Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division General Docket

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division. No. GD COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division GD COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

" Jurisdiction & Venue

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 5 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 8:19-cv SCB-JSS Document 2 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 14 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/17 Page 1 of 24

("FLSA"). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax)

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case: 2:10-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/21/17 Page 1 of 23

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffand the proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs

Case 3:16-cv GMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class

Case 7:17-cv MFU Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 9 Pageid#: 1

Case 2:10-cv SJF -ETB Document 7 Filed 04/14/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:19-cv BPG Document 1 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARLYAND

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 02/17/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:163

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/13/17 Page 1 of 24

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 21

Case 7:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/14/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:10-cv TON Document 1 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case: 1:17-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/14/17 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2017 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv JWL-TJJ Document 1 Filed 12/05/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

PROTECTION FROM ABUSE (PFA) Instructions PRO SE FAYETTE COUNTY

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv HB Document 20 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:18-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

err Corporation System 306 West Main Street, Suite 512 Frankfort, KY (registered agent for service of process)

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/21/18 Page 1 of 15

KUO, M.J. STATEME1IT. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious violations. Telephone: U.

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 324 W. Market Street Greensboro, NC 27401

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CLASS/COLLECTIVE ACTION

they are so related in this action within such original jurisdiction that they form part (212) (212) (fax)

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/14/14 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH CULP, Plaintiff, Case No. v. CONSOL ENERGY, Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT NOW COMES Plaintiff, Joseph Culp, by and through his attorney, Christi Wallace, Esquire, and files this Complaint alleging as follows: I. Nature of the Action 1. Plaintiff bring this Complaint to recover damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ), 42 U.S.C. 2000e alleging he was subjected to Race Discrimination because other Caucasian employees, in the same position as the Plaintiff, were granted preferential treatment while attending school while the Plaintiff was not. II. Jurisdiction and Venue 2. This action arises under the Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e. This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff s discrimination claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331. 3. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff s discrimination claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a).

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 2 of 7 4. Plaintiff is a resident and citizen of Pennsylvania, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in Western Pennsylvania, and, therefore, this action is within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and the venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). III. Parties 5. Plaintiff, Joseph Culp ( Plaintiff ), is an adult individual residing at 869 3 rd Avenue, Waynesburg, PA 15370. 6. Defendant, Consol Energy ( Defendant ), is a business with corporate headquarters located at 1000 Consol Energy Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317-6506. IV. Facts 7. Defendant employed the Plaintiff in August 2010 as a Manager. 8. Plaintiff is an African-American male with Mexican descent. 9. While Plaintiff was employed with Defendant, in 2012, Plaintiff began going to Penn State Fayette for an Associate Degree in Mining Technology in order to advance his career with the Defendant. a. The additional schooling was job related and necessary to advance his career. b. In May 2014, Plaintiff graduated from Penn State Fayette with his Associate Degree in Mining Technology. 10. Plaintiff is roughly one of twenty Managers who worked for the Defendant while simultaneously going to Penn State for an Associate s Degree.

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 3 of 7 a. All the other Managers are Caucasian and Plaintiff is the only African- American. 11. When Plaintiff first started going to school in Fall 2012, the Defendant would not accommodate the Plaintiff with his work schedule and class schedule. a. Defendant forced the Plaintiff to work the swing shift from 12AM-8AM. b. Plaintiff would then go to class from 10:15AM to 4:30PM. c. Plaintiff would then have to wake up for work at 10PM. d. Plaintiff was forced to did this rigorous schedule for months. e. However, none of the other Caucasian Managers were forced to do this. 12. Around September 2012, Plaintiff spoke with his Superintendent and was transferred from the West Virginia mine to the Pennsylvania (BMX) mine. a. As a result of this transfer, Plaintiff thought his work/class schedule would get better, but it didn t. b. Plaintiff was still being treated differently from the other Caucasian Managers who were going to school and working simultaneously. 13. Beginning in April 2013, Plaintiff would go to school Monday and Wednesdays. a. At the end of each semester, the Defendant would add up all the days Plaintiff missed to attend his classes ( missed days ). b. Plaintiff was then forced to make up all the days he missed work in order to attend classes. Plaintiff had to make up all the missed days before he was able to earn any money for the days he worked.

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 4 of 7 c. Plaintiff would use all of his scheduled days off to work off his accrued missed days. i. For every 28 days the Plaintiff worked, he got 6 days off. ii. Because the Defendant was not accommodating with the Plaintiff s work/class schedule, the Plaintiff would use those 6 scheduled days off to offset his missed days of work. d. Plaintiff even used all his vacation or personal days in order to offset his missed days. 14. The Defendant would allow the Plaintiff to attend his classes but he was forced to make up any missed days. a. The other Caucasian Managers were not required to make up any days they missed to attend class. 15. Since Fall of 2012, Plaintiff had to make up over 200 missed days of work that he took in order to attend classes. a. Plaintiff was required to make up all of the missed days and still work his regular hours. Sometimes Plaintiff would work doubles just to make up his accrued missed days. b. Plaintiff is not paid for any of the missed days he makes up. c. Therefore, every day that Plaintiff is required to make-up, he is losing out on $450 (take home pay for each day) because if he did not have to make that day up, he could have worked and made $450. 16. Several Caucasian Managers have specifically told the Plaintiff that they didn t have to make up the workdays they missed because of classes.

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 5 of 7 a. The same Caucasian Managers told the Plaintiff that the Defendant would even pay for them to receive extra tutoring. 17. Plaintiff s Professors have also informed him that never has a Consol Manager had to use their vacation/personal days or had to make up missed days. V. Allegations Count I Discrimination in Violation of Title VII 18. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 19. Plaintiff is an African American male with Mexican descent and is therefore a member of a protected class under Title VII and the PHRA. 20. The Plaintiff was subjected to discriminatory treatment from the Defendant because of his Race. 21. While Plaintiff was employed with Defendant, Plaintiff was going to Penn State Fayette for an Associate Degree in Mining Technology in order to advance his career with the Defendant. 22. Plaintiff is roughly one of twenty Managers working for the Defendant while simultaneously going to Penn State for an Associate s Degree. 23. The Defendant gave preferential treatment to the Caucasian Managers in violation of Title VII. a. In the Fall of 2012, Defendant forced the Plaintiff to work the swing shift from 12AM-8AM. Plaintiff would then go to class from 10:15AM to 4:30PM. Plaintiff would then have to wake up for work at 10PM. i. None of the other Caucasian Managers were forced to work this rigorous schedule in order to attend classes.

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 6 of 7 b. After Plaintiff was transferred to the Pennsylvania Mine, he was still being treated differently from the other Caucasian Managers who were going to school and work simultaneously. c. Beginning in April 2013, at the end of each semester, the Defendant would add up all the days Plaintiff missed to attend his classes. i. Plaintiff was then forced to make up those missed days. Plaintiff had to make up all the missed days before he was able to earn any money for the days he worked. ii. Plaintiff would use all of his scheduled days off to work off his accrued missed days. iii. Plaintiff even used all his vacation or personal days in order to offset his missed days. iv. The other Caucasian Managers were not required to make up any days they missed to attend class. 1. Several Caucasian Managers have specifically told the Plaintiff that they didn t have to make up the workdays they missed because of classes. d. The Defendant even paid for the Caucasian Managers to receive extra tutoring. Request for Relief WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against the Defendant for the following:

Case 2:14-cv-01597-JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 7 of 7 a. Loss of wages for making up missed days in an amount exceeding $90,000; b. Additional liquidated and punitive damages in excess of $250,000; c. Plaintiff s legal fees in an amount exceeding $25,000; d. Pre-judgment and continuing interest; e. Court costs; and f. Other such relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Christi Wallace Pa ID: 313721 KRAEMER, MANES & ASSOCIATES, LLC US Steel Tower 600 Grant St, Suite 660 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 (412) 722-9700 Direct (412) 206-0834 Fax cw@lawkm.com Counsel for Plaintiff