Melbourne City Council February 23, 2016 City Manager s Agenda Report

Similar documents
Page 431 Item No. 25

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

Coastal Control Construction Setback Line

ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT

CITY COUNTY ZIP CODE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

ORDINANCE NO. C-13-34

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS

Sec Planned unit development business (PUD-B).

ORDINANCE NO IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF DEBARY AS FOLLOWS:

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

SPECIAL BILLBOARD PERMITS (Sec. 1268)

AMENDMENT TO THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSTANG, OKLAHOMA;

CITY OF SANIBEL ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE 11-O-14 { }{

ORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is

AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD ZONING ORDINANCE

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.

ORDINANCE NO. O

METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION DOCKET NO AO-01

ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE

City of Green River City Council Meeting Agenda Documentation

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

LOWER SAUCON TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE

WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS, WHEREAS

ORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS:

ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE

CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission

PORT ST. LUCIE CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

FOR FARMER' S MARKETS AND PROVIDING THAT FARMER' S 6 MARKETS ARE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE IN THE GENERAL 7 COMMERCIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL AND HIGHWAY

1200 N. Milwaukee Avenue

MEMORANDUM. Mayor Ciancio & Members of Town Council. SUBJECT: Rezoning Request for 2326 Cat Tail Pond Road MEETING DATE: March 26, 2019

Application For Rezoning

ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE

City of Miami. Legislation. Resolution: R

Digital Billboard Review City Council Economic Development Committee June 16, 2014

(Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.)

ORDINANCE NO

CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF YORK WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 145 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 2014

City Council of Fort Walton Beach ENGINEERING & UTILITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM

Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution SEQR Resolution - Type II Action File: ZB #

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

Chapter 6 MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

(JULY 2000 EDITION, Pub. by City of LA) Rev. 9/13/

BYLAW 5948 A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF LETHBRIDGE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO REGULATE THE USE OF PORTABLE SIGNS IN THE CITY OF LETHBRIDGE

TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted. Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, Motion: O Connor Motion:

YORK COUNTY GOVERNMENT

City of Grass Valley City zcouncil Agenda Action Sheet

COMMUNICATION TOWERS

LAKE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION REZONING STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. 17_3_9_9_2_

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO:

Council Agenda Report

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SECTION 2. Article 7, Section 7. 5, subsection E entitled " Accessory Freestanding

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK ORDINANCE #

ORDINANCE NO

Now, therefore be it and it is hereby ordained chapter 152 Outdoor Advertising shall read as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on January 14, 2013, to receive public input; and

#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT

ARTICLE VIII SIGN REGULATIONS

PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Notice to applicant: Please read the following:

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1423

CITY COMMISSION BRIEFING & Planning Board Report For Meeting Scheduled for June 20, 2013 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Ordinance 1564

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

ORDINANCE NO. 91. The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, does ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Village of Pinecrest (the Village ) has adopted certain tree cutting

BOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES

To: Honorable City Council Date: 03/20/12 From: Richard A. Leahy, City Manager By: Thomas E. Hansen, RE., Public Works Director

All applicants are to complete the following:

, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

ARTICLE 7. PROCEDURES AND NONCONFORMITIES

TOWN OF JUPITER. John R. Sickler, Director of Planning and Zoning

Item 8C 1 of 17

TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO P&Z

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, murals are only permitted in the GC-1, GC-2 and T zoning districts;

SECOND AMENDMENT TO GRAND HAVEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REQUESTS

LOCAL LAW NO.: OF 2016

ARTICLE 9. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

SIGN REGULATIONS Exterior signs have a substantial impact on the character and quality of the environment.

CHAPTER 11 SIGNS SECTION APPLICABILITY

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Peoria, Arizona as follows:

MAYOR AND BOARD OF A LDERMEN. Submitted By: Rachel S. Depo, Assistant City Attorney Date: 6/3/2016

WHEREAS, Part 10, Chapter 2, Section requires that a Special Use Permit be obtained to operate a school, private or special; and

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR WORKSHOP JUNE 2, 2015 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMMISSION MEETING

REZONING (MAP AMENDMENT) Pre-Application Meeting

CITY OF MELISSA, TEXAS

Transcription:

Melbourne City Council February 23, 2016 City Manager s Agenda Report DEPARTMENT: Reading No. 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Public Hearing Yes Disclosure Required No Item No. 9 SUBJECT Ordinance No. 2016-10, Land Development Regulations (LDR-2016-01) Allowing for Changeable Copy Signs for Institutional Uses BACKGROUND/CONSIDERATION This is a request to amend City Code, Appendix D, Chapter 11, Section 11.04 and Section 11.20, providing for electronic changeable copy signs for institutional uses abutting collector roadways. City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to address this issue during the November 24, 2015 meeting. Staff is proposing to amend language in the Sign Code that will expand the allowance for electronic changeable copy signs to include institutional uses abutting collector roadways. The definition of institutional use will be amended to require a minimum one-acre parcel and will limit the timeframe for the operation of the signs to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., since they are more likely to be near residential uses. Staff reviewed the impact of these changes on existing institutional uses and found eight to ten institutional uses on collector roadways that may benefit from the proposed Code change. On January 21, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed amendments. FISCAL IMPACT (IF APPLICABLE) N/A REQUESTED ACTION Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 2016-10, based on the findings contained in the Planning and Zoning Board memorandum. Page 28 Item No. 9

MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: Michael A. McNees, City Manager Cindy Dittmer, AICP, Community Development Director Cheryl A. Dean, AICP, Planning Manager Community Development Department RE: Finding of Consistency (FOC-2016-01), Land Development Regulations (LDR-2016-01) Electronic Changeable Copy for Institutional Uses DATE: January 28, 2016 Applicant City of Melbourne Proposed Action Amend City Code, Appendix D, Chapter 11, Section 11.04 and Section 11.20, providing for electronic changeable copy signs for certain institutional uses. Location This shall apply to properties located within the City of Melbourne. History Currently, City Code only allows changeable copy signs on arterial roadways for any type of non-residential use. On November 24, 2015, City Council directed staff to look at the existing sign ordinance to see how institutional uses abutting collector roadways could be permitted to have changeable copy signs. Issues and Considerations City Code currently permits a changeable copy sign for an institutional use, only under the following circumstances: The Institutional Use is at least contiguous five acres in size; and The property is adjacent to an arterial roadway. There are institutional uses presently located within the City of Melbourne that could benefit from the ability to have a changeable copy sign; however, while they are large institutions, they do not meet the five-acre minimum and they have property frontages on a collector roadway. Page 29 Item No. 9

The purpose of the change to Melbourne City Code is to provide institutional uses of at least one acre in size, located on collector roadways, the ability to have a changeable copy sign. There are 20 collector roadways or roadway sections identified in the Comprehensive Plan, Map III. Staff has found approximately eight to 10 institutional uses of at least one acre in size, with frontage on these collectors. Most of the identified uses are churches/houses of worship, with one school and one cultural arts center. Staff has proposed adding a restriction that the changeable copy signs for these institutional uses on collector roadways not be illuminated between the hours of 11:00 pm and 7:00 am, in order to reduce any possible glare impacts on area residential uses. Proposed Changes to City Code Staff is proposing to amend language in the Sign Code that will expand the area where an electronic changeable copy sign may be placed. The changes within Appendix D, Chapter 11, Signs and Advertising, include the following: Section 11.04, in the definition of Institutional Uses, adding the term cultural, eliminating the term medical and replacing it with the term hospital, and reducing the minimum acreage from five acres to one acre; and Section 11.20.B.1.d., by expanding the location of changeable copy signs to include collector roadways for institutional uses and limiting the hours of illumination from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. On January 21, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed amendments. Recommendation Based upon the findings contained in the Planning and Zoning Board memorandum, the Planning and Zoning Board and the Community Development Department recommend: A. Approval of FOC-2016-01, a Finding of Consistency amending Appendix D, Chapter 11 of the City Code, entitled Signs and Advertising ; amending Section 11.04, Definitions and Section 11.20.B.1.d; and B. Approval of LDR-2016-01, Land Development Regulations amendment, for the changes proposed to amend Appendix D, Chapter 11 of the City Code, entitled Signs and Advertising ; amending Section 11.04, Definitions and Section 11.20.B.1.d, allowing electronic changeable copy signs for institutional uses on collector roadways. Page 30 Item No. 9

MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Mayor and Council Alan King, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board City of Melbourne Community Development Department RE: Finding of Consistency (FOC-2016-01), Land Development Regulations (LDR-2016-01) Electronic Changeable Copy for Institutional Uses DATE: January 21, 2016 APPLICANT: City of Melbourne REPRESENTATIVE: City of Melbourne The Planning and Zoning Board, at its regular scheduled meeting of January 21, 2016, reviewed the above referenced request for a Finding of Consistency and an amendment to the Land Development Regulations. Following review and discussion, the Planning and Zoning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of FOC-2016-01 and LDR-2016-01, amending City Code, Appendix D, Chapter 11, Section 11.04 and Section 11.20, providing for electronic changeable copy signs for certain institutional uses, based upon the following findings: Findings 1. The proposed modifications to City Code are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and will assist in the implementation of policies within the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed revisions to allow changeable copy signs for certain institutional uses are specifically consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1.22, which states the City shall maintain, amend and develop new land use and development regulations to implement the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposal is also distinctly consistent with Parks and Recreation Policy 1.2.4, which states scenic corridors will continue to be identified and protected by the City's sign regulations. No institutional uses affected by this ordinance are on a scenic corridor. 4. The zoning map and land development regulations may impose more restrictive densities and intensities of development based on height requirements, land coverage standards, setbacks, minimum lot size requirements, traffic and Page 31 Item No. 9

circulation standards, landscaping and breezeway requirements, and other such dimensional and development criteria. 5. The subject modifications regarding changeable copy signs limit the hours of illumination to aesthetically protect surrounding properties during late evening and early morning hours. 6. The proposal will have no adverse effect on the City s ability to provide adequate public services and facilities. 7. The proposed ordinance change will not significantly change the general character of the City, cause depreciation of property values, or reduce the safety, light, and general convenience of neighboring developments. 8. The subject modification will enhance City Code requirements by making City Code more user-friendly to property owners, the development community, and City staff. Respectfully Submitted, Alan King, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board for Page 32 Item No. 9

ORDINANCE NO. 2016-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ELECTRONIC CHANGEABLE COPY SIGNS FOR INSTITUTIONAL USES; MAKING FINDINGS; AMENDING APPENDIX D, CHAPTER 11 OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED SIGNS AND ADVERTISING; AMENDING SECTION 11.04, DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTION 11.20, SIGNS PERMITTED IN ZONING DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND INTERPRETATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. (FOC-2016-01/LDR-2016-01) WHEREAS, on November 24, 2015, City Council directed staff to examine the existing Sign Code and evaluate the potential allowance of electronic changeable copy signs on properties with institutional uses abutting collector roadways in the City of Melbourne; and WHEREAS, City Code currently permits an electronic changeable copy sign for a property with an institutional use at least five acres in size and adjacent to an arterial roadway; and WHEREAS, several properties with an institutional use located in the City of Melbourne could benefit from the ability to install electronic changeable copy signs, though they do not meet the current City Code requirements; and WHEREAS, the City of Melbourne desires to reasonably accommodate these properties by expanding the area where an electronic changeable copy sign may be placed; and WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance amends the Sign Code by providing the ability for properties with institutional uses at least one acre in size and located on collector roadways to install electronic changeable copy signs; and WHEREAS, the proposed modifications are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and will assist in the implementation of policies within the Comprehensive Plan; and Page 1 of 4 Page 33 Item No. 9

WHEREAS, the subject modifications regarding electronic changeable copy signs limit the hours of illumination to aesthetically protect surrounding properties during late evening and early morning hours; and WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance will not significantly change the general character of the City, cause depreciation of property values, or reduce the safety, light, and general convenience of neighboring developments; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, reviewed this ordinance at its meeting on January 21, 2016, conducted a public hearing with regard to this ordinance, and found same to be consistent with the City of Melbourne Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, after consideration of this ordinance at an advertised public hearing, the City Council adopts the finding of the Local Planning Agency as its own; and WHEREAS the City Council finds this ordinance to be in the promotion of the public health, safety, education, and cultural and economic welfare, morals, public order, and aesthetics of the community and region. BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, FLORIDA: SECTION 2. That Appendix D, Chapter 11, of the City Code of Melbourne, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 11.04. Definitions. CHAPTER 11. SIGNS AND ADVERTISING Institutional use: Five One or more contiguous acres under unified ownership which are developed as part of a unified plan and used predominately for religious, cultural, charitable, educational, medical hospital or governmental purposes. Page 2 of 4 Page 34 Item No. 9

Sec. 11.20. Signs permitted in zoning districts. B. On-premises signs in nonresidential zoning districts (R-P, C-1A, C-1, C-2, C-3, C- P, M-1, M-2, I-1) excluding residential uses in R-P, C-1A, C-1, C-3, and C-P are permitted subject to the following limitations: 1. Ground signs. d. Changeable copy ground signs are permitted only along property frontages that are adjacent to arterial roadways and institutional uses with property frontages that are adjacent to collector roadways, as the terms are is defined in the City of Melbourne Comprehensive Plan, and subject to the following restrictions: i. Operational limitations. Such displays shall contain static messages only and shall not have movement, or the appearance of optical illusion of movement of any part of the sign structure, design, or pictorial segment of the sign, including the movement or appearance of movement of any illumination or the flashing, scintillating or the varying of light intensity. vi. Prohibited display hours for institutional uses on collector roadways. Changeable copy ground signs may not be illuminated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. SECTION 3. Severability and Interpretation. (a) That in the event that any term, provision, clause, sentence or section of this ordinance will be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be partially or wholly unenforceable or invalid for any reason whatsoever, any such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any of the other or remaining terms, provisions, clauses, sentences, or sections of this Page 3 of 4 Page 35 Item No. 9

ordinance, and this ordinance will be read and/or applied as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable term, provision, clause, sentence, or section did not exist. (b) That in interpreting this ordinance, underlined words indicate additions to existing text and stricken words indicate deletions from existing text. Asterisks () indicate an omission from the ordinance of text, which exists in the Code of Ordinances. It is intended that the text in the Code of Ordinances denoted by the asterisks and not set forth in this ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption in accordance with the Charter of the City of Melbourne. SECTION 5. That this ordinance was passed on first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 9 th day of February, 2016, and adopted on the second and final reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of, 2016. BY: Kathleen H. Meehan, Mayor ATTEST: Cathleen A. Wysor, City Clerk Ordinance No. 2016-10 Page 4 of 4 Page 36 Item No. 9