Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Similar documents
Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Case5:08-cv PSG Document494 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 6

Case: Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/ , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case5:08-cv PSG Document498 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 6

Case 3:12-cv VC Document 119 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 13 (Counsel listed on signature page)

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv VC Document50 Filed02/18/15 Page1 of 17

Case: Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2018

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Case5:08-cv PSG Document702 Filed12/30/13 Page1 of 19

EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON CHARLES H. MOORE S JOINDER TO MOTION OF THE CREDITORS

ORACLE AMERICA, INC. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. JOINT RESPONSE RE: JURY QUESTIONNAIRE PROCEDURE CV WHA

Case3:12-cv VC Document21 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 12

United States District Court

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case3:12-cv VC Document88 Filed06/09/15 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 1:16-cv CMA/O Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case5:08-cv PSG Document578 Filed09/17/13 Page1 of 17

Case5:11-cv LHK Document902 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 7

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case5:08-cv PSG Document518 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 157 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 257 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2040 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

February 6, Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-853

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 174 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 6

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document 319 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2017 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

The American Court System BASIC JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS. Jurisdiction

Case 3:19-cv GPC-LL Document 4 Filed 03/22/19 PageID.16 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

FILED 2015 Mar-25 PM 03:41 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv BJD-JRK Document 49 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 2283

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:18-cv VKD Document 1 Filed 12/18/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERKINS COIE BROWN & BAIN P.A.

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of [See Signature Page for Counsel] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION and GATEWAY, INC., Case No. :0-cv-00 PSG v. Plaintiffs, JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, and ALLIACENSE LIMITED, Defendants. HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., v. Plaintiffs, TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, and ALLIACENSE LIMITED, Defendants. Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00 Case No. :0-cv-00 PSG JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of Plaintiffs Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation (collectively Acer ) and Gateway, Inc. ( Gateway ) and Plaintiffs HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, HTC ) and Defendants Technology Properties Limited, Patriot Scientific Corporation, and Alliacense Limited (collectively, TPL ) respectfully request that, in addition to its usual questions, the Court submit the following voir dire questions to prospective jurors: Individual Juror Questions ) Please state your full name, juror number, age, and city of residence. ) Please state your educational background, including any degrees, credentials, or certificates you hold. ) Please state your present employment status, the name of your current or most recent employer, and your current and previous occupations. If retired or unemployed, what was your occupation before you retired or became unemployed? ) Have you ever served on a jury before? If so, please state how many cases you have served as a juror on, and for each case, explain whether the case was a civil or criminal case, whether the jury reached a verdict, whether you served as a foreperson, and whether your jury experience was positive or negative. ) Please tell us the titles of all newspapers, magazines and electronic blogs you regularly read or subscribe to. ) Do you own or use a smartphone? [HTC only question] ) If the answer to Question was yes, please state how often you use a smartphone each week (daily, - times a week, - times a week or occasionally) and for what purposes (texting, social media, music, internet, telecommunications)? [HTC only question] ) Do you own any computers? If so, what type (i.e. notebook, tablet or desktop)? [Acer only question] ) If the answer to Question was yes, please state how often you use a computer each week and for what purposes? [Acer only question] Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of ) Have you or any member of your family ever sued or been sued in a lawsuit? If so, what was the nature of the lawsuit. ) Do you or any member of your family have any special training or work experience in the fields of: accounting, law, electrical engineering, computer engineering, computer science, electronics product development/design, smartphone programming, or patents? [HTC only question] computer programming, or patents? [Acer only question] If yes, please identify your profession or specify the family member s profession and their relation to you. ) Have you ever worked with microprocessor technology? If yes, please describe. ) Do you, or does any member of your family, have any experience designing or developing microprocessor technology? If yes, please explain. ) Do you have any health or physical conditions (vision, hearing, or other medical conditions) that might affect your jury service? If so, please explain. ) Have you heard or read anything about this lawsuit before coming to court? If yes, please explain what have you heard or read? ) Do you have any beliefs that you feel might prevent you from serving as a fair juror in this case? If yes, simply answer yes and you will be given an opportunity to discuss your full answer in private with the Court and the attorneys. ) Do you know of any other matter which you believe should be called to the court s attention as a juror, or which you think may prevent you from rendering a fair and impartial verdict based solely upon the evidence and my instructions to you regarding the Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of law? Parties and Attorneys ) The Defendants in this case are Technology Properties Limited, Patriot Scientific Corporation, and Alliacense Limited. Have you heard of any of these companies before today? (If yes, inquire into specifics). ) The Plaintiffs in this case are Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation (collectively called Acer ), Gateway, Inc., and HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively called HTC ). a. Do you, or does any member of your family, have any connection with Acer? What is the connection? b. Were you aware of Acer before today? (if yes, ask if juror has ever bought any products made or sold by Acer.) Would that fact or your prior experience with Acer influence you in any way in reaching a fair and impartial verdict in this case? c. Do you, or does any member of your family, have any connection with Gateway? What is the connection? d. Were you aware of Gateway before today? (if yes, ask if juror has ever bought any products made or sold by Gateway.) Would that fact or your prior experience with Gateway influence you in any way in reaching a fair and impartial verdict in this case? e. Do you, or does any member of your family, have any connection with HTC? What is the connection? f. Were you aware of HTC before today? (if yes, ask if juror has ever bought any products made or sold by HTC.) Would that fact or your prior experience with HTC influence you in any way in reaching a fair and impartial verdict in this case? ) Are you related to or acquainted with any of the attorneys working on this case? ) Have any of the attorneys or any other members of their firms acted as your attorney or for a family member or close friend in any legal matter? ) Have you ever had any business dealings with a Taiwanese company? If so, Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of please explain. Patent Questions ) Have you or any member of your family ever applied for a patent? ) Have you, any member of your family, or anyone you have worked for been involved in a patent litigation? ) Do you have any negative opinion about, or bias against, someone coming to court seeking to enforce their patent rights? If yes, please explain. ) If the evidence and the law supported it, would you be able to find a patent issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to be either valid or invalid? ) If the evidence and the law supported it, would you be able to find a patent issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to be either infringed or not infringed? ) Have you, or any member of your family, ever had any dealings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office? If yes, please explain. ) Have you, or any member of your family, ever had any negative experiences with, or negative opinions about, patents or the patent system? If yes, please explain. Disputed Questions 0) Do you believe that a company accusing another company of wrongdoing should have to prove its allegations in order to recover for that wrongdoing? [HTC and Acer question] ) Is there anyone who feels for any reason that patent owners should not be allowed to prevent others from making, using or selling the patented invention? [TPL question] ) Is there anyone who feels there are circumstances where a patent owner should not be entitled to prevent others from making, using, or selling the patented invention? [TPL question] ) Does anyone here not believe that a Taiwanese company has the same legal rights in this Court as an American company? [HTC and Acer question] ) How many people believe that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office never Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of makes a mistake when granting a patent? [HTC and Acer question] ) Have you, or any member of your family, ever been accused of taking the idea of another? If yes, please explain. [TPL question] In addition, HTC and Acer would replace the following two additional disputed TPL questions: ) Do you have any negative opinion about, or bias against, someone coming to court seeking to enforce their patent rights? If yes, please explain. ) Do you have any negative opinion about, or bias against, patent owners seeking monetary damages for infringement of their patent? with the following, single, HTC/Acer question: ) Do you have any negative opinion about, or bias against, patent owners seeking monetary damages for a patent that a jury ultimately finds to be both valid and infringed? Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of Dated: August, Respectfully submitted, K&L GATES LLP By: /s/ Harold H. Davis Jr. Michael J. Bettinger, Esq. SBN Mike.bettinger@klgates.com Timothy P. Walker, Esq. SBN 00 Timothy.walker@klgates.com Harold H. Davis, Jr., Esq. SBN Harold.davis@klgates.com Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Phone: () -0 Fax: () -0 Jeffrey Ratinoff, Esq. (SBN ) Jeffrey.ratinoff@klgates.com 0 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, and GATEWAY, INC. Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of By: /s/ Kyle D. Chen Heidi L. Keefe, Esq. SBN 0 hkeefe@cooley.com Mark R. Weinstein, Esq. SBN 0 mweinstein@cooley.com Ronald S. Lemieux, Esq. SBN 0 rlemieux@cooley.com Kyle D. Chen, Esq. SBN 0 kyle.chen@cooley.com 000 El Camino Real Five Palo Alto Square, th Floor Palo Alto, California 0 Phone: (0) -000 Fax: (0) -0 Stephen R. Smith, Esq. (pro hac vice) stephen.smith@cooley.com One Freedom Square Reston Town Center Freedom Drive Reston, VA 0- Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC. AGILITY IP LAW, LLP By: /s/ Thomas T. Carmack James C. Otteson, Esq. SBN jim@agililityiplaw.com Thomas T. Carmack, Esq. SBN tom@agilityiplaw.com Philip W. Marsh, Esq. SBN phil@agilityiplaw.com David Lansky, Esq. SBN Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 0 Phone: (0) -00 Fax: (0) - Attorneys for Defendants TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC and PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE LLP By: /s/ Charles T. Hoge Charles T. Hoge, Esq. SBN choge@knlh.com Tenth Avenue San Diego, California Phone: () - Fax: () - Attorneys for Defendant PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION FILER S ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. -(i)() I, Kyle D. Chen, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. Dated: August, By: /s/ Kyle D. Chen Kyle D. Chen /CO Case Nos. :0-cv-00, :0-cv-00. JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS