held on October 8, Present for the hearing were Martha Fornaris, Esq., counsel for the

Similar documents
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

This matter came before me, the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims, for a

AFTER PROPER NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES, a Final Merits Hearing was held on

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE. Judge: W.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

ORDER ON AWARD OF CLAIMANT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN /MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE

However, he was unable to find an attorney who wished to undertake

F:INAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE

Courtesy 440Authority.com

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS DAYTONA BEACH DISTRICT

was represented by Kate Albin Esq.

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

OJCC No: GDAL DIA: 06/26/2017 JUDGE: Daniel A. Lewis FINAL ORDER ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS (FEE AMOUNT HEARING)

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ralph J. Humphries, Judge.

FNAL COMPENSATION ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

After due notice, the above styled matter came before the undersigned Judge of

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

ORDER REVERSING FINAL JUDGMENT AND DENYING APPELLEE=S MOTION FOR COUNSEL FEES

CASE NO. 1D L. Barry Keyfetz of L. Barry Keyfetz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Bradley Guy Smith, Lakeland, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Henry H. Harnage, Judge.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA XXXXAB CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 1D Walter C. Wyatt of Bradham, Benson, Lindley, Blevins, Bayliss & Wyatt, P.L.L.C., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Orlando District

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

attorney fees and costs (Petition for Benefits (PFB) #4) (Docket Number (DN) 38) and

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

Hinda Klein, Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer P.A., Hollywood, for Respondents.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District FINAL MERITS ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

~'

KEON ROUSE, CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.:

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Henry Diaz, SC Case No.: SC Petitioner, DCA Case No.: 1D

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Thomas G. Portuallo, Judge.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mary A. D'Ambrosio, Judge.

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

MAD, MAD

DISPOSITION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY WITHOUT ADMINISTRATION Disposition without Administration

BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of

IN-LIEU OF PARKING FEE PAYMENT AGREEMENT

~/

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2010

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT ST. LUCIE DISTRICT OFFICE

JOANNE HUNT, Petitioner, CASE NO.: 2010-CA O v. WRIT NO.: 10-76

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Appellants, CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Shelley M. Punancy.

Filing # E-Filed 09/24/ :52:23 PM

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge.

REPORT OF THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE COMMITTEE

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Case No CA000567MB. ~:r~:~~~~~~~galaffairs,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION (JUDGE HAYES)

COUNTY COURT JUDGE GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA PROCEDURES FOR DIVISION 52. (Amended May 1, 2017)

WRIT NO.: WRIT NO: 07-06

Petitioner, Respondent.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA FAMILY LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE ECFLAD

THE COURTS. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER

A hearing was conducted, telephonically, on September 15, 2016 to consider the

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

v. CASE NO.: CVA Lower Court Case No.: 2006-SC O

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT ST. LUCIE DISTRICT OFFICE

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

At the Final Hearing, the claimant sought the following benefits:

COMPLAINT. l. This is a complaint for temporary and permanent relief. demanding access to public records as defined in F.S. 119.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-59 L.T. CASE NUMBERS: 4D ; CA005626XXXXMD

TITLE 2 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS SERIES 2 DISCIPLINARY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ARCHITECTS

Transcription:

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE Vincent Sansone, Employee /Claimant, vs. Frank Crum/Frank Winston Crum Insurance, Inc., Employer /Carrier /Servicing Agent. OJCC Case No. 15-000982MAD Accident date: 1/14/2015 Judge: Mary A. D'Ambrosio / ORDER DENYING ENTITLEMENT TO ATTORNEY'S FEES AFTER PROPER NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES, an Attorney Fee Amount hearing was held on October 8, 2015. Present for the hearing were Martha Fornaris, Esq., counsel for the Claimant and Paul Luger, Esq., counsel for the Employer /Carrier. The subject of the hearing was Claimant's Interim Verified Petition for Attorney's Fees filed on April 16, 2015. The Employer /Carrier's Response was filed on May 8, 2015. Claimant's counsel filed a Supplemental Verified Petition on October 5, 2015 (additional attorney fee for proving entitlement). The Employer /Carrier objected as untimely for the Fee Hearing. Jurisdiction is reserved on the Supplemental Verified Petition to allow the Employer /Carrier the requisite 30 days to respond. EXHIBITS 1. Pretrial Stipulation - Judge's Exhibit #1; 2. Claimant's Interim Verified Petition for Attorney's Fees filed 4/16/15- Claimant's Exhibit #1; 3. Deposition of Misty Rish taken 9/21/15 (D #41) - Claimant's Exhibit #2; 4. Copy of Docket (D #45) - Claimant's Exhibit #3; 5. Service List/Notice List (D #44) - Claimant's Exhibit #4; 6. Verified Petition for Attorney's Fees (Supplemental)(D #38) - Claimant's Exhibit Page 1 of 7

#5 (for identification only); 7. Letter from Broadspire to Delray Medical Center 1/15/15 - Employer /Carrier's Exhibit #1; 8. Envelope from Tenet Boca Raton Medical Insurance Center to Broadspire - Employer/Carrier's Exhibit #2; 9. USPS Tracking - Employer /Carrier's Exhibit #3; 10. Payout Sheet - Employer /Carrier's Exhibit #4; 11. Response to Petition for Benefits - Employer /Carrier's Exhibit #5; 12. Employer /Carrier's Verified Response filed May 8, 2015 (D #20) - Employer/Carrier's Exhibit #6; 13. Employer /Carrier's Objection to Claimant's Supplemental Verified Petition (D #46) - Employer /Carrier's Exhibit "A" for identification. I considered testimony from Martha Fornaris, Paul Luger, and brief telephone testimony from Misty Rush. I considered the Memoranda of Law filed by counsel as argument. STIPULATIONS Counsel stipulated that the adjuster, Misty Rish, mailed out the Response to Petition for Benefits on March 9, 2015. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Claimant suffered an accident on January 14, 2015. A Notice of Injury was received by the Carrier on January 15, 2015 and adjuster, Misty Rish was assigned the case. Ms. Rish left a voicemail for Delray Medical Center on January 15, 2015 in order to obtain medical records and provide contact information to the hospital. On January 15, 2015 a letter was sent by Ms. Rish to Delray Medical Center outlining the address where the medical bills and records should be sent (in Kentucky). 2. After an initial positive drug test, the claim was denied on January 19, 2015 in a Notice of Denial. 3. The Claimant retained Martha Fornaris, Esq. who filed a Petition for Benefits on February 10, 2015, seeking, among other things, "Payment to Delray Medical Center, Page 2 of 7

compensability for hospitalization and treatment received due to his injury sustained on January 14, 2015." This PFB was received by the Employer, Frank Crum on February 10, 2015, and by the Carrier, Broadspire, on February 12, 2015. 4. On February 18, 2015, Broadspire in Kentucky received the bills from Delray Medical Center for review. On February 18, 2015 the bill was processed through Broadspire's fee scheduling department and validated on February 19, 2015 to be paid by the adjuster. The approved bill was placed in the adjuster's "CEP" electronic folder for her to request issuance of a check for payment. 5. Unaware of the fact that the hospital bill from Delray Medical Center had been received by Broadspire's bill review department in Kentucky on February 18, 2015, Misty Rish filed a Response to Claimant's PFB on March 9, 2015 which rescinded the January 19, 2015 Notice of Denial, and indicated, that upon receipt and review, the bills will be "processed and paid in an (sic) accordance with Florida WC Fee Schedule." On March 13, 2015 the adjuster approved the bill for payment. On March 27, 2015, a check for payment in the amount of $201,388.14 was mailed by Broadspire to Delray Medical Center. 6. Counsel for the Claimant, Martha Fornaris, filed an Interim Verified Petition for Attorney's Fees on April 16, 2015 alleging entitlement to a statutory attorney's fee for obtaining payment of the hospital bill to Delray Medical Center in the amount of $201,388.14. The Claimant argues entitlement to an attorney's fee under section 440.34(3)(b) Florida Statutes (applicable when Claimant has employed an attorney in the successful prosecution of a petition) because the Carrier filed a Notice of Denial of compensability of the claim on January 19, 2015, thus forcing the Claimant to hire an attorney and file a Petition for Benefits on Page 3 of 7

February 10, 2015. Alternatively, Claimant argues that payment of the bills should have been made within 14 days of the February 10, 2015 Petition for Benefits pursuant to section 440.192(8)(2013) Florida Statutes, and the Carrier's failure to file a Response to the Petition for Benefits within 14 days operates as a denial, relying on McDonald's Restaurant #7160 v. Montes, 736 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). As to the jurisdictional issue raised by the Employer /Carrier, the Claimant argues the Employer /Carrier has waived its jurisdictional argument by not raising it within 30 days of receipt of the Petition for Benefits. They acknowledge that if this was a compensable case, and a Petition was filed for payment of the bills, jurisdiction would lie with AHCA; however, in the instant case, the Carrier had denied compensability and entitlement to benefits, thereby placing compensability in issue (clearly within the jurisdiction of the JCC). 7. The Employer /Carrier filed a Verified Response to Claimant's Verified Petition for Attorneys Fees on May 8, 2015, asserting that the Judge of Compensation Claims lacked jurisdiction to award any fees as the issue of payment of the bills of a provider falls squarely within the jurisdiction of AHCA, and that no entitlement to fees or costs was present as the Employer /Carrier timely processed payment of the bill at issue. They argue jurisdictional issues can be raised at any time pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140(b), and that the 30 day time limitation argued by Claimant applied only to a dismissal for lack of specificity under section 440.192(5). The Employer /Carrier rely upon section 440.20(6)(b), Florida Statutes which considers medical bills timely paid if paid within 45 calendar days after the Carrier's receipt of the bill and section 440.20(2)(b), Florida Statutes which requires the Carrier to "pay, disallow, or deny all medical, dental, pharmacy and hospital bills submitted to the Carrier no later than 45 calendar Page 4 of 7

days after the Carrier's receipt of the bill". The Employer /Carrier argue that section 440.20(2)(b) and Administrative Rule 69L- 7.602(5)(k) should be read in pari materia with section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes, which states "Regardless of the date benefits were initially requested, attorney's fees shall not attach under this subsection until 30 days after the date the Carrier receives the petition ". CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. I reject the Claimant's argument that the jurisdictional issue is waived if not raised within 30 days. I find that I have jurisdiction over the claim for attorney's fees on the basis that the Petition for Benefits requested compensability of the accident and " compensability for hospitalization and treatment received ", and not just for payment of the hospital bill. I find that the medical necessity of the hospitalization and treatment was placed at issue in the Petition for Benefits. 2. I find that the Carrier timely paid the Delray Medical Center hospital bill within 45 days of its' receipt of the bill pursuant to sections 440.20(2)(b) and 440.20(6)(b), Florida Statutes. The bill was received on February 18, 2015 and paid on March 27, 2015, within 45 days (45 days ran on April 4, 2015). 3. I find that the Carrier rescinded their January 19, 2015 Denial in their March 9, 2015 Response to Petition for Benefits which is within 30 days of their receipt of the February 10, 2015 Petition for Benefits (30 days ran on March 12, 2015). As of March 9, 2015, there was no responsibility of the Claimant for the payment of the hospital bills (as the Carrier agreed to pay them upon receipt of the proper billing forms). I find it irrelevant that the Carrier's Kentucky office was already in receipt of the bills when Misty Rish responded on March 9, 2015 Page 5 of 7

that bills would be paid once received. The relevant inquiry is whether the bills were paid within 45 days of the Carrier's receipt, and I find that they were. 4. I reject the Claimant's argument that attorney fee entitlement attaches because the Carrier's failure to respond to the Petition within 14 days under section 440.192(8) operates as a denial. This argument ignores the language of section 440.34(3) which states "attorney's fees shall not attach under this subsection until 30 days after the date the carrier receives the petition ". 5. I reject the Claimant's argument that the status of the case on January 19, 2015 (total controvert) takes the facts of the case out of the 45 day statutory time frame for payment of bills. I find that the Carrier rescinded the denial timely upon receipt of the Petition for Benefits and paid the bills within 45 days of their receipt. I find that the Claimant was not successful in the prosecution of the petition under section 440.34(3)(b)(2013), because the carrier did not file a response to the petition denying benefits, but rather, filed a response to the petition accepting benefits. WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The claim for payment of an Employer /Carrier paid attorney's fee is denied. 2. The Verified Petition for Attorney's Fees is denied and dismissed. DONE AND ORDERED this Palm Beach County, Florida. 28 day of October, 2015, in West Palm Beach, Mary A. D'Ambrosio Judge of Compensation Claims Division of Administrative Hearings Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims West Palm Beach District Office One Clearlake Centre, 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 200 Page 6 of 7

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561)650-1040 www.fljcc.org CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Order has been electronically furnished to counsel for the parties on this2 8 day of October, 2015. Martha D. Fornaris, Esquire fornaris@fornaris.com,yvalle@fornaris.com Paul L. Luger, Esquire pluger@hrmcw.com,ahathcock@hrmcw.com frciud Secretary to Judge of Compensation Claims Page 7 of 7