REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

Similar documents
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

PETITION FOR REHEARING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S BRIEF

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1356 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-1013 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TERRANCE MONTREAL JENKINS NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT. Julie Ann Epps (MS Bar No. 504 East Peace Street Canton, MS (601) facsimile (601)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT

MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS HAND DOWN DATE: 11/21/2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSIS~P py FILED AUG orefice OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

%QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT TIMOTHY DUPUIS NO CA-1635-COA VS. APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAR OFFICE OFTHE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI & IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CA-188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-KA-1593 BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE LAURAH. TEDDER SPECIAL

v No St. Joseph Circuit Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00231

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-KA-0387-SCT CERTIORARI FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.200B-CA APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.: 08-CR-011-NW-C

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

ERIC DARRELL LOTT APPELLANT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT Oral Argument Not Requested

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAR OFFICE i)+ ThE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BURNETTE AVAKIAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NORAIR AVAKIAN, DECEASED NO.

E-Filed Document Jun :33: KA COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Transcription:

E-Filed Document Jul 1 2016 11:19:28 2014-KA-01335-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LORI GRIFFIN APPELLANT v. No. 2014-KA-1335-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lowndes County, Miss. No. 2010-0013-CR1K Justin T. Cook, MB # 102622 OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER INDIGENT APPEALS DIVISION P.O. Box 3510 Jackson MS 39207 jcook@ospd.ms.gov T: (601) 576-4290 F: (601) 576-4205 Attorney for the Appellant

TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... i Index of Authorities... i Reply Argument... 1 Reply Issue: There is no serious bodily injury in this case.... 1 Conclusion... 4 Certificate of Service... 5 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES CASES Ames v. State, 17 So. 3d 130 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009)... 2 Bright v. State, 986 So. 2d 1042 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008)... 3 Brown v. State, 934 So. 2d 1039 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006)... 3 Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280 (Miss. 1992)... 2 Truelove v. State, 78 So.3d 363 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011)... 2 Williams v. State, 126 So. 3d 992 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013)... 2 OTHER AUTHORITIES Model Penal Code 210.0 (1980)... 2 i

REPLY ARGUMENT Reply Issue: There is no serious bodily injury in this case. In its analysis in Issues III and IV, the State argues that the prosecution presented sufficient evidence to support Griffin s conviction and that her conviction is not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. (Brief of the Appellee pp. 18-21). The State s argument is misplaced and not supported by the law of this State or the facts in this case. In this case, Griffin s indictment alleged, in pertinent part, that she did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously, purposely and knowingly cause serious bodily injury to Dean Loftis, by choking her and hitting her with her fist, breaking a rib, without authority of law and not in necessary self defense[.] (C.P. 8). The State s elements instruction likewise required the jury find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that: (C.P. 86). 1. the Defendant, Lori Griffin; 2. did on or about December 14, 2009, in Lowndes County, Mississippi; 3. unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, knowingly and intentionally; 4. cause serious bodily injury to Dean Loftis by hitting her and breaking her rib; 5. without authority of law and not in necessary self-defense; In its brief, however, the State argues that in an attempt to show the severity of Loftis s injuries, the State introduced photographs that showed Loftis s bruising and visible wounds. All of this evidence was sufficient to show that Loftis s injuries, including her broken rib, were serious bodily injuries. (Brief of the Appellee p.19). The State s argument is misplaced and not focused on the true crux of this case. The 1

indictment and the jury s instruction focus solely on Loftis s rib. All of this evidence as the State puts it, was not for the jury to consider, nor is it for the Court to assess in its analysis on the sufficiency or weight of the evidence. On this issue, the sole question before this Court is whether a cracked rib, which required no surgery, no prescription, no follow-up appointment, no referral to a specialist essentially, no treatment at all -- qualifies as a serious bodily injury for the purposes of this State s aggravated assault statute. As noted in its principal brief, serious bodily injury has been defined as bodily injury which creates a substantial risk of death or which causes serious, permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ. Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 292 (Miss. 1992) (quoting Model Penal Code 210.0 (1980)). No such evidence exists in this case. In a string cite, the State lists several cases for which it asserts that a broken bone is significant bodily injury. (Brief of the Appellee pp.19-20). The State omits pertinent facts that clearly distinguish those cases from Griffin s. In Williams v. State, 126 So. 3d 992, 994 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013), the victim had a broken shoulder, eye socket, and jaw and was left with permanent nerve damage in her face. No comparable injury exists in this case. In fact, no treatment was required. In Truelove v. State, 78 So.3d 363 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011), the victim suffered from closed-head trauma and a broken nose. There is no evidence of any closed-head trauma in this case. The State presented no evidence about the extent of the cracked rib. In Ames v. State, 17 So. 3d 130 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009), the defendant required surgery after receiving several broken bones in his face. Loftis did not need surgery. She 2

did not even get a prescription for any medication. In Bright v. State, 986 So. 2d 1042 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008), the victim required surgery to repair broken bones in his face with wires and plates to reconstruct the bones. Id. at 1045. Again, no surgery was required in this case. Why? Simply put, it is because this cracked rib is not a serious bodily injury. In Brown v. State, 934 So. 2d 1039, 1041-42 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006), the victim required surgery on a broken jaw, had that jaw wired shut, and was hospitalized for four days. Loftis was never hospitalized. The State was required to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Loftis s cracked rib was a serious bodily injury. It failed to present any information as to the injury s severity, be it through medical testimony or through the testimony of Loftis herself. The simple fact that Loftis had a cracked rib is not sufficient evidence to support this conviction. 3

CONCLUSION Griffin submits that based on the propositions cited and briefed herinabove, together with the argument presented in his initial brief, the judgment of the trial court and his conviction and sentence should be reversed and vacated, respectively, and this matter remanded to the lower court for further proceedings. Respectfully submitted, Lori Griffin, Appellant /s Justin T. Cook Miss. Bar. 102622 Office of State Public Defender Indigent Appeals division Post Office Box 3510 Jackson, MS 39207 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Justin T. Cook, counsel for the appellant, hereby certify that I have this day filed by means of the electronic case filing system the foregoing Brief of the Appellant, pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 25 by which immediate notification to the following ECF participants in this cause is made: In addition, the following non-ecf participants are served by United States Mail, first class firs- class postage prepaid: Honorable James T. Kitchens, Jr. Circuit Judge P.O. Box 1387 Columbus, MS 39703 Scott Colom, Esq. District Attorney P.O. Box 1044 Columbus, MS 39703 THIS the 1st day of July, 2016 s/ Justin T. Cook Justin T. Cook, Miss Bar #102622 5