IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Similar documents
Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[Proposedi Order Granting Motion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/22/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2015

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Case 2:17-cv JS Document 59 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

EXHIBIT 1

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv PAC Document 94 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case: 1:06-cv Document #: 771 Filed: 03/15/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:28511

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Transcription:

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 457 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ELIZABETH MOELLER and NICOLE BRISSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 16-cv-11367 Hon. Judith E. Levy v. Plaintiffs, AMERICAN MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, and ODYSSEY MAGAZINE PUBLISHING GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS, APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, APPOINTING CLASS COUNSEL, AND APPROVING NOTICE PLAN WHEREAS, a class action is pending before the Court entitled Moeller el al. v. American Media, Inc. et al., No. 2:16-cv-11367-JEL- EAS; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Elizabeth Moeller and Nicole Brisson and Defendants American Media, Inc. and Odyssey Magazine Publishing Group, Inc. have entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement, which, together with the exhibits attached thereto, sets forth the terms 1

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 2 of 15 Pg ID 458 and conditions for a proposed settlement and dismissal of the Action with prejudice as to Defendants upon the terms and conditions set forth therein (the Settlement Agreement ), and the Court having read and considered the Settlement Agreement and exhibits attached to; This matter coming before the Court upon the agreement of the parties, good cause being shown, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, DECREED, AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Terms and phrases in this Order shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement. 2. The Parties have moved the Court for an order approving the settlement of the Action in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, which, together with the documents incorporated therein, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement and dismissal of the Action with prejudice, and the Court having read and considered the Settlement Agreement and having heard the parties and being fully advised in the premises, hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement in its entirety subject to the Final Approval 2

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 3 of 15 Pg ID 459 Hearing referred to in paragraph 20 of this Order. 3. This Court finds that it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over all Parties to the Action. 4. The Court finds that, subject to the Final Approval Hearing, the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, within the range of possible approval, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class set forth below. The Court further finds that the Settlement Agreement substantially fulfills the purposes and objectives of the class action, and provides substantial relief to the Settlement Class without the risks, burdens, costs, or delay associated with continued litigation, trial, and/or appeal. The Court also finds that the Settlement Agreement (a) is the result of arm s-length negotiations between experienced class action attorneys; (b) is sufficient to warrant notice of the settlement and the Final Approval Hearing to be disseminated to the Settlement Class; (c) meets all applicable requirements of law, including Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the Class Action Fairness Act ( CAFA ), 28 U.S.C. 1715; and (d) is not a finding or admission of liability by the Defendants or any other parties. Certification of the Settlement Class 3

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 4 of 15 Pg ID 460 5. For purposes of settlement only: (a) Jay Edelson of Edelson PC and Scott A. Bursor of Bursor & Fisher, P.A. are appointed Class Counsel for the Settlement Class; and (b) Elizabeth Moeller and Nicole Brisson are named Class Representatives. The Court finds that these attorneys are competent and capable of exercising the responsibilities of Class Counsel and that Plaintiffs Moeller and Brisson will adequately protect the interests of the Settlement Class defined below. 6. For purposes of settlement only, the Court conditionally certifies the following Settlement Class as defined in the Settlement Agreement: [T]he approximately 415,000 Persons with Michigan street addresses who purchased a subscription to an AMI Publication to be delivered to that Michigan street address between April 14, 2010 and July 31, 2016. 7. The Court finds, subject to the Final Approval Hearing referred to in Paragraph 20 below, that the Settlement Agreement is fundamentally fair, adequate, and reasonable, and, solely within the context of and for the purposes of settlement only, that the Settlement Class satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically, that: the Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; there are questions of fact and 4

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 5 of 15 Pg ID 461 law common to the Settlement Class (e,g., whether Defendants obtained consent before disclosing to third parties Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class s Subscriber Information, whether Defendants disclosure of Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members Magazine Subscriber Information violated the Michigan Video Rental Privacy Act, M.C.L. 445.1712, et al. ( VRPA ), and whether Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class members are entitled to uniform statutory damages under the VRPA); the claims of the Class Representatives are typical of the claims of the members of the Settlement Class; the Class Representatives and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the Settlement Class; common questions of law or fact predominate over questions affecting individual members; and a class action is a superior method for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the Action. 8. Should the Settlement Agreement not receive the Court s final approval, should final approval be reversed on appeal, or should the Settlement Agreement otherwise fail to become effective, the Court s grant of class certification shall be vacated, and the Class Representatives and the Settlement Class would once again bear the 5

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 6 of 15 Pg ID 462 burden of establishing the propriety of class certification. In such case, neither the certification of the Settlement Class for settlement purposes, nor any other act relating to the negotiation or execution of the Settlement Agreement shall be considered as a factor in connection with any class certification issue(s). Notice and Administration 9. The Court approves, as to form, content, and distribution, the Claim Form attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A, the Notice Plan and all forms of Notice to the Settlement Class as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Exhibits B, C, and D thereto, and finds that such Notice is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and that the Notice complies fully with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court also finds that the Notice constitutes valid, due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto, and meets the requirements of Due Process. The Court further finds that the Notice is reasonably calculated to, under all circumstances, reasonably apprise members of the Settlement Class of the pendency of this action, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the right to object to the settlement and to exclude themselves from the 6

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 7 of 15 Pg ID 463 Settlement Class. In addition, the Court finds that no notice other than that specifically identified in the Settlement Agreement is necessary in this Action. The parties, by agreement, may revise the Notice and Claim Form in ways that are not material, or in ways that are appropriate to update those documents for purposes of accuracy or formatting for publication. 10. The Court approves the request for the appointment of Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC as Settlement Administrator of the Settlement Agreement. 11. Pursuant to paragraph 4.1 of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Administrator is directed to publish the Notice and Claim Form on the Settlement Website and to send direct notice via U.S. Mail and email in accordance with the Notice Plan called for by the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Administrator shall also maintain the Settlement Website to provide full information about the Settlement and allow for the filing of claims online. Exclusion 12. Members of the Class who wish to receive benefits under the Settlement Agreement must complete and submit their Claim Form(s) 7

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 8 of 15 Pg ID 464 in accordance with the instructions contained therein. All Claim Forms must be postmarked or received by the Settlement Administrator within forty-five (45) days after the date of the entry of the Final Judgment. 13. Members of the Settlement Class who wish to exclude themselves from the Class may do so if, on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline of August 14, 2017 they comply with the exclusion procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice. Any members of the Class so excluded shall neither be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement nor entitled to any of its benefits. 14. Any members of the Settlement Class who elect to exclude themselves or opt out of the Settlement Agreement must file a written request with the Settlement Administrator, received or postmarked no later than the Objection/Exclusion Deadline. The request for exclusion must comply with the exclusion procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice and include the Settlement Class member s name and address, the name of the American Media, Inc. and/or Odyssey Magazine Publishing Group, Inc. publication to which he or she is a subscriber, a signature, the name and number of the case, and a 8

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 9 of 15 Pg ID 465 statement that he or she wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class for the purposes of this Settlement. So called mass or class opt-outs shall not be allowed. 15. Members of the Settlement Class who opt out of the Settlement Agreement will relinquish their rights to benefits under the Settlement Agreement and will not release their claims. However, members of the Settlement Class who fail to submit a valid and timely request for exclusion shall be bound by all terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Final Judgment, regardless of whether they have requested exclusion from the Settlement Agreement. Objections 16. Any members of the Settlement Class who have not timely filed a request for exclusion may object to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the Settlement Agreement or to a Final Judgment being entered dismissing the Action with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, or to the attorneys fees and expense reimbursement sought by Class Counsel in the amounts specified in the Notice, or to the award to the Class Representatives as set forth in the Notice and Settlement Agreement. At least fourteen (14) 9

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 10 of 15 Pg ID 466 days prior to the Objection/Exclusion Deadline, papers supporting the Fee Award shall be filed with the court and posted to the settlement website. Members of the Class may object on their own, or may do so through separate counsel at their own expense. 17. To object, members of the Class must sign and file a written objection no later than on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline of August 14, 2017. To be valid, the objection must comply with the objection procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice, and include his or her name and address; an explanation of the basis upon which he or she claims to be a Settlement Class Member, including the American Media, Inc. and/or Odyssey Magazine Publishing Group, Inc. publication to which he or she is or was a subscriber; a signature; all grounds for the objection, including all citations to legal authority and evidence supporting the objection; the name and contact information of any and all attorneys representing, advising, or in any way assisting him or her in connection with the preparation or submission of the objection or who may profit from the pursuit of the objection (the Objecting Attorneys ); and a statement indicating whether he or she intends to appear at the Final Approval 10

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 11 of 15 Pg ID 467 Hearing (either personally or through counsel who files an appearance with the Court in accordance with Eastern District of Michigan Local Rules). If a Settlement Class Member or any of the Objecting Attorneys has objected to any class action settlement where the objector or the Objecting Attorneys asked for or received any payment in exchange for dismissal of the objection, or any related appeal, without any modification to the settlement, then the objection must include a statement identifying each such case by full case caption. 18. Members of the Class who fail to file and serve timely written objections in compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and the Settlement Agreement shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from making any objections (whether by appeal or otherwise) to the Settlement Agreement or to any of the subjects listed in paragraph 20, below. 19. To be valid, objections must be filed with the Court and sent to the following: Class Counsel Jay Edelson of Edelson PC, 350 North LaSalle, 13th Floor, Chicago, IL 60654; Class Counsel Scott A. Bursor of Bursor & Fisher, P.A., 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019; and Defendants American Media, Inc. and and/or Odyssey Magazine 11

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 12 of 15 Pg ID 468 Publishing Group, Inc. s Counsel Jacob Sommer of Zwillgen, PLLC, 1900 M St. SW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20036. In addition, any objections made by a Class member represented by counsel must be filed through the Court s CM/ECF system. Final Approval Hearing 20. The Final Approval Hearing shall be held before this Court on September 6, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 100 at the Federal Building, 200 E. Liberty Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan to determine (a) whether the proposed settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be given final approval by the Court; (b) whether a judgment and order of dismissal with prejudice should be entered; (c) whether to approve the payment of attorneys fees and expenses to Class Counsel; and (d) whether to approve the payment of an incentive award to the Class Representatives. The Court may adjourn the Final Approval Hearing without further notice to members of the Settlement Class. 21. Class Counsel shall file papers in support of their Fee Award and Class Representatives Incentive Awards (collectively, the Fee 12

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 13 of 15 Pg ID 469 Petition ) with the Court on or before July 31, 2017. Defendants may, but are not required to, file a response to Class Counsel s Fee Petition with the Court on or before August 16, 2017. Class Counsel may file a reply in support of their Fee Petition with the Court on or before August 23, 2017. 22. Papers in support of final approval of the Settlement Agreement and any supplementation to the Fee Petition shall be filed with the Court on or before August 23, 2017. Further Matters 22. All further proceedings in the Action are ordered stayed until Final Judgment or termination of the Settlement Agreement, whichever occurs earlier, except for those matters necessary to obtain and/or effectuate final approval of the Settlement Agreement. 23. Members of the Settlement Class shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Action concerning the Action and/or Settlement Agreement, whether favorable or unfavorable. 24. If the Settlement Agreement is not approved by the Court in complete accordance with its terms, each party will have the option of having the Action revert to its status as if the Settlement Agreement 13

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 14 of 15 Pg ID 470 had not been negotiated, made, or filed with the Court. In such event, the parties will retain all rights as if the Settlement Agreement was never agreed upon. 25. In the event that the Settlement Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions of the Settlement Agreement or for any reason whatsoever the approval of it does not become Final then (i) the Settlement Agreement shall be null and void, including any provision related to the award of attorneys fees, and shall have no further force and effect with respect to any party in this Action, and shall not be used in this Action or in any other proceeding for any purpose; (ii) all negotiations, proceedings, documents prepared, and statements made in connection therewith shall be without prejudice to any person or party hereto, shall not be deemed or construed to be an admission by any party of any act, matter, or proposition, and shall not be used in any manner or for any purpose in any subsequent proceeding in this Action or in any other action in any court or other proceeding, provided, however, that the termination of the Settlement Agreement shall not shield from subsequent discovery any factual information provided in connection with the negotiation of this Settlement Agreement that 14

5:16-cv-11367-JEL-EAS Doc # 34 Filed 06/08/17 Pg 15 of 15 Pg ID 471 would ordinarily be discoverable but for the attempted settlement; (iii) other than as expressly preserved by the Settlement Agreement in the event of its termination, the Settlement Agreement shall have no further force and effect with respect to any party and shall not be used in the Action or any other proceeding for any purpose; and (iv) any party may elect to move the Court pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, and none of the non-moving parties (or their counsel) shall oppose any such motion. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of June, 2017. Entered: s/judith E. Levy The Honorable Judith E. Levy United States District Judge 15