Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Similar documents
EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. M. Slavin & Sons, Ltd. d/b/a M. Slavin & Sons Fish

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn

EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

Peralta Community College District Office of Employee Relations th Street, Oakland CA (510)

PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT & DISCRIMINATION

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Sunrise Hospitality BC II, LLC d/b/a Microtel Inns & Suites

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Houston Area Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 1-12-1998 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company Judge Jerry Budmeyer Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company Keywords EEOC, Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Barjac Company, 3-97-CV-1572-R, Consent Decree, Sexual Harassment, Hostile Work Environment, Female, Sex, Retail, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/593

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT O: DALLAS DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) B Y ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) v ) 3-97-CV-1572-R ) BETSY ROSS FLAG GIRL, INC. d/b/a ) BETSY ROSS FLAG GIRL and BARJAC ) COMPANY ) ) Defendant. ) ) U.S. DISTRICT COURT couffthernd,str,ct0ftr<as TEXAS FILED NANCY DOHERTY, CLERK Deputy CONSENT DECREE THIS CONSENT DECREE is made and entered into by and between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC )and Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc., d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. (sometimes known as Betsy Ross Flag Girls) and Baijac Company (Baijak) (collectively defined as Betsy Ross ), in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Civil Action NO. 3-97-CV-1752- R, based upon a charge o f discrimination filed by Debi K. Smith against Betsy Ross. The above referenced action alleges that Betsy Ross violated Sections 703 and 704 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ), 42 U.S.C. Sections 2 0 0 0 e -2 and 2000e-3, by subjecting Debi K. Smith, Stephanie L. Beiford, Fleeta K. Kelley, Karen Rosato, Kimberly C. Schuler and Ruth Vasquez ( aggrieved individuals ) to a sexually hostile work environment. The parties hereto desire to compromise and settle the differences embodied in the aforementioned

lawsuit, and intend that the terms and conditions of the compromise and settlement be set forth in this Consent Decree ( Consent Decree ). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements set forth. herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows, the Court finds appropriate, and therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This Consent Decree resolves all issues and claims raised in EEOC Charge No. 310 96-2258. This Decree further resolves all issues and claims raised in the Complaint filed by the EEOC in this civil action. The EEOC and the aggrieved individuals agree that this Consent Decree is intended to be a full and final compromise, release and settlement of all claims, demands, actions, and causes of action relating to the allegations contained in the above captioned lawsuit, and the claims made in EEOC Charge No. 310 96 2258. The EEOC and the aggrieved individuals waive further litigation on all issues raised in the above referenced Complaint and Charge. The EEOC and the aggrieved individuals agree and acknowledge that this Consent Decree is intended to fully and finally release, acquit, and discharge Betsy Ross, and their respective insurers, employees, officers, directors, shareholders, agents, divisions, subsidiaries, parent corporations, affiliates, predecessors, successors and assigns, and all other persons and entities, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, and causes of action, relating to those matters which were raised or could have been raised in the above captioned lawsuit and EEOC Charge No. 310 96 2258. The Commission does not waive processing or litigating charges other than the above referenced charge; provided, however, that the EEOC agrees and acknowledges that it hereby waives all claims and matters arising from the above captioned lawsuit and the EEOC Charge No. 310 96 2258. 2. The parties agree that this Consent Decree does not constitute an admission by Betsy CONSENT DECREE 2

Ross of any violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 3. Betsy Ross agrees that it shall conduct all employment practices in a manner which does not subject any employee to sexual harassment or a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. Betsy Ross agrees that there shall be no discrimination or retaliation o f any kind against any person because o f opposition to any practice declared unlawful under Title VII, or because o f the filing o f a charge; giving testimony or assistance or participating in any manner in any investigation, proceeding or hearing under Title VII. 5. Betsy Ross agrees to implement the written sexual harassment and complaint procedure policy attached to this Consent Decree as Attachment A. Betsy Ross will provide a copy o f such policy to each current employee, and agrees to provide a copy o f such policy to each new employee at the time of hire. Betsy Ross agrees that the Human Resources Director shall be the official avenue for reporting and responding to Title VII violations. Betsy Ross further agrees that, for the duration o f this decree, all reports of sexual harassment shall be reported by the Human Resources Director to the EEOC within 24 hours o f the report. 6. Betsy Ross agrees to post the Notice appended hereto as Attachment B on its employee bulletin board at each Betsy Ross facility within ten (10) days of signing o f this Consent Decree by the Court. Betsy Ross will report to the EEOC that it has complied with this requirement within 14 days after posting the notices. The notices shall remain posted for the duration of this Consent Decree as specified in Paragraph 16, below. 7. Betsy Ross agrees to conduct training for all employees, including Jack Casey, Jr., and all supervisors, managers and office workers, advising them o f the requirements and CONSENT DECREE 3

prohibitions against sexual harassment under Title VII. The training shall also address the prohibition against retaliatory treatment under Title VII against employees who participated in any way in the filing of the EEOC charge, the investigation of the charge or the filing of this lawsuit. The training will inform the employees of the complaint procedure. The training will also advise employees, including supervisors and managers, of the consequences of violating Title VII. The training shall be at least four hours in duration and shall be conducted on or before June 30, 1998. No less than 10 days before the training is conducted, Betsy Ross agrees to give written notice to the EEOC as to the date and location of the training, the name o f the person providing the training and the substance of the training. 8. Betsy Ross agrees to provide a neutral letter of reference to Debi K. Smith and Stephanie L. Belford within 10 days after the signing of this Consent Decree by the Court. 9. Betsy Ross agrees to purge all personnel files of Debi K. Smith, Stephanie L. Belford, Fleeta K. Kelley, Karen Rosato, Kimberly C. Schuler and Ruth Vasquez of all references, if any, to this lawsuit, the charge o f discrimination upon which this lawsuit is based and the facts and circumstances that led to the filing of the charge. 10. Betsy Ross agrees to make a total award o f $205,975.00 in monetary relief to Debi K. Smith, Stephanie L. Belford, Fleeta K. Kelley, Karen Rosato, Kimberly C. Schuler and Ruth Vasquez by check drawn on the trust account of Cantilo, Maisel & Hubbard, L.L.P. Betsy Ross shall send a check to each aggrieved individual made payable to the aggrieved individual in the specific amount stated by the EEOC. Each check shall be sent directly to the aggrieved individual at her home address by depositing the checks in the U.S. Mail within three (3) business days o f the signing o f this Consent Decree by the Court. Betsy Ross agrees to provide a copy of each check to the CONSENT DECREE 4

EEOC within three (3) business days of mailing. 11. Payment of monetary relief as described in Paragraph 10, above, shall be in addition to the payment o f bonuses for May 1997 in the amount of $11,900.00 and bonuses for December 1997 in the amount o f $5,975.00. 12. If Betsy Ross fails to tender payment or otherwise fails to timely comply with the terms of paragraph 9, above, Betsy Ross shall: a. Pay interest at the rate calculated pursuant to 26 U.S.C.Section 6621(b) on any untimely or unpaid amounts; and b. Bear any additional costs incurred by the EEOC caused by the noncompliance or delay o f the defendant. The parties reserve the right to seek contempt sanctions for non-payment and non-compliance with this Court Order and Judgment and all other rights secured by the laws o f the United States. 13. All reports to the EEOC required by this Decree shall be sent to Toby Costas, Legal Unit, EEOC, 207 S. Houston, Dallas, Texas 75202. 14. No party shall contest the validity of this Consent Decree nor the jurisdiction o f the federal district court to enforce this Consent Decree and its terms or the right o f any party to bring an enforcement action upon breach o f any term of this Consent Decree by any party. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to preclude the Commission from enforcing this Decree in the event that Betsy Ross fails to perform the promises and representations contained herein. All parties shall be authorized to seek compliance with the Consent Decree through civil action in the United States District Court. 15. The parties agree to bear their own attorney fees and costs associated with this action. CONSENT DECREE 5

16. The term of this Decree shall be for two years or until Jack Casey, Jr. no longer holds an ownership interest in, no longer is employed by and no longer operates as a board member, officer, consultant or independent contractor for Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc., through conveyance of Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. to a non-family member, and provides proof to the EEOC that he has done so in an arms length transaction; but in no event shall the term of this Consent Decree be less than six (6) months. SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED this I day o f U.S. DISTRIC CONSENT DECREE 6

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE: Counsel for the Plaintiff EEOC Counsel for Defendant: lal Attorney Connecticut State Bar No. 301166 ROBERT A. CANINO Supervisory Trial Attorney Oklahoma Bar No. 011782 TOBY W. COSTAS Sr. Trial Attorney Texas Bar No. 04855720 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 207 South Houston Street Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 655 3335 (214) 655 3331 (FAX) DIANA R. WARNECKE State Bar No. 00791577 Cantilo, Maisel & Hubbard 1717 Main Street Suite 3200 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 740-4600 (214) 740-4646 (FAX) CONSENT DECREE 7

FROM : 1997,12-19 IS: 02 #526 P. 02/03 Attachment A SEXUAL AND OTHER UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. (the "Company") is committed to providing a work environment that is fe e of unlawful discrimination and harassment. Company policy prohibits sexual harassment and harassment because of an individual s sex, race, religious creed, national origin or ancestry, physical or mental disability, age, sexual orientation or any other basis protected by applicable federal, state or local law. Harassment or any form of misconduct by an employee, or other person doing business with or for the Company, that is demeaning to another person, that undermines the integrity of the employment relationship, or that create a hostile working environment is strictly prohibited. Prohibited unlawful harassment includes, but is not limited to, the following behavior: a. Verbal conduct such as epithets, derogatory jokes or comments, slurs or unwanted sexual advances, invitations or comments; b. Visual conduct such as derogatory and/or sexually-orientated posters, photography, cartoons, drawings or gestures; c. Physical conduct such as assault, unwanted touching, blocking normal movement or interfering with work because of sex, race or any other protected basis; d. Threats and demands to submit to sexual requests as a condition of continued employments, or to avoid some other loss, and offers of employments benefits in return for sexual favors; and e. Retaliation for having reported or threatened to report harassment. Any employee who believes that he or she is a victim of any unlawful harassment, including but net limited to any of the conduct listed above, by any supervisor, management official, other employee, customer, client or any other person in connection with employment at the Company should bring the matter lo the attention of his or her supervisor An employee may report such conduct even though he or she was not the target of the harassment. An employee who is uncomfortable for any reason in bringing the matter to the attention of his or her supervisor should report the matter to the Human Resources Director. Any questions about this policy or potential sexual harassment shoul d also be brought to the attention of the same persons. Any supervisor who becomes aware of possible sexual harassment or other unlawful harassment should promptly advise the Human Resources Director. The Company will immediately undertake effective, thorough and objective investigation of all harassment allegations. If the Company determines that unlawful harassment has occurred, effective remedial action will be taken in accordance with the circumstances involved. Any employee determined by the Company to be responsible for unlawful harassment will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Whatever action is taken against the harasser

FROH : 1 9 9 T,12-19 ISi 02 #529 P. 03/03 will be made known to the individual subjected to the harassment. The Company will not pay damages assessed against any employee personally on account of sexual harassment. In addition, the Company will take disciplinary action, up to and including termination, against any employee who is determined to have engaged in harassment in violation of this policy. Company policy and state law forbids retaliation against any employee who opposes any unlawful harassment, files a complaint, testifies, assists or participates in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing conducted by an regulatory agency. The Company will not retaliate against any employee for filing a complaint and will not tolerate or permit retaliation by management, employees or co-workers.

Attachment B NOTICE AS REQUIRED UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. AS AMENDED This NOTICE to all employees of Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. And Barjak is being posted as part of a Consent Decree between Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. and Barjak and the U.S. Egual Employment Opportunity Commission. 1. Federal Law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of that person s race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability with respect to hiring, compensation, promotion, discharge, or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. 2. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. and Barjak strongly support and will comply with such Federal Law in all aspects and it will not take any action against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law by filing charges with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 3. Specifically, Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. and Barjak will report on their implementation and adherence to the adopted sexual harassment policy enacted as a result of the settlement of Civil Action No. 3-97-CV-1572. 4. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. and Barjak will not tolerate sexual harassment in the workplace. 5. This NOTICE will remain posted until December 31, 1999, or as provided in the Consent Decree.