How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana

Similar documents
J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION ALLAN THOMAS CIVIL ACTION NO JUDGE ROBERT G.

Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

California Bar Examination

Thinking Evidentially

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION * * * * * * * * *

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

Non-Scientific Expert Testimony in Child Abuse Trials

Criminal Evidence 6th Edition

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR

Case 1:11-cv WJM-CBS Document 127 Filed 12/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER

New Hampshire Supreme Court October 13, 2016 Oral Argument Case Summary

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 85 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:07-cr EDL Document 49 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case5:08-cv PSG Document498 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 6

E. Expert Testimony Issue. 1. Defendants may assert that before any photographs or video evidence from a camera

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and MOORE *, District Judge.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

New Hampshire Supreme Court October 13, 2016 Oral Argument Case Summary

Essentials of Demonstrative Evidence

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

California Bar Examination

Demonstrative Evidence

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

ER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

Evidence Brown Spring I. A. 1. a. i. I. INTRODUCTION

California Bar Examination

MEMORANDUM OPINION. No CR. Jason David YEPEZ, Appellant. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 2018 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 12

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

Video Course Evaluation Form. My Name is: Name of Course: My Street address: Address:

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH : : : : : : : : : : : :

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

PlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.

Follow this and additional works at:

Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

2007 WL United States District Court, S.D. California.

DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE UNDER THE RULES: THE ADMISSABLE AND INADMISSABLE

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Litigation Unveiled Click to edit Master title style

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

Adding a Little Bit of Hollywood to Your Trial

Case 1:15-cv WJM-KLM Document 136 Filed 05/12/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules will

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY

Docket No. MID-L CM ORDER. The above matter having been opened to the Court by Anapol Weiss attorneys for

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 20, 2004 Session

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

Rumberger KIRK & CALDWELL

Case 3:01-cv AWT Document 143 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : :

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

KXL: Surprise! Economists Do Not Agree

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CITY OF CLEVELAND KATHY MORIARTY

Case 1:14-cv PAB-NYW Document 163 Filed 01/12/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2866 Filed 02/28/19 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 1:14-cr JB Document 51 Filed 09/09/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv MEA Document 284 Filed 03/18/14 Page 1 of 10

Neil Feldscher, CIH, CSP, Esq. and Chip Darius, MA, OHST

Transcription:

How to Testify Qualifications for Testimony Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.

CPE PIN Instructions 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 2 of 27

Introduction Testimonial evidence is evidence presented in the form of statements made during a legal proceeding, an administrative hearing, or a deposition. Specific requirements govern the admissibility of testimonial evidence, depending on the type of witness and the manner in which the witness is testifying. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 3 of 27

Sources of Testimony Observations Investigations Calculations and summaries Research Opinions 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 4 of 27

Information Versus Evidence Information consists of all facts, documents, observations, statements, or other indications of what happened. Evidence is information that is presented to the judge or jury under the supervision of the judge to prove or disprove an alleged fact at issue. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 5 of 27

Information Versus Evidence The fraud examiner must not let concerns about the admissibility of investigative information or leads limit the scope or tenacity of the examination. All witnesses should work closely with their lawyers to make sure that all important information can be presented as evidence. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 6 of 27

What Is Hearsay? A statement Made outside the court s supervision Offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 7 of 27

Admissibility of Hearsay The hearsay rule only applies to statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Exceptions to the hearsay rule include: Admissions Business records Public records or reports Absence of public record or entry Market reports, commercial publications 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 8 of 27

Other Admissibility Considerations Best-evidence rule Photocopies as evidence Admissibility of business records 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 9 of 27

Can Summaries Be Introduced? Voluminous evidence that cannot be conveniently examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary, or calculation. Originals must be available for examination or copying by other parties. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 10 of 27

Types of Evidence Testimonial evidence Real evidence Demonstrative evidence 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 11 of 27

Determining the Relevance of the Evidence Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Simply because evidence is relevant does not mean that it will be deemed admissible. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 12 of 27

Grounds for Excluding Relevant Evidence Its probative value (tendency to prove an issue) is substantially outweighed by the danger of: Unfair prejudice Confusion of the issues Misleading the jury It raises efficiency concerns: Undue delay Waste of time Needless presentation of cumulative evidence 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 13 of 27

Role of the Judge Serves as gatekeeper at trial May exclude evidence on the grounds of: Hearsay Irrelevance Potential for causing confusion Possibility for prejudice to another litigant 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 14 of 27

Consulting with the Attorney Consult on questions of evidence. Discuss and resolve any concerns before the evidence is to be presented. Rules of procedure greatly curtail the ability to consult with counsel at trial. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 15 of 27

Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses Generally, lay witnesses must testify from firsthand knowledge that is, their actual perception of events. A lay witness may testify in the form of an opinion when such opinion is: Rationally based on the perception of the witness Helpful to a clear understanding of the witness s testimony or the determination of a fact in issue 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 16 of 27

Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses Lay witnesses are commonly allowed to testify regarding: The appearance of persons or things Identity The manner of conduct Competency of a person Degrees of lightness or darkness Sound, size, weight, or distance State of mind, including intent 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 17 of 27

Lay Versus Expert Testimony As courts have become stricter about allowing experts to testify, many attorneys attempt to work around this obstacle by offering their experts as lay witnesses and then proceeding to elicit expert opinions on the desired topic. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 18 of 27

Amended FRE 701 Bars lay witnesses from providing opinions based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge Does not bar an expert from testifying as a lay witness 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 19 of 27