distribution STATUS OF WORK IN PANELS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PANEL REPORTS Report by the Director-General

Similar documents
STATUS OF WORK IN PANELS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PANEL REPORTS. Report by the Director-General

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON. 1Previous reports were circulated as documents C/124, C/136, C/139 RESTRICTED C/181 TARIFFS AND TRADE

ARTICLE XXII CONSULTATION

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES UNDER WTO

Dispute Settlement Procedures under WTO

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON F ' 196, 24 April 1981 TARIFFS AND TRADE

THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES

MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS THE URUGUAY ROUND UR RESTRICTED MTN. GNG/NG13/W/16 12 November Special Distribution.

C/M/54 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE. (a) Committee on Budget, Finance and. (b) Rates of subsistence allowance Programme of meetings 5

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

TRADE POLICY REVIEW OF SOUTH AFRICA 1-2 JUNE GATT Council's Evaluation

Contents. 1 The Law of International Trade and the Multilateral Trading System 1. Acknowledgments

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GATT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM

RESTRICTED MTN.GNG/W/28 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE GROUP OF NEGOTIATIONS ON GOODS TO THE TRADE NEGOTIATIONS COMMITTEE

THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES

OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS

The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism

WORLD TRADE WT/DS50/AB/R 19 December 1997 ORGANIZATION

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Rolando Alcala Agriculture and Commodities Division World Trade Organization

GATT DEPOSITORY LIBRARIES LIST OF THE PUBLICATIONS DEPOSITED IN EACH LIBRARY BASIC INSTRUMENTS AND SELECTED DOCUMENTS SERIESJ

OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS

Review of the Operation of the SPS Agreement DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION

Historical documents of disputes

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

Using Trade Data to Develop MRL Strategies to Maximize Crop Protection Options for Growers

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

Global Economic Prospects 2004: Realizing the Development Promise of the Doha Agenda

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON ^lolber 1971

OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS

UNITED STATES - TRADE MEASURES AFFECTING NICARAGUA. Report by the Panel (L/6053)

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/6053 TARIFFS AND TRADE

Ch. 6 Free Trade. Organizing the Marketplace Introduction to International Relations

Chapter 9. The Political Economy of Trade Policy. Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop

C/W/760 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE. Forty-Ninth Session. Page

Report of the Panel adopted on 7 November 1990 (L/ S/228)

Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU)

Lecture 4 Multilateralism and Regionalism. Hyun-Hoon Lee Professor Kangwon National University

Growth, Investment and Trade Challenges: India and Japan

Appendix B A WTO Description of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

Dispute Settlement under FTAs and the WTO: Conflict or Convergence? David A. Gantz

THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF ASIA-PACIFIC TRADE

General Interpretative Note to Annex 1A

State and Prospects of the FTAs of Japan and the Asia-Pacific Region. February 2013 Kazumasa KUSAKA

Article 1. Coverage and Application

UNITED STATES SECTION 129(c)(1) OF THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS ACT

R ESEARCHERS T EST Q UESTION P APER. By Dr. Nicolas Lamp Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Queen s University

Mizuho Economic Outlook & Analysis

United States Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Requirements, Procedures, and Developments

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Enforcement Regulations for the Law Concerning Standardization, etc. of Agricultural and Forestry Products

The Diversity. of Non-Tariff Measures. FIW-Workshop From Tariffs to Standards: Assessing the Role of Non-Tariff Measures Vienna, 21 October 2016

Dispute settlement. Dispute settlement activity in Appellate Body World Trade Organization Annual Report Dispute settlement

( ) Page: 1/32 UNITED STATES CERTAIN SYSTEMIC TRADE REMEDIES MEASURES REQUEST FOR CONSULTATIONS BY CANADA

Chapter 7. Government Policy and International Trade

THE COLLEGE OF THE BAHAMAS LL.B. Programme and Centre for Continuing Education & Extension Services

Rules of Origin Process (Chile)

STATE GOVT S - WTO & FTA ISSUES CENTRE FOR WTO STUDIES, IIFT AUGUST 2012

MULTILATERAL TRADE. NEGOTIATIONS 10 June 1987 RESTRICTED THE URUGUAY ROUND. Special Distribution UR

Compliance and Remedies Against Non-Compliance Under the WTO System

China Measures affecting Imports of Automobile Parts (WT/DS 339, 340, 342)

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE

AD HOC COMMITTEE ON AGENDA AND INTERSESSIOnAL BUSINESS. Explanatory Notes on the Advance Agenda I* AGENDA FOR THE SEVENTH SESSION

Article XVI. Miscellaneous Provisions

Workshop on EU import requirements for fruit and vegetables

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

The CAP yesterday, today and tomorow 2015/2016 SBSEM and European Commission. 13. The Doha Round Tomás García Azcárate

E-Commerce Development in Asia and the Pacific

CONCILIATION UNITED STATES - IMPORTS OF CERTAIN AUTOMOTIVE SPRING ASSEMBLIES. Report of the Panel adopted on 26 May 1983 (L/ S/107)

INDONESIA MEASURES CONCERNING THE IMPORTATION OF CHICKEN MEAT AND CHICKEN PRODUCTS

SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF LEGAL STUDIES SYLLABUS INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW COMPULSORY PAPER-III LL.M PROGRAMME WINTER SEMESTER

LL.M. in International Legal Studies WTO LAW

EU Trade Policy and IPRs Generally, all EU external economic policies including trade policies are first drafted and considered by the European Commis

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENTS IN EAST ASIA. Dukgeun Ahn. Working Paper

SOFTWOOD LUMBER AGREEMENT

Green Growth and WTO Rules: Harmonization from Korea s Perspective

OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS

Agricultural Trade and Foreign Policy

Exporting Trends, Facts & Profits

Article 11. Initiation and Subsequent Investigation

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

REGULATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance)

States, Provinces, and Cross-Border International Trade

BACKGROUND NOTE PROPOSAL TO PERMANENTLY EXCLUDE NON-VIOLATION AND SITUATION COMPLAINTS FROM THE WTO TRIPS AGREEMENT. 20 September

Capitalizing on Global and Regional Integration. Chapter 8

Proliferation of FTAs in East Asia

Intellectual Property in WTO Dispute Settlement

International Regulation: Lessons from the IP Experience for the Internet

AGRICULTURAL POLICIES, TRADE AGREEMENTS AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT. Michael N. Gifford

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX Agreement on Agriculture Article 4 (Jurisprudence)

TRADE&PROSPERITY KEY POINTS. Alan Oxley: Trudeau got captured by the anti-trade brigade. Canada stall on trade pact: what happened to TPP

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

3) The European Union is an example of integration. A) regional B) relative C) global D) bilateral

ADDRESS U. S. SENATOR ALLEN J. ELLENDER TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION OF SUGAR CANE TECHNOLOGISTS NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA NOVEMBER 1, 1971

Chapter 10 STANDARDS AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS

LIBRARY European Community

Transcription:

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE RESTRICTED C/156 7 June 1988 Llmited distribution COUNCIL 15 June 1988 STATUS OF WORK IN PANELS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PANEL REPORTS Report by the Director-General A. STATUS OF WORK IN PANELS ESTABLISHED BY THE COUNCIL 1. Canada - Measures affecting the sale of gold coins The Panel, established In November 1984 at the request of South Africa, submitted Its report In September 1985 (L/5863). At Issue in this case was the differential fiscal treatment In Ontario between Maple Leaf gold coins and other gold investment coins. This differential treatment was removed on 7 January 1986. The report was discussed at five Council meetings. At the May 1986 meeting Canada stated that it was not in a position to indicate whether it could support the adoption of the report (C/M/198). 2. Canada - Import, distribution and sale of alcoholic drinks by provincial marketing agencies The Panel was established in March 1985 at the request of the European Economic Community (C/M/186). The Council was informed of the terms of reference in February 1986 (C/M/195) and of the composition of the Panel in December 1986 (C/143). The Panel began its work in December 1986 and submitted its report to the parties to the dispute in October 1987 and to the Council in February 1988 (L/6304). The Council adopted it in March 1988 (C/M/218). 3. United States - Restrictions on Imports of certain sugar-containing products The Panel was established in March 1985 at the request of Canada (C/M/186). The Chairman of the Council was authorized to draw up the terms of reference of the Panel and to designate its Chairman and members in consultation with the parties concerned. These consultations have been deferred since the two parties are having bilateral discussions on the matter of the dispute. Previous reports were circulated as documents C/124, C/136, C/139 C/146, C/148 and C/152. 88-0866

Page 2 4. United States - Trade measures affecting Nicaragua The Panel was established in October 1985 at the request of Nicaragua and submitted its report in October 1986 (L/6053). The report was considered at the Council meeting in November 1986 (C/M/204) and April and July 1987 (C/M/208, C/M/212). The Chairman of the Council has consulted with delegations on the Panel reports on several occasions (C/M/212, 213, 215). 5. Japan - Restrictions on imports of certain agricultural products The Panel was established in October 1986 at. the request of the United States (C/M/202). The terms of reference and the composition of the Panel were agreed in February 1987 (C/145). The Panel began its work in March 1987 and submitted its report to the parties to the dispute in October 1987 and to the Council in November 1987 (L/6253). The Council adopted the report in February 1988 (C/M/217). 6. Japan - Customs duties, taxes and labelling practices on imported wines and alcoholic beverages The Council established this Panel and determined its terms of reference and composition in February 1987 at the request of the EEC (C/M/206). The Panel began its work in February 1987 and submitted its report to the parties to the dispute in September 1987 and to the Council in October 1987 (L/6216). The Council adopted it in November 1987 (C/M/215) 7. United States - Customs user fee The Panel was established in March 1987 at the request of Canada and the EEC (C/M/207). The terms of reference and composition of the Panel were agreed in May 1987 (C/147). The Panel began its work in June 1987 and submitted its report to the parties to the dispute and then to the Council in November 1987 (L/6264). The Council adopted it in February 1988 (C/M/217). The report was derestricted by the Council in March 1988 (C/M/218). 8. Canada - Restrictions on exports of unprocessed salmon and herring The Panel was established in March 1987 at the request of the United States (C/M/207). The Council was informed of the terms of reference and composition of the Panel in April 1987 (C/M/208). The Panel began its work in April 1987 and submitted its report to the parties to the dispute and then to the Council in November 1987 (L/6268). The Council considered the report in February 1988 (C/M/217) and adopted it in March 1988 (C/M/218).

Page 3 9. Japan - Trade in semi-conductors The Council established this Panel and determined its terms of reference in April 1987 at the request of the EEC (C/M/208). The Council was informed of the composition of the Panel in June 1987 (C/149). The Panel began its work in September 1987 and submitted its report to the parties to the dispute and then to the Council in March 1988 (L/6309). The Council adopted it in May 1988 (C/M/220). 10- United States - Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 The Panel was established in October 1987 at the request of the EEC (C/M/213). The Council was informed of the terms of reference and the composition of the Panel in January 1988 (C/153). The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met. The Panel began its work in February 1988. 11. India - Import restrictions on almonds The Council established this Panel in November 1987 at the request of the United States (C/M/215). The Council was informed of the terms of reference and the composition of the Panel in April 1988 (C/154). The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met. The Panel began its work in May 1988. It was informed in June 1988 that the parties had settled the matter and that the United States withdrew its complaint (C/154/Add.1). 12. Norway - Restrictions on imports of apples and pears The Panel was established in March 1988 at the request of the United States (C/M/218). The terms of reference and the composition of the Panel have been agreed and will be announced at the next Council meeting. The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met. 13. Japan - Imports of spruce-pine-fir (SPF) dimension lumber The Panel was established in March 1988 at the request of Canada (C/M/218). The terms of reference and the composition of the Panel have not yet been determined. The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met. 14. Japan - Restrictions on imports of beef and citrus products The Panel was established in May 1988 at the request of the United States. The Council authorized its Chairman to draw up the terms of reference and to designate the Chairman and members of the Panel in consultation with the parties concerned. The Council, noting the separate request by Australia on Japanese import restrictions on beef (see below), agreed that its Chairman would consult with the parties and with the Secretariat concerning the appropriate administrative arrangements for this Panel (C/M/220). The thirty-day time limit fpr the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met.

Page 4 15. Japan - Restrictions on imports of beef The Panel was established in May 1988 at the request of Australia. The Council authorized its Chairman to draw up the terms of reference and designate the Chairman and members of the Panel in consultation with the parties concerned. The Council agreed that its Chairman would consult with the parties and with the Secretariat concerning the appropriate administrative arrangements of this Panel in the light of the establishment of the Panel on Japanese restrictions on imports of beef and citrus products (C/M/220). The terms of reference and the composition of the Panel have not yet been determined. The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met. 16. Korea - Restrictions on imports of beef (complaint by the United States) 17. Korea - Restrictions on imports of beef (complaint by Australia) In May 1988, the Council established these Panels, at the request of the United States and Australia, determined their terms of reference, authorized its Chairman to designate the Chairmen and members of the Panels in consultation with the parties concerned and agreed that the Council Chairman would consult with the parties to the two Panels and with the Secretariat concerning the appropriate administrative arrangements for the Panels (C/M/220). The composition of the Panels has not yet been determined. The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met. 18. European Economic Community - Import licenses for dessert apples The Panel was established in May 1988 at the request of Chile (C/M/220). The terms of reference and the composition of the Panel have not yet been determined. The thirty-day time limit for the establishment of panels (BISD 29S/14) was not met.

Page 5 B. STATUS OF WORK OF PANELS ESTABLISHED BY MTN COMMITTEES 1. European Economic Community - Subsidies on exports of wheat flour 2. European Economic Community - Subsidies on exports of pasta products The reports of these two Panels, established by the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures at the request of the United States (SCM/42 and SCM/43), were submitted to the Committee in March and May 1983, respectively. They deal with fundamental issues, bearing on the interpretation of Article 10 in the wheat flour case and on the application of Article 9 in the pasta products case. As there have been divergent perceptions in the Committee in this respect, it has not been possible, so far, to adopt these reports. 3. United States - Definition of "industry" for wine and grape products The Panel was established by the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures in February 1985 at the request of the EEC and submitted its report to the Committee in March 1986 (SCM/71). The Committee discussed the report at meetings in April and October 1986 but no agreement on its adoption could be reached (SCM/M/31 and 32). 4. Canada - Countervailing duty investigation into manufacturing beef from the EEC The Panel was established by the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures in October 1986 at the request of the EEC (SCM/M/32). The terms of reference of the Panel were agreed * in December 1986 and its composition in March 1987. The Panel began its work in May 1987. It submitted its report to the parties to the dispute in September 1987 and to the Committee in October 1987 (SCM/85). The Committee considered the report at meetings in October and December 1987, and in February and May 1988 (SCM/M/35, 36, 37 and 38). 5. India - Licensing with respect to imports of almonds The Panel was established by the Committee on Import Licensing in September 1987 at the request of the United States (LIC/M/19). The terms of reference and the composition of the Panel were determined in April 1988 (LIC/14). The Panel began its work in April 1988. It was informed in June 1988 that the parties had reached a mutually satisfactory solution and that the United States withdrew its complaint (LIC/15).

Page 6 C. IMPLEMENTATION OF PANEL REPORTS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL 1. United States - Taxes on petroleum and certain imported substances The report of the Panel, established at the request of Canada, the European Economic Community and Mexico, was adopted in June 1987 (L/6175 and C/M/211). At the meeting of the Council in October 1987 Canada, the EEC and Mexico asked for information on the implementation of the Panel's recommendations. The United States stated that the implementation of the Panel report required legislation and that the United States' authorities, while anxious to respond positively to the report, continued to reflect on how best to address it (C/M/213). The Council discussed the matter again in February 1988 (C/M/217). In March 1988 the European Economic Community submitted a request for authorization to suspend the application of concessions in accordance with Article XXIII:2 (C/W/540, Add.l). This request was considered by the Council in March and May 1988 (C/M/218, 220). 2. Japan - Customs duties, taxes and labelling practices on imported wines and alcoholic beverages The report of the Panel, established at the request of the European Economic Community, was adopted in November 1987 (C/M/215). At the meeting pf the Council in February 1988 the representative of Japan said that his authorities had decided on the basic direction of the liquor tax reform but that the revision of the liquor tax, in the context of the overall tax reform, involved a decision by the Diet and therefore inevitably took time. The representative of the EEC expressed concern that a link had been made between the liquor tax reforms and a broader reform of indirect taxes and that this could lead to an unacceptable delay in the implementation of the Panel report (C/M/217). The matter was also briefly referred to at the meeting of the Council In March 1988 (C/M/218). 3. Japan - Restrictions on imports of certain agricultural products The report of the Panel was adopted in February 1988 (C/M/217). At the Council meeting in April 1988 the representative of the United States v. asked Japan for a report on the status of implementation of the Panel's recommendations. The representative of Japan said that his Government was currently deliberating on the appropriate action to be taken (C/M/219). At the Council meeting in May 1988 the matter was again referred to by the representatives of the United States, Australia, Thailand (speaking for the ASEAN countries) and Uruguay (C/M/220).