>> PLEASE RISE. HEAR YE, HEAR YE, HEAR YE. THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR. GIVE ATTENTION AND

Similar documents
Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

IN RE RAMIREZ, S.Ct. No. 31,664 (Filed June 26, 2009) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO FORMAL REPRIMAND FORMAL REPRIMAND

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) 9 The Commission on Judicial Conduct and the Honorable Stephen M.

Supreme Court of Florida

[The present language is amended as indicated below by underlining for new text and strikeover for text that has been deleted.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, THE HONORABLE LYNN ROSENTHAL No STIPULATION

TEXT OBTAINED BY WORLD WIDE WEB PAGE: STATE.MN.US; 29th APRIL 2003.

California Judges Association OPINION NO. 43. (Originally issued: February 5, 1994) (Revised: August 1996)

Ethics and Professionalism In DWI Cases

IN RE LOZANO, S.Ct. No. 29,264 (Filed June 8, 2010) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Supreme Court of Florida

Senate Statutes - Title V ( Judicial Branch) - Updated

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Fourth Amendment United States Constitution

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

ct»t BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. Recommends Modification of Canons of Judicial Ethics

ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION 16-03

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUDICIAL ETHICS IN ELECTION CAMPAIGNS

Part I Arbitrator Qualifications

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PRESENT: Lemons, C.J., Goodwyn, Mims, Powell, Kelsey, and McCullough, JJ., and Millette, S.J.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

[Cite as In re Complaint Against Resnick, 107 Ohio St.3d, 2005-Ohio-6800.]

(A) A magisterial district judge shall perform the duties of judicial office, including administrative duties, without bias or prejudice.

TEXT OBTAINED BY WEB PAGE STATE.AZ.US; 25th APRIL 2003.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. INQUIRY CONCERNING A ) Supreme Court. JUDGE, NO ) Case No. SC

BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION

CANON 1 A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 10 VERMONT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. Vt. A.O. 10 PREAMBLE (2012) PREAMBLE

JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA MEMORANDUM

Ethics in Judicial Elections

Communicating with Difficult Judges NCADA Annual Spring Meeting

The GPS Tracking Case Fourth Amendment United States Constitution

CHAPTER 13 - STANDARDS FOR JAIL FACILITIES - INMATE BEHAVIOR, DISCIPLINE AND GRIEVANCE

February I. Conduct Inside the Courtroom. Generally

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding. Against FRED R. STAPLES, Judge of. the Superior Court for Benton. and Franklin Counties.

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT FOR THE COMMONWEALTH JUDICIARY AND PROCEDURE FOR FILING GRIEVANCES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY

ETHICS FOR THE PROBLEM-SOLVING COURT JUDGE: THE NEW ABA MODEL CODE *

Supreme Court of Florida

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO CASE NO. 91,325

IN THE CIRCUIT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No , 396 (17J) REPORT OF REFEREE

Arizona Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

A Sad Day for the Judiciary

FIRST AMENDMENT UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Congress shall make no law respecting an

COMMONWEALTH JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMBATTING CORRUPTION WITHIN THE JUDICIARY LIMASSOL CONCLUSIONS

Comments from the Boston Bar Association on the Proposed Revisions to the Code of Judicial Conduct (5/20/15)

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

PRESENT: Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, Mims, and McClanahan, JJ. and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MAGISTRATE OR HEARING OFFICER

People v. Biddle, 07PDJ024. December 17, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Grafton

AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES. YOU ARE HEREBY notified that the Investigative Panel of the Florida Judicial

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

July 2004 PRELIMINARY DRAFT

California Code of Judicial Ethics

APPLICATION FOR NOMINATION TO THE

POLITICAL OR CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE INDEPENDENCE, INTEGRITY, AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY.

JUDICIAL CONDUCT INFORMATION SERVICE. June 1992

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The Commission on Judicial Conduct sustained four. charges of misconduct and determined that petitioner, a justice

IN RE POPE, S.Ct. No. 29,778 (Filed June 13, 2007) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO FORMAL REPRIMAND

ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK

Supreme Court of Kentucky

COLORADO COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

Supreme Court of Florida

Code of Administrative Law Judge Ethics

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. UTTER, J.--John G. Ritchie has been a King County

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

ETHICS ISSUES FOR PUBLIC ATTORNEYS

RULES OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGLE POINT

OKLAHOMA. Comparison of Oklahoma Revised Code of Judicial Conduct to ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (2007) Effective April 15, 2011

Rules of Procedure Houston County Commission

Robert H. Tembeckjian (John J. Postel and David M. Duguay, Of Counsel) for the Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. (Before a Referee) Case No.: SC v. TFB File No.: ,037(07A)(OSC)

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR COLORADO STATE COURT JUDGESHIP

Tribal Government Code of Conduct

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JUDGE RODRIGUEZ MITIGATION STATEMENT I. PROFESSIONAL RECORD AS A LAWYER AND CIRCUIT JUDGE

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Introducing the Code of Judicial Conduct The Ethics of Ex Parte Communications, Judicial Demeanor and other ethical considerations

VOLUSIA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2018 Judicial Election Questionnaire. 6. Military Service (including Reserves) Service Branch Highest Rank Dates

Referring to Article 110 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo and the Law on Kosovo Prosecutorial Council (Nr.03/L-244)

Fourth Amendment United States Constitution

Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges 2014

The Problem of SpongeBob RoundPants

DECISION ON DISPOSITION AND SENTENCE

Political and campaign activities of judicial candidates in public elections. A. Candidates for election to judicial office.

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

lb Ðat? COOK COI]NTY ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS GENERAL ORDER NO. 2OO9-2

Transcription:

>> PLEASE RISE. HEAR YE, HEAR YE, HEAR YE. THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR. GIVE ATTENTION AND YOU SHALL BE HEARD. GOD SAVE THESE UNITED STATES, THIS GREAT STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THIS HONORABLE COURT. >> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING, AND WELCOME TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. THE FIRST ITEM ON THE COURT'S AGENDA THIS MORNING IS THE PUBLIC REPRIMAND FOR JUDGE MARY JANE HENDERSON. IF YOU WOULD APPROACH THE PODIUM, PLEASE. JUDGE HENDERSON, YOU HAVE BEEN SUMMONED BEFORE THIS COURT TODAY, PURSUANT TO A STIPULATION YOU ENTERED INTO WITH THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION, REGARDING ETHICAL MISCONDUCT. WHILE THE STIPULATION AND THE FACTS OF THIS CASE SHOW YOUR ACTIONS WERE WELL INTENDED THEY NONETHELESS VIOLATED THE FLORIDA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. BY ACCEPTING THE OFFICE, EVERY JUDGE ASSUMES A BURDEN OF RECOLLECTUDE AND PUBLIC SCRUTINY THAT FEW OTHER PUBLIC OFFICES REQUIRE. JUDGES ARE JUDGES 24 HOURS A DAY. THEY CANNOT EXPECT AS MOST LAY

PERSONS DO, THAT THEIR DUTIES END THE MOMENTS THEY LEAVE WORK. AND THE FACTS THAT HAVE BROUGHT YOU BEFORE US INVOLVE YOUR FRIENDSHIP WITH A PERSON WHO PREVIOUSLY WAS A DEFENDANT IN YOUR COURT. THIS MAN, HENRY WHEELER WAS A FELON AND A SUBSTANCE ABUSER. AFTER HE NO LONGER HAD CASES BEFORE YOUR COURT, YOU DECIDED TO BEFRIEND HIM AND SERVE AS A MENTOR IN THE HOPE OF HELPING HIM LIVE A SOBER AND PRODUCTIVE LIFE. TO THIS EXTENT, YOUR MOTIVATIONS CERTAINLY ARE NOT OBJECTIONABLE. HOWEVER, YOU EXPANDED YOUR ASSISTANCE TO HIM IN WAYS THIS RAN AFOUL OF THE ESTABLISHED ETHICAL STANDARDS. YOU DECIDED TO HELP MR. WHEELER FIND AN APARTMENT, AND PERSONALLY MET WITH THE LANDLORD, WHO KNEW YOU WERE A JUDGE. THE LAND LORD DID NOT WISH TO RENT THE APARTMENT TO MR. WHEELER, BUT DID SO ANYWAY, AFTER MEETING WITH YOU. YOU FURTHER LOANED MR. WHEELER $4,000, TO BUY A TRUCK, AND SECURE THE LOAN ONLY WITH THE HANDSHAKE. YOU BOUGHT YOU A CELL PHONE FOR HIM AND GAVE HIM MONEY ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, TO PAY FOR CAB FARES. YOU HELD MR. WHEELER'S MONEY FOR HIM, REQUIRING HIM TO COME TO YOU TO REQUEST THE FUNDS WHEN HE NEEDED THEM.

AND THEN IN THE EARLY MORNING HOURS OF APRIL 26TH, 2007 HE APPEARED AT YOUR RESIDENCE IN AN IMPAIRED AND DISORDERLY STATE IN A CALLED THE 911 EMERGENCY LINE TO REPORT A TRESPASS. BUT, AFTER MR. WHEELER LEFT, YOU ADVISED LAW ENFORCEMENT THE HELP NO LONGER WAS NEEDED AND YOU WOULD NOT FILE A COMPLAINT. IMMEDIATELY AFTER, MR. WHEELER WAS STOPPED AND FIELD TESTED ON SUSPICION OF DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE. HOWEVER HE WAS NOT ARRESTED FOR DUI. YOU LATER TESTIFIED THAT YOU NEVER INTENDED TO IMPLY TO THE POLICE THAT MR. WHEELER SHOULD NOT BE ARRESTED. ON MAY 11, 2007, MR. WHEELER CREATED DISTURBANCES AT BOTH YOUR HOME AND YOUR CHAMBERS, NECESSITATING INTERVENTION BY OFFICERS, AND WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED LATER YOU DECLINED TO GIVE A STATEMENT ABOUT THE INCIDENT. AS A RESULT OF THESE INTERACTIONS WITH MR. WHEELER THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION CONCLUDED THAT YOU ADMITTED THAT YOUR CONDUCT, THOUGH WELL INTENDED, CREATED AN APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY. JUDGE HENDERSON, CANON ONE OF THE FLORIDA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT PROVIDES THAT JUDGES MUST MAINTAIN AND OBSERVE HIGH STANDARDS OF CONDUCT. THE DUTY TO OBSERVE THESE STANDARDS IS MEANT TO PRESERVE

THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY AND IT EXTENDS EVEN TO YOUR PRIVATE LIFE, AWAY FROM THE COURTHOUSE. BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THERE EXISTS THE IDEA THAT PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN YOUR INTEGRITY WAS IMPAIRED BY YOUR ACTIONS. THEREFORE, YOU HAVE BREACHED CANON ONE. CANON TWO OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT STATES THAT JUDGES MUST ACT AT ALL TIMES IN A MANNER THAT PROMOTES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE INTEGRITY AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY. THE COMMENTARY TO CANON 2A FURTHER NOTES THAT JUDGES ARE SUBJECT TO CONSTANT SCRUTINY AND MUST FREELY AND WILLINGLY ACCEPT RESTRICTIONS THAT ORDINARY CITIZENS MAY VIEW AS BURDENSOME. YOUR ACTIONS ESTABLISH THAT YOU VIOLATED THE STRICTURES OF CANON 2A. CANON 2B OF THE CODE REQUIRES THAT JUDGES MAY NEVER USE THE PRESTIGIOUS OF JUDICIAL OFFICE TO ADVANCE THE PRIVATE INTERESTS OF THE JUDGE OR OF OTHER AND HERE THE RECORD SHOWS THAT YOU VIOLATED THE REQUIREMENT BY ACTIONS CONVEYING AN IMPRESSION THAT MR. WHEELER WAS IN A SPECIAL POSITION TO INFLUENCE YOU. SPECIFICALLY, YOU CONVEYED AN IMPRESSION THAT YOU USED YOUR JUDICIAL OFFICE TO ADVANCE THE PRIVATE INTERESTS OF MR. WHEELER.

THE JQC ALSO CONCLUDED THAT YOU VIOLATED CANON 5A. OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. THIS PROVISION REQUIRES JUDGES WHO CONDUCT THEIR EXTRA JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT DEMEAN THE JUDICIAL OFFICE, OR INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. IT ALSO REQUIRES JUDGES TO REFRAIN FROM ACTIONS THAT MAY APPEAR TO BE COERCIVE TO A REASONABLE PERSON. HERE, YOUR ASSOCIATION WITH MR. WHEELER AND THE DISORDERLY CONDUCT THAT OCCURRED DURING YOUR ASSOCIATION, CLEARLY DEMEANED YOUR OFFICE, AND INTERFERED WITH THE PROPER PERFORMANCE OF YOUR DUTIES. FURTHER, YOUR ACTIONS IN SECURING AN APARTMENT FOR MR. WHEELER MAY HAVE APPEARED COERCIVE TO THE LANDLORD. TO YOUR CREDIT, YOU HAVE SHOWN REMORSE FOR YOUR POOR JUDGMENT, AND FOR YOUR FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY, CREATED BY YOUR CONDUCT. AND, YOU HAVE AGREED TO UNDERGO COUNSELING AND HAVE ENTERED INTO A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE JQC. IN KEEPING WITH THE STIPULATION YOU SIGNED WE HAVE COMMANDED YOU TO APPEAR TODAY FOR A PUBLIC REPRIMAND THAT IS BEING PUBLICLY BROADCAST THROUGHOUT THE STATE. THE PUBLICITY ACCORDED TO PUBLIC REPRIMANDS OF JUDGES IS ONE WAY WE CAN SHOW THE PUBLIC THAT WE

WILL NOT TOLERATE MISCONDUCT SUCH AS YOURS, AND THAT WE WILL INVITE THE PEOPLE TO SEE FOR THEMSELVES THAT DISCIPLINE RESULTS. FOR YOUR ACTIONS, DETAILED IN THE CASE, YOU ARE HERE BY REPRIMANDED. FINALLY, WE CAUTION YOU TO EXAMINE OUR PREVIOUS CASES, INVOLVING JUDGES, WHO HAVING BEEN DISCIPLINED ONCE, FAILED TO PERFORM REFORM THEIR CONDUCT. YOU ARE NOW ON NOTICE THAT ANY FURTHER MISCONDUCT WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. JUDGE HENDERSON, YOUR REPRIMAND IS CONCLUDED, AND YOU ARE FREE TO LEAVE.