents in Tier 3 viewed more favorably Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. Therm. Mean Warm - Cool Percent Know Cool Warm Democratic Tier 1 Districts 30 36 51.2 +6 86 Democratic Tier 2 Districts 33 35 49.4 +2 85 Democratic Tier 3 Districts 28 39 53.4 +11 88 50 25 0 25 50 *Note: Actual names of house incumbents were inserted.

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 62 Obama favorability lukewarm in tiers 1 and 3, still warm in tier 2 Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold Barack Obama. Therm. Mean Warm - Cool Cool Warm Democratic Tier 1 46 45 48.2-1 Democratic Tier 2 41 48 50.9 +7 Democratic Tier 3 42 45 49.3 +3 75 50 25 0 25 50 75

October 16, 2009 October Page 16, 2009 63 www.greenbergresearch.com Washington, DC 10 G Street NE, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20002 California 50 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94111 London, UK 405 Carrington House, 6 Hertford Street London, UK W1J 7SU Ph: +1 202 478 8300 Fax: +1 202 478 8301 Ph: +1 415 277 5403 Fax: +1 415 358 9599 Page 63 Ph: +44 (0) 207 499 5204 Fax: +44 (0) 207 499 5284 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner