NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IBEW LOCAL UNION 98, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv SRC ) ) CLASS ACTION ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : : CLASS ACTION : : : : Master File No. 1:08-cv LTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : :

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Lead Case No CV CLASS ACTION

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

x : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

CAUSE NO. DC C

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:12-cv MCA-LDW CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION EXHIBIT A-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No CB Hon. James M.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

x : : x NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv APG-GWF (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In re HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) )

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. CGC CLASS ACTION

Transcription:

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY KENTON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION I CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 07-CI-00627 CLASS ACTION EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC., et al., Defendants. NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IF YOU WERE A COMMON STOCKHOLDER OF EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. ( EAGLE OR THE COMPANY ) ON ANY DAY FROM FEBRUARY 28, 2007 TO AND INCLUDING AUGUST 15, 2007, THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER OF EAGLE WITH AP AIMCAP HOLDINGS LLC AND AP AIMCAP CORPORATION (COLLECTIVELY, APOLLO ) (THE TRANSACTION ), YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF A CLASS ACTION. The Circuit Court in and for Kenton County, Kentucky, authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. The settlement resolves a lawsuit over whether Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the shareholders of Eagle in connection with the merger between Eagle and Apollo (the Merger ). Eagle, William P. Butler, J. William Blackham, Thomas E. Banta, Thomas E. Costello, Robert J. Kohlhepp, Frank C. McDowell, Lewis D. George, Thomas R. Engel, Paul S. Fisher, and Corporex Companies, LLC are the Defendants. The settlement provides for the disclosure of additional information by Eagle regarding the Merger in a Form 8-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about July 31, 2007. Plaintiff believes disclosure of such information was necessary in order for Eagle shareholders to make an informed vote on the proposed Merger. The settlement also provides for payment of Plaintiff s Counsel s attorney fees and expenses. Please read this Notice carefully.

EXCLUDE YOURSELF DO NOTHING OBJECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT You may exclude yourself from the Class and participate in another lawsuit against the Defendants and the other Released Persons relating to the legal claims in this case. You may write to the Court if you don t like this settlement. GO TO A HEARING You may ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement. These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this Notice. The Court in charge of this case must decide whether to approve the settlement. 1. Why Did I Get This Notice? BASIC INFORMATION You or someone in your family held shares of Eagle common stock on any day during the period from February 27, 2007, to and including the effective date of the consummation of the Transaction, August 15, 2007. The Court ordered this Notice because you have a right to know about a proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit before the Court decides whether to approve the settlement. This Notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement and your legal rights. The Court in charge of the case is the Circuit Court, Division 1, in and for Kenton County, Kentucky, and the case is known as City of Pontiac General Employees Retirement System v. Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-CI-00627. 2. What Is This Lawsuit About? This case was brought as a class action. The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Eagle shareholders in connection with the acquisition of Eagle by Apollo and they sought to stop the Defendants from proceeding with the Transaction. The Plaintiff also alleged that the public statements and descriptions of the Transaction omitted information necessary for Eagle shareholders to make an informed vote on the proposed merger. The Defendants and Apollo contend that the allegations are meritless. They contend that their public statements and descriptions of the Transaction included all information that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding whether to vote in favor of the Transaction. 3. Why Is This a Class Action? In a class action, one or more people or entities (in this case the City of Pontiac General Employees Retirement System), sue as class representatives on behalf of people and entities who are similarly situated. These similarly situated people and entities are called a Class or Class Members, if the Court determines that the lawsuit should proceed as a class action. One Court resolves the issues for all Class Members. 4. Why Is There a Settlement? The Court did not decide in favor of Plaintiff or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a settlement, thereby avoiding the costs and risks of a trial. Before agreeing to finalize the settlement, Plaintiff s Settlement Counsel negotiated for the right to conduct discovery to confirm that the material terms of the Transaction 2

were fair. Following completion of the discovery, Plaintiff s Settlement Counsel have determined that they believe the additional disclosures that Defendants agreed to provide to shareholders were sufficient to allow Eagle shareholders to make an informed vote on the Transaction. 5. How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? The Class includes all common stockholders of Eagle on any day during the period from February 28, 2007, to and including August 15, 2007, including their legal representatives, heirs, successors-in-interest, transferees, and assigns of all such foregoing holders and/or owners, immediate and remote. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, members of the immediate family of any Individual Defendant, any entity in which a Defendant has or had a controlling interest, officers of Eagle, and the legal representatives, agents, executors, heirs, successors, or assigns of any such excluded person. Also excluded from the Class are those Persons who timely and validly exclude themselves therefrom pursuant to the terms of this Notice. 6. What Does the Settlement Provide? THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants agreed to the Transaction on terms structured to meet the specific needs of several of the Company s insiders, without attempting to obtain the highest price reasonably available for Eagle and its shareholders. Plaintiff also alleged that the Defendants failed to disclose all material information relating to the proposed Transaction. Defendants have denied Plaintiff s allegations. To settle the lawsuit, however, Defendants made available to Eagle shareholders additional information related to the Transaction in a Form 8-K. To settle the lawsuit, however, Defendants made available to Eagle shareholders additional information related to the Transaction in a Form 8-K. In summary, the disclosure related to equity ownership of a number of Company insiders; fees and payments to the Company s counsel for their work on the Transaction; work performed by Morgan Stanley & Co. ( Morgan Stanley ) in attracting bids of the Company and how much it would be paid for its work; and more extensive management projections. More specifically, the Form 8-K disclosed: additional information regarding the equity ownership of defendants William P. Butler and J. William Blackham, and the obligations of limited partners of the EHP Operating Partnership, L.P. in connection with the Transaction; disclosure that the engagement letter between Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and the Special Committee of Eagle s Board of Directors does not require the payment of any success fee, and that any success fee is in the discretion of the Special Committee; disclosure that as part of the Special Committee s review of strategic alternatives, Morgan Stanley made initial contact with 17 strategic buyers and 32 financial buyers. Morgan Stanley also had contact with an additional 4 strategic buyers and 13 financial buyers that made unsolicited inquiries following the public announcement of the Company s review of strategic alternatives; disclosure that the Special Committee determined not to permit bidders to team up during the first round of bidding because of concern that joint bidders would reduce the number of competing bidders, and that when certain bidders were invited to team up with an equity partner to submit a definitive proposal to acquire the Company, no formal requests to team up were received by the Special Committee; disclosure that after consulting with its advisors, the Special Committee unanimously determined to pursue the ongoing sale process, rather than a potential business combination with another REIT hospitality company exploring strategic alternatives, because the Special Committee believed the ongoing sales process would provide a higher likelihood that Eagle s common stockholders would receive a premium that would provide more value for Eagle s common stockholders on a current basis; 3

disclosure that the Special Committee granted exclusivity to the buyers because they made a definitive proposal to acquire the Company that was clearly superior to any other offer received, and they required a period of exclusivity to negotiate a definitive agreement; disclosure that if the transaction between Eagle and the buyer is consummated, Morgan Stanley will charge the Company a transaction fee of approximately $7.1 million; and disclosure of additional management projections provided to Morgan Stanley. Defendants acknowledge that the pendency of this lawsuit was the prevailing factor in Defendants decision to provide this additional information to Eagle shareholders. 7. What Does It Mean To Be Part of the Class? If you are in the Class, and you do not exclude yourself therefrom, that means you cannot sue or be part of any other lawsuit, if one is filed, against the Defendants or other Released Persons about the legal issues in this case. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you. In addition, you are releasing your claims, including Unknown Claims as defined below, against the Defendants and other Released Persons that you may have arising out of the acts of the Defendants or other Released Persons, which were asserted or could have been asserted in the lawsuit or in an action in any other forum, by the Plaintiff or any Class Members against any of the Released Persons in connection with, or that arise out of, any claim that was or could have been brought in the action by or on behalf of the Plaintiff, or the putative Class, that relate to Eagle s review of its strategic alternatives, the Transaction or the public disclosures concerning the Transaction, including the Form 8-K filed in connection with the settlement. Unknown Claims includes claims that you do not know or suspect to exist, which if you knew, might affect your agreement to release the Released Persons and the Settled Claims, or might affect your decision to object to or not object to the settlement. If the Stipulation of Settlement ( Stipulation ) and the settlement are approved by the Court, you shall be deemed to waive any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which governs or limits any person s release of the Unknown Claims. The foregoing waiver includes, without limitation, an express waiver, to the full extent permitted by law, by you of any and all rights under California Civil Code 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. The foregoing waiver further includes without limitation an express waiver, to the full extent permitted by law, by you, of any and all rights under any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code 1542. 8. Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU The law firm of Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP represents you and other Class Members. These lawyers are called Plaintiff s Settlement Counsel. You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 4

9. How Will the Lawyers Be Paid? Defendants have agreed that if the other conditions of the settlement are satisfied, Eagle or its successor shall pay the attorney fees and expenses of Plaintiff s Counsel in the sum of $500,000. The parties negotiated this fee amount after reaching agreement on the Supplemental Disclosures. The fees and expenses awarded will not reduce the Transaction consideration paid to Eagle shareholders in any way. THE COURT S FAIRNESS HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don t have to. Any Member of the Class who objects to the settlement, or who otherwise wishes to be heard, may appear in person or by counsel, at your own expense, at the Settlement Hearing and show cause why the settlement should not be approved; provided, however, that no person other than Plaintiff s Counsel and Defendants counsel shall be heard and no papers, briefs, pleadings or other documents submitted by any person shall be considered by the Court unless not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing such person files with the Court and serves upon counsel listed below: (a) a written notice of intention to appear; (b) proof of Class membership; (c) a detailed statement of all of such person s objections to any matters before the Court; and (d) the grounds therefore or the reason that such person desires to appear and be heard, as well as all documents or writings such persons desires the Court to consider. Mail the objections to the following six different places such that it is postmarked by September 12, 2008. Clerk of the Court Ellen Gusikoff Stewart COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER KENTON CIRCUIT COURT RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP DIVISION 1 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 Kenton County Justice Center San Diego, CA 92101-3301 230 Madison Avenue Covington, KY 41011 Counsel for Plaintiff Eric S. Waxman James E. Burke SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, KEATING, MUETHING MEAGHER & FLOM LLP & KLEKAMP 300 South Grand Avenue One East Fourth Street Suite 3400 Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Mark Vander Laan Michael J. Biles DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, 1900 Chemed Center HAUER & FELD, L.L.P. 255 E. Fifth Street 300 W. Sixth Street, Suite 2100 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Austin, TX 78701 Counsel for Defendants Unless the Court otherwise directs, no person shall be entitled to object to the approval of the settlement, or otherwise be heard, except by serving and filing a written objection and supporting papers and documents as described above. Any person who fails to object in the manner described above shall be deemed to have waived the right to object (including any right of appeal) and shall be forever barred from raising such objection or otherwise contesting the settlement in this or any other action or proceeding. 5

10. When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a fairness hearing at 1:30 p.m., on October 13, 2008, at the Kenton Circuit Court of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kenton County Justice Center, 230 Madison Avenue, Covington, Kentucky. At this hearing the Court will consider whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. The Court will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing. The Court may decide these issues at the hearing or take them under consideration. We do not know how long the Court s decision will take. The Court has reserved the right to adjourn or continue the fairness hearing without further notice to you. 11. Do I Have to Come to the Hearing? No. Plaintiff s Settlement Counsel will answer questions the Court may have, but, you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you don t have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you submitted your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE CLASS You may request to be excluded from the Class. To do so, you must mail a written request to the Notice Administrator at: Eagle Hospitality Shareholder Litigation - Exclusions, c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC, P.O. Box 9014, Jericho, NY 11753-8914. The request for exclusion must state: (a) your name, address and telephone number; (b) the number of shares of Eagle common stock owned on any date from February 28, 2007, to and including August 15, 2007; and (c) that you wish to be excluded from the Class. TO BE VALID, A REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION MUST STATE ALL OF THE FOREGOING INFORMATION, AND BE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE September 12, 2008. If you submit a valid and timely request for exclusion, you will have no rights under the settlement, and shall not be bound by the Stipulation or the Judgment. 12. Are There More Details About the Settlement? GETTING MORE INFORMATION This Notice summarizes the proposed settlement. This summary is qualified by, and subject to, the detailed terms of the Stipulation together with its Exhibits entered into as of March 24, 2008. You can get a copy of the Stipulation during business hours at the Clerk of the Court, Kenton Circuit Court of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kenton County Justice Center, 230 Madison Avenue, Covington, Kentucky 41011; or by writing to Rick Nelson, c/o Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101. 13. How Do I Get More Information? You can call (619) 231-1058 or write to Rick Nelson, c/o Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101. 6

SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES If you held any Eagle common stock on any date from February 28, 2007, to and including August 15, 2007 as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) calendar days after you receive this Notice, you must either: (a) send a copy of this Notice by first class mail to all such persons or entities; or (b) provide a list of the names and addresses of such persons or entities to the Notice Administrator at: Eagle Hospitality Shareholder Litigation c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY 11753-8914 Phone: (800) 766-3330 Fax: (516) 931-0810 Website: www.berdonclaims.com If you choose to mail the Notice yourself, you may obtain from the Notice Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for reasonable administrative costs actually incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice, after submission of appropriate documentation to the Notice Administrator. DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE Dated: June 23, 2008 BY ORDER OF THE COURT COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY KENTON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION I 7