Pretrial Service Programs in North Carolina

Similar documents
Right-Sizing America s Jail Population and Protecting Public Safety

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

County Detention: Proposed Mental Health Facility & Immigration Enforcement Policies Fact Sheet

CCJJ BAIL SUBCOMMITTEE. FY13-BL #1 Implement evidence based decision making practices and standardized bail release decision making guidelines

Court Support Agencies Organization Department Summary

TEXAS COMMISSION ON JAIL STANDARDS

HALIFAX COUNTY PRETRIAL RELEASE RISK ASSESSMENT PILOT PROJECT

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

State Policy Implementation Project

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

Corrections Division Policy and Procedure Manual Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

Summit County Pre Trial Services

JAIL UTILIZATION PLAN

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Prepared for the Broward Sheriff s Office Department of Community Control. September Prepared by:

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

Pretrial Services and Bail Funds Increasing Access to Justice

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 56 1

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Receipts and Expenditures of Civil Division 3. Receipts and Expenditures of Criminal Division 4, 5

PRETRIAL SERVICES. Why Sheriffs Should Champion Pretrial Services

AB 109 and Prop 47 County Public Planning

**READ CAREFULLY** L.A County Sheriff s Civilian Oversight Commission Ordinance Petition Instructions

Overcrowding Alternatives

Prince William County 2004 Adult Detention Services SEA Report

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

Alaska Department of Corrections: Post-conviction Incarcerated Population,

Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS

COUNTY OF ORANGE. PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT PAPER PILOT STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY (Pretrial Supervision Meeting)

CHAPTER 88 CRIMINAL JUSTICE SUBSTANCE ABUSE ACT

County of Santa Clara OFFICE OF PRETRIAL SERVICES

Senate Committee on Criminal Justice (515) THE NEED FOR PRETRIAL DIVERSION

SPARTANBURG ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

Arkansas Current Incarceration Crisis

OFFICE OF THE MAGISTRATE Bruce Adam, Chief Magistrate

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1

Chapter 148. State Prison System. Article 1. Organization and Management Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1262, s. 10.

Communicating the Need for Pretrial Justice Reform

NEW ORLEANS PRETRIAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

Broken: The Illinois Criminal Justice System and How to Rebuild It

The Judiciary, State of Hawai i

PA PAC Questionnaire for District Attorney Candidates

Pretrial Release Issues

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT S.2371, AN ACT RELATIVE TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission Current Enabling Statute Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

Justice and Public Safety Subcommittee Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

Justice Reinvestment in Missouri

Jail: Who is in on bail?

Statutory provisions may be implicated by any or all of the ten Key Components of Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts.

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Commitment and Parole Population Projections

LONDONDERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Colorado Springs Police Department

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Background: Focus on Public Safety Outcomes in Sentencing

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Criminal Justice Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

2010 Bail Policy Review. For Releases Occurring July 12 Oct 31, 2010

Report of the Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight to the 2016 Kansas Legislature

CIRCUIT COURT William T. Newman, Jr. FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Work Group to Re-envision the Jail Replacement Project Report Release & Next Steps. Board of Supervisors June 13, 2017

Evaluation of Broward County Jail Population. Current Trends and Recommended Options

Texas Law & Due Process (Chapter 10) Dr. Michael Sullivan. Texas State Government GOVT

Results Minneapolis. Minneapolis City Attorney s Office

NORTH CAROLINA RACIAL JUSTICE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: YEAR 2 EVALUATION FINDINGS. PREPARED FOR: The American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section

The Field Poll, (415) The California Endowment, (213)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Expungements and Pardons in South Carolina Courts

Staci Biggar Criminal Defense Attorney Harris County, Texas

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

CHAPTER 17: COMMUNITY JUSTICE

Analysis of Findings from a Survey of 2,233 likely 2016 General Election Voters Nationwide

PLAN TO REDUCE CORRECTIONAL COSTS AND ACHIEVE SAVINGS FOR REINVESTMENT

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

Court Watch NOLA 2015 Data & Statistics

For Informational Purposes (916) July 15, 2011

Criminal Justice Public Safety and Individual Rights

Types of Programs Fall Conference. Dispute Resolution Center (DRC)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

JUVENILE JUSTICE. Creates the Raise the Age Louisiana Act of 2016 and the La. Juvenile Jurisdiction Planning and Implementation Council.

Alaska Criminal Justice Reforms Why they are critical for serving justice-involved Trust beneficiaries

Charlotte-Mecklenburg 2015 Criminal Justice System Public Perceptions Study Quantitative Report

Driving Under the Influence; House Sub. for SB 374

PART C IMPRISONMENT. If the applicable guideline range is in Zone B of the Sentencing Table, the minimum term may be satisfied by

CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING

Objectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors

PA PAC Questionnaire for District Attorney Candidates

Smart Justice, Fair Justice: Campaign to End Mass Incarceration

Transcription:

Pretrial Service Programs in North Carolina North Carolina Criminal Justice Analysis Center October 2008 Pretrial Service Programs in North Carolina Examined both program process and perceived impact on community, clients, jail populations and judicial processing Two surveys were designed: 1. Pretrial program directors 2. Constituents Chief District Court Judges Sheriffs Magistrates 1

Pretrial Service Programs in North Carolina Pretrial Program Director Survey - 40 Questions Items addressed: Program Operations Annual Budgets Personnel and Training Goals and Objectives Number of Clients Outcomes Success/Failure Perceptions on Program Impact Also Included Constituent Questions Pretrial Service Programs in North Carolina Constituent Survey 24 Items Likert Scale Ratings: Client Supervision and Behavior Service Provision Jail Population Reviews Trials Speed and Number Reduce Jail Populations Community Awareness 2

Sample and Return Rates 33 Pretrial programs operating in 40 counties Surveyed all program directors 70% return rate Constituents: 19 Chief District Court Judges 40 Sheriffs 119 Magistrates Weak 16% return rate Average Annual Operating Budget x Population Average Population N Range Operating Budget Less than 50,000 3 $ 19,880 81,000 $ 45,293 50,000 100,000 4 $ 20,000 75.000 $ 36,279 100,001 500,000 12 $ 36,000 563,480 $ 251,226 500,001 1,000,000 1 ---------- $ 340,000 3

Average Number of Staff = 4 Typical program has: Service Provision: 1 Managerial 2 Screeners 1-2 Administrative 91% Substance Abuse 78% Mental Health 70% Drug Testing 57% Electronic Monitoring Number and Type of Offenders Accepted into Pretrial Service Programs Number of Offender Type Programs Accepting Percent Violent Felons 7 30% Non-violent Felons 22 96% Misdemeanants 22 96% Traffic 20 87% Juvenile 9 39% Mentally Ill 14 61% 4

Effect of Pretrial Programs on Judicial Process 50 43.5 40 Percent 30 20 26.1 13 17.4 10 0 Significantly slower 0 0 Slightly slower No effect Slightly faster Significantly faster Not sure Effect of Pretrial Programs on Number of Trials 40 Percent 30 20 10 13.0 30.4 26.1 8.7 21.7 0 0 Strongly disagree Disagree No effect Slightly agree Strongly agree Not sure 5

Program Admissions: 12 to 6,232 Total Admissions (FY 2005/06) 14,555 Average Number of Admissions 555 Successful Completions: 6 to 4,752 Total Successes 11,602 Average Number of Completions 430 Average Completion Rate 77% Pretrial Programs are Cost Effective and Reduce Detention Populations Average Daily Cost per Offender: $ 6.04 Average Cost to House in Detention: $ 57.30 Average County Saves: $1.05 million per year Average Detention Population < 1% Overcrowded Average Pretrial Program Removes 134 Arrestees/Day Without Pretrial Services, ADP Grows from 386 to 520 Overcrowding Jumps to 35% Above Rated Capacity 6

Selected Constituent Perceptions 86% Above Average on Release Recommendations 66% Above Average on Defendant Supervision 60% Above Average on Service Provision 74% Positive Effect on Judicial Processing 69% Excellent Management Tool for Overcrowding Selected Constituent Perceptions (continued) 75% More Beneficial than Bail 86% Reduce Failure to Appear Incidents 79% Facilitate Rehabilitation 78% Reduce Recidivism 86% Positive Effect on Community 7

Policy Recommendations Increase Number of Pretrial Programs Statewide Increase Program Use Increase the Use of Research Findings and Evidence Based Programs Better Utilization of Administrative Data 8