THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN THE WESTERN STATES

Similar documents
PROJECTED COST: $193,990 PROJECTED TIMELINE: 8 Months (May 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018)

The Right to Counsel in RURAL NEVADA

American Bar Association, SCLAID 8 th Annual Indigent Defense Summit Gideon at 50: The Way Forward Dallas, Texas February 9, 2013

The Right to Counsel. Within the criminal justice system in the United States today, those people

The Right to Counsel in Mississippi Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services

ABA Indigent Defense Summit News from around the Nation

The right to counsel in Indiana Evaluation of trial level indigent defense services

POWELL V. ALABAMA United States Supreme Court 287 U.S. 45; 53 S.Ct. 55; 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO

Justice Denied: America s Continuing Neglect of Our Constitutional Right to Counsel

STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016

gideon v. wainwright (1963)

STAT E ST AND A RDS F OR AP P OINTM ENT OF COU NS EL I N DE ATH P EN ALTY CAS ES

Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases

GIDEON S BROKEN PROMISE:

Citing Rising Workload, Public Lawyers Reject Cases

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Article III. The Role of the Federal Court

Re: Support of Congressional request for federal indigent defense funding. Dear Chairman Crenshaw and Ranking Member Serrano,

COLORADO HOUSE BILL : SAFEGUARDING THE RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY IN MUNICIPAL COURT?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Right to Counsel - A Due Process Requirement

Due Process of Law. 5th, 6th and & 7th amendments

Unit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution

Applications for Post Conviction Testing

Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin

Department of Justice

NATIONAL SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC. BYLAWS WITH CHANGES

August 16, Dear Supervisors Call, English and Searle,

Supreme Court of Florida

NEW MEXICO PUBLIC DEFENDER COMMISSION FY16 BUDGET REQUEST

The Fourteenth Amendment The adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 potentially limited the discretion that the states had possessed to

Rates of Compensation for Court-Appointed Counsel in Capital Cases at Trial A State-By-State Overview, 1999 November 1999

The Right to Counsel 151

Sixth Amendment. Fair Trial

Assistance of Counsel: A Fundamental Right

7/8/2016. The Challenge of Equal Justice: Marea Beeman. Sixth Amendment Guarantee of the Right to Counsel in Criminal Matters

Indigent Defense. Presented to the 2018 Annual Treasurer s Conference March 17, 2018 San Marcos, Texas. Debra Stewart,

STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES IN NON-CAPITAL CASES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

The Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S.

State Bar of Michigan Representative Assembly September 18, 2008 SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

The right to counsel in Indiana Evaluation of trial level indigent defense services

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

~ Constitutional Criminal Procedure Outline ~ Fall 2008 ~ Prof. Bradley

A Constitutional Right to Self-Representation - Faretta v. California

evaluation evaluation THE GUARANTEE OF COUNSEL Advocacy & Due Process in Idaho s Trial Courts

Legal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law. CONTACT US

Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons

National Latino Peace Officers Association

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 6/11/2012 :

A LOOK BACK AT GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT AFTER FORTY YEARS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ILLUSORY SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. State of Vermont, Petitioner, Michael Brillon,

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION. v. CRIMINAL NO. 3:08cr107-DPJ-LRA ORDER

The True Benefits of Counsel: Why Do-It-Yourself Lawyering Does Not Protect the Rights of the Indigent

Testimony on Senate Bill 125

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

ADOPTED REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES RESOLUTION

LEO 1880: QUESTIONS PRESENTED:

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report

The Right to Counsel and Frivolous Appeals: Assistance to the Court or Advocacy for the Indigent Client-Which Is the Real McCoy?

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services

COMMONWEALTH vs. SCOTT JOSEPH BOLTON. No. 16-P-960. Worcester. October 18, November 16, Present: Massing, Kinder, & Ditkoff, JJ.

Civil Rights: Attorney Malpractice: Public Defenders Not Liable Under 42 U.S.C. Sec Polk County v. Dodson, 102 S. Ct. 445 (1981).

Civil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

Appointment of Committees

THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL A Brief History By Kimberly Simmons, Execu8ve Director Idaho State Public Defense Commission

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC BERTHA JACKSON, PETITIONER, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT.

CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14984, * DARBERTO GARCIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 04-CV-0465

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION. COMES NOW Defendant RODNEY TOMMIE STEWART, by and through

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

and Ethics: Slope Lisa Sommer Devlin

Millions to the Polls

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Countries Of The World: The United States

The Bill of Rights CHAPTER 6. Table of Contents. ESSENTIAL QUESTION: How do societies balance individual and community rights?

I ve Been Charged With an Offence: What Now?

MARK SILVER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION (AC 39238)

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE

THE FAIRNESS OF A FAIR TRIAL: NOT GUILTY PLEAS AND THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

Criminal Procedure. 8 th Edition Joel Samaha. Wadsworth Publishing

STATE OF OHIO JAMAR TRIPLETT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2016

THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION

Self-represented litigants and the code of judicial conduct

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Transcription:

DAVID CARROLL Executive Director THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN THE WESTERN STATES SIXTH AMENDMENT CENTER PO Box 15556 Boston, MA 02215 Council of State Governments - West May 20, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah

GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours. Gideon v. Wainwright (March 18, 1963)

GIDEON V WAINWRIGHT From the very beginning, our state andnational constitutions and laws have laid great emphasis on procedural and substantive safeguards designed to ensure fair trials. Gideon v. Wainwright (March 18, 1963)

WHY IS THERE A SIXTH AMENDMENT? Even the intelligent and educated layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. Without [counsel], though he be not guilty, he faces the danger of conviction because he does not know how to establish his innocence. - Gideon v. Wainwright Whereas it doth appeaere that any person... may on good grounds, or through mallice or envie be indicted and accused for matters criminal, wherein the person is so [accused] may be innocent, and yett, may not be accomplished with soe much wisdom and knowledge of the law to plead his own innocencye, &c. Rhode Island & Providence Plantations, 1660 Statute

JOHN ADAMS Counsel ought to be the very last thing an accused person should [be without] in a free country.

POP QUIZ Which state was the first to codified the right to counsel in all cases (including misdemeanors) AND the payment of lawyers for services, as early as 1877?

NEVADA a failure to assign professional counsel for a poor defendant will be deemed a fatal error on appeal. In re WIxom

UTAH

GRANTSVILLE, UTAH

NO COUNSEL COURTS THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ARE INCARCERATED EVERYDAY IN AMERCIA WITHOUT EVER HAVEN SPOKEN TO AN ATTORNEY

BREAKDOWN IN THE ADVERSARIAL PROCESS The right to effective assistance of counsel is thus the right of the accused to require the prosecution s case to survive the crucible of meaningful adversarial testing [I]f the process loses its character as a confrontation between adversaries, the constituional guarantee is violated. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984)

UNITED STATES V. CRONIC 466 U.S. 648 (1984) While a criminal trial is not a game in which the participants are expected to enter the ring with a near match in skills, neither is it a sacrifice of unarmed prisoners to gladiators.

BREAKDOWN IN THE ADVERSARIAL PROCESS The Court then says that there are certain circumstances where the structure is so deficient that any lawyer would fail to provide effective assistance of counsel... United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984)

POWELL V. ALABAMA 287 U.S. 45 (1932)

POWELL V. ALABAMA 287 U.S. 45 (1932) Judge hand-picked attorneys Insufficient time to prepare a case Lawyers to qualified to handle the complexity of the case

POWELL V. ALABAMA 287 U.S. 45 (1932) [H]ow can a judge, whose functions are purely judicial, effectively discharge the obligations of counsel for the accused? He can and should see to it that, in the proceedings before the court, the accused shall be dealt with justly and fairly. He cannot investigate the facts, advise and direct the defense, or participate in those necessary conferences between counsel and accused which sometimes partake of the inviolable character of the confessional.

INDEPENDENCE OF THE DEFENSE FUNCTION States have a constitutional obligation to respect the professional independence of the public defenders whom it engages.. Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S 312 (1981).

UTAH

COMPARISON MISSISSIPPI (1990): $34.86 (overhead) + reasonable fee ($25) UTAH (2016): $17.88 all overhead and trial-related expenses

NEW MEXICO November 6, 2012: the New Mexico electorate passed a constitutional amendment requiring the creation of an independent public defender commission. (62%)

ABA TEN PRINCIPLES 1. Independence 2. State Funding/inclusion of Private Bar 3. Early Appointment of Counsel 4. Sufficient time 5. Caseload controls 6. Attorney Qualifications 7. Continuous Representation 8. Prosecution Parity/Bar Flat Fee Contracts 9. Training 10.Supervision

Ten Principles: Principle 1: The public defense function, including the selection, funding, and payment of defense counsel, is independent. The fundamental criteria necessary to design a system that provides effective, efficient, high-quality, ethical, conflict free legal representation.

UTAH SB 155

IDAHO HB 504

GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours. Gideon v. Wainwright (March 18, 1963)