Executive Summary Initiation of Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: JUNE 30, 2016 EXPIRATION DATE: N/A

Similar documents
Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment INITIATION HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2017 ADOPTION HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2017

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment Initiation INITIATION HEARING DATE: MAY 24, 2018

City and County of San Francisco Page 1. Meeting Minutes Land Use and Transportation Committee

MINUTES CITY OF DEKALB PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 11, 2017

EASTERN NEIGHBORHOODS CODE AMENDMENTS

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

Executive Summary Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: JULY 29, 2016 EXPIRATION DATE: N/A

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND SERVICE FEE BYLAW, 2010 AMENDMENTS

1 [Planning Code - Valencia Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District Zoning Control Table] 2

Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:

ORDINANCE NO. 91. The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, does ordain as follows:

Executive Summary Zoning Map and General Plan Amendment HEARING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2014

Executive Summary General Plan Amendment, Planning Code Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment

Executive Summary General Plan Amendment, Planning Code Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment

Placentia City Council AGENDA REPORT

City of Grass Valley ilw_:. [:] Agenda Action Sheet. Joe C. Heckel, Community Development Direct Thomas Last, Planning Director

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

Planning Commission Motion HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2013

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

STAFF REPORT REFLECTING THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE FEBRUARY 8, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING

HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION ED GALLAGHER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PASO ROBLES COLLISION CENTER)

CITY OF WINTER GARDEN

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION

i. _, - ORDINANCE NO

City of Novato Current Planning Projects Projects Under Review & Recently Approved FEBRUARY 2018

Medical Cannabis Advisory Committee

AGENDA COUNTY COUNCIL OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Legislative Session 2018, Legislative Day No. 13 May 7, :00 P.M.

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

I FILE NO ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. O

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

SUMMARY: BILL NUMBER: ORDINANCE NUMBER:

AMENDMENT RECORD AMC Title 20 Albany Development Code (Text Only)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Peoria, Arizona as follows:

CITY OF GRANBURY NOVEMBER 6, 2018 SPECIAL ELECTION CHARTER AMENDMENT PROPOSITIONS

STAFF REPORT CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

CB District Central Business

PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 19, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of York Meeting Minutes November 18, 2015

RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Primary Nominating Election of the City of Los Angeles is scheduled to be held on March 7, 2017; and

INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 15, 2013

..title TEXT CHANGE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO SEXUAL OFFENDER TREATMENT FACILITIES (B)

memo Date: March 26, 2012 To: From:

CITY OF SURREY BYLAW NO A bylaw to impose fees for rezoning, subdivision and development applications...

City Attorney s Synopsis

3 Ordinance amending the Planning Code and Zoning Map to create the 1550 Evans

ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 7, :00 P.M. 120 W. Dougherty Street

Review of Sign Regulations City Council Sign Ordinance Workshop October 20, 2011

URBANA POLICE DEPARTMENT: 2017 TRAFFIC STOP UPDATE

Why a Board of Adjustment? Its Role & Authority

Oakland City Planning Commission

21. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 15, DATE: December 6, 2018

LEGISLATIVE ANALYST REPORT

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO

i ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section 6-4 of CHAPTER 6, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, of the

3 Ordinance amending the General Plan to revise the Bayview Hunters Point Area Plan,

Sec Planned unit development business (PUD-B).

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

Legislation Introduced at Roll Call. Tuesday, November 13, 2018

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Zoning Hearing Board Information

Article 4 Administration of Land Use and Development

ORDINANCE NO

301 PUD MINIMUM LAND AREA. DC Office of Planning. Committee of 100 on the Federal City

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF PALMER, ALASKA REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, February 16, :00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the CSA is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any conflicting State enactments; and

CITY OF POMPANO BEACH Broward County, Florida

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL

Frenchtown Planning Board Regular Meeting July 27, :30 P.M.

BIRMINGHAM CITY COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 27, 2018 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 151 MARTIN 7:30 P.M.

3 Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code Section 231 to allow for greater

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

ARTICLE 1 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES

Social Consumption Advisory Committee (SCAC) Meeting Minutes Meeting #1-January 18, 2017

WHEREAS, the Atlanta Gulch Project was contemplated by and is consistent with the Westside Redevelopment Plan adopted by the City; and

CITY OF CLAREMONT IN THE YEAR TWO THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN ORDINANCE #554 ZONING-ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Consultation on TLAB Rules of Practice and Procedures and Related Documents

Ordinance 2713 Marijuana Facility Regulations

INC. VILLAGE OF MANORHAVEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, p.m. - AGENDA

Executive Summary Amendment to the Planning Commission Rules & Regulations HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2015

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION

ATTACHMENT I TO BOARD POLICY A-5

MEMORANDUM. MPC February 11, 2016 Agenda Item # 46

Page 431 Item No. 25

Euclidian Zoning. Euclidian Zoning Cont d

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO CENTRAL DIVISION UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Parking and Housing Affordability

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 56

City of Stockton. Meeting Agenda - Final. City Council Special

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

#1 FIXING TIME AND PLACE OF HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS #3 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE SALE OF BEER BY RETAIL

TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: APPLICATION FOR A LOCATION TRANSFER, CORPORATION, SERIES 9 LIQUOR LICENSE FOR DESERT LIQUORS.

WOODINVILLE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT FY JULY 1, 2010 TO JUNE 30, 2011

DEVELOPMENT CODE Amendments

Transcription:

DATE: July 14, 2016 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Aaron D. Starr Manager of Legislative Affairs RE: Planning Code Reorganization: Phase 2, Article 7 Attached, please find the Planning Commission case report for Phase 2 of the Planning Code Reorganization ordinance. The Planning Commission initiated this ordinance on June 30, 2016, and scheduled the adoption hearing for October 13, 2016. Per your request, there will be an information presentation on this item at your July 20 hearing. Memo

Initiation of Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: JUNE 30, 2016 EXPIRATION DATE: N/A Project Name: Article 7: Phase 2 of the Planning Code Reorganization Case Number: 2014-001965PCA [Board File No. TBD] Initiated by: Planning Department Staff Contact: Aaron Starr, Manager of Legislative Affairs aaron.starr@sfgov.org, 415-558-6362 Recommendation: Initiate and Schedule for Adoption on or After September 22, 2016 The action before the Commission is initiation of the code amendments described below. Initiation does not involve a decision on the substance of the amendments; it merely begins the required 20 day notice period, after which the Commission may hold a hearing and take action on the proposed Code amendments. PLANNING CODE AMENDMENT The proposed Ordinance would amend the Planning Code to reorganize Article 7 and to update, correct, clarify, and simplify Code language in other Planning Code Sections; requiring Conditional Use authorization for Bars, and Liquor Stores on the first floor in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts; enacting permanent controls requiring Conditional Use authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensaries in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts; requiring Conditional Use authorization for Personal Services on the second floor in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts; prohibiting Kennels in the North Beach Neighborhood Commercial District. The Way It Is Now: Main Amendments 1. Article 7 of the Planning Code contains land use controls, development standards, and density controls for the City s Neighborhood Commercial Districts. These controls are outlined in zoning control tables. 2. All uses allowed in Neighborhood Commercial Districts are defined in Section 790 of the Planning Code. 3. The Conditional Use (CU) mailed notice requirement is 20 days for Neighborhood Commercial and Mixed Use Districts and 10 days for all other districts. The General Plan, and Variance mailing requirement is 10 days for all zoning districts. www.sfplanning.org

4. Section 316 contains CU procedures and findings for Neighborhood Commercial Districts and Mixed Use Districts, which are essentially the same as the controls in Section 306 of the Planning Code. Sunset NCD Amendments 5. Bars and Liquor Stores are principally permitted on the first floor in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts; 6. An interim control requires CU authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensaries in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts. 7. Personal Services are principally permitted on the second floor in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts. Other Amendments 8. Mobile Food Facilities are currently listed as a separate use in the Article 2 zoning control tables, and defined as a distinct and separate use in Section 102 of the Planning Code. 9. Use Characteristic is a term used in the Article 2 zoning control tables but not currently defined in the Planning Code. 10. Various Neighborhood Commercial Districts are missing or incorrectly cited in Section 134 of the Planning Code. 11. Accessory Uses are defined in Section 204 of the Planning Code. 12. Waterborne Commerce is a term used in the Article 2 zoning control tables, but is actually defined in Section 102 as a Maritime Use. The Way It Would Be: Main Amendments 1. Article 7 of the Planning Code will still contain land use controls, development standards, and density controls for the City s Neighborhood Commercial Districts; however the proposed ordinance would revise the zoning control tables to match the tables in Article 2. 2. Use definitions in Section 790 of the Planning Code would be deleted. Neighborhood Commercial Districts would use the standardized use definitions in Section 102. 3. The CU, General Plan, and Variance mailing noticing requirement would be 20 days for all zoning districts. 4. Section 316 would be deleted. Conditional Use procedures and findings for CUs in Neighborhood Commercial Districts and Mixed Use Districts would be found in Section 306 of the Planning Code along will all other zoning districts. Sunset NCD Amendments 5. Bars and Liquor Stores would require CU authorization on the first floor in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts; 2

6. The existing interim control that requires CU authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensaries in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts would become permanent. 7. Personal Services would require CU authorization to establish on the second floor in the Noriega, Irving, Taraval, and Judah Neighborhood Commercial Districts. Other Amendments 8. The definition for Mobile Food Facilities would be amended to only refer to the Public work s Code for the definition and refer to temporary use controls and restaurant controls for approval. 9. A definition for Use Characteristic would be added to Section 102. 10. Section 134 of the Planning Code would be amended to correct any missing or miss-cited neighborhood commercial districts. 11. The definition of Accessory Uses in Section 204 would be moved to Section 102. 12. Waterborne Commerce would be deleted from the Article 2 zoning control tables and replaced with Maritime Use. BACKGROUND Overall Goals and Phasing Initiated in 2013, the Code Reorganization Project seeks to restructure the Planning Code so that it s easier to read, understand, and use. This Ordinance is Phase 2 of the Planning Code Reorganization project and focuses on Article 7 of the Planning Code. Phase 1 was adopted by the Board of Supervisor on February 10, 2016 (Board File 141253), and signed by the Mayor on February 20, 2015 (Enactment Number 022-15). Phase 1 of the Code Reorganization program streamlined the use definitions in the Planning Code by consolidating them into one section of the Code (Section 102). The Planning Department also reorganized Article 2, which includes Residential (RH, RM, and RC), Downtown (C-3), and Industrial (PDR, and M) zoning districts, by creating Zoning Control Tables similar to the ones already used in our Neighborhood Commercial Districts. The major benefit to Zoning Control Tables is that they allow users to obtain building standards and use controls for a particular zoning district in one easy to use chart. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Phase 1, the Article 2 Reorganization Ordinance, in October of 2014. Having successfully completed Phase 1 with significant community support, the Department is now proposing to initiate Phase 2. This phase of the project will focus on Article 7 of the Planning Code, which contains controls for Neighborhood Commercial Districts. Phase 2 will delete the definitions in Article 7 (Planning Code Section 790) so that Neighborhood Commercial Districts use the same consolidated definitions created in Phase 1, and update the format of the Zoning Control Tables. The final phase, Phase 3, will do the same thing for Article 8 of the Planning Code (Mixed Use Districts), and will be initiated once Article 7 is complete. One of the benefits of the new zoning control tables is that they will account for every use in the Code. This will allow users to easily find out what uses are allowed in a particular zoning district in one 3

chart, rather than having to rely on interpretations by the Zoning Administrator or complex cross referencing. It will also allow for greater customization by removing use groupings that limit how certain uses can be regulated. How Did We Get Here? The Planning Code maintained the same basic structure until 1986 when the NCD controls were added to the Code in Article 7. Prior to that, all development standards and general definitions were located in Article 1, use definitions and use controls were located in Article 2. For its time, Article 7 was a dramatically new way of organizing the Planning Code and thinking about land use, primarily because it used vertical controls to regulate uses; however, because of the structural differences between Articles 2 and 7, and the desire to more closely regulate retail and service uses, Article 7 was given its own set of use definitions. When Article 8 was added to the Code, it followed the same format as Article 7 along with adding its own list of use definitions. Today we have three sets of use definitions in the Planning Code; one for R, C, M and PDR Districts in Section 102, one for NCDs in Article 7, and one for MUDs in Article 8. At the end of this process, there will only be one set of use definitions in the Planning Code (Section 102) and one standard format for zoning control tables. ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS Two Ordinances, One Goal The proposed Article 7 Reorganization ordinance is actually split into two separate ordinances. One ordinance deletes all of the Article 7 zoning control tables and Article 7 use definitions in Section 790. The other ordinance adds the new zoning control tables back and makes other proposed changes. This was done to make the changes easier to identify and understand, and to make the 692 pages much more manageable. It also allows member so the public to only to print out half of the ordinance if they just want to see what is being changed. The Commission s single action today will initiate both ordinances. Outreach and Process to Date The Department originally presented the Planning Code Reorganization effort to the Planning Commission on June 20, 2013. At that time, the Department gave an overview of how the Planning Code had grown over time from about 18 pages in the 1930s to the 1336+ page Code we have today, and how that growth added both necessary and unnecessary complexity to the Code. Staff also discussed the proposed organizational structure of the new Article 2 including the proposed use categories, the use of zoning control tables and consolidating definitions into Section 102. After that presentation, the Department held a series of community outreach meetings both before and after the ordinance was initiated by the Planning Commission. At those meetings, the Department gave an overview of the proposal to interested community members and took feedback on the proposed reorganization. The Department spent the next few months further refining the proposed Ordinance based on the outreach meetings, comments from the Commission and further analysis of the Planning Code. When it was finally adopted by the Planning Commission in October of 2013, those that had participated in the outreach meetings expressed their support for the proposed amendments. On June 3, staff sent out an invitation to a June 22 community outreach meeting for Phase 2 of the Code Reorganization Project to approximately 800 recipients. That outreach meeting is intended to go over the 4

proposed ordinance and answer questions. Staff anticipates hosting other outreach meetings between the initiation hearing on June 30 and the scheduled adoption hearing on September 22. The number and format of the meetings will largely depend on interest and need. Deletion of Section 316 and the 20-Day Notice Planning Code Section 316 outlines the procedures for CU authorization in Neighborhood Commercial, and Mixed Use Districts. The section is not substantially different than Section 306, which outlines the CU procedures for all other zoning districts in the City. In fact in several instances, the reader is directed back to Section 306. The one significant difference is the 20-day mailed notice required for CU applications in NC Districts. In all other districts this mailed notice is required 10 days prior to the hearing. The Department is proposing to maintain the 20 day noticing period and use it for all mailed CU, General Plan, and Variance notices in all zoning districts. Further, other requirements for posted notices and newspaper notices are already 20 days in all zoning districts. This change will help standardize the noticing requirements in the Planning Code. Changes to the Sunset Neighborhood Commercial Districts Unlike the Article 2 Reorganization, the proposed ordinance does include some substantive changes, most which were requested by Supervisor Tang. Over the last year, the Planning Department has been working with Supervisor Tang s office on amendments that she wanted to make to the NCDs within her Supervisorial District. Staff felt that it was possible to include these changes in the propose Article 7 reorganization. Those specific changes are called out above, but essentially they would: 1. Make permanent the interim controls that require CU authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensaries in the Sunset NCDs. The CU requirement was inadvertently taken out as part of the Article 2 Reorganization. As a stop gap measure, the Supervisor passed interim controls that put them back. The changes in this ordinance would make them permanent. 2. Require CU for Bars and Liquor Stores on the ground floor, where they are currently principally permitted. These uses typically require a CU authorization in most NCDs. 3. Require CU approval for Personal Service uses on the ground floor but principally permit Instructional Services on the second floor. These two uses were separated as part of the Article 2 Reorganization project, with the intention of regulating them separately in these zoning districts. The purpose of regulating them separately is to reduce the possibility of Personal Service uses located on the second floor being used as a cover for illicit activities, which is an issue that the Supervisor has been trying to address in her district. IMPLEMENTATION The Department has determined that this ordinance will help the Department implement the Planning Code by standardizing the Planning Code, making it easier to use and understand. REQUIRED COMMISSION ACTION The proposed Ordinance is before the Commission so that it may initiate the proposed Ordinance and schedule a time for the ordinance to be heard for adoption. 5

RECOMMENDATION The Department recommends that the Commission recommend approval of the resolution to initiate the Planning Code amendments for consideration on or after September 22, 2016. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION The Department recommends that the Commission initiate the proposed ordinance because it will allow for the Code Reorganization effort to move forward, adding more clarity and better organization to the Planning Code. Further, the Department believes that the September 22, 2016 adoption date will provide sufficient time for the community to review the proposed amendments and for the Department to conduct further outreach. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal to amend the Planning Code is anticipated to result in no physical impact on the environment. Evaluation under CEQA will be complete prior to the initiation hearing. PUBLIC COMMENT As of the date of this report, the Planning Department has not received any public comment regarding the proposed Ordinance. The Department held a pre-initiation outreach meeting on June 22 at the Planning Department s office. Additional outreach meetings between initiation and adoption are anticipated. RECOMMENDATION: Initiate and Consider Adoption on or after September 22, 2016 Attachments: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Draft Planning Commission Resolution Draft Ordinance Part 1 (Deletions) Draft Ordinance Part 2 (Additions and Modifications) 6