National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme 2005: An overview of Situation in Uttar Pradesh. CDS, Trivendrum, Kerala

Similar documents
WOMEN EMPOWERMENT THROUGH RURAL EMPLOYMENT IN UTTAR PRADESH

Uttar Pradesh Report on Trafficking and HIV. (Need Assessment Study- based on Secondary Data) Preliminary Report

Sixteenth Assembly Elections in Uttar Pradesh

Women s Reservation and India s National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme

Socio-Demographic Condition of One of the Most Marginalised Caste in Northern India

DEMOGRAPHIC ASPECTS OF URBANIZATION

Rajiv Sharma, HJS, Joint Registrar (Judicial) (Services), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 UTTAR PRADESH RULES

Chapter 1 UTTAR PRADESH: A GENERAL PROFILE

CHAPTER - XII JUDICIAL-MISCELLANEOUS

Table 1: Financial statement of MGNREG scheme

No. of Vacancies. Note :- (i) The number of vacancies may increase or decrease in numbers.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD. The Uttar Pradesh Civil Court Staff Centralized Recruitment

Tribunalisation of Justice in India Boon or Bane

Hiring of Courier Agency for delivery of Provisional Degree Certificate and Transcripts to Students

MANIFESTO OF THE CONGRESS PARTY

MGNREGA: Making Way for Social Change in Women s: A Case Study of Musunuru Mandal in Andhra Pradesh

Kashmir unrest: NHRC issues notice to Union Home Secretary and the Chief Secretary of State

The Uttar Pradesh Bhoomi Evam Jal Sanrakshan Adhiniyam, 1963

Recast(e)ing Inequality: Residential Segregation by Caste across City Size and Over Time in Urban India

Impact of MGNREGS on Labour Supply to Agricultural Sector of Wayanad District in Kerala

URBAN INDIA. Volume 34 Issue l January-June 2014 ISSN Preface... iii. Editorial... iv. Acknowledgements... x

I: INTRODUCTION. Table-2: Election Results Party Seats Contested Seats won Votes Share (percent) India National Congress

SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies (SSRG-IJEMS) volume 4 Issue 8 August 2017

CHAPTER - II DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF RURAL POPULATION

GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

For. Selection of suppliers for both Apis mellifera Bee Boxes (BIS Standard Type- C ) and live bee colonies. Cost of the Tender Rs 5,000/-

ABHINAV NATIONAL MONTHLY REFEREED JOURNAL OF REASEARCH IN COMMERCE & MANAGEMENT MGNREGA AND RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION IN INDIA

OFFICE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY Gokaran Nath Road, Badshah Bagh, Lucknow Tender Schedule

Mgnregs and Rural Unemployment- A Case Study of Chanditala C.D Block- I of Hugli District, West Bengal

NREGA in Abu Road, Rajasthan

AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF SCHEDULED CASTES: A STUDY OF BORDER AREAS OF JAMMU DISTRICT

A Study of the ImpAct of NAtIoNAl RuRAl employment GuARANtee Scheme on migration IN cachar district of ASSAm

Impact of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) on Rural Labour Markets

Economic Transformation of Tribal women Through MGNREGA: A Study on Irula Community Women in Attappady, Kerala

India (ratification: 1960)

Annexure XI. Comments on the Feedback received during the Workshop on "the Study of Counter Magnet Areas to Delhi and NCR"

WAGE PROBLEMS IN LABOUR MARKET AND MGNREGA

Social Science Class 9 th

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF THE MIGRANT WORKERS IN KERALA: A STUDY IN THE TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT

SOCIAL INCLUSION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH MGNREGA

Electoral Politics in the Indian States T h e Impa ct o f M o d e rn iza tio n

Evaluation of Upliftment of Scheduled Tribes under MGNREGA

The Socio-economic Status of Migrant Workers in Thiruvananthapuram District of Kerala, India. By Dilip SAIKIA a

A case study of women participation in Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNERGA) in Kashmir

LIVELIHOOD PATTERN OF SCHEDULED CASTES OF SARAN DISTRICT

Urban Women Workers. A Preliminary Study. Kamla Nath

Efficiency Consequences of Affirmative Action in Politics Evidence from India

U.P. BEEJ VIKAS NIGAM, C- 973/74, FAIZABAD ROAD, MAHANAGAR, LUCKNOW Ph. No , (Mob , )

Information bulletin India: floods in northeast states

SOCIAL AUDIT REPORT. (English) MEGHALAYA SOCIETY FOR SOCIAL AUDIT & TRANSPERANCY

INDIAN SCHOOL MUSCAT SENIOR SECTION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCE CLASS: IX TOPIC/CHAPTER: 03-Poverty As A Challenge WORKSHEET No.

THE MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE ACT, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Rural Non-Farm Employment of the Scheduled Castes in India

Theft and Loss of Electricity in an Indian State 1

Unemployment in Kerala: An Analysis of Economic Causes

MINUTES OF THE SECOND MEETING OF FIFTH NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES HELD ON AT NOON.

Issues related to Working Women s Hostels, Ujjwala, Swadhar Greh. Nandita Mishra EA, MoWCD

Faculty Details proforma for DU Web-site

THE KARNATAKA ACQUISITION OF LANDS FOR GRANT OF HOUSE SITES ACT, 1972

NCERT Class 9th Social Science Economics Chapter 3: Poverty as a Challenge

INTRODUCTION I. BACKGROUND

A Study on Workers Participation and related issues of MGNREGA in Jayanti Forest Village of Kalchini Block, Alipurduar District

HUMAN RESOURCES MIGRATION FROM RURAL TO URBAN WORK SPHERES

Sustainable Development Goals: Agenda 2030 Leave No-one Behind. Report. National Multi-Stakeholder Consultation. November 8 th & 9 th, 2016

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES BILL, 2013

Workforce Participation in Tribal Districts of Gujarat: Comparative Study of ST and Non ST

Poverty alleviation programme in Maharashtra

3 QUARTERLY PROJECT REPORT

The Great Job Robbery

Report Launch December 9, 2011 ODI, London

Appraisal of Processes and Procedures of NREGS in Orissa: A Study of Mayurbhanj and Balasore District. (Report) Study Team

AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION

Are Caste Categories Misleading? The Relationship Between Gender and Jati in Three Indian States

Data base on child labour in India: an assessment with respect to nature of data, period and uses

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006.

Socio-demographic profile of socioeconomically disadvantaged internal migrants in Delhi

IPUMS samples for NSSO (India)

WOMEN IN NREGA: ISSUES OF CHILD CARE. Case Studies from Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh FORCES

National Survey of Manual Scavengers Workshop for Nodal officers and Coordinators

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (SECOND) BILL, 2013

How To. Conduct a Gram Sabha. December 2016

Workshop with Stakeholders on Reducing Vulnerability to Bondage in Orissa

THE CONSTITUTION (SCHEDULED TRIBES) ORDER ( SECOND AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: A Unique Scheme for Indian Rural Women

Minimizing the adverse of impact of distress migration. District study of Nayagarh in western Odisha by Madhyam Foundation

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-third Year of the Republic of India as follows:

Chapter 6. A Note on Migrant Workers in Punjab

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MINES LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 259 TO BE ANSWERED ON 30 TH MARCH, 2012 R&R POLICY FOR MINING PROJECTS

A Multi-dimensional Framework for Understanding, Measuring and Promoting Inclusive Economies Growth and Poverty Reduction: India s Experience

In the matter of: M/s Rauzagaon Chini Mills (A unit of Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd.) Rauzagaon , District Barabanki (U.P.

GIDR- ICRISAT Policy Brief 2. P. K. Viswanathan, Rudra N Mishra and Madhusudan Bhattarai

Research Chronicler: International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed Journal ISSN: Print: ISSN: Online: X

Migration, HIV and Technical Education in Nepal

Rural-urban Migration and Education of Children: Studying the Left Behind and Migrant Children in India

THE STATE OF EMPLOYMENT IN UTTAR PRADESH

Notice For Inviting Expression Of Interest For Treatment & Disposal Of Illegal Hazardous Waste Lying At Village Khanpur, Rania Kanpur Dehat

Does political connections and affiliation affect allocation of benefits in the Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: Evidence from West Bengal, India #

Rural Labour Migration: A Case Study in Villupuram district of Tamil Nadu

An Analysis of Rural to Urban Labour Migration in India with Special Reference to Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes

Transcription:

National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme 2005: An overview of Situation in Uttar Pradesh Miss Pratima Yadav Institute of Economic Growth Delhi University Correspondence: misspratimakrishna@gmail.com To be presented in the: International Conference on Employment Opportunities and Public Employment Policy in Globalizing India 3 5 April, 2008 CDS, Trivendrum, Kerala

Distribution of NREG Scheme by Regions & districts: UP Regions Number of Districts No. of Districts covered in NREGS No. of Districts in Phase-1: 2006-07 NO. of Districts in Phase 2 2007-08 Eastern Uttar Pradesh 27 21 9 12 Central Uttar Pradesh 10 8 7 1 Western Uttar Pradesh** 26 3 None 3 Southern Uttar Pradesh 7 7 6 1

Objectives of the Study Conducted for 2006-07 07 & 2007-08 08 To Study the Demand for and Supply of Employment under the NREGA Examine Differences between the Job Cards Issued & Supply of Actual Employment Distribution of Job Cards among the social groups Distribution of fund according to work profile and materials Difference between NREGS Wage rate and Minimum Wage rate. Types of work and execution Part of the analysis was conducted by Social Groups

Where do the Demand for Employment and Supply of Employment stand? What happens to the Job Cards Issued and Employment Provided?

Distribution of NREGS Employment During 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Region-wise ) Regions NREGS Performance Based on Demand & Supply of Employment (%) Employment Demanded Employment Supplied Financial Year 2006-08 Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Financial Year 2006-07 Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP 56.82 63.72 56.80 62.43 71.26 62.85 DATA NA 68.46 51.00 64.50 56.80 57.77 55.90 62.56 56.80 60.99 68.08 60.76 DATA NA 65.94 51.00 64.17 56.80 57.16

Region-wise Distribution of NREGS Employment 2006-07 & 2007-08 (%) Regions Job Card Issued to Households Employment provided to Households Differences between Job Cards Issued & Empl. Provided Financial Years: 2006-08 Eastern UP 54.16 30.27 23.88 Central UP 63.16 39.51 23.65 Western UP 38.04 21.6 16.43 Southern UP 62.91 38.37 24.54 Financial Year: 2006-07 Eastern UP 48.74 33.18 15.56 Central UP 61.96 37.65 24.32 Western UP DATA NA DATA NA DATA NA Southern UP 60.22 39.71 20.51 Eastern UP 56.7 28.91 27.78 Central UP 64.26 41.24 23.02 Western UP 38.04 21.6 16.43 Southern UP 65.15 37.24 27.91

District-wise distribution of NREGS Employment : 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Eastern UP) Name of the Regions AMBEDKAR NAGAR Financial Year 2006-07 % of Employment Demanded % of Employment Supplied % of Employment Demanded 30.87 % of Employment Supplied 30.87 AZAMGARH 10 10 54.59 54.57 BAHRAICH 55.12 55.12 BALLIA 48.53 48.53 BALRAMPUR 63.59 63.59 BASTI 48.61 48.61 CHANDAULI 72.15 61.53 41.51 41.48 GONDA 54.77 54.77 GORAKHPUR 41.74 39.99 42.81 42.81 JAUNPUR 85.58 69.66 50.14 50.01 KAUSHAMBI 52.30 51.12 26.79 26.79 KUSHI NAGAR 64.54 57.71 59.00 59.00 MAHARAJGANJ 45.10 45.06 MAU 54.82 54.82 MIRZAPUR 48.50 48.50 54.62 54.62 PRATAPGARH 96.91 96.91 65.13 65.13 SANT KABEER NAGAR 61.02 61.02 SHRAVASTI 61.65 61.65 SIDDHARTH NAGAR 48.07 48.22 SONBHADRA 55.34 54.50 57.67 57.67 SULTANPUR 47.15 47.15

District-wise Demand and Supply of Job Cards: 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Eastern Uttar Pradesh) Financial Year 2006-07 Name of the Regions % Job Card Issued to Rural Households % of Employment provided to Rural Households Differences between Issued Job Cards and Provided Employment (in %) % Job Card Issued to Rural Households % of Employment provided to Rural Households Differences between Issued Job Cards and Provided Employment (in %) AMBEDKAR NAGAR 72.44 22.36 50.08 AZAMGARH** 49.07 49.07 53.89 29.41 24.48 BAHRAICH 72.60 40.02 32.58 BALLIA 41.86 20.31 21.55 BALRAMPUR 42.92 27.29 15.63 BASTI 58.62 28.49 30.13 CHANDAULI** 37.67 23.18 14.49 64.94 26.94 38.00 GONDA 53.97 29.56 24.41 GORAKHPUR** 41.65 16.66 24.99 48.84 20.91 27.93 JAUNPUR** 30.22 21.05 9.17 43.79 21.90 21.89 KAUSHAMBI** 66.35 33.92 32.43 76.59 20.52 56.07 KUSHI NAGAR** 35.98 20.77 15.22 69.53 41.02 28.51 MAHARAJGANJ 39.52 17.81 21.71 MAU 48.34 26.50 21.84 MIRZAPUR ** 72.10 34.97 37.13 74.70 40.80 33.90 PRATAPGARH** 59.76 57.91 1.85 58.79 38.29 20.50 SANT KABEER NAGAR 52.65 32.13 20.52 SHRAVASTI 44.38 27.36 17.02 SIDDHARTH NAGAR 51.32 24.75 26.58 SONBHADRA** 77.12 42.03 35.08 86.30 49.77 36.53 SULTANPUR 56.49 26.63 29.85

District-wise Distribution of NREGS Employment: 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Central UP) Financial Year 2006-07 Name of the Districts % of Employme nt Demanded % of Employment Supplied % of Employmen t Demanded % of Employment Supplied BARABANKI 66.88 60.24 124.00 124.00 FATEHPUR 72.61 72.27 59.76 57.92 HARDOI 74.00 71.56 59.44 59.31 KANPUR DEHAT 72.08 72.08 KHERI 69.62 69.29 47.38 47.14 RAE BARELI 56.57 53.55 61.12 61.01 SITAPUR 51.86 51.78 64.18 63.91 UNNAO 53.02 53.02 61.26 61.05

District-wise Demand and Supply for Issued Job Cards: 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Central UP) Financial Year 2006-07 Name of the Districts % Job Card Issued to Rural Househol ds % of Employm ent provided to Rural Househol ds Differences between Issued Job Cards and Provided Employment (in %) % Job Card Issued to Rural Househol ds % of Employm ent provided to Rural Househol ds Differences between Issued Job Cards and Provided Employment (in %) BARABANKI @ 79.20 47.71 31.49 40.94 50.76-9.82 FATEHPUR** 57.23 41.36 15.87 58.85 34.09 24.76 HARDOI** 52.19 37.35 14.84 73.34 43.50 29.84 KANPUR DEHAT 30.80 22.20 8.60 KHERI** 54.49 37.76 16.73 74.33 35.04 39.29 RAE BARELI @ 74.13 39.70 34.43 76.03 46.39 29.64 SITAPUR @ 63.74 33.01 30.73 69.01 44.10 24.91 UNNAO** 52.41 27.79 24.62 71.51 43.66 27.86

District-wise Distribution of NREGS Employment: 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Western & Southern UP) Financial Year 2006-07 Name of the Districts % of Employme nt Demanded % of Employment Supplied % of Employme nt Demanded % of Employment Supplied Western Uttar Pradesh Districts BUDAUN ETAH FARRUKHABAD Southern Uttar Pradesh Districts 48.29 66.28 60.98 48.29 66.28 60.98 BANDA 35.81 35.70 33.35 33.35 CHITRAKOOT 94.32 97.25 68.74 68.74 HAMIRPUR 79.71 77.44 67.55 67.55 JALAUN 79.46 70.77 67.69 66.51 JHANSI 50.69 50.69 LALITPUR 57.53 53.62 53.01 49.92 MAHOBA 75.28 75.28 81.20 81.20

District-wise Demand and Supply for Issued Job Cards: 2006-07 & 2007-08 (Western & Southern UP) Financial Year 2006-07 Districts % Job Card Issued to Households % of Employment provided to Households Differences between Issued Job Cards and Provided Employment (in %) % Job Card Issued to Househol ds % of Employm ent provided to Househol ds Differences between Issued Job Cards and Provided Employment (in %) Western Uttar Pradesh Districts BUDAUN 42.11 20.34 21.78 ETAH 31.45 20.85 10.61 FARRUKHABAD 42.08 25.66 16.42 Southern Uttar Pradesh Districts BANDA 57.08 20.38 36.70 63.89 21.31 42.58 CHITRAKOOT 75.82 73.74 2.08 79.23 54.46 24.77 HAMIRPUR 61.86 47.90 13.96 63.47 42.88 20.59 JALAUN 67.97 48.10 19.87 71.67 47.67 24.00 JHANSI 59.02 29.92 29.10 LALITPUR 54.58 29.26 25.31 61.30 30.60 30.70 MAHOBA 40.14 30.21 9.92 58.87 47.81 11.07

Distribution of Job Cards among the social groups

Distribution of Job Cards by Social Group in UP: Regional Profile 2006-07 & 2007-08 Regions Financial Year 2006-08 Eastern Uttar Pradesh Central Uttar Pradesh Western Uttar Pradesh Southern Uttar Pradesh Financial Year 2006-07 Eastern Uttar Pradesh Central Uttar Pradesh Western Uttar Pradesh Southern Uttar Pradesh Eastern Uttar Pradesh Central Uttar Pradesh Western Uttar Pradesh Southern Uttar Pradesh % of households issued job card (up to March ) Schedule Caste 48.96 56.07 34.03 50.58 57.97 55.87 48.27 40.07 61.31 34.03 63.8 Schedule Tribes 1.5 0.15 0 1.82 2.75 0.16 2.14 0.26 0 0 0 Others 49.55 43.78 65.97 47.6 39.28 43.97 49.59 59.66 38.69 65.97 36.2

Districts Financial Year 2006-07 Distribution of Job Cards by Social Group: Eastern UP 2006-07 & 2007-08 % of job card issued to household (till the reporting March month) Schedule Caste Schedule Tribes Others AZAMGARH 6 4 CHANDAULI 62.00 38.00 GORAKHPUR 57.86 42.14 JAUNPUR 65.00 35.00 KAUSHAMBI 65.79 34.21 KUSHI NAGAR 48.58 51.42 MIRZAPUR 61.41 0.02 38.57 PRATAPGARH 60.32 39.68 SONBHADRA 43.56 30.69 25.74 AMBEDKAR NAGAR 40.14 59.86 BAHRAICH 19.04 0.09 80.86 BALLIA 36.71 1.74 61.56 BALRAMPUR 20.02 1.08 78.90 BASTI 33.06 66.94 GONDA 6 4 MAHARAJGANJ 48.75 0.52 50.73 MAU 51.00 49.00 SANT KABEER NAGAR 43.67 56.33 SHRAVASTI 28.03 0.73 71.24 SIDDHARTH NAGAR 27.04 72.96 SULTANPUR 58.94 41.06

Distribution of Job Cards by Social Group: Central UP 2006-07 & 2007-08 Districts % of Job cards issued to household (till the reporting March month) Schedule Cast Schedule Tribes Others Financial Year 2006-07 BARABANKI 57.18 42.82 FATEHPUR 43.44 56.56 HARDOI 54.54 45.46 KHERI 54.61 0.93 44.46 RAE BARELI 59.65 40.35 SITAPUR 60.58 39.42 KANPUR DEHAT 61.31 38.69

Distribution of Job Cards by Social Group: Western & southern UP 2006-07 & 2007-08 Districts % of Job Cards Issued to Household Schedule Cast Schedule Tribes Others Western Region, BUDAUN 34.48 65.52 ETAH 23.25 76.75 FARRUKHABAD 48.32 51.68 Southern Region, BANDA 50.94 49.06 CHITRAKOOT 62.03 37.97 HAMIRPUR 51.70 48.30 JALAUN 36.57 63.43 LALITPUR 39.01 14.42 46.57 MAHOBA 55.88 44.12 JHANSI 63.80 36.20

Distribution of fund according to work profile and materials

Work Profile and Expenditure: Regions of UP Expenditure on Wages, Material & Contingencies (%) Regions Unskilled Workers Semi- Skilled & skilled Workers Material Contingenc y Total Expendit ure Unspent Funds Financial Year 2006-08 Eastern UP 52.11 2.22 25.5 1.43 81.27 18.73 Central UP 52.32 3.05 24.2 1.89 81.46 18.54 Western UP 67.35 1.87 27.18 0.9 97.29 2.71 Southern UP 46.21 3.37 23.06 1.69 74.33 25.67 Financial Year 2006-07 Eastern UP 45.42 3.64 25.83 0.78 75.67 24.33 Central UP 45.76 2.83 27.89 1.86 78.34 21.66 Western UP DATA NA DATA NA DATA NA DATA NA DATA NA DATA NA Southern UP 42.11 3.49 25.56 1.78 72.94 27.06 Eastern UP 55.13 1.58 25.35 1.73 83.8 16.2 Central UP 57.51 3.23 21.28 1.92 83.93 16.07 Western UP 67.35 1.87 27.18 0.9 97.29 2.71 Southern UP 49.22 3.29 21.21 1.63 75.36 24.64

work profile and Expenditure by Districts: Eastern UP Expenditure on Wages, Material & Contingencies (%) Regions Unskilled Workers Semiskilled and Skilled Workers Mater ial Conting ency Total Exp. Unspent Funds Financial Year 2006-07 AZAMGARH 46.54 9.92 36.85 0.80 94.10 5.90 CHANDAULI 44.27 4.63 23.01 0.97 72.89 27.11 GORAKHPUR 50.39 1.10 26.30 0.88 78.66 21.34 JAUNPUR 40.23 1.32 16.06 1.07 58.69 41.31 KAUSHAMBI 56.59 8.23 22.27 1.79 88.87 11.13 KUSHI NAGAR 41.54 31.60 0.63 73.77 26.23 MIRZAPUR 39.20 3.07 19.41 0.28 61.95 38.05 PRATAPGARH 43.55 1.02 28.01 0.54 73.11 26.89 SONBHADRA 48.49 3.77 27.39 0.51 80.16 19.84

work profile and expenditure in Districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh AZAMGARH BAHRAICH BALLIA BALRAMPUR BASTI CHANDAULI GONDA JAUNPUR KAUSHAMBI KUSHI NAGAR MAU MIRZAPUR PRATAPGARH SHRAVASTI SONBHADRA SULTANPUR Regions AMBEDKAR NAGAR GORAKHPUR MAHARAJGANJ SANT KABEER NAGAR SIDDHARTH NAGAR Unskilled Workers 53.59 66.39 56.00 78.43 43.42 52.89 51.85 51.64 55.62 60.01 47.40 61.19 51.64 46.77 62.64 50.77 44.13 53.54 51.22 60.22 45.33 Expenditure on Wages, Material & Contingencies (%) Semi-skilled and Skilled Workers 2.40 4.22 0.01 0.25 5.48 0.87 0.61 2.05 3.16 0.74 1.05 0.06 1.57 3.64 1.73 2.61 2.68 1.39 25.16 23.24 18.75 50.14 25.93 19.22 27.20 26.20 18.75 16.55 26.28 33.35 32.29 18.22 25.74 25.49 16.94 15.93 29.22 28.45 24.80 Material 1.60 0.99 0.77 0.36 7.28 0.19 1.02 3.30 1.69 1.52 2.09 3.46 1.00 0.71 1.45 1.09 0.72 1.06 1.78 1.07 1.28 Continge ncy 82.75 94.85 75.53 128.93 76.87 77.78 80.94 81.14 76.67 80.13 78.93 98.74 85.99 65.77 91.41 77.35 65.42 72.25 84.83 92.42 72.80 Total Exp. 17.25 5.15 24.47-28.93 23.13 22.22 19.06 18.86 23.33 19.87 21.07 1.26 14.01 34.23 8.59 22.65 34.58 27.75 15.17 7.58 27.20

work profile and expenditure in Districts of Central Uttar Pradesh Expenditure on Wages, Material & Contingencies (%) Regions Unskilled Workers Semi-skilled and Skilled Workers Material Continge ncy Total Exp. Financial Year 2006-07 BARABANKI 41.05 3.14 22.69 1.53 68.42 31.58 FATEHPUR 44.64 8.20 30.78 1.67 85.30 14.70 HARDOI 52.16 2.85 20.94 1.55 77.50 22.50 KHERI 45.29 2.71 28.10 1.11 77.21 22.79 RAE BARELI 40.68 1.26 30.25 1.54 73.73 26.27 SITAPUR 45.26 2.70 30.31 3.41 81.68 18.32 UNNAO 49.18 32.79 1.79 83.77 16.23 BARABANKI 64.87 5.73 24.58 1.92 97.11 2.89 FATEHPUR 53.61 5.94 24.33 2.31 86.19 13.81 HARDOI 61.44 1.54 22.99 2.58 88.55 11.45 KANPUR DEHAT 37.25 0.46 24.09 0.28 62.08 37.92 KHERI 49.62 1.96 16.30 1.63 69.50 30.50 RAE BARELI 57.56 2.97 15.63 2.02 78.18 21.82 SITAPUR 54.23 3.46 24.24 1.67 83.61 16.39 UNNAO 68.31 3.31 20.08 1.84 93.54 6.46

BUDAUN ETAH BANDA HAMIRPUR JALAUN LALITPUR MAHOBA 2007-08 BANDA HAMIRPUR JALAUN JHANSI LALITPUR MAHOBA work profile and expenditure in Districts of Western & southern UP Regions Western UP 2007-08 FARRUKHABAD Southern UP 2006-07 CHITRAKOOT CHITRAKOOT Expenditure on Wages, Material & Contingencies (%) Unskilled Workers 68.38 87.05 44.78 33.79 68.54 43.11 33.73 49.00 36.30 43.44 37.91 47.50 51.37 70.30 45.16 63.04 Semi-skilled and Skilled Workers 0.14 5.86 0.44 0.99 2.49 3.17 2.07 2.51 2.08 5.82 2.46 3.50 6.59 4.23 20.74 36.36 27.93 23.79 21.31 27.15 18.49 28.62 21.23 24.64 12.81 30.22 22.35 14.34 18.93 20.62 Materia l 0.58 2.14 0.11 2.44 1.59 1.22 1.38 1.97 3.05 2.14 0.68 1.11 2.58 1.22 2.04 1.59 Conting ency 89.84 131.40 73.26 61.01 93.94 71.48 56.77 81.67 63.10 72.30 57.22 78.84 78.77 89.35 72.72 89.48 Total Exp. 10.16-31.40 26.74 38.99 6.06 28.52 43.23 18.33 36.90 27.70 42.78 21.16 21.23 10.65 27.28 10.52

What about the NREGS Wage rate & Minimum Wage rate?

Every person working under the NREG Scheme shall be entitled to wages at the minimum wage rate fixed by the State Government (or the competent authority concerned) for agricultural labourers under the Minimum Wage Act, 1948, unless the wages have been notified by the Central Government Section 6 (1) of the Act. As the stated in the Act (Schedule I, Section 6),labourers shall not be paid less than the above mentioned wage rate (hereafter the minimum wage ) under any circumstances. Ministry of Rural Development (GOI)

Gap between NREGS Wage and the Minimum Wage: A Region-wise Picture of UP Name of the Districts Financial Year 2006-08 Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Financial Year 2006-07 Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Minimum Wages 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 Avg. wage Paid Per Persondays 73.45 73.03 72.28 56.09 55.85 57.73 90.81 90.21 86.83

Average wage Paid Per Person a day (Wage rate) in Region of Uttar Pradesh 10 9 8 Wage Rate 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Eastern Uttar Pradesh Central Uttar Pradesh Southern Uttar Pradesh Regions of Uttar Pradesh 2006-2007 2007-2008 Note :Wage rate data is not available for Western UP

Gap between NREGS Wage and the Minimum Wage: A District-wise Picture of Eastern UP Name of the Districts Financial Year 2006-07 Wage Gap between Wage rate and Minimum Wage Wage Gap Between Wage rate and region wage rate Wage Gap between Wage rate and Minimum Wage Wage Gap Between Wage rate and region wage rate AMBEDKAR NAGAR AZAMGARH -10.19-8.28 41.99 9.18 BAHRAICH BALLIA BALRAMPUR BASTI CHANDAULI 2.91 4.82 17.25-15.56 GONDA 0-90.81 GORAKHPUR 0.14 2.05 32.48-0.33 JAUNPUR -0.44 1.47 31.82-0.99 KAUSHAMBI -3.29-1.38 28.87-3.94 KUSHI NAGAR 0 1.91 41.99 9.18 MAHARAJGANJ MAU MIRZAPUR -6.33-4.42 36.35 3.54 PRATAPGARH 0 1.91 33.66 0.85 SANT KABEER NAGAR SHRAVASTI SIDDHARTH NAGAR SONBHADRA 0 1.91 30.84-1.97 SULTANPUR

Gap between NREGS Wage rate and the Minimum Wage rate: A District-wise Picture of Central UP Financial Year 2006-07 Name of the Districts Wage Gap between Wage rate and Minimum Wage Wage Gap Between Wage rate and region wage rate Wage Gap between Wage rate and Minimum Wage Wage Gap Between Wage rate and region wage rate BARABANKI -4.04-1.89 33.05 0.84 FATEHPUR -7.41-5.26 34.15 1.94 HARDOI 0 2.15 36.03 3.82 KANPUR DEHAT KHERI 0 2.15 37.72 5.51 RAE BARELI -3.59-1.44 27.59-4.62 SITAPUR 0 2.15 28.33-3.88 UNNAO 0 2.15 28.57-3.64

Gap between NREGS Wage rate and the Minimum Wage rate: A District-wise Picture of Southern UP Financial Year 2006-07 Name of the Districts Wage Gap between Wage rate and Minimum Wage Wage Gap Between Wage rate and region wage rate Wage Gap between Wage rate and Minimum Wage Wage Gap Between Wage rate and region wage rate BANDA 0.1 0.37 34.33 5.5 CHITRAKOOT -0.61-0.34 18.71-10.12 HAMIRPUR 0 0.27 30.42 1.59 JALAUN 0 0.27 35.07 6.24 JHANSI LALITPUR 0 0.27 29.69 0.86 MAHOBA -1.13-0.86 24.77-4.06

Which types of work are executed in UP?

Regions Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Eastern UP Central UP Western UP Southern UP Work profile of NREGA Programme in Regions of UP Total Work/Activity (%) Land Development Financial Year 2006-2008 4.37 5.95 4.97 10.71 Financial Year 2006-2007 3.20 3.31 7.46 Financial Year 2007-2008 5.03 8.37 4.97 12.25 Rural Connectivity 44.71 41.60 79.30 16.05 49.50 42.07 18.55 42.01 41.17 79.30 14.86 Any Other Activity Approved by MRD 7.24 0.10 2.38 8.87 0.21 3.23 6.32 1.98 Water conservation 43.68 52.35 15.74 70.86 38.43 54.40 70.75 46.64 50.46 15.74 70.91

Work profile of NREGA programme in districts of Eastern UP: Total Work/Activity (%) Financial Year 2006-07 Districts Land Developme nt Rural Connectiv ity Any Other activity Approved by MRD %age of water conservati on Land Developme nt Rural Connecti vity Any Other activity Approved by MRD %age of water conservati on AMBEDKAR NAGAR 2.89 15.21 81.90 AZAMGARH 51.74 19.04 29.22 39.36 25.69 34.94 BAHRAICH 4.90 60.67 4.20 30.23 BALLIA BALRAMPUR 2.75 52.40 44.84 BASTI 1.18 51.01 47.81 CHANDAULI 58.34 41.66 3.09 43.20 53.71 GONDA 11.89 27.47 1.79 58.85 GORAKHPUR 13.07 28.66 4.06 54.21 26.53 46.56 26.92 JAUNPUR 5.19 47.94 46.86 0.65 17.61 1.38 80.36 KAUSHAMBI 33.18 66.82 17.05 82.95 KUSHI NAGAR 73.17 26.83 18.41 45.78 3.65 32.15 MAHARAJGANJ 10.83 65.73 23.44 MAU 1.00 52.60 46.40 MIRZAPUR 26.02 7.92 1.05 65.02 4.72 28.50 66.79 PRATAPGARH 3.99 32.78 63.23 SANT KABEER NAGAR 0.15 72.21 27.65 SHRAVASTI 0.43 70.12 4.05 25.41 SIDDHARTH NAGAR 7.79 46.90 45.31 SONBHADRA 22.21 77.79 SULTANPUR 37.77 62.23 0.13 49.24 50.63

Work profile of NREGA Programme in districts Central UP: Total Work/Activity (%) Financial Year: 2006-07 Financial Year: 2007-08 Districts Land Devel opme nt Rural Conne ctivity Any Other activit y Appro ved by MRD %age of water conser vation Land Devel opme nt Rural Conne ctivity Any Other activit y Appro ved by MRD %age of water conserva tion BARABANKI 40.98 2.18 56.84 4.07 45.12 50.81 FATEHPUR 0.94 14.19 84.88 2.58 23.20 74.22 HARDOI 1.90 68.42 29.68 0.48 58.26 41.26 KANPUR DEHAT 5.64 53.90 40.46 KHERI 4.41 62.58 33.01 37.38 13.10 49.52 RAE BARELI 11.58 54.47 33.95 6.68 47.84 45.47 SITAPUR 17.80 82.20 1.50 50.02 48.48 UNNAO 0.20 22.30 77.50 2.03 37.03 60.95

Work Profile of NREGA Programme in Districts Western & Southern UP Total Work/Activity (%) Financial Year: 2006-07 Financial Year: 2007-08 Districts Land Develo pment Rural Connec tivity Any Other activity Approv ed by MRD %age of water conser vation Land Develo pment Rural Connec tivity Any Other activity Approv ed by MRD %age of water conser vation Western Uttar Pradesh districts BUDAUN 8.14 79.75 12.11 ETAH 7.85 69.14 23.01 FARRUKHABA D 0.09 86.08 13.84 Southern Uttar Pradesh districts BANDA 1.70 26.68 8.08 63.54 0.44 18.93 3.76 76.87 CHITRAKOOT 20.19 16.48 63.34 40.36 4.33 6.84 48.47 HAMIRPUR 3.58 96.42 0.38 5.64 93.98 JALAUN 12.10 24.09 63.82 7.63 23.29 69.08 JHANSI 3.41 15.55 81.04 LALITPUR 8.10 12.07 11.32 68.51 17.13 6.05 76.82 MAHOBA 32.77 67.23 18.29 81.71

Concluding Observations A complete equality between the demand for and supply of employment in all the regions of UP over both the years. However, when we make a comparison between the job cards issued and the actual employment provided to the job seekers, there appears a considerable mismatch. This needs investigation. Distribution of employment by social groups reveal a greater share going to the SC followed by the Others. As the population of ST in most districts of UP is marginal, it s also reflected in their NREGS share as well. As was expected, a greater amount of the NREGS expenditure went to unskilled workers and their wages. Next to this was expenditure on goods and material. Evidences drawn at region-level reveal that about a fifth of total financial allocations remained unspent over both the years. NREGS Wages appeared to have improved overtime. Conservation of water remained the priority for 3 regions. Western UP has however differed and laid greater emphasis on road connectivity.