Courthouse News Service

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 1:18-cv PKC Document 24 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:10-cv GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

Case 2:11-cv RAJ -FBS Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division 2001 FE8 21 P U.: 18 NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP., ) CALEXAHDR?ARvip C URT Plaintiff, ) Case No. j ) v. ) Jury Trial Demanded ) VALUECLICK, INC., MEDIAPLEX, INC., ) FASTCLICK, INC., COMMISSION ) JUNCTION, INC., MEZIMEDIA, INC., ) and WEB CLIENTS, L.L.C., ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Netscape Communications Corp. ("Netscape"), by counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), alleges the following in support of its Complaint against ValueClick, Inc. ("ValueClick"), Mediaplex, Inc. ("Mediaplex"), FastClick, Inc. ("FastCHck"), Commission Junction, Inc. ("Commission Junction"), MeziMedia, Inc. ("MeziMedia"), and Web Clients, L.L.C. ("Web Clients"), (collectively "Defendants") for patent infringement: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Netscape Communications Corp. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 22000 AOL Way, Dulles, Virginia 20166. Netscape Courthouse News Service Communications Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of AOL L.L.C, which is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 22000 AOL Way, Dulles, Virginia 20166. 2. Upon information and belief, ValueClick, Inc., is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 30699 Russell Ranch Road, Suite 250, Westlake Village, California 91362.

3. Upon information and belief, Mediaplex, Inc., is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 160 Spear Street, 15th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. Upon information and belief, Mediaplex, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of ValueClick, Inc. 4. Upon information and belief, FastClick, Inc., is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 30699 Russell Ranch Road, Suite 250, Westlake Village, California 91362. Upon information and belief, FastClick, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of ValueClick, Inc. 5. Upon information and belief, Commission Junction, Inc., is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 530 East Montecito Street, Santa Barbara, California 93103. Upon information and belief, Commission Junction, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of ValueClick, Inc. 6. Upon information and belief, MeziMedia, Inc., is a California corporation with its principal place of business located at 103 E. Lemon Ave., Suite 200, Monrovia, California 91016. Upon information and belief, MeziMedia, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of ValueClick, Inc. 7. Upon information and belief, Web Clients, L.L.C., is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business located at 2201 N. Front St., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110. Upon information and belief, Web Clients, L.L.C., is a wholly owned subsidiary of ValueClick, Inc. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 U.S.C. 1, et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).

9. Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because Defendants have regularly and purposefully availed themselves of the privilege of conducting business activities within Virginia and this Judicial District. In addition, upon information and belief, personal jurisdiction is proper because Defendants have committed acts of infringement in this Judicial District. 10. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 1391(c), and 1400(b) because Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this Judicial District and the infringing activity has occurred and continues to occur in this Judicial District. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,774,670 11. The allegations of Paragraphs 1-10 are incorporated herein by reference. 12. Netscape is the assignee and sole owner of all right, title, and interest in United States Patent No. 5,774,670 ("the '670 patent"), entitled "Persistent Client State in a Hypertext Transfer Protocol Based Client-Server System," which issued on June 30,1998. A true and correct copy of the '670 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 13. ValueClick and its subsidiaries are an online marketing services company. Collectively, Defendants offer and provide in the United States services, technology, and products for various business segments, including media, affiliate marketing, and comparison shopping. Among other things, Defendants sell targeted and measurable online advertising campaigns to advertisers and advertising agency customers. 14. Defendants have been and are now infringing, inducing others to infringe, and/or contributing to the infringement by others, one or more claims of the '670 patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, online advertising and marketing

products, services, and technology that utilize HTTP state information in a manner covered by one or more claims of the '670 patent. 15. Defendants' infringing products, services, and technology include, but are not necessarily limited to: display advertising, behavioral targeting, and lead generation products, technology, and services of ValueClick, FastClick, and Web Clients; the ValueClick Media Network; affiliate marketing products, technology, and services of Commission Junction, including Internet user tracking and reporting services; comparison shopping products, technology, and services of MeziMedia, including those provided through Smarter.com, CouponMountain.com, and MoreRebates.com; and online advertising and marketing products, technology, and services of Mediaplex, including the MOJO Adserver; each of which uses state information and/or transmit a state object which specifies state information from an HTTP server to an HTTP client. 16. Defendants' acts of infringement have injured and damaged Netscape. 17. Defendants' infringement has caused irreparable injury to Netscape and will continue to cause irreparable injury until Defendants are enjoined from further infringement by this Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the following relief: 1. A judgment against Defendants as to infringement of the '670 patent; 2. A permanent injunction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283, enjoining Defendants and their officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, subsidiaries, parents, licensees, assigns, and customers, and all others acting in concert or participation with them, from further acts of infringing, inducing infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the '670 patent;

3. A judgment against Defendants for money damages sustained as a result of Defendants' infringement of the '670 patent in an amount to be determined at trial as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284, including enhanced damages; 4. An accounting for infringing sales not presented at trial and an award by the Court of additional damages for any such infringing sales; 5. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages caused by Defendants' infringing activities and other conduct complained of herein; 6. A finding that this case is an exceptional case pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; 7. An award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this action; 8. A compulsory future royalty; and 9. Any and all other relief as the Court finds just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of all issues in this action so triable. Date: February 27,2009 Respectfully submitted, C Robert L. Burns (VSB # 65159) Umar Arshad (VSB #74638) Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Dr. Reston,VA20190 Phone: (571)-203-2700 Fax: (202) 408-4400 Gerald F. Ivey (DCB #367009) C. Gregory Gramenopoulos (VSB #38633) John M. Williamson (DCB #472713) Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 Phone: (202) 408-4000 Fax: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiff Netscape Communications Corp.