Introduction... i. Population Family Structure Education Mobility Status... 7

Similar documents
Introduction... i. Population Family Structure Education Mobility Status... 7

Introduction... i. Population Family Structure Education Mobility Status... 7

Introduction... i. Population Family Structure Education Mobility Status... 7

North York City of Toronto Community Council Area Profiles 2016 Census

Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre City of Toronto Ward Profiles 2016 Census

people/hectare Ward Toronto

Ward 16 River. City of Ottawa Ward Profiles 2011 Census and National Household Survey POPULATION* 45, ,390. Total City of Ottawa Population

Ward 17 Davenport City of Toronto Ward Profiles 2016 Census

Scarborough City of Toronto Community Council Area Profiles 2016 Census

Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park City of Toronto Ward Profiles 2016 Census

CENSUS RESULTS NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions. Calgary-McCall. Compiled from the 2016 Census of Canada

2011 CENSUS & NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 1 PROFILE

2011 CENSUS & NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 3 PROFILE

2011 CENSUS & NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 4 PROFILE

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions

Population and Dwelling Counts

2011 CENSUS & NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 10 PROFILE

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions. Lacombe- Ponoka. Compiled from the 2016 Census of Canada

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions. Calgary-Shaw. Compiled from the 2016 Census of Canada

HIGHLIGHTS Ward Toronto. 67% with postsecondary 58% $1,040 average monthly rent. $ $1,026 average monthly rent. China #1 immigrant place of birth

$ $1,026. HIGHLIGHTS Ward Toronto. 52% with postsecondary 58% $978 average monthly rent. China #1 immigrant place of birth

HIGHLIGHTS. 62% with postsecondary 58% $1,081 average monthly rent. $1,026 average monthly rent. China #1 immigrant. China #1 immigrant place of birth

CENSUS RESULTS WARD 3 PROFILE

Verdun borough HIGHLIGHTS. In 1996, the Verdun borough had a population of 59,714. LOCATION

CENSUS RESULTS WARD 9 PROFILE

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions

CENSUS RESULTS WARD 10 PROFILE

CENSUS RESULTS WARD 7 PROFILE

CENSUS RESULTS WARD 6 PROFILE

CENSUS RESULTS WARD 8 PROFILE

Study Area Maps. Profile Tables. W Broadway & Cambie St, Vancouver, BC Pitney Bowes 2016 Estimates and Projections. W Broadway & Cambie St

Fanshawe Neighbourhood Profile

COMMUNITY PROFILE COQUITLAM. Coquitlam Immigrant Demographics I Page 1

Release of 2006 Census results Labour Force, Education, Place of Work and Mode of Transportation

Bostwick Neighbourhood Profile

If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact ext. 2564

Alberta Provincial Electoral Divisions

COMMUNITY PROFILE BURNABY

City of Montréal HIGHLIGHTS. En 1996, the ville de Montréal had a population of 1,775,788.

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Overview 2-1. A. Demographic and Cultural Characteristics

(Note: These are inititial neighbourhood estimates and are subject to change.) C P R. NEI Score. Female 52%

COMMUNITY PROFILE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY. Township of Langley Immigrant Demographics I Page 1

(Note: These are inititial neighbourhood estimates and are subject to change.) SCARBOROUGH SHORELINE. NEI Score. 1,500 Female 53%

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force

BRAMALEA. Overview A. Demographic and Cultural Characteristics

Social and Demographic Trends in Burnaby and Neighbouring Communities 1981 to 2006

Planning Study Area 1 Burnaby Heights

Keelesdale-Eglinton West

(Note: These are inititial neighbourhood estimates and are subject to change.) C P R. NEI Score. 600 Female 51%

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review Growth Analysis Technical Background Report

City of Surrey. Labour Force Fact Sheet. Preface

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: April 28, 2008 NO: R071 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 28, 2008

The population universe (target population) of the 2011 Census includes the following groups:

(Note: These are inititial neighbourhood estimates and are subject to change.) 1,000 Female 54%

A Profile of CANADiAN WoMeN. NorTHerN CoMMuNiTieS

City Windsor 1981 Canada Census WARD 1

COMMUNITY PROFILE: Fort St. John, British Columbia Census Subdivision (CSD) PHASE 1 Winter 2018

What is the Census? Why is it important?

Tracking Trends in Kingston

Immigrant Employment by Field of Study. In Waterloo Region

Community Social Profile Cambridge and North Dumfries

(Note: These are inititial neighbourhood estimates and are subject to change.) NEI Score. 1,000 Female 52%

A Statistical Profile of Artists and Cultural Workers in Canada Based on the 2011 National Household Survey and the Labour Force Survey

North Okanagan A Regional District in British Columbia

2011 National Household Survey Profile on the Town of Richmond Hill: 1st Release

(Note: These are inititial neighbourhood estimates and are subject to change.) C N R. NEI Score. Female 54%

Victoria A City in Capital Regional District

Klarvatten. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Changing Faces Profile of Burlington Newcomers. November 2010

Strathcona A Regional District in British Columbia

Spryfield Highlights. Household Living Arrangements. The following are highlights from the 2016 Census.

Pembina. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

2009 Community Profile. Municipality of Leamington

Bearspaw. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Michaels Park. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Cromdale. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Prince Charles. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Patricia Heights. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Strathearn. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Grandview Heights. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Malmo Plains. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Mayfield. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Capilano. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Ritchie. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Aspen Gardens. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Empire Park. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Strathcona. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY, B.C Township of Langley Immigrant Demographics I

Saanich A District Municipality in Capital Regional District

NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY: LABOUR FORCE, EMPLOYMENT, AND INCOME

Spruce Avenue. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Lago Lindo. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Hazeldean. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

East Kootenay A Regional District in British Columbia

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME $83,026 ($93,586) RENTERS 37% (29%) UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 7% (7%) TAKE TRANSIT TO WORK 20% (15%)

Lake Country A District Municipality in Central Okanagan Regional District

Montrose. Table of Contents. A Community Profile

Transcription:

ward ten

Table of Contents Introduction... i Population... 2 Family Structure... 5 Education... 6 Mobility Status... 7 ward ten Ethnicity, Language, Immigrants and Visible Minority... 9 Labour Force Characteristics...13 Low Income Status...20 Dwellings...21 Land Use...27 Voter Turnout...29 2011 National Household Survey Limitation Notes...30 Introduction This document is one in a series of 15 Ward Profiles developed for the City of. Each ward profile provides an overview of the ward s features, assets and various indicators of sociodemographic characteristics. The indicators in each of the Ward Profiles are a compilation of the most recent available data from Statistics Canada s 2011 Census, Statistics Canada s 2011 National Household Survey, the City of s Planning and Economic Development Department (PED) development applications, Planning and Economic Development Department (PED) building permits, Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) housing starts, orthophotos, Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC), Teranet, and the Official Plan and Parks Committee. Note that due to the various sources of data used in this document, there may be discrepancies between data that may result from differences in definitions of variables and/or geographic boundaries between data sources. Moreover, considerations should also be taken of the 2011 National Household Survey limitations provided at the end of this document when reviewing this data. Where available, data for different points in time and/or for the overall City of was also provided. Each indicator is presented in tables and graphs which help draw comparisons over time and between geographies. City of Ward Profiles i

FIRST RD E GRAY RD MILLEN RD THIRD RD E FIFTH RD E DEWITT RD FRUITLAND RD JONES RD 10 ward ten, also known as the Stoney Creek area is an urban ward situated below the Niagara Escarpment (often referred to as the Mountain), with an industrial and commercial corridor south of the Queen Elizabeth Way. It is bordered by the lower edge of the Escarpment to the south, Lake Ontario to the north, Fruitland Road to the east and Grays Road to the west. is home to Mohawk College STARRT Institute and a section of the Waterfront Trail. is located within the Conservation Authority watershed. ward ten Lake Ontario QUEEN ELIZABETH WAY GREEN RD BARTON ST E HIGHWAY NO 8 LAKE AVE RIDGE RD TAPLEYTOWN RD KING ST E SECOND RD E City of Ward Profiles 1

ward ten Population Population by Age has 24,275 residents which is 4.7% of the city s total population. Compared to, the proportion of population below 50 years of age is slightly lower in, but the age groups above 49 years of age are all slightly higher in total population. Population by Age Group 2006 2006% 2011 2011% 2006 2006% 2011 2011% Total population 24,975 100.0% 24,275 100.0% 504,560 100.0% 519,950 100.0% 0 to 4 years 1,085 4.3% 1,000 4.1% 26,940 5.3% 27,430 5.3% 5 to 9 years 1,215 4.9% 1,135 4.7% 29,410 5.8% 27,995 5.4% 10 to 14 years 1,580 6.3% 1,255 5.2% 33,530 6.6% 30,295 5.8% 15 to 19 years 1,705 6.8% 1,605 6.6% 34,910 6.9% 36,200 7.0% 20 to 24 years 1,715 6.9% 1,515 6.2% 34,395 6.8% 36,370 7.0% 25 to 29 years 1,545 6.2% 1,450 6.0% 30,330 6.0% 33,195 6.4% 30 to 34 years 1,330 5.3% 1,305 5.4% 30,620 6.1% 30,905 5.9% 35 to 39 years 1,570 6.3% 1,280 5.3% 34,775 6.9% 31,365 6.0% 40 to 44 years 1,895 7.6% 1,545 6.4% 41,225 8.2% 35,610 6.8% 45 to 49 years 1,975 7.9% 1,905 7.8% 40,845 8.1% 41,890 8.1% 50 to 54 years 2,040 8.2% 1,930 8.0% 36,125 7.2% 40,875 7.9% 55 to 59 years 2,020 8.1% 1,945 8.0% 31,860 6.3% 35,425 6.8% 60 to 64 years 1,495 6.0% 1,935 8.0% 24,220 4.8% 30,810 5.9% 65 to 69 years 1,245 5.0% 1,370 5.6% 19,735 3.9% 22,930 4.4% 70 to 74 years 910 3.6% 1,130 4.7% 17,870 3.5% 18,450 3.5% 75 to 79 years 705 2.8% 850 3.5% 16,200 3.2% 15,675 3.0% 80 to 84 years 575 2.3% 575 2.4% 12,620 2.5% 12,630 2.4% 85 years and over 395 1.6% 540 2.2% 8,975 1.8% 11,880 2.3% 2 City of Ward Profiles

Population by Sex and Age Group Age Group There are slightly more females than males residing in. Between 2006 and 2011, has seen an increase in the population age 60 years and older. 85 + 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 Population by Sex and Age Group,, 2006 and 2011 Census Male Female 2006 2011 ward ten -1500-1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 Population City of Ward Profiles 3

ward ten Population Projections The 2011 year end population for is expected to increase approximately 13% by 2031 according to the land use population model based on the GRIDS growth projections. Projected units are to increase by 22% to 11,155 for an average persons per unit of 2.56 in 2031. 25 Year GRIDS Population Projections Population Units 2006 25,312 8,729 2011 25,314 9,013 2016 25,403 9,257 2021 26,019 9,695 2026 27,537 10,595 2031 28,591 11,155 25 Year GRIDS Population Projections - 4 City of Ward Profiles

Family Structure In, there is a higher proportion of couples with children than couples without children. There is a lower proportion of lone parent families in compared to. Family Structure of Census Families 2011 2011% 2011 2011% ward ten Total Census Families in Private Households Couple Families (Married or Common Law) with Children Couple Families (Married or Common Law) without Children 7,325 100.0% 144,120 100.0% 3,515 48.0% 64,935 45.1% 2,800 38.2% 51,975 36.1% Lone Parent Families 1,010 13.8% 27,220 18.9% Family Structure of Census Families 100% Percent (%) of Total Census Families 75% 50% 25% 0% Couple Families (Married or Common Law) with Children Couple Families (Married or Common Law) without Children Lone Parent Families Census Family Type City of Ward Profiles 5

ward ten Education The proportion of residents who have a postsecondary certificate, diploma or degree is similar to. Highest Educational Certificate, Diploma or Degree 2011 2011% 2011 2011% Total population aged 15 years and over by highest certificate, diploma or degree 20,325 100.0% 424,055 100.0% No certificate, diploma or degree 4,400 21.6% 92,385 21.8% High school diploma or equivalent 5,955 29.3% 115,720 27.3% Postsecondary certificate, diploma or degree 9,970 49.1% 215,945 50.9% Apprenticeship or trades certificate or diploma 1,620 8.0% 36,255 8.5% College, CEGEP or other non-university certificate or diploma 4,715 23.2% 88,785 20.9% University certificate or diploma below bachelor level 595 2.9% 14,685 3.5% University certificate, diploma or degree at bachelor level or above 3,045 15.0% 76,220 18.0% Bachelor's degree 1,910 9.4% 45,600 10.8% University certificate, diploma or degree above bachelor level 1,135 5.6% 30,625 7.2% Highest Education Certificate, Diploma or Degree - 2011 Highest Certificate, Diploma or Degree University certificate, diploma or degree above Bachelor's degree University certificate, diploma or degree at University certificate or diploma below bachelor College, CEGEP or other non-university certificate Apprenticeship or trades certificate or diploma Postsecondary certificate, diploma or degree High school diploma or equivalent No certificate, diploma or degree 0% 20% 40% 60% Percent (%) of Population 15+ 6 City of Ward Profiles

Mobility Status has a lower proportion of residents who have moved in the past year and lower proportion of residents who have moved in the past five years compared to,. Mobility Status 1 Year Ago 2011 2011% 2011 2011% Total - Mobility status 1 year ago 23,650 100.0% 504,025 100.0% ward ten Non-movers 22,285 94.2% 450,890 89.5% Movers 1,360 5.8% 53,140 10.5% Non-migrants 895 3.8% 34,895 6.9% Migrants 465 2.0% 18,245 3.6% Internal migrants 415 1.8% 15,140 3.0% Intraprovincial migrants 395 1.7% 13,620 2.7% Interprovincial migrants 20 0.1% 1,520 0.3% External migrants 50 0.2% 3,105 0.6% Mobility Status 1 Year Ago - 2011 100% Percent (%) of Population Age 1+ 75% 50% 25% 0% Non-movers Movers: Non-migrants Movers: Migrants Mobility Status City of Ward Profiles 7

ward ten Mobility Status 5 Years Ago 2011 2011% 2011 2011% Total - Mobility status 5 years ago 22,805 100.0% 482,275 100.0% Non-movers 17,430 76.4% 309,025 64.1% Movers 5,375 23.6% 173,255 35.9% Non-migrants 3,650 16.0% 113,755 23.6% Migrants 1,720 7.5% 59,500 12.3% Internal migrants 1,445 6.3% 44,995 9.3% Intraprovincial migrants 1,355 5.9% 40,515 8.4% Interprovincial migrants 90 0.4% 4,475 0.9% External migrants 280 1.2% 14,505 3.0% Mobility Status 5 Years Ago - 2011 Percent (%) of Population Age 5+ 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Non-movers Movers: Non-migrants Movers: Migrants Mobility Status 8 City of Ward Profiles

Ethnicity, Language, Immigrants and Visible Minority Ethnicity The top three ethnicities residents in identify with are Italian, English and Canadian. Ethnicity ward ten Total population in private households by ethnic origins 2011 2011% 2011 2011% 23,850 100.0% Total population in private households by ethnic origins 509,640 100.0% Italian 5,375 22.5% English 134,925 26.5% English 4,285 18.0% Canadian 122,145 24.0% Canadian 3,835 16.1% Scottish 98,955 19.4% Scottish 2,820 11.8% Irish 85,650 16.8% Irish 2,660 11.2% Italian 60,535 11.9% Polish 1,720 7.2% German 46,910 9.2% Croatian 1,675 7.0% French 42,735 8.4% East Indian 1,615 6.8% Polish 27,460 5.4% German 1,400 5.9% Dutch 26,375 5.2% Serbian 1,280 5.4% Ukrainian 17,765 3.5% French 1,220 5.1% Portuguese 14,615 2.9% Ukrainian 860 3.6% First Nations (North American Indian) 13,720 2.7% Dutch 555 2.3% British Isles origins, n.i.e. 13,240 2.6% Hungarian 525 2.2% East Indian 12,525 2.5% British Isles origins, n.i.e. 480 2.0% Chinese 10,875 2.1% City of Ward Profiles 9

ward ten Language Most Often Spoken at Home There is a higher proportion of residents that speak a non-official language at home most often in compared to. Language Most Often Spoken at Home 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total Total population by language spoken most often at home 24,060 100.0% 513,170 100.0% English 18,540 77.1% 431,675 84.1% French 75 0.3% 2,245 0.4% Non-official languages 3,955 16.4% 60,180 11.7% Multiple responses 1,490 6.2% 19,070 3.7% Language Most Often Spoken at Home - 2011 100% Percent (%) of Total Population 75% 50% 25% 0% English French Non-official languages Language Multiple responses 10 City of Ward Profiles

Immigrants has a higher proportion of immigrants with over one third of its residents being immigrants compared to,. Immigrants 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total ward ten Total Population by immigrant status 23,850 100.0% 509,640 100.0% Immigrants 8,170 34.3% 125,015 24.5% Recent Immigrants 330 1.4% 14,825 2.9% Immigrants - 2011 50% 40% Percent (%) of Total Population 30% 20% 10% 0% Immigrants Recent Immigrants Immigrant Status City of Ward Profiles 11

ward ten Visible Minority Population The proportion of residents who self identify as being a visible minority is slightly lower in compared to. Visible Minority Groups 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total Total population by visible minority groups 23,850 100.0% 509,635 100.0% Total visible minority population 3,300 13.8% 79,970 15.7% South Asian 1,940 8.1% 17,245 3.4% Chinese 105 0.4% 8,500 1.7% Black 240 1.0% 16,110 3.2% Filipino 90 0.4% 7,175 1.4% Latin American 190 0.8% 7,335 1.4% Arab 160 0.7% 7,075 1.4% Southeast Asian 330 1.4% 5,875 1.2% West Asian 40 0.2% 4,260 0.8% Korean 60 0.3% 1,975 0.4% Japanese 25 0.1% 855 0.2% Visible minority, n.i.e. 45 0.2% 1,390 0.3% Multiple visible minorities 75 0.3% 2,180 0.4% Not a visible minority 20,550 86.2% 429,665 84.3% Visible Minority Groups - 2011 Visible Minority Group South Asian Chinese Black Filipino Latin American Arab Southeast Asian West Asian Korean Japanese Visible minority, n.i.e. Multiple visible minorities 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% Percent (%) of Total Population 12 City of Ward Profiles

Labour Force Characteristics Labour Force Activity has a slightly lower unemployment rate compared to. Labour Force Activity 2011 2011 Participation rate 63.3 62.8 ward ten Employment rate 58.7 57.3 Unemployment rate 7.2 8.7 Labour Force Activity - 2011 100.0 75.0 Rate per 100 50.0 25.0 0.0 Participation rate Employment rate Unemployment rate Labour Force Characteristic City of Ward Profiles 13

ward ten Labour force by occupation Similar to, the most common occupation of residents in is sales and service. Total labour force population aged 15 years and over by occupation - National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2011 Labour Force by Occupation 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total 12,860 100.0% 266,200 100.0% All occupations 12,660 98.4% 258,885 97.3% Management 1,170 9.1% 25,455 9.6% Business, finance and administration 2,110 16.4% 39,355 14.8% Natural and applied sciences and related 680 5.3% 14,675 5.5% Health 720 5.6% 19,565 7.3% Education, law and social, community and government services 1,285 10.0% 33,110 12.4% Art, culture, recreation and sport 315 2.4% 6,695 2.5% Sales and service 3,095 24.1% 62,855 23.6% Trades, transport and equipment operators and related 2,240 17.4% 38,255 14.4% Natural resources, agriculture and related production 145 1.1% 4,090 1.5% Manufacturing and utilities 910 7.1% 14,835 5.6% Occupation - Not applicable 200 1.6% 7,315 2.7% Labour Force by Occupation - 2011 Occupation Management Business, finance and administration Natural and applied sciences and related Health Education, law and social, community and Art, culture, recreation and sport Sales and service Trades, transport and equipment operators and Natural resources, agriculture and related Manufacturing and utilities Occupation - Not applicable 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Percent (%) of Total Labour Force Age 15+ 14 City of Ward Profiles

Labour Force by Industry has a higher proportion of residents employed in the manufacturing industry compared to. Labour Force by Industry 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total ward ten Total labour force population aged 15 years and over by industry - North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 2007 12,855 100.0% 266,200 100.0% All industries 12,660 98.5% 258,880 97.3% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 65 0.5% 2,900 1.1% Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction - 0.0% 315 0.1% Utilities 105 0.8% 1,630 0.6% Construction 970 7.5% 17,405 6.5% Manufacturing 2,195 17.1% 31,605 11.9% Wholesale trade 575 4.5% 11,615 4.4% Retail trade 1,725 13.4% 30,315 11.4% Transportation and warehousing 710 5.5% 11,225 4.2% Information and cultural industries 230 1.8% 4,985 1.9% Finance and insurance 600 4.7% 10,815 4.1% Real estate and rental and leasing 180 1.4% 4,730 1.8% Professional, scientific and technical services 580 4.5% 14,635 5.5% Management of companies and enterprises - 0.0% 255 0.1% Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services 615 4.8% 12,820 4.8% Educational services 1,030 8.0% 24,165 9.1% Health care and social assistance 1,145 8.9% 33,640 12.6% Arts, entertainment and recreation 160 1.2% 4,440 1.7% Accommodation and food services 600 4.7% 15,765 5.9% Other services (except public administration) 620 4.8% 12,355 4.6% Public administration 560 4.4% 13,265 5.0% Industry - Not applicable 195 1.5% 7,315 2.7% City of Ward Profiles 15

ward ten Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Utilities Construction Manufacturing Labour Force by Industry - 2011 Wholesale trade Retail trade Transportation and warehousing Information and cultural industries Finance and insurance Industry Real estate and rental and leasing Professional, scientific and technical services Management of companies and enterprises Administrative and support, waste management Educational services Health care and social assistance Arts, entertainment and recreation Accommodation and food services Other services (except public administration) Public administration Industry - Not applicable 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Percent (%) of Total Labour Force Age 15+ 16 City of Ward Profiles

Place of Work The distribution of the employed labour force by place of work is similar for and. Employed Labour Force by Place of Work 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total ward ten Total employed population aged 15 years and over by place of work status 11,935 100.0% 243,080 100.0% Worked at home 545 4.6% 14,045 5.8% Worked outside Canada 60 0.5% 840 0.3% No fixed workplace address 1,250 10.5% 26,345 10.8% Worked at usual place 10,080 84.5% 201,850 83.0% Employed Labour Force by Place of Work 2011 Percent (%) of Total Employed Labour Force Age 15+ 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Worked at home Worked outside Canada Place of Work No fixed workplace address Worked at usual place City of Ward Profiles 17

ward ten Mode of Transportation Similar to, the most common mode of transportation to and from work by employed residents in is by a car, truck or van as a driver. The proportion of the employed labour force that use public transit or walk to their place of work is lower in than in. Employed Labour Force by Mode of Transportation Total employed population aged 15 years and over with a usual place of work or no fixed workplace address by mode of transportation 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total 11,335 100.0% 228,195 100.0% Car, truck or van - as a driver 9,600 84.7% 174,410 76.4% Car, truck or van - as a passenger 645 5.7% 16,080 7.0% Public transit 525 4.6% 22,475 9.8% Walked 410 3.6% 11,235 4.9% Bicycle 105 0.9% 1,805 0.8% Other methods 55 0.5% 2,190 1.0% Employed Labour Force by Mode of Transportation - 2011 100% Percent (%) of Total Employed Labour Force Age 15+ 75% 50% 25% 0% Car, truck or van - as a driver Car, truck or van - as a passenger Public transit Walked Bicycle Other methods Mode of Transportation 18 City of Ward Profiles

Household Income Compared to, has larger proportion of households falling in the higher income brackets. The average household income is higher for households in than households in overall. Household Income ward ten 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total Household total income in 2010 of private households 8,665 100.0% 203,805 100.0% Under $5,000 115 1.3% 5,100 2.5% $5,000 to $9,999 115 1.3% 3,645 1.8% $10,000 to $14,999 85 1.0% 7,810 3.8% $15,000 to $19,999 195 2.3% 10,875 5.3% $20,000 to $29,999 655 7.6% 19,685 9.7% $30,000 to $39,999 760 8.8% 19,115 9.4% $40,000 to $49,999 715 8.3% 18,850 9.2% $50,000 to $59,999 685 7.9% 16,380 8.0% $60,000 to $79,999 1,350 15.6% 27,605 13.5% $80,000 to $99,999 1,205 13.9% 22,785 11.2% $100,000 to $124,999 1,150 13.3% 19,125 9.4% $125,000 to $149,999 615 7.1% 12,565 6.2% $150,000 and over 1,020 11.8% 20,280 10.0% Average household total income $ $86,807 $76,742 Household Income - 2010 Percent (%) of Total Private Households 30% 20% 10% 0% City of Ward Profiles 19

ward ten Low Income Status The prevalence of after tax low-income is much lower in than in. Low Income Status, 2010 Total persons in private households 23,850 509,640 Prevalence of low income after tax in 2010 9.4 15.7 Total persons less than 6 years 1,240 33,200 Prevalence of low income after tax in 2010 8.9 24.0 Total persons 65 years and over 4,275 75,870 Prevalence of low income after tax in 2010 4.9 8.3 Low Income Status - 2010 40 Prevalence of Low Income After Tax in 2010 30 20 10 0 Total persons in private households Total persons less than 6 years Target Group Total persons 65 years and over 20 City of Ward Profiles

Dwellings Dwellings by Period of Construction There are very few dwellings in that were constructed after 2000. Compared to, has a much higher proportion of dwellings that were constructed between 1961 and 2000. ward ten Occupied Private Dwellings by Period of Construction 2011 2011% 2011 2011% Total number of occupied private dwellings by period of construction 8,665 100.0% 203,805 100.0% 1960 or before 985 11.37% 78,360 38.4% 1961 to 1980 3,080 35.55% 59,655 29.3% 1981 to 1990 2,790 32.20% 25,680 12.6% 1991 to 2000 1,110 12.81% 19,895 9.8% 2001 to 2005 520 6.00% 10,280 5.0% 2006 to 2011 180 2.08% 9,935 4.9% Occupied Private Dwellings by Period of Construction - 2011 Percent (%) of Total Occupied Private Dwellings 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1960 or before 1961-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2005 2006-2011 Period of Construction City of Ward Profiles 21

ward ten Dwellings by Structural Type Similar to, the most common type of dwelling in is a single-detached house. There is a much lower proportion of apartment type dwellings in than in. Occupied Private Dwellings by Structural Type of Dwelling 2011 2011% 2011 2011% Total number of occupied private dwellings by structural type of dwelling 8,770 100.0% 203,805 100.0% Single-detached house 5,965 68.0% 118,105 58.0% Apartment, building that has five or more storeys 515 5.9% 33,140 16.3% Movable dwelling - 0.0% 370 0.2% Semi-detached house 255 2.9% 6,325 3.1% Row house 1,605 18.3% 21,440 10.5% Apartment, duplex 140 1.6% 6,320 3.1% Apartment, building that has fewer than five storeys 275 3.1% 17,660 8.7% Other single-attached house 20 0.2% 440 0.2% Occupied Private Dwellings by Structural Type of Dwelling - 2011 75% Percent (%) of Total Occupied Private Dwellings 50% 25% 0% Singledetached house Semidetached house Row house Apartment, duplex Apartment, building five or more storeys Apartment, building fewer than five storeys Other singleattached house Movable dwelling Structural Type of Dwelling 22 City of Ward Profiles

Vacant Residential Land Inventory Although most of the area is developed there is 12.7 hectares of potential vacant residential land available for an estimated 547 dwelling units. The majority of these, namely 69% or 378 units are in draft approved status, while the remaining, or 30% or 163 units are under potential development status. Most of the dwelling types for proposed development in are either townhouses, (38%) or apartment units (48%), while single family comprises only 14%. Vacant Residential Land Inventory -, 2013 ward ten Single-Detached Semi-detached Row Apartment Total Units Area (ha) Units Area (ha) Units Area (ha) Units Area (ha) Units Area (ha) Total by Development Status 75 4.5 2 0.1 205 5.7 265 2.4 547 12.7 Registered 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Draft Approved 49 2.2 0 0.0 127 3.5 202 1.6 378 7.3 Pending 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.2 0 0.0 6 0.2 Potential Development 26 2.3 2 0.1 72 2.0 63 0.8 163 5.2 Urban Residential Condominiums Of the 232 total condominium units, 208 were townhouse units, while 24 were apartments, all being under registered status. Urban Residential Condominiums -, 2013 Single-detached Semi-detached Row Apartment Total Units Units Units Units Units Total by Development Status 0 0 208 24 232 Registered 0 0 208 24 232 Draft Approved 0 0 0 0 0 Pending 0 0 0 0 0 Potential Development 0 0 0 0 0 City of Ward Profiles 23

ward ten Housing Starts In the thirteen year period since 2000, there were a total of 805 housing starts reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) for, of which 47% were single detached, while 43% were townhouse units. There has been a steady decline in new housing starts in since the mid-2000s, with less than 20 new units being reported annually for the last three years. Housing Starts -, 2006-2013 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 2006-2013 Total 83 36 43 26 33 18 15 17 271 Single-detached 25 36 12 11 17 16 6 15 138 Semi-detached 2 0 2 2 6 2 2 2 18 Townhouse 56 0 29 13 10 0 7 0 115 Apartment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Housing Starts -, 2006-2013 Semi-detached, 18, 7% Single-detached, 138, 51% Townhouse, 115, 42% 24 City of Ward Profiles

Housing Tenure The majority (89.6%) of housing in is owned, which is a much higher proportion compared to overall. Housing Tenure 2011 2011 % Total 2011 2011 % Total Total number of private households by tenure 8,665 100.0% 203,805 100.0% ward ten Owner 7,760 89.6% 139,345 68.4% Tenant 905 10.4% 64,460 31.6% Housing Tenure - 2011 Percent (%) of Total Occupied Private Dwellings 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Owner Housing Tenure Tenant City of Ward Profiles 25

ward ten Housing Affordability Similar to, almost one-fifth (19.7%)of owner households and over forty percent (41.4%) of renter households in Ward 11 spend 30% or more of their household income on shelter costs. Housing Affordability - 2011 Number of owner households in non-farm, non-reserve private dwellings % of owner households spending 30% or more of household total income on shelter costs 2011 2011 7,765 138,765 19.7% 18.9% Number of tenant households in non-farm, non-reserve private dwellings % of tenant households spending 30% or more of household total income on shelter costs 905 64,430 41.4% 42.8% Housing Affordability - 2011 60% Percent (%) Spending 30% or more of household income on shelter costs 40% 20% 0% Owner Tenant 26 City of Ward Profiles

Land Use Primary Land Use More than half (52%) of ward 10 is comprised of residential land use, totalling 1,249 acres. is located in the community of Stoney Creek and within the urban boundary. Next to Ward 2, is the second smallest in the city, only totalling approximately 2,400 acres in size. The industrial portion is still proportionately large at 519 acres or 22% of the total land use. The remaining land uses only make up less than 10% in each category. The estimated density is estimated at 48.0 persons per net residential hectare on residential lands, or 19.6 persons per gross hectare of the overall ward. ward ten Primary Land Use Areas 2013 2013 % Total Average Urban Ward Total land use area (ac) 2,387 100.0% Wards % Residential 1,249 52.3% 36.8% Commercial/Office 96 4.0% 5.2% Institutional 140 5.9% 5.6% Industrial 519 21.7% 10.7% Transportation/Utility 80 3.4% 5.5% Agricultural 6 0.3% 4.3% Open Space* 153 6.4% 12.4% Vacant Land* 144 6.0% 19.5% *adjusted land use overlaps and/or non-applicable lands between wards where required Source: Planning Department Community Planning GIS Section, 2013 Year End Land Use Commercial/Office 4% Institutional 6% Industrial 22% Residential 52% Transportation/ Utility 5% Agricultural 0% Open Space* 7% Vacant Land* 6% City of Ward Profiles 27

ward ten Parks and Open Space In 2014, had a surplus of 11.4 hectares in neighbourhood parks and deficit of 5.1 hectares for community parks. The percentage of neighbourhood parks is among the highest in the city at 55%, or 28.4 hectares, followed by Community parks (23%) and Natural Open Space (17%). There are no city wide parks in this ward. Sherwood Park is the largest classified park (Community) in at 7.6 hectares. Parks and Open Space - 2014 Total Area (ha) 51.8 Neighbourhood 28.4 Parkette 2.0 Community 11.9 City Wide 0.0 General Open Space 0.4 Natural Open Space 9.1 Parks and Open Space -, 2014 Parkette 4% Community 23% Neighbourhood 55% General Open Space 1% Park Deficiency - 2011 Natural Open Space 17% Neighbourhood Parks (ha) 11.4 Community Parks (ha) -5.1 28 City of Ward Profiles

Voter Turnout During the 2014 Muncipal Election, 37.4% of eligble voters in voted. City of Municipal Election 2014 Turnout 2014 2014 % Total 2014 2014 % Total Eligible Voters 19,106 100.0% 366,124 100.0% Ballots Cast 7,145 37.4% 124,550 34.0% ward ten City of Municipal Election 2014 Turnout 50% Percent (%) of Eligible Voters who Cast A Ballot 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% City of Ward Profiles 29

ward ten 2011 National Household Survey Limitation Notes The 2011 National Household Survey (NHS) provides information about the demographic, socialand economic characteristics of Canadians. The NHS was designed to capture the sociodemographic characteristics that were previously collected by the long form census questionnaire. However, the NHS had made some changes to the census questions and is a voluntary survey which would result in estimates subject to higher non-response bias than the previous mandatory long form census. Non-response bias is a concern because populations who choose to respond to a survey tend to be different from those who chose not to participate in a survey. This means there would be data gaps for certain groups that tend not to participate in voluntary surveys (including aboriginal, low income, immigrants and other groups) and data may be skewed to over or under represent different sub-population groups. For the 2011 National Household Survey (NHS) estimates, the global non-response rate (GNR) is used as an indicator of data quality. This indicator combines complete non-response (household) and partial non-response (question) into a single rate. A smaller GNR indicates a lower risk of non-response bias and as a result, lower risk of inaccuracy. Despite then the fact that the questions in the NHS were similar to those from the previous mandatory long form census questionnaire, due to methodological differences between the NHS and the census, comparisons of data from these two sources are unreliable. Hence, the 2011 NHS data should not be compared to previous Census data and trend over time information is not available for the information that used to be collected in the census long-form questionnaire. Furthermore, since it is not possible to determine with certainly whether differences in data are attributable to actual differences of a characteristic among populations or non-response bias, extra caution should be exercised when comparing NHS data for different and/or at smaller geographies with varying Global Non-Response Rates (GNRs). Comparisons between geographies with similar GNRs may be more suitable. The following table shows the GNRs of each ward in the City of as well as the overall GNR for the City of. Note that the GNRs vary greatly between the different wards ranging from 19.1% to as high as 41.5%; with most being over 25% which is the 2011 Census threshold for suppression. 30 City of Ward Profiles

ward ten Contact Information Community and Emergency Services Department Neighbourhood and Community Initiatives Division Email: louisa.wong@hamilton.ca Planning and Economic Development Department GIS Planning and Analysis Phone: 905-546-2424 Ext. 1222 Email: GIS-Planning&Analysis@hamilton.ca Produced by: Cartographic and Graphic Services Section Planning and Economic Development Department City of 32 City of Ward Profiles