FARO Annual Meeting 2016

Similar documents
James Drummond asked for changes to the minutes of the last FARO meeting in Helsinki, Finland The minutes were approved without comments.

FARO Annual Meeting ASSW 2018/Polar June Davos, Switzerland

IASC Council Meeting

Microsoft Dynamics AX. Microsoft Dynamics AX Preview. Product availability, localization, and translation guide. Microsoft.

Microsoft Dynamics AX. Microsoft Dynamics AX. Product availability, localization, and translation guide. Microsoft. 1 Microsoft

KIRUNA DECLARATION KIRUNA, SWEDEN 15 MAY 2013

ISSUE BRIEF: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context

Strukturen und Akteure der Internationalen Arktisforschung. Polar

Mapping physical therapy research

Social and Human Working Group Meeting. Draft Agenda

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2015

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MAY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MARCH 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN SEPTEMBER 2015

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN DECEMBER 2016

Introduction to the European Agency. Cor J.W. Meijer, Director. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education

Perceptions and knowledge of Britain and its competitors in Foresight issue 156 VisitBritain Research

Continuous shared learning and improvement of nuclear safety and regulatory organisations through the OECD/NEA

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

THE EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM:

China s Aid Approaches in the Changing International Aid Architecture

WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS

SKILLS, MOBILITY, AND GROWTH

Markets in higher education

Shaping the Future of Transport

VOICE AND DATA INTERNATIONAL

CLASSIFICATION/CATEGORISATION SYSTEMS IN AGENCY MEMBER COUNTRIES

Dr Nengye Liu, Hobart, 6 July The European Union and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Education Quality and Economic Development

The Voice of Labour Choice. Structure and profile of the International Confederation of Private Employment Services

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of establishing the list of supporting documents to be presented by visa applicants in Ireland

TOURISM IN ESTONIA IN 2013 (as of 17 March 2014) 1

EU Innovation strategy

ISIRA Advisory Group Meeting Oslo, Norway 12 October OPENING AND REPORTING SESSION 1.1. WELCOME AND PRACTICAL INFORMATION

Taiwan s Development Strategy for the Next Phase. Dr. San, Gee Vice Chairman Taiwan External Trade Development Council Taiwan

Setting National Broadband Policies, Strategies & Plans

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

Machine Translation at the EPO Concept, Status and Future Plans

However, a full account of their extent and makeup has been unknown up until now.

VISA SERVICES CANADA

BRIEFING. International Migration: The UK Compared with other OECD Countries.

CHAPTER XVI MAGAZINE

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

8193/11 GL/mkl 1 DG C I

7 th Baltic Sea States Summit

Extended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted

9 th International Workshop Budapest

Global Harmonisation of Automotive Lighting Regulations

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

Chapter 13. Country of Birth of the Foreign-Born Population

EUROPEAN COUNCIL Brussels, 18 June 2013 (OR. en)

GERMANY, JAPAN AND INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT IMBALANCES

Summary Report. Question 245. Taking unfair advantage of trademarks: parasitism and free riding

LABOR MIGRATION AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

SURVEY ON SWEDISH LANGUAGE AMONG FOREIGN-LANGUAGE COMMUNITY IN FINLAND

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013: A Further Decline

OECD expert meeting hosted by the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Oslo, Norway 2-3 June 2008 ICTs and Gender Pierre Montagnier

Provisional agenda and annotations for the eighth session 1 2

EU Trade Mark Application Timeline

OECD Strategic Education Governance A perspective for Scotland. Claire Shewbridge 25 October 2017 Edinburgh

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

International investment resumes retreat

Making Global Labour Mobility a Catalyst for Development: The contribution of Private Employment Agencies

Aid spending by Development Assistance Committee donors in 2015

HIGHLIGHTS. There is a clear trend in the OECD area towards. which is reflected in the economic and innovative performance of certain OECD countries.

The First ESN Council Meeting took place at Athens (Greece) on Tuesday 30 th August, 2011 from 12:45 to 14:30 h, with the following agenda:

RUSSIA PROJECTCONNECT SUGGESTED ACTIONS POSITION ALLIES. - from a geological perspective, Russia s continental shelf extends into the Arctic region

CONVENTION ON EARLY NOTIFICATION OF A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT* CONVENTION ON ASSISTANCE IN THE CASE OF A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT OR RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY*

4. Connectivity in Culture and Media

Migration, Mobility and Integration in the European Labour Market. Lorenzo Corsini

The Human Dimension of Globalizing Mid-Caps - as Seen by their Leaders. Welcome to the Flight Deck»

Visit Finland Visitor Survey 2016

All Party Parliamentary Group Art, Craft & Design Education

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3 TOURISM STATISTICS REPORT. September 2010

Proposal from Tuvalu for amendments to the Kyoto Protocol

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

PISA 2009 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and tables accompanying press release article

Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material. Declarations/reservations and objections thereto

Summary Report. Question Q191. Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Overview of Priority 6: International Cooperation in National ERA Road Maps

The 46 Antarctic Treaty nations represent about two-thirds of the world's human population.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Applying for studies in the Karol Szymanowski Academy of Music in Katowice on terms applicable to Polish citizens

Calculations based on updated figures up to 1 March 2011

Economic Growth & Welfare Systems. Jean Monnet Chair in European Integration Studies Prof. PASQUALE TRIDICO

The EU on the move: A Japanese view

Mobility of Rights 1

International Scholar, Employee, Dependent, and OPT Alumni Statistics Fall people

The life of a patent application at the EPO

Nordic Defence Cooperation NORDEFCO (International Seminar, Lisbon, Portugal 29 th March 2012)

MINISTERIAL DECLARATION

Organisation of Provision. Cor J.W. Meijer, Director. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education

Mr. James Harper. Mr. Hans Chr. Lauritzen

Widening of Inequality in Japan: Its Implications

Transcription:

FARO Annual Meeting 2016 ASSW 2016-12 March 2016, 09:00-17:30 Gruening Building Room: 412 University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA Minutes 1. Opening and reporting session 1.1 Welcome and introduction The FARO Chair (James Drummond) made a welcome statement and FARO Annual Meeting participants presented themselves. 1.2 Approval of last meetings minutes Minutes from the FARO Annual Meeting 2015 were approved. 1.3 Adoption of agenda The FARO Chair informed of the cancellation of Finland country presentation (the representative was unable to attend due to a last-minute emergency) and the agenda was adopted. 1.4 Report from the Chair The FARO Chair informed that the past year had been affected by serious illnesses of key staff and hence FARO had not achieved as much as hoped. 1.4.1 A MoU has been drafted with INTERACT and the ratification of this was on the agenda later at the meeting.

1.4.2 The Arctic Circle conference is different from many other international conferences as it has participation from a broad set of stakeholders: Science community, Decision makers, Indigenous Peoples, Industry, etc. 1.4.3 The FARO Chair participated together with Terry Callaghan in the 2 nd Tri-lateral Symposium on Arctic and Marine Research Infrastructure in Halifax, Canada on September 24-25, 2015 and led a breakout session on International scientific planning. 1.4.4 The tragic loss of Lillian Magelund Jensen (FARO Executive Secretary) after a period of illness greatly affected FARO. Lillian was a powerhouse for FARO and through her long dedicated participation possessed invaluable knowledge of the organization and its activities. Lillian will for this reason and for her always positive attitude be greatly missed in FARO. I minute of silence was held to honour Lillian and a letter of condolence to her family was signed by participants. 2. Information from countries Short news from each country on issues relevant to other members Each member gave a short presentation of logistical items of relevance to the other members. Please notice that all presentations can be found on the FARO website. 2.1 France: Yves Frenot, French Polar Institute, informed about the French activities in the Arctic. See Yves Frenot s presentation on the FARO website. 2.2 Norway: Nalan Koc, Norwegian Polar Institute, informed about the Norwegian activities in the Arctic. See Nalan Koc s presentation on the FARO website. 2.3 Denmark/Greenland: Morten Rasch, University of Copenhagen, informed about the Danish/Greenlandic activities in the Arctic. See Morten Rasch s presentation on the FARO website. 2.4 USA: Renee, National Science Foundation, Crain informed about the US activities in the Arctic. See Renee Crain s presentation on the FARO website. 2.5 Japan: Kazuyuki Shiraishi, National Institute of Polar Research, informed about the Japanese activities in the Arctic. See Kazuyuki Shiraishi s presentation on the FARO website.

2.6 UK: Henry Burgess, NERC Arctic Office, informed about the UK activities in the Arctic. See Henry Burgess s presentation on the FARO website. 2.7 Italy: Vito Vitale, National research Council, informed about the Italian activities in the Arctic. See Vito Vitale s presentation on the FARO website. 2.8 Russia: Sergey Priamikov, Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, informed about the Russian activities in the Arctic. See Sergey Priamikov s presentation on the FARO website. 2.9 China: Jianfeng He, Polar Research Institute of China, informed about the Chinese activities in the Arctic. See Jianfeng He s presentation on the FARO website. 2.10 Germany: Dirk Mengedoth, Alfred Wegener Institute, informed about the German activities in the Arctic. See Dirk Mengedoth s presentation on the FARO website. 2.11 Poland: Piotr Glowacki, Polish Academy of Science, informed about the Polish activities in the Arctic. See Piotr Glowacki s presentation on the FARO website. 2.12 Sweden: Håkan Grudd, Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, informed about the Swedish activities in the Arctic. See Håkan Grudd s presentation on the FARO website. 2.13 Canada: James Drummond, Canadian Network of Northern Research Operators, informed about the Canadian activities in the Arctic. See James Drummond s presentation on the FARO website. 2.14 Korea: Hyoung Chul Shin, Korea Polar Research Institute, informed about the Korean activities in the Arctic. See Hyoung Chul Shin s presentation on the FARO website. 2.15 Portugal: Joao Canario, University of Lisbon, informed about the Portuguese activities in the Arctic. See Joao Canario s presentation on the FARO website.

2.16 Austria, Czech Republic, Finland and Iceland: Were unable to participate and hence no presentations were given for these countries. 2.17 Discussion and summary remarks from the FARO Chair Country presentations show an impressive amount of research including many long term infrastructure initiatives. A general positive trend in the use of terrestrial infrastructures was noted and plans for new ships for Arctic research were presented by several countries. Presentations also showed a great deal of collaboration across countries and sharing of infrastructures, which is one of the key aims of FARO. However, liability was raised as an issue that potentially could limit the open sharing of infrastructure. 3 Other information 3.1 Arctic Circle James Drummond, Canadian Network of Northern Research Operators, gave an update: 3.1.1 James Drummond highlighted the broad set of stakeholders attending the Arctic Circle conference and the potential herein for increasing the visibility of FARO among decision makers, funding agencies, scientists, industry and others. 3.1.2 James Drummond suggested that FARO should apply for a session at the upcoming Arctic Circle conference (always held in Reykjavik, Iceland). James suggested that the idea could be developed further by FARO ExCom and noted that the deadline for applying for sessions is 15 May 2016. 3.1.3 A brief discussion followed regarding the purpose and costs of having a session at the conference: Purpose: Promote FARO and infrastructures, and show the amount of work and level of cooperation. Target groups: It is important to identify target groups and ensure their participation in the session. It should be seen as an option for strengthening ties to funding agencies, the science community and others. Session elements: About FARO, summary of combined activities, show case examples, etc.. A key question for the session could be What logistics is needed in the Arctic the coming 20 years? including the need for sustained financing for ongoing activities and new

developments. Involve existing infrastructure projects representing relevant sectors, e.g. ships, planes, terrestrial stations, buoys, etc. Costs are difficult to estimate, but it would surely increase the level of activities and hence costs of the FARO Secretariat. It would also require more input from FARO participants in the period leading up to the conference. Money for travels to ensure participation of key speakers would probably also be needed. The FARO Chair informed that financial resources were available to cover these extra costs. The FARO Chair encouraged participants to think more about this and said that the issue will be raised in an upcoming FARO ExCom meeting. 3.2 INTERACT II Morten Rasch, University of Copenhagen, gave an update. See Morten Rasch s presentation on the FARO website. 3.3 COMNAP Kazuyuki Shiraishi, National Institute of Polar Research, gave an update. See Kazuyuki Shiraishi s presentation on the FARO website. 3.4 The Pacific Arctic Group (PAG) Jackie Grebmeier, University of Maryland/PAG, gave an update. See Jackie Grebmeier s presentation on the FARO website. 3.5 Risk Management Renee Crain, National Science Foundation, gave an update. It was agreed to include Risk Management as an issue on the FARO website. The idea will be developed further by the Risk Management group and the FARO Secretariat and input may be requested from other FARO participants (e.g. publications/field manuals) and other institutions/organisation dealing with risk management (e.g. COMNAP, Arctic Safety Center at UNIS). See Renee Crain s presentation on the FARO website. 3.6 Asian Forum for Polar Sciences (AFoPS) Yea Dong Kim, Korea Polar Research Institute, gave an update. See Yea Dong Kim s presentation on the FARO website. 3.7 EU-PolarNet Dirk Mengedoth, Alfred Wegener Institute, gave an update. See Dirk Mengedoth s presentation on the FARO website. 3.8 MOSAIC Dirk Mengedoth, Alfred Wegener Institute, gave a presentation. See Dirk Mengedoth s presentation on the FARO website under the German country presentation.

4 Internal Business (open) 4.1 Ratification of MoU with INTERACT The MoU had been ratified by INTERACT and the FARO members agreed to ratify the MoU. The FARO Chair will ratify the MoU and notify INTERACT. 4.2 Other It was suggested that the plans for future activities for each FARO country should be presented on the FARO website. The FARO Secretariat would initiate this and ask for input from individual countries (e.g. plans or national logistics planning systems). FARO Internal Business (closed session) 4.3 The FARO Secretariat and membership fees 4.3.1 The FARO Chair informed that the FARO Secretariat could be located in any FARO country. Some member countries stressed the importance of securing stability in the support function and minimize loss of knowledge build up over the years. It was agreed to maintain the FARO secretariat at Aarhus University, but that the issue will be discussed again during upcoming FARO meetings. 4.3.2 The FARO Chair presented the financial statement for 2015 showing a surplus of 12.842 $, partly due to the prolonged illness of key persons in the FARO Secretariat and external funding of the Chairs participation in the FARO annual meeting. 4.3.3 The budget for 2016 was presented and discussed. The Chair highlighted that the 2016 budget was based on previous years budgets and a best guess of costs related to a potential session at the Arctic Circle conference. Assuming membership fees of similar magnitude as 2015, would lead to a small surplus of 1.053 $ for 2016. Should the costs for the Arctic Circle conference be higher than estimated, the FARO Chair highlighted that the FARO surplus from 2015 would act as a buffer. It was agreed to keep the membership fee at the present level, but discuss this again during future FARO meetings. 4.4 The next FARO meeting NPOCs agreed that the next meeting will take place at the Arctic Science Summit Week 2017, 31 March 7 April, in Prague, Czech Republic.

Some members raised concern over the FARO meeting often conflict with other meetings preventing some participant from being present during the full day FARO Annual Meeting. The FARO Chair will keep this in mind when planning the next annual meeting. 4.5 Any other business: None. Participants Members Dirk Mengedoth, Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany Elmer Topp-Jørgensen (FARO Secretariat), Aarhus University, Denmark Håkan Grudd, Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, Sweden Henry Burgess, NERC Arctic Office, UK Hyoung Chul Shin, Korea Polar Research Institute, Korea James Drummond (FARO Chair), Canadian Network of Northern Research Operators, Canada. Jianfeng He, Polar Research Institute of China, China Joao Canario, University of Lisbon, Portugal Kazuyuki Shiraishi, National Institute of Polar Research, Japan Morten Rasch, University of Copenhagen, Denmark/Greenland Nalan Koc, Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway Piotr Glowacki, Polish Academy of Science, Poland Renee Crain, National Science Foundation, USA Sergey Priamikov, Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Russia Uwe Nixdorf, Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany Vito Vitale, National research Council, Italy Yves Frenot, French Polar Institute, France Observers /Guests Anna Schemper, Polar Field Services, USA Davis LeBlanc, Polar Knowledge Canada, Canada Frej S. Dichmann, Ministry of higher Education and Science, Denmark Ivan Tomskii, Minny Polytechnic Institute, Russia Jeremy Mathis, NOAA Arctic Program, USA Jessica Rohde, US Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee, USA Kelly Falknar, National Science Foundation, USA Laurel McFadden, Polar Field Services, USA LeeAnn Fishback, Churchill Northern Studies Centre/CNNRO, Canada Marin Kuizenga, Polar Field Services, USA Naomi Whitty, Polar Field Services, USA

Tom Quinn, Polar Field Services, USA