Case 2:12-cv APG-PAL Document 168 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 12

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/07/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/07/2015

Case 1:12-cv DJC Document 36 Filed 09/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/05/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/05/2014

Case 3:15-cv RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO.: 1:15-CV LCB-LPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 11 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 9

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2012

Case5:09-cv JW Document106 Filed04/22/10 Page1 of 9

Attorneys for Defendant SAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:15-cv DBP Document 26 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 20

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2017

Case3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:17-cv EEF-MBN Document 66 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. 3:18-CV FDW-DSC

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ /09/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/08/2013 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 76 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2017

Case 4:17-cv PJH Document 61 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 33

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/05/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant.

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2010. Plaintiffs,

3:13-cv JFA Date Filed 04/04/13 Entry Number 4 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2018

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Case 2:12-cv MSD-TEM Document 4 Filed 12/26/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/22/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/22/2016. Exhibit D {N

R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 3:11-cv JCH Document 96 Filed 11/16/11 Page 1 of 13

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/10/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/10/2018 EXHIBIT 4

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS GORDON RAMSAY'S AND G.R. US LICENSING'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 1:14-cv JCC-IDD Document 7 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1294 v.

FIRST AFFIRMATIVE MATTER SECOND AFFIRMATIVE MATTER. Page 1 of 6 ANSWER

HUSHHUSH ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * *

Case 8:13-cv JSM-AEP Document 17 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2017

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 88 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 17

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

Case 1:12-cv DLC Document 11 Filed 09/07/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv CMA-KMT Document 1081 Filed 05/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/30/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015

2. Green Tree is without knowledge of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

Case 1:18-cv LY-AWA Document 12 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:13-cv CG-WPL Document 17 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION. DAVID ESRATI : Case No CV Plaintiff, : Judge Richard Skelton

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2018

Case 1:17-cv PBS Document 24 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv CRB Document 1 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:15-cv CMR Document 6 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017

Case 1:13-cv NMG Document 25 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUETTS

PlainSite. Legal Document. Georgia Northern District Court Case No. 1:10-cv D. H. Pace Company, Inc. v. Stephens et al.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:09-cv WAP-DAS Document 90 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 18

Case 2:18-cv JAD-GWF Document 6 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 6

)(

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/25/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 44 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/25/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 117 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2016

Consolidated Class Action Complaint ( Complaint ) filed by Plaintiffs JAMES E. ELIAS and GENERAL DENIAL

Case 2:14-cv APG-VCF Document 107 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil Case No.: 18-cv (WMW/SER)

BANKRUPTCY LAW CENTER, APC Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. [SBN: ] Ahren A. Tiller, Esq. [SBN ]

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Ryan W. Mitchem (TN #0) Michael K. Alston (TN #0) Kathryn Ann Reilly (CO #) HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP Georgia Avenue, Suite 00 Chattanooga, Tennessee 0 Telephone: () - Patricia Lee (NV #) Joseph R. Ganley (NV #) Telia U. Williams (NV #) HUTCHISON & STEFFEN Peccole Professional Park 00 West Alta Drive, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 Attorneys for Defendant LeadPile LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA FLEMMING KRISTENSEN, individually, ) Case No. :-CV-00-APG (PAL) and on behalf of a class of similarly ) situated individuals, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC., ) a Nevada corporation, f/k/a ) DEFENDANT LEADPILE LLC S MYCASHNOW.COM INC., ENOVA ) ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Illinois ) AMENDED CLASS ACTION corporation, PIONEER FINANCIAL ) COMPLAINT SERVICES, INC., a Missouri corporation, ) LEADPILE LLC, a Delaware limited ) Judge: Hon. Andrew P. Gordon liability company, and CLICKMEDIA, LLC ) d/b/a NETPROMOTIONS LLC, a ) Magistrate: Hon. Peggy A. Leen Georgia limited liability company, ) Defendants. )

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Defendant LeadPile LLC, by and through its counsel, for its Answer to Plaintiff s First Amended Class Action Complaint (the Amended Complaint ), states as follows: FIRST DEFENSE. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph the Amended Complaint. LeadPile also lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in footnote on page of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile admits that Plaintiff purports to bring this action as a class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) to redress alleged injuries. LeadPile avers that the TCPA speaks for itself and denies any allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint which are inconsistent with the TCPA. LeadPile denies the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile admits that Plaintiff purports to bring this action as a class action and seeks certain relief in this action. LeadPile denies the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0. LeadPile admits that its principal place of business is in Arizona. LeadPile admits that it has business dealings with the other Defendants. LeadPile admits that it conducts business in the lead generation industry. LeadPile denies the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. 0. LeadPile admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 0 of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile admits that it does business throughout the United States, including in this District. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile admits that, at various times, it has contracted with CPS, Enova and Pioneer to provide leads for their respective businesses. LeadPile lacks knowledge or in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile admits that, at various times, it has contracted with CPS, Enova and Pioneer to provide leads for their respective businesses. LeadPile lacks knowledge or in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. 0. LeadPile admits that, at various times, it has contracted with certain companies, including ClickMedia, as part of LeadPile s effort to provide leads for LeadPile s customers including, but not limited to, CPS, Enova and Pioneer.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. LeadPile also lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in footnote on page of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in the first sentence of Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. LeadPile denies the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint as stated.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. 0. LeadPile admits that Plaintiff purports to bring an action pursuant to Rule (b)() and Rule (b)() of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of himself and a class. LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 0 of the Amended Complaint.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0. LeadPile avers that the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint call for a legal conclusion to which LeadPile is not required to respond. To the extent it must respond, LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint to the extent that they are directed against LeadPile. Further, LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile avers that the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint call for a legal conclusion to which LeadPile is not required to respond. To the extent it must respond, LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile avers that the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint call for a legal conclusion to which LeadPile is not required to respond. To the extent it must respond, LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile avers that the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint call for a legal conclusion to which LeadPile is not required to respond. To the extent it must respond, LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint to the extent that they are directed against LeadPile. Further, LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile avers that the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint call for a legal conclusion to which LeadPile is not required to respond. To the extent it must respond, LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint to the extent that they are directed against LeadPile. Further, LeadPile

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile avers that the allegations contained in Paragraph m of the Amended Complaint call for a legal conclusion to which LeadPile is not required to respond. To the extent it must respond, LeadPile lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile incorporates herein its answers to Paragraphs - as if fully set forth herein.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint. 0. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 0 of the Amended in Paragraph 0 of the Amended Complaint.. LeadPile denies the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Amended in Paragraph of the Amended Complaint.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0. LeadPile denies that Plaintiff or any member of the purported class is entitled to any of the relief requested in the WHEREFORE clause of the Amended Complaint. SECOND DEFENSE Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. THIRD DEFENSE Plaintiff has failed to mitigate his damages, if any. FOURTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s damages, if any, were not caused by LeadPile, but by another person or entity, including Plaintiff, for whom LeadPile is not responsible and over whom LeadPile exercises no control. FIFTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s claims are barred by the doctrines of unclean hands, ratification, collateral estoppel, or waiver. SIXTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s claims are barred by his consent to receiving the text message of which he complains. SEVENTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s claims are barred because the imposition of statutory damages under the TCPA would violate the Due Process provisions of the United States Constitution. EIGHTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s claims may be barred because the party who may have sent a text message to Plaintiff did not use an automatic telephone dialing system as defined under the TCPA. NINTH DEFENSE Plaintiff claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 TENTH DEFENSE Plaintiff has failed to join necessary parties including, but not limited to, AC Referral, James Gee, 0 Data Management and Mike Ferry. ELEVENTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s claims are subject to arbitration. TWELFTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s claim cannot be awarded treble damages because LeadPile did not engage in knowing or willful misconduct. THIRTEENTH DEFENSE LeadPile did not send the alleged text messages and did not authorize, instruct, supervise or direct any individual or entity to send the alleged text messages and did not control the manner and means by which the alleged text message were sent. FOURTEENTH DEFENSE LeadPile expressly reserves the right to amend its Answer to assert such other and further defenses as may be appropriate. WHEREFORE, Defendant, LeadPile LLC, requests that this Court enter judgment in LeadPile s favor, dismiss Plaintiff s First Amended Class Action Complaint with prejudice, award LeadPile all costs and fees incurred herein, and grant such further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of DATED: April, 0 Respectfully submitted, HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP 0 By: s/ryan W. Mitchem Ryan W. Mitchem (TN #0) Michael K. Alston (TN #0) Kathryn Ann Reilly (CO #) Georgia Avenue, Suite 00 Chattanooga, Tennessee 0 Patricia Lee (NV #) Joseph R. Ganley (NV #) Telia U. Williams (NV #) Peccole Professional Park 00 West Alta Drive, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada Attorneys for Defendant LeadPile LLC

Case :-cv-00-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to FRCP (b), I certify that on this th day of April, 0, I caused the above and foregoing document entitled DEFENDANT LEADPILE LLC S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED CLASS COMPLAINT to be served as follows: [ ] by placing same to be deposited for mailing in the United States Mail, in a sealed envelope upon which first class postage was prepaid in Las Vegas, Nevada; and/or [ ] Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (b) and Section IV of District of Nevada Electronic Filing Procedures, to be served via electronic service; or [ X ] to be sent via e-mail; [ ] to be sent via facsimile; and/or [ ] to be hand-delivered to all attorneys of record according to the Court s CM/ECF system. s/ryan W. Mitchem Ryan W. Mitchem 0