Appendix L: Administrative Procedure

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Record Retention Program Overview

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (P.L )

BEFORE THE BOARD OF OIL, GAS AND MINING DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES STATE OF UTAH

Expulsion Hearing Rules

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

MISCONDUCT BY ATTORNEYS OR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB)

Daytona Beach ARTICLE 1. LANDLORD PERMITS

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

Planning and Organizing Public Hearings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) *** *** *** ***

The Justices of the Peace Act, 1988

135 FERC 61,167 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. North American Electric Reliability Corporation

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OPINION

CRS Report for Congress

PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

United States Court of Appeals

Chapter III ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. Administrative law concerns the authority and procedures of administrative agencies.

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389

Constitutional Issues, Administrative Procedures, and Cost Allocation and Rate Design

BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL NASD DECISION

ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES LEGAL TOOLS

Supreme Court Holds that SEC Administrative Law Judges Are Unconstitutionally Appointed

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

The Regulatory State: Introduction to Legislation, Statutory Interpretation, and Administration Spring 2013 Professor Jodi Short

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

STATE OF FLORIDA. WHEREAS, government must be held accountable for efficient and effective

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

In the Supreme Court of the United States

APPENDIX TEXT OF SUBTITLE D OF TITLE X OF THE DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW. Subtitle D Preservation of State Law

(129th General Assembly) (Amended Substitute House Bill Number 383) AN ACT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Record and Extra-Record Evidence

January 23, Mr. Pruitt s Lawsuits to Overturn EPA s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards

Case 1:17-mc XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

17B-005. Civil injunction proceedings. A. Petition for civil injunction. If chief disciplinary counsel or, when necessary, chief disciplinary counsel

In the Supreme Court of the United States

JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES. December 2006

Case 1:09-cv JTC Document 28 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 11. Plaintiffs, 09-CV-982-JTC. Defendant.

BUSINESS USE AGREEMENT

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

The New Normal: Potential Revisions to the Securities Law and Regulations Under the New Administration

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMENTS ON PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

BAD ARGUMENTS: HOW TO IDENTIFY AND REFUTE THEM

AGENCY SPECIFIC RECORD SCHEDULE FOR: Vermont Parole Board

Powerhouse Design Architects & Engineers, Ltd.

August 29, VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 18 CFR Part 33. [Docket No. RM ]

FARMERS FIGHT: TEXAS EMINENT DOMAIN AND THE 2015 TEXAS RICE II CASE

STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

COMMENTS OF CTIA I. INTRODUCTION. CTIA 1 submits these comments in response to the Notice of Rulemaking ( Notice ) in

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: MICHAEL A. BETTS NUMBER: 15-DB-054 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD INTRODUCTION

Case: 5:06-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 3139 Filed: 07/18/08 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: <pageid>

2838.] Syllabus of the Court

Rule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26

Financial ServicesAlert

NEW MEXICO. New Mexico 1

Working Draft of Proposed Rules (Redline Version)

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

6 Binding The Federal Government

THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT: AN INTRODUCTION. Gillian Metzger, Columbia Law School 1

Chapter UNFAIR TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION. Article Credit Service Organizations

Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Patent and Trademark Office (P.T.O.)

FCC BROADBAND JURISDICTION: THE PSTN TRANSITION IN AN ERA OF CONGRESSIONAL PARALYSIS. Russell Lukas April 4, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA

NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAKING HEARING BEFORE THE COLORADO WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION

INTRODUCTION. WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Renewal Application Update 10206

N.J.A.C. 6A:6, STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION RULEMAKING PROCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Review of Foreign Ownership Policies for Broadcast, Common Carrier and Aeronautical

MSHA Document Requests During Investigations

Adjudication- Judicial Power of Agencies

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11. : : Petitioner, : : Respondent.

California Association of School Counselors Ethics Committee Policies and Procedures Adopted November 12, 2007 Revised August 3, 2008

The Justices of the Peace Act, 1988

PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION ACT

Conducting Effective Motion Practice

Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

Rules and Procedures Approved: Oct. 1, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

County of Alameda. Civil Service Rules

Knock, Knock... Who s There?

NFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes

New Hampshire Employment Security Appeal Tribunal. Erika Randmere Administrator

LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM CONTESTED CASE AND DECLARATORY RULING PROCEDURES

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. PREFACE...i

Policy and Procedures. of the. Code Enforcement Board. of the. City of Orlando, Florida

Cook v. Snyder: A Veteran's Right to An Additional Hearing Following A Remand and the Development of Additional Evidence

Palm Beach County Procedures for Conduct of Quasi-Judicial Hearings

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Transcription:

Appendix L: Administrative Procedure Regulatory Agencies Follow Administrative Procedure Act Commissions must solicit comments Engage in open decision making Establish factual record http://www.clarkquinnlaw.com/images/admin-law.jpg Agency Actions 1. Rule Making : Creating general rules Adjudication : deciding company- -specific cases Agency enforcement of regulations E.g. FCC takes away TV licenses from General Tire Corp for misrepresentation in its application Rulemaking Example: FCC ownership ceilings on TV stations References 1

Rulemaking Procedures NOI (Notice of Inquiry) NoPR (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) Final Rules Litigation (often) Enforcement Rulemaking Procedures (1) Often, Commission publishes a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) Inviting outside parties to comment on issue before the FCC,,provide information All comments are public Responses are possible Some public hearings possible Rulemaking Procedure (2) Commission then proposes regulation Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) published in Federal Register Rulemaking Procedure (3) Parties affected by proposed rule submit comments No oral evidence No cross-examination, but response to comments possible 2

Rulemaking Procedure (4) Agency can seek information beyond testimony of interested parties in order to form final decision i Rulemaking Procedure (5) Staff drafts rules, commissioners may modify. No backroom meetings allowed by commissioners Public vote on rules Final rules published Rulemaking Procedure (6) Then, many parties sue in court, to overturn rules Adjudication http://www.cnfm.fr/images/adjudication.jpg E.g. Can Fox TV keep extra TV stations the company got with a merger, since they are UHF and not VHF? Procedure similar to court trial 3

Often started by filing of a complaint from the agency, private citizen, Attorney General of US, or injured party against the company Business must produce response to complaint Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) from agency then heads a hearing Cross-examination is allowed ALJ issues decision A party can object to the ALJ decision, the agency decision and then reviews the commission 4

If objections remain, party must go to Federal Courts Judicial Review Agency decision can be reversed if: -agency did not follow procedure as required by constitution, existing law, or agency-created regulations -agency failed to satisfy court as to the reasons for its actions Appeals to courts (In US, Courts of Appeals; Supreme Court rarely takes administrative appeals) Grounds for legal appeals are limited: exceeding authority or jurisdiction no due process or no substantial evidence violation of constitution Bad policy is no ground for appeal 5

Chevron Deference Chevron vs. Natural Resources Defense Council is a landmark case in Administrative Law Bf Before Chevron, courts could supersede agency interpretations on questions of law but deferred to agencies on http://www.zanzaman.com/~slo tcar/billboards/chevron.jpg questions of fact Chevron Deference Now a two step process: Court rules whether legislative language is ambiguous or not. If it is not ambiguous, the court s judgment supersedes the agency. Andersen, William R.. Administrative Law Review, Fall2004, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p957, 22p Chevron Deference If legislative language is found to be ambiguous, the any reasonable agency interpretation supersedes the court s own judgment. Chevron Deference Legal philosophy behind Chevron deference: Congress has given the agency the power to interpret ambiguous laws. But not to change clear legislation on its own. Andersen, William R.. Administrative Law Review, Fall2004, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p957, 22p Andersen, William R.. Administrative Law Review, Fall2004, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p957, 22p 6

An Investigation May occur when agency requires data to support rulemaking or adjudication actions Investigation Agencies need a source of legal authority (statute or regulation) to conduct any inspection Agency cannot exercise authority that violates legal constraint http://www.verobeach.com/common/images/directory/feature/phil%20investigation.jpg Explanations, New York: Aspen Law & Business. 2001, p.304 Investigatory power The administrative agency can require a business to produce periodic reports showing that the business is complying with the law Anderson, Ronald A., Kumpf Walter A., Business Law, Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co., 1976. p. 62 Requirements An Administrative inspections do not violate the 4th amendment if: It takes place in a public area Takes place under an issued warrant consistent with reasonable administrative or legislative standards Involves a pervasively regulated business Explanations, New York: Aspen Law & Business. 2001, p.307 7

Obtaining Documents and Testimony Agency can obtain information in two involuntary ways: 1. Reporting requirements Require reports to be made periodically to an agency e.g. Tax returns to IRS Explanations, New York: Aspen Law & Business. 2001, p.309-315 Obtaining Documents and Testimony 2. Subpoenas Directed to specific individuals who are instructed to produce documents or testimony. Subpoenas require specific statutory authority and can be enforced through judicial contempt proceedings Explanations, New York: Aspen Law & Business. 2001, p.309-315 Morton Salt Test United States Vs. Morton Salt Co. (1950) Interprets 4th amendment to impose limits on agency subpoenas Cannot be too indefinite or overly burdensome Must seek information relevant http://homepage3.nifty.com/craftersplace/picture/picturesuki/4mortrinsalt.jpg Explanations, New York: Aspen Law & Business. 2001, p.318 8