UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Similar documents
)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/ :57 AM INDEX NO /2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~ NOV - FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS~i.~ SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Courthouse News Service

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:11-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 2:17-cv JS-GRB Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/02/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015. Exhibit A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/14/ :30 PM

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, THERESA CHASE, Plaintiff, Plaintiff-Intervenor, CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-CV-1091 (GLS/RFT) Vo WHITE HOUSE HOME FOR ADULTS, and RONALD HERTZEL, individually, Defendants. AMENDED INTERVENOR S COMPLAINT This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and the New York State Executive Law, 290, et. se q:.,, to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex and retaliation, and to provide appropriate relief to Theresa Chase (hereinafter "Plaintiff-Intervenor") and similar situated female employees (hereinafter "the class"), who were affected by such practices. As alleged with greater particularity below, defendants White House Home for Adults (hereinafter "White House") and Ronal Hertzel ("Hertzel") subjected Plaintiff-Intervenor and the class of female employees to repeated sexual harassment and unlawful retaliation. In addition, defendants constructively discharged Plaintiff-Intervenor and similarly situated female employees when it failed to remedy the sexually hostile and retaliatory work environment.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1337, 1343, and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) ("Title VII") and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981A. 2. Defendant White House regularly does business within the Northern District of New York and venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391. PARTIES Plaintiff-Intervenor Theresa Chase resides in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York. 4. Defendant White House is a New York corporation doing business in the State of New York, Rensselaer County, and has continuously had at least fifteen employees. 5. At all relevant times, defendant White House has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701 (b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(b), (g) and (h). 6. Upon information and belief, at all times herein relevant, defendant Hertzel resided in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 7. Theresa Chase filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter "EEOC") on January 29, 2003, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by defendant White House. The EEOC filed a Complaint on the basis of this charge on or about September 20, 2004. Defendant White House filed an Answer to the EEOC s Complaint on or about October 28, 2004. 2

AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 8. Plaintiff-Intervenor was employed as a nurses aide for defendant White House from October 2000 to December 2001, when she was promoted to Assistant Administrator. Ms. Chase remained an Assistant Administrator until her employment ended on May 24, 2002. 9. Throughout the duration of Ms. Chase s employment, defendant White House engaged in unlawful employment practices at its facility in Rensselaer, New York, in violation of Section 703(a)(1), of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These practices include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Defendant Hertzel, the owner of defendant White House, subjected Ms. Chase to repeated and persistent crude and vulgar sexual statements about her, other employees, Mr. Hertzel s girlfriend, residents of the home, and visitors to the home. In addition, Mr. Hertzel routinely made sexual references about food, and directed crude sexual gestures to Ms. Chase and her colleagues in the workplace. b. Mr. Hertzel s offensive and sexually explicit behavior was unwanted and unwelcomed by Ms. Chase and her colleagues in the workplace. c. Although Ms. Chase complained about Mr. Hertzel s behavior to the White House Administrator, defendant made no efforts reasonably calculated to prevent or eradicate the conduct, and Mr. Hertzel s behavior persisted unremedied. d. Beginning immediately after Ms. Chase s f mal complaint about Mr. Hertzel s behavior, Mr. Hertzel acted in an angry and abrupt manner toward her, and did not stop his crude and offensive sexual remarks. On or about May 20, 2002, while Ms. Chase was alone in the office, defendant Hertzel took a gun out of his pants, slammed it on her desk and asked her 3

in a threatening tone whether she was scared. As a result, Ms. Chase feared for her physical safety and well-being in the presence of defendant Hertzel. e. As a result of Mr. Hertzel s crude and vulgar sexual behavior, Hertzel s physically threatening conduct, and defendant White House s refusal to appropriately address it, the employment conditions at the White House Home for Adults became so intolerable that Ms. Chase was forced to resign from her position. 10. The harassing and discriminatory employment practices complained of above have deprived Ms. Chase of equal employment opportunity, caused her to suffer emotional pain and suffering, and caused her to suffer financial losses. 11. The harassing and discriminatory employment practices complained of in paragraph 8 above were intentional. 12. The harassing and discriminatory employment practices complained of in paragraph 8 above were done with malice and/or with reckless indifference to Ms. Chase s federally protected rights, and are imputable to the Defendant. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 13. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 12 as though set forth in full herein. 14. By its actions herein alleged, defendant White House has retaliated against Ms. Chase in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3(a). 15. As a result of this retaliatory conduct, Ms. Chase has suffered emotional trauma and physical consequences, and is entitled to an award of compensatory damages from defendant White House. 4

16. Because the retaliatory conduct of defendant White House was malicious and/or done with reckless indifference to Ms. Chase s federally-protected rights, Ms. Chase is entitled to an award of punitive damages against defendant White House. AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSEO F ACTION 17. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 16 as though set forth in full herein. 18. By their actions herein alleged, defendants White House and Hertzel have harassed and discriminated against Ms. Chase on the basis of her sex in violation of New York State Executive Law 296. 19. As a result of the deprivation of Ms. Chase s rights, she has suffered emotional trauma and physical consequences and is entitled to compensatory damages from defendants. AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION 20. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 19 as though set forth in full herein. 21. By their actions herein alleged, defendants White House and Hertzel have retaliated against Ms. Chase in violation of New York State Executive Law 296. 22. As a result of the deprivation of Ms. Chase s rights, she has suffered emotional trauma and physical consequences and is entitled to compensatory damages from defendants. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff-Intervenor respectfully requests that this Court: A. Order defendants to make Theresa Chase whole by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described 5

above, including but not limited to, appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest and job search expenses, in amounts to be determined at trial. B. Order defendants to make Theresa Chase whole by providing compensation for past and future non-pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described above, including, but not limited to, emotional pain and suffering in amounts to be determined at trial. C. Order defendant White House to pay Theresa Chase punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described above, in amounts to be determined at trial. D. Award Theresa Chase her reasonable attorneys fees and costs. E. Grant Ms. Chase such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper. JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiff-Intervenor Theresa Chase requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by her Complaint. Dated: February ~ ~, 2005 Respectfully submitted, Theresa Chase PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR By her attorney, "L isa-~.joslin, Esq. i Deily, Mooney and Glastetter, LLP 8 Thurlow Terrace Albany, New York 12203 Tel: (518) 436-0344 6

VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS: COUNTY OF ALBANY ) THERESA CHASE, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is the Plaintiff named in the within action; that she has read the foregoing Verified Complaint and knows the contents thereof; and that the same is true to her own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters she believes it to be true. THERESA CHASE Sworn to before me this day of February, 2005. ~ot~ y~~u~york 23206-001 -verif-client LI$~, E JOSLIN Notary Public, State ot New York. Oualilied in Albany County No. 02J06002753 Commission Expires Fel~. 17, 20 440988