The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing,

Similar documents
Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

The Changing Face of Labor,

Recent Job Loss Hits the African- American Middle Class Hard

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

Job Displacement Over the Business Cycle,

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2011: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

Asian American and Pacific Islander Workers Today

Patrick Adler and Chris Tilly Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UCLA. Ben Zipperer University of Massachusetts, Amherst

The State of. Working Wisconsin. Update September Center on Wisconsin Strategy

Suggested Citation: Howell, David R. and Diallo, Mamadou. (2007)

REPORT. Third Anniversary of the Recovery Shows Job Growth for Women Slowed by Public Sector Job Losses. (July 2012)

8. United States of America

Government data show that since 2000 all of the net gain in the number of working-age (16 to 65) people

EPI BRIEFING PAPER. Immigration and Wages Methodological advancements confirm modest gains for native workers. Executive summary

Demographic Data. Comprehensive Plan

Globalization: It Doesn t Just Happen

Youth Voter Turnout has Declined, by Any Measure By Peter Levine and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 September 2002

How Have Hispanics Fared in the Jobless Recovery?

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

Persistent Inequality

Union Members and Gainful Workers in Los Angeles, 1930 to 1950

FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE

Deconstructing Structural Unemployment

8.1 Trends in Agency Assisted Employment: Galway 1

Deconstructing Structural Unemployment

FAVORABLE RATINGS OF LABOR UNIONS FALL SHARPLY

The Hispanic white wage gap has remained wide and relatively steady

Working women have won enormous progress in breaking through long-standing educational and

Real Wage Trends, 1979 to 2017

LEFT BEHIND: WORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES IN A CHANGING LOS ANGELES. Revised September 27, A Publication of the California Budget Project

Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests

Population Growth in Lackawanna & Luzerne Counties

Part 1: Focus on Income. Inequality. EMBARGOED until 5/28/14. indicator definitions and Rankings

Where have all the Wages Gone?

Understanding Racial Disparities in Unemployment Rates

Inequality in the Labor Market for Native American Women and the Great Recession

Policy brief ARE WE RECOVERING YET? JOBS AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA OVER THE PERIOD ARINDRAJIT DUBE, PH.D. Executive Summary AUGUST 31, 2005

Growing Number Sees U.S. Divided Between Haves and Have-Nots KATRINA RELIEF EFFORT RAISES CONCERN OVER EXCESSIVE SPENDING, WASTE

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: Union Membership In The United States

State and Local Law Enforcement Personnel in Alaska:

REPORT TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND ON LAW ELIGIBLE TRAFFIC STOPS

Who is Leaving the Food Stamp Program? An Analysis of Caseload Changes from 1994 to 1997

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2007: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

Demographic, Social, and Economic Trends for Young Children in California

Why growth matters: How India s growth acceleration has reduced poverty

Structural changes with new challenges

THE COLOR OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP Why the Racial Gap among Firms Costs the U.S. Billions

Unemployment Rises Sharply Among Latino Immigrants in 2008

Detroit's population drops 25% to lowest since 1910 as a growing number of black people leave major U.S. cities

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

Michelle Obama Coverage Seen as Positive PUBLIC CLOSELY TRACKING OBAMA TRANSITION

The State of Working Connecticut 2011: Wages, Job Sector Changes, and the Great Recession

Peruvians in the United States

Over the past three decades, the share of middle-skill jobs in the

Characteristics of Poverty in Minnesota

Economic Contribution of the Culture Sector in Ontario

Low-Skill Jobs A Shrinking Share of the Rural Economy

A Progressive Agenda for Inclusive and Diverse Entrepreneurship

Judicial Nominations and Confirmations after Three Years Where Do Things Stand?


Meanwhile, the foreign-born population accounted for the remaining 39 percent of the decline in household growth in

Second Anniversary of the Recovery Shows No Job Growth for Women (July 2011)

Financial Crisis. How Firms in Eastern and Central Europe Fared through the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence from

INEQUALITY IN NEW YORK CITY

Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, this study first recreates the Bureau s most recent population

Labor Market Dropouts and Trends in the Wages of Black and White Men

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METROPOLITAN CONTEXTS: ANNIE E. CASEY FOUNDATION CITIES

Non-Voted Ballots and Discrimination in Florida

WILLIAMSON STATE OF THE COUNTY Capital Area Council of Governments

Private Sector Commission

AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS 2016

SUMMARY LABOUR MARKET CONDITIONS !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! POPULATION AND LABOUR FORCE. UNRWA PO Box Sheikh Jarrah East Jerusalem

Trends in inequality worldwide (Gini coefficients)

The Dynamics of Low Wage Work in Metropolitan America. October 10, For Discussion only

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

Current Trends in Juvenile Incarceration. Presented by Barry Krisberg April 25, 2012

Poverty data should be a Louisiana wake-up call

Changes in Wage Inequality in Canada: An Interprovincial Perspective

The Role of the Rising American Electorate in the 2012 Election

Original data on policy leaders appointed

Growth in the Foreign-Born Workforce and Employment of the Native Born

Research note on different methods of estimating retention rates of immigrants using the Longitudinal Immigration Database (IMDB) 2014

Human Population Growth Through Time

BLACK-WHITE BENCHMARKS FOR THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH

CITY OF TUSTIN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET NO. 6

The migration ^ immigration link in Canada's gateway cities: a comparative study of Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver

Promoting Work in Public Housing

THE TRUMP SLUMP IN TOURISM

Latino Workers in the Ongoing Recession: 2007 to 2008

Public Tunes Out Press Coverage of McCain INTEREST IN GAS PRICES REMAINS HIGH

Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force

Immigrants are playing an increasingly

The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers. Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, May 2015.

Evaluating the Role of Immigration in U.S. Population Projections

Recent Trends in Ethnic and Racial Business Ownership

Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit

States of Change. Demographic Change, Representation Gaps, and Challenges to Democracy,

Transcription:

BRIEFING PAPER January 2006 The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 BY JOHN SCHMITT AND BEN ZIPPERER Summary Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20009 tel: 202-293-5380 fax:: 202-588-1356 www.cepr.net Between 1983 and 2004, the share of African-American workers who were either members of a union or represented by a union at their place of employment fell substantially, from 31.7 percent of all black workers in 1983 to 16.6 percent in 2004. In 2004, African-Americans were still more likely to be in a union (16.6 percent) than whites (13.9) and Hispanics (11.4 percent). Nevertheless, the decline in union membership for black workers between 1983 and 2004 was sharper for blacks (down 15.1 percentage points) than it was for whites (down 8.3 percentage points) and Hispanics (down 12.8 percentage points). (See Table 1.) Between 1979 and 2004, the share of African Americans working in manufacturing declined from 23.9 percent in 1979 to 10.6 percent in 2004. Whites saw slightly smaller declines (from 23.5 percent to 12.1 percent), while Hispanics experienced a bigger drop off (from 30.2 percent to 13.7 percent). (See Table 2.) Between 1979 and 2004, the share of workers in auto manufacturing dropped for blacks, whites, and Hispanics. Blacks suffered the biggest declines a 0.8 percentage-point decline, from 2.1 percentage points in 1979 to 1.3 percentage points in 2004-- compared to a 0.2 percentage point drop for whites and Hispanics. (See Table 3.) Throughout the entire 1983-2004 period, black workers have represented 13-15 percent of all union workers. Over the same period, the share of whites in the total union workforce fell from 78.1 percent to 70.1 percent, and the share of Hispanics rose from 5.8 percent to 11.0 percent of all union workers. (See Table 4.) Throughout the entire period from 1979 to 2004, the share of African-American workers in the total manufacturing workforce hovered around 10 percent. Meanwhile, the share of white workers fell from 82.1 percent of all manufacturing workers in 1979 to 69.5 percent in 2004. Hispanics (and other John Schmitt is an Economist and Ben Zipperer is a Research Assistant at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. CEPR thanks the Rockefeller Foundation for its financial support.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 2 workers) increased their representation in the manufacturing workforce over the same period (up from 6.1 percent of manufacturing jobs in 1979 to 14.6 percent in 2004, for Hispanics). (See Table 5.) In 2004, blacks made up 14.5 percent of the auto manufacturing workforce; whites were 73.3 percent; Hispanics, 7.5 percent. Between 1979 and 2004, the share of blacks and whites in the total auto manufacturing workforce both fell. The share of Hispanic and other workers, meanwhile, increased, although remained at relatively low levels. (See Table 6.) Interpreting the preceding changes in the distribution of African-American employment and unionization rates can be complicated since the share of African Americans and other racial and ethnic groups in the total workforce has changed over time. Tables 8, 9, and 10 show the "relative representation" of whites, blacks, and Hispanics in the total union workforce (Table 8), the total manufacturing workforce (Table 9), and the auto manufacturing workforce (Table 10). The simplest way to explain the calculation is with an example. To calculate the relative representation of African Americans in the share of all union workers, we take the ratio of the share of African Americans in all union workers (13.5 percent in 2004, in Table 4) to the share of African Americans in the total workforce (10.6 percent in 2004, in Table 7). The resulting ratio is 1.27, which is greater than 1, indicates that African Americans are "over-represented" among union workers since there is a larger share of African Americans in unions than there is in the workforce as a whole. In the same year, Hispanics made up 11.0 percent of union workers, but 12.9 percent of the total workforce, resulting in a relative representation of 0.85, which is less than 1, indicating that Hispanics are "under-represented" among union workers. If a group has the same share of workers in unions as they do in the total workforce, then the ratio for relative representation would equal one (which is close to the rate for whites in 2004, 0.99). In 2004, African-American workers were "over-represented" in unions (Table 8) and in auto manufacturing (Table 10), but are actually "under-represented" in manufacturing as a whole (Table 9). The relative representation of African Americans has been steadily declining in unions (Table 8), manufacturing (from the mid-1990s, Table 9), and auto manufacturing (Table 10). From the mid- 1990s on, black workers have actually been under-represented in manufacturing, relative to the rest of the economy (Table 9). Meanwhile, white workers have held their ground in manufacturing (Table 9), and have actually increased their relative representation in unions (Table 8) and auto manufacturing (Table 10).

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 3 Data Appendix All data are from the CEPR uniform extracts of the Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group. For full details, see http://www.ceprdata.org/.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 4 TABLE 1 Share of workers in unions, by race or ethnicity, 1983-2004 1979 -- -- -- 1980 -- -- -- 1981 -- -- -- 1982 -- -- -- 1983 31.7 22.2 24.2 1984 29.2 20.5 22.8 1985 27.3 19.5 21.3 1986 26.6 19.0 20.0 1987 25.3 18.4 19.1 1988 25.9 18.1 17.8 1989 25.2 17.8 16.9 1990 24.2 17.7 16.5 1991 24.1 17.4 17.6 1992 24.0 17.1 16.9 1993 23.6 17.1 16.6 1994 22.9 16.8 15.9 1995 22.2 16.1 14.8 1996 21.2 15.8 14.6 1997 20.1 15.4 13.5 1998 19.7 15.1 13.2 1999 19.2 15.1 13.1 2000 18.9 14.7 12.8 2001 18.7 14.7 12.5 2002 18.8 14.4 12.0 2003 18.2 14.2 12.0 2004 16.6 13.9 11.4 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group. Union workers are either members of a union or covered by a collective-bargaining agreement.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 5 TABLE 2 Share of workers in manufacturing, by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 (percent) 1979 23.9 23.5 30.2 1980 22.8 22.9 28.9 1981 22.8 22.5 28.5 1982 20.8 21.2 26.7 1983 20.6 20.5 23.8 1984 21.2 20.7 24.4 1985 20.2 20.1 25.3 1986 19.9 19.7 24.0 1987 19.3 19.1 23.0 1988 18.7 19.0 22.1 1989 18.5 18.8 22.0 1990 18.4 18.4 21.7 1991 18.1 17.9 20.3 1992 17.7 17.3 19.8 1993 16.5 16.8 19.4 1994 16.2 16.8 19.3 1995 16.2 16.8 19.2 1996 16.0 16.5 18.1 1997 15.6 16.2 18.6 1998 14.9 16.0 17.7 1999 14.5 15.4 16.9 2000 13.6 15.0 17.1 2001 12.5 14.3 16.4 2002 12.0 13.5 14.8 2003 10.9 12.5 14.0 2004 10.6 12.1 13.7 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 6 TABLE 3 Share of workers in auto manufacturing, by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 (percent) 1979 2.1 1.3 0.8 1980 1.3 1.0 0.6 1981 1.5 1.0 0.5 1982 1.2 0.8 0.4 1983 1.5 1.0 0.6 1984 1.9 1.1 0.8 1985 1.6 1.1 0.8 1986 1.7 1.1 0.8 1987 1.3 1.0 0.9 1988 1.5 1.0 0.7 1989 1.5 1.0 0.6 1990 1.3 1.0 0.6 1991 1.2 0.9 0.6 1992 1.3 1.0 0.6 1993 1.2 1.0 0.6 1994 1.4 1.0 0.6 1995 1.2 1.0 0.6 1996 1.4 1.0 0.5 1997 1.5 1.0 0.5 1998 1.2 1.0 0.7 1999 1.3 1.0 0.5 2000 1.3 1.0 0.5 2001 1.1 0.9 0.5 2002 1.1 0.9 0.5 2003 1.3 1.1 0.5 2004 1.3 1.1 0.6 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group. Auto workers defined as those in "Motor Vehicle and Equipment Manufacturing."

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 7 TABLE 4 Distribution of union workers by race or ethnicity, 1983-2004 (percent) Share of union workers who are: 1979 -- -- -- 1980 -- -- -- 1981 -- -- -- 1982 -- -- -- 1983 13.7 78.1 5.8 1984 14.1 77.3 6.1 1985 14.1 76.5 6.9 1986 14.1 76.2 6.9 1987 14.2 75.8 7.2 1988 14.8 75.2 7.1 1989 14.9 75.2 6.9 1990 14.3 75.6 7.1 1991 14.4 74.7 7.7 1992 14.6 74.6 7.6 1993 14.6 74.9 7.7 1994 14.7 73.6 8.4 1995 15.1 73.5 8.4 1996 14.7 73.1 8.7 1997 14.6 72.8 8.9 1998 14.9 72.2 9.1 1999 14.7 72.1 9.3 2000 14.9 71.5 9.7 2001 14.7 71.6 9.7 2002 14.9 71.4 9.5 2003 14.4 69.3 11.1 2004 13.5 70.1 11.0 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group. Union workers are either members of a union or covered by a collective-bargaining agreement.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 8 TABLE 5 Distribution of manufacturing workers by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 (percent) Share of manufacturing workers who are: 1979 9.9 82.1 6.1 1980 9.9 81.5 6.5 1981 10.0 81.0 6.8 1982 10.0 81.1 6.7 1983 10.2 80.9 6.2 1984 10.2 80.6 6.5 1985 10.1 79.2 8.0 1986 10.2 78.8 8.2 1987 10.3 78.2 8.3 1988 10.3 78.3 8.5 1989 10.2 78.0 8.7 1990 10.5 77.6 8.9 1991 10.5 77.3 8.9 1992 10.7 76.8 9.1 1993 10.4 76.9 9.3 1994 10.2 75.9 10.5 1995 10.4 76.0 10.5 1996 10.5 74.7 10.3 1997 10.5 73.2 11.4 1998 10.4 73.5 11.3 1999 10.6 73.2 11.4 2000 10.2 72.4 12.3 2001 9.9 72.4 12.4 2002 10.2 72.2 12.4 2003 9.7 69.5 14.2 2004 9.7 69.5 14.6 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 9 TABLE 6 Distribution of auto workers by race or ethnicity (percent) Share of motor vehicle workers who are: 1979 17.0 79.4 2.9 1980 15.4 80.6 3.1 1981 15.4 80.4 3.2 1982 16.5 79.9 2.7 1983 16.6 78.6 3.5 1984 15.9 79.2 3.6 1985 14.3 80.2 4.2 1986 15.2 78.9 4.6 1987 14.0 78.7 5.7 1988 14.5 79.1 5.0 1989 15.9 78.8 3.8 1990 14.2 79.9 4.4 1991 13.6 79.9 4.9 1992 14.0 79.7 4.8 1993 13.5 79.7 5.1 1994 14.3 77.2 5.6 1995 13.0 79.3 5.8 1996 15.0 76.8 4.7 1997 15.9 76.0 4.7 1998 14.0 75.4 7.2 1999 14.6 76.7 6.0 2000 15.1 76.4 5.7 2001 15.3 75.1 6.0 2002 14.3 75.5 6.3 2003 14.5 74.8 6.5 2004 14.5 73.3 7.5 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group. Auto workers defined as those in "Motor Vehicle and Equipment Manufacturing."

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 10 TABLE 7 Distribution of total workforce by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 (percent) Share of all workers who are: 1979 9.4 83.7 4.7 1980 9.3 83.4 5.1 1981 9.2 83.2 5.3 1982 9.1 83.3 5.2 1983 9.2 83.0 5.2 1984 9.5 82.5 5.4 1985 9.7 81.4 6.3 1986 9.7 80.9 6.6 1987 9.9 80.3 6.9 1988 10.0 79.9 7.2 1989 10.0 79.6 7.3 1990 10.0 79.4 7.5 1991 10.0 79.3 7.5 1992 10.0 79.0 7.6 1993 10.0 78.9 7.8 1994 10.3 77.7 8.8 1995 10.5 77.6 8.9 1996 10.5 76.3 9.2 1997 10.5 75.4 9.8 1998 10.8 74.8 10.1 1999 10.9 74.4 10.3 2000 11.0 73.7 10.7 2001 11.0 73.4 10.9 2002 10.9 73.3 11.1 2003 10.6 71.1 12.7 2004 10.6 70.8 12.9 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 11 TABLE 8 Relative representation in union workforce, by race or ethnicity, 1983-2004 (Representation among unions / representation total workforce) 1979 -- -- -- 1980 -- -- -- 1981 -- -- -- 1982 -- -- -- 1983 1.49 0.94 1.12 1984 1.48 0.94 1.13 1985 1.45 0.94 1.10 1986 1.45 0.94 1.05 1987 1.43 0.94 1.04 1988 1.48 0.94 0.99 1989 1.49 0.94 0.95 1990 1.43 0.95 0.95 1991 1.44 0.94 1.03 1992 1.46 0.94 1.00 1993 1.46 0.95 0.99 1994 1.43 0.95 0.95 1995 1.44 0.95 0.94 1996 1.40 0.96 0.95 1997 1.39 0.97 0.91 1998 1.38 0.97 0.90 1999 1.35 0.97 0.90 2000 1.35 0.97 0.91 2001 1.34 0.98 0.89 2002 1.37 0.97 0.86 2003 1.36 0.97 0.87 2004 1.27 0.99 0.85 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 12 TABLE 9 Relative representation in manufacturing, by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 (Representation among manufacturing workers / representation total workforce) 1979 1.05 0.98 1.30 1980 1.06 0.98 1.27 1981 1.09 0.97 1.28 1982 1.10 0.97 1.29 1983 1.11 0.97 1.19 1984 1.07 0.98 1.20 1985 1.04 0.97 1.27 1986 1.05 0.97 1.24 1987 1.04 0.97 1.20 1988 1.03 0.98 1.18 1989 1.02 0.98 1.19 1990 1.05 0.98 1.19 1991 1.05 0.97 1.19 1992 1.07 0.97 1.20 1993 1.04 0.97 1.19 1994 0.99 0.98 1.19 1995 0.99 0.98 1.18 1996 1.00 0.98 1.12 1997 1.00 0.97 1.16 1998 0.96 0.98 1.12 1999 0.97 0.98 1.11 2000 0.93 0.98 1.15 2001 0.90 0.99 1.14 2002 0.94 0.98 1.12 2003 0.92 0.98 1.12 2004 0.92 0.98 1.13 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 13 TABLE 10 Relative representation in auto manufacturing, by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 (Representation among auto workers / representation in total workforce) 1979 1.81 0.95 0.62 1980 1.66 0.97 0.61 1981 1.67 0.97 0.60 1982 1.81 0.96 0.52 1983 1.80 0.95 0.67 1984 1.67 0.96 0.67 1985 1.47 0.99 0.67 1986 1.57 0.98 0.70 1987 1.41 0.98 0.83 1988 1.45 0.99 0.69 1989 1.59 0.99 0.52 1990 1.42 1.01 0.59 1991 1.36 1.01 0.65 1992 1.40 1.01 0.63 1993 1.35 1.01 0.65 1994 1.39 0.99 0.64 1995 1.24 1.02 0.65 1996 1.43 1.01 0.51 1997 1.51 1.01 0.48 1998 1.30 1.01 0.71 1999 1.34 1.03 0.58 2000 1.37 1.04 0.53 2001 1.39 1.02 0.55 2002 1.31 1.03 0.57 2003 1.37 1.05 0.51 2004 1.37 1.04 0.58 Survey Outgoing Rotation Group.

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 14 Figure 1: Share of workers in unions, by race or ethnicity, 1983-2004 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Figure 2: Share of workers in manufacturing, by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 15 Figure 3: Share of workers in auto manufacturing, by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Figure 4: Distribution of union workers by race or ethnicity, 1983-2004 100.0 75.0 50.0 25.0 0.0

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 16 Figure 5: Distribution of manufacturing workers by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 100.0 75.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 Figure 6: Distribution of auto workers by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 100.0 75.0 50.0 25.0 0.0

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 17 Figure 7: Distribution of total workforce by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 100.0 75.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 Figure 8: Relative representation in unions by race or ethnicity, 1983-2004 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8

The Decline in African-American Representation in Unions and Auto Manufacturing, 1979-2004 18 Figure 9: Relative representation in manufacturing by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 Figure 10: Relative representation in autos by race or ethnicity, 1979-2004 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00